Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Open access

ColabAR: A Toolkit for Remote Collaboration in Tangible Augmented Reality Laboratories

Published: 07 April 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Current times are accelerating new technologies to provide high-quality education for remote collaboration, as well as hands-on learning. This is particularly important in the case of laboratory-based classes, which play an essential role in STEM education. In this paper, we introduce ColabAR, a toolkit that uses physical proxies to manipulate virtual objects in Tangible Augmented Reality (TAR) laboratories. ColabAR introduces haptic-based customizable interaction techniques to promote remote collaboration between students. Our toolkit provides hardware and software that enable haptic feedback to improve user experience and promote collaboration during learning. Also, we present the architecture of our cloud platform for haptic interaction that supports information sharing between students in a TAR laboratory. We performed two user studies (N=40) to test the effect of our toolkit in enriching local and remote collaborative experiences. Finally, we demonstrated that our TAR laboratory enables students' performance (i.e., lab completion rate, lab scores) to be similar to their performance in an in-person laboratory.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (v6cscw1081vf.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Mahmoud Abdulwahed and Zoltan K Nagy. 2011. The TriLab, a novel ICT based triple access mode laboratory education model. Computers & Education, Vol. 56, 1 (2011), 262--274.
[2]
Matt Adcock and Chris Gunn. 2015. Using projected light for mobile remote guidance. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 24, 6 (2015), 591--611.
[3]
Sean Andrist, Michael Gleicher, and Bilge Mutlu. 2017. Looking coordinated: Bidirectional gaze mechanisms for collaborative interaction with virtual characters. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2571--2582.
[4]
David Anton, Gregorij Kurillo, Allen Y Yang, and Ruzena Bajcsy. 2017. Augmented telemedicine platform for real-time remote medical consultation. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling. Springer, 77--89.
[5]
Ronald T Azuma. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, Vol. 6, 4 (1997), 355--385.
[6]
Trevor J Barrett, Andrew T Stull, Ted M Hsu, and Mary Hegarty. 2015. Constrained interactivity for relating multiple representations in science: When virtual is better than real. Computers & Education, Vol. 81 (2015), 69--81.
[7]
Carlos Bermejo and Pan Hui. 2017. A survey on haptic technologies for mobile augmented reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.00698 (2017).
[8]
Mark Billinghurst, Raphael Grasset, and Julian Looser. 2005. Designing augmented reality interfaces. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics, Vol. 39, 1 (2005), 17--22.
[9]
Mark Billinghurst, Hirokazu Kato, Ivan Poupyrev, et al. 2008. Tangible augmented reality. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA, Vol. 7, 2 (2008).
[10]
Mark Billinghurst, Alaeddin Nassani, and Carolin Reichherzer. 2014. Social panoramas: using wearable computers to share experiences. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications. 1--1.
[11]
Milan Bjelica and Mirjana Simić-Pejović. 2018. Experiences with remote laboratory. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, Vol. 55, 1 (2018), 79--87.
[12]
Marta G Carcedo, Soon Hau Chua, Simon Perrault, Paweł Wozniak, Raj Joshi, Mohammad Obaid, Morten Fjeld, and Shengdong Zhao. 2016. Hapticolor: Interpolating color information as haptic feedback to assist the colorblind. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3572--3583.
[13]
Suchandra Chatterjee. 2021. Revolutionizing Science Education Through Virtual Laboratories. Advances in Science Education (2021), 119.
[14]
Jennifer L Chiu, Crystal J DeJaegher, and Jie Chao. 2015. The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students' understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education, Vol. 85 (2015), 59--73.
[15]
Barney Dalgarno, Andrea G Bishop, William Adlong, and Danny R Bedgood Jr. 2009. Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, Vol. 53, 3 (2009), 853--865.
[16]
Sarah D'Angelo and Darren Gergle. 2018. An eye for design: gaze visualizations for remote collaborative work. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.
[17]
Ton De Jong, Marcia C Linn, and Zacharias C Zacharia. 2013. Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, Vol. 340, 6130 (2013), 305--308.
[18]
Carmine Elvezio, Mengu Sukan, Ohan Oda, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2017. Remote collaboration in AR and VR using virtual replicas. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2017 VR Village. 1--2.
[19]
Barrett Ens, Joel Lanir, Anthony Tang, Scott Bateman, Gun Lee, Thammathip Piumsomboon, and Mark Billinghurst. 2019. Revisiting collaboration through mixed reality: The evolution of groupware. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 131 (2019), 81--98.
[20]
Omid Fakourfar, Kevin Ta, Richard Tang, Scott Bateman, and Anthony Tang. 2016. Stabilized annotations for mobile remote assistance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1548--1560.
[21]
Judith Fischer, Rudolph Mitchell, and Jesus Del Alamo. 2007. Inquiry-learning with WebLab: Undergraduate attitudes and experiences. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 16, 4 (2007), 337--348.
[22]
Lei Gao, Huidong Bai, Rob Lindeman, and Mark Billinghurst. 2017. Static local environment capturing and sharing for MR remote collaboration. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Mobile Graphics & Interactive Applications. 1--6.
[23]
Lu'is Gomes and Seta Bogosyan. 2009. Current trends in remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics, Vol. 56, 12 (2009), 4744--4756.
[24]
Kunal Gupta, Gun A Lee, and Mark Billinghurst. 2016. Do you see what I see? The effect of gaze tracking on task space remote collaboration. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, Vol. 22, 11 (2016), 2413--2422.
[25]
Pavel Gurevich, Joel Lanir, and Benjamin Cohen. 2015. Design and implementation of teleadvisor: a projection-based augmented reality system for remote collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 24, 6 (2015), 527--562.
[26]
Pavel Gurevich, Joel Lanir, Benjamin Cohen, and Ran Stone. 2012. TeleAdvisor: a versatile augmented reality tool for remote assistance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 619--622.
[27]
Ingvar Gustavsson, Kristian Nilsson, Johan Zackrisson, Javier Garcia-Zubia, Unai Hernandez-Jayo, Andrew Nafalski, Zorica Nedic, Ozdemir Gol, Jan Machotka, Mats I Pettersson, et al. 2009. On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, Vol. 2, 4 (2009), 263--274.
[28]
Ruben Heradio, Luis De La Torre, Daniel Galan, Francisco Javier Cabrerizo, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, and Sebastian Dormido. 2016. Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, Vol. 98 (2016), 14--38.
[29]
Anuruddha Hettiarachchi and Daniel Wigdor. 2016. Annexing reality: Enabling opportunistic use of everyday objects as tangible proxies in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1957--1967.
[30]
Cindy E Hmelo, Douglas L Holton, and Janet L Kolodner. 2000. Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 9, 3 (2000), 247--298.
[31]
Eve Hoggan, Andrew Crossan, Stephen A Brewster, and Topi Kaaresoja. 2009. Audio or tactile feedback: which modality when?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2253--2256.
[32]
Zahid Hossain, Engin Bumbacher, Alison Brauneis, Monica Diaz, Andy Saltarelli, Paulo Blikstein, and Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse. 2018. Design guidelines and empirical case study for scaling authentic inquiry-based science learning via open online courses and interactive biology cloud labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 28, 4 (2018), 478--507.
[33]
Zahid Hossain, Engin W Bumbacher, Alice M Chung, Honesty Kim, Casey Litton, Ashley D Walter, Sachin N Pradhan, Kemi Jona, Paulo Blikstein, and Ingmar H Riedel-Kruse. 2016. Interactive and scalable biology cloud experimentation for scientific inquiry and education. Nature biotechnology, Vol. 34, 12 (2016), 1293--1298.
[34]
Weidong Huang, Leila Alem, Franco Tecchia, and Henry Been-Lirn Duh. 2018. Augmented 3D hands: a gesture-based mixed reality system for distributed collaboration. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, Vol. 12, 2 (2018), 77--89.
[35]
Gijs Huisman, Jan Kolkmeier, and Dirk Heylen. 2014. With us or against us: simulated social touch by virtual agents in a cooperative or competitive setting. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 204--213.
[36]
Fabian Hutmacher and Christof Kuhbandner. 2018. Long-term memory for haptically explored objects: fidelity, durability, incidental encoding, and cross-modal transfer. Psychological science, Vol. 29, 12 (2018), 2031--2038.
[37]
Hiroshi Ishii. 2007. Tangible user interfaces. Human-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications (2007), 141--157.
[38]
Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. The tangible user interface and its evolution. Commun. ACM, Vol. 51, 6 (2008), 32--36.
[39]
Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems. 234--241.
[40]
Tomi Jaakkola and Sami Nurmi. 2008. Fostering elementary school students' understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24, 4 (2008), 271--283.
[41]
Tomi Jaakkola, Sami Nurmi, and Koen Veermans. 2011. A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of research in science teaching, Vol. 48, 1 (2011), 71--93.
[42]
Oliver Beren Kaul and Michael Rohs. 2017. Haptichead: A spherical vibrotactile grid around the head for 3d guidance in virtual and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3729--3740.
[43]
Seungwon Kim, Gun Lee, Weidong Huang, Hayun Kim, Woontack Woo, and Mark Billinghurst. 2019. Evaluating the Combination of Visual Communication Cues for HMD-based Mixed Reality Remote Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[44]
Seungwon Kim, Gun A Lee, Sangtae Ha, Nobuchika Sakata, and Mark Billinghurst. 2015. Automatically freezing live video for annotation during remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1669--1674.
[45]
Alice Y Kolb and David A Kolb. 2009. Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development (2009), 42--68.
[46]
Nektarios Kostaras, Michalis Xenos, and Athanassios N Skodras. 2010. Evaluating usability in a distance digital systems laboratory class. IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 54, 2 (2010), 308--313.
[47]
Dongjun Lee, Antonio Franchi, Hyoung Il Son, ChangSu Ha, Heinrich H Bülthoff, and Paolo Robuffo Giordano. 2013. Semiautonomous haptic teleoperation control architecture of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 18, 4 (2013), 1334--1345.
[48]
Gun A Lee, Gerard J Kim, and Mark Billinghurst. 2007. Interaction design for tangible augmented reality applications. In Emerging technologies of augmented reality: Interfaces and design. IGI Global, 261--282.
[49]
Seungyon" Claire" Lee and Thad Starner. 2010. BuzzWear: alert perception in wearable tactile displays on the wrist. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 433--442.
[50]
David I Lewis. 2014. The pedagogical benefits and pitfalls of virtual tools for teaching and learning laboratory practices in the biological sciences. The Higher Education Academy: STEM (2014).
[51]
Euan D Lindsay and Malcolm C Good. 2005. Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes. IEEE transactions on education, Vol. 48, 4 (2005), 619--631.
[52]
Sichao Liu, Lihui Wang, and Xi Vincent Wang. 2021. Sensorless haptic control for human-robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Vol. 32 (2021), 132--144.
[53]
Tiina Lynch and Ioana Ghergulescu. 2017. Review of Virtual Labs as the emerging technologies for teaching stem subjects. In INTED2017 Proc. 11th Int. Technol. Educ. Dev. Conf. 6--8 March Valencia Spain. 6082--6091.
[54]
I Scott MacKenzie and Shawn X Zhang. 1997. The immediate usability of Graffiti. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface'97 .
[55]
Akira Matsuda, Kazunori Nozawa, Kazuki Takata, Atsushi Izumihara, and Jun Rekimoto. 2020. HapticPointer: A Neck-worn Device that Presents Direction by Vibrotactile Feedback for Remote Collaboration Tasks. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference. 1--10.
[56]
Sarah Mervosh and Vanessa Swales. 10 March, 2020. Colleges and Universities Cancel Classes and Move Online Amid Coronavirus Fears. The New York Times ( 10 March, 2020).
[57]
Zorica Nedic, Jan Machotka, and Andrew Nafalski. 2003. Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories. Vol. 1. IEEE.
[58]
Jeffrey V Nickerson, James E Corter, Sven K Esche, and Constantin Chassapis. 2007. A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education. Computers & Education, Vol. 49, 3 (2007), 708--725.
[59]
Ehsan Noohi, Milovs vZ efran, and James L Patton. 2016. A model for human-human collaborative object manipulation and its application to human--robot interaction. IEEE transactions on robotics, Vol. 32, 4 (2016), 880--896.
[60]
Donald A Norman. 1988. OF EVERYDAY THINGS.
[61]
Magdalena Novak, Siëlle Phelan, Doris Lewalter, and Stephan Schwan. 2020. There is more to touch than meets the eye: haptic exploration in a science museum. International Journal of Science Education (2020), 1--23.
[62]
Magdalena Novak and Stephan Schwan. 2021. Does touching real objects affect learning? Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 33, 2 (2021), 637--665.
[63]
Benjamin Nuernberger, Kuo-Chin Lien, Tobias Höllerer, and Matthew Turk. 2016. Interpreting 2d gesture annotations in 3d augmented reality. In 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 149--158.
[64]
Ohan Oda, Carmine Elvezio, Mengu Sukan, Steven Feiner, and Barbara Tversky. 2015. Virtual replicas for remote assistance in virtual and augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. 405--415.
[65]
Mai Otsuki, Keita Maruyama, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Yusuke Suzuki. 2018. Effects of enhanced gaze presentation on gaze leading in remote collaborative physical tasks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[66]
Laura E Ott, Kerrie Kephart, Kathleen Stolle-McAllister, and William R LaCourse. 2018. Students' understanding and perceptions of assigned team roles in a classroom laboratory environment. Journal of college science teaching, Vol. 47, 4 (2018), 83.
[67]
Evan Pezent, Ali Israr, Majed Samad, Shea Robinson, Priyanshu Agarwal, Hrvoje Benko, and Nick Colonnese. 2019. Tasbi: Multisensory squeeze and vibrotactile wrist haptics for augmented and virtual reality. In 2019 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 1--6.
[68]
Kevin P Pfeil, Neeraj Chatlani, Joseph J LaViola Jr, and Pamela Wisniewski. 2021. Bridging the Socio-Technical Gaps in Body-worn Interpersonal Live-Streaming Telepresence through a Critical Review of the Literature. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--39.
[69]
Lea Pogacnik and Blaz Cigic. 2006. How to motivate students to study before they enter the lab. Journal of Chemical Education, Vol. 83, 7 (2006), 1094.
[70]
Jing Qian, Jiaju Ma, Xiangyu Li, Benjamin Attal, Haoming Lai, James Tompkin, John F Hughes, and Jeff Huang. 2019. Portal-ble: Intuitive Free-hand Manipulation in Unbounded Smartphone-based Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 133--145.
[71]
Marissa Rollnick, Stella Zwane, Mina Staskun, Sandra Lotz, and Gail Green. 2001. Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 23, 10 (2001), 1053--1071.
[72]
Andrew Sawers and Lena H Ting. 2014. Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, Vol. 11, 1 (2014), 1--13.
[73]
Orit Shaer, Eva Hornecker, et al. 2010. Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, 1--2 (2010), 4--137.
[74]
Douglas C Sicker, Tom Lookabaugh, Jose Santos, and Frank Barnes. 2005. Assessing the effectiveness of remote networking laboratories. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference. IEEE, S3F--S3F.
[75]
Koun-tem Sun, Yuan-cheng Lin, and Chia-jui Yu. 2008. A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, Vol. 50, 4 (2008), 1411--1422.
[76]
Theophilus Teo, Gun A Lee, Mark Billinghurst, and Matt Adcock. 2018. Hand gestures and visual annotation in live 360 panorama-based mixed reality remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 406--410.
[77]
Marc Teyssier, Gilles Bailly, Catherine Pelachaud, and Eric Lecolinet. 2018. MobiLimb: Augmenting Mobile Devices with a Robotic Limb. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 53--63.
[78]
Hussain Tinwala and I Scott MacKenzie. 2009. Eyes-free text entry on a touchscreen phone. In 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH). IEEE, 83--88.
[79]
Clara Viegas, Ana Pavani, Natércia Lima, Arcelina Marques, Isabel Pozzo, Elsa Dobboletta, Vanessa Atencia, Daniel Barreto, Felipe Calliari, André Fidalgo, et al. 2018. Impact of a remote lab on teaching practices and student learning. Computers & Education, Vol. 126 (2018), 201--216.
[80]
Peng Wang, Xiaoliang Bai, Mark Billinghurst, Shusheng Zhang, Dechuan Han, Mengmeng Sun, Zhuo Wang, Hao Lv, and Shu Han. 2020. Haptic Feedback Helps Me? A VR-SAR Remote Collaborative System with Tangible Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2020), 1--16.
[81]
Peng Wang, Shusheng Zhang, Xiaoliang Bai, Mark Billinghurst, Weiping He, Shuxia Wang, Xiaokun Zhang, Jiaxiang Du, and Yongxing Chen. 2019. Head Pointer or Eye Gaze: Which Helps More in MR Remote Collaboration?. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 1219--1220.
[82]
Shiyao Wang, Michael Parsons, Jordan Stone-McLean, Peter Rogers, Sarah Boyd, Kristopher Hoover, Oscar Meruvia-Pastor, Minglun Gong, and Andrew Smith. 2017. Augmented reality as a telemedicine platform for remote procedural training. Sensors, Vol. 17, 10 (2017), 2294.
[83]
Koji Yatani, Darren Gergle, and Khai Truong. 2012. Investigating effects of visual and tactile feedback on spatial coordination in collaborative handheld systems. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 661--670.
[84]
Yitong Zhao, Elbon Flanagan, Hamza Abbasi, Kayla Black, Xin Wang, and Andres Cardona. 2019. Development of a Virtual Lab in Assistance of a Fluid Mechanics Laboratory Instruction. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vol. 59421. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V005T07A029.
[85]
Feng Zhou, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, and Mark Billinghurst. 2008. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. In 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE, 193--202.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Bridging minds and machines in Industry 5.0: neurobiological approachFrontiers in Human Neuroscience10.3389/fnhum.2024.142751218Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
  • (2024)ProtoBricks: A Research Toolkit for Tangible Prototyping & Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661573(476-495)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)CoAR-TV: Design and Evaluation of Asynchronous Collaboration in AR-Supported TV ExperiencesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656320(231-245)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW1
CSCW1
April 2022
2511 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3530837
Issue’s Table of Contents
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 April 2022
Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW1

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. STEM
  2. augmented reality
  3. collaboration
  4. distance
  5. education
  6. haptics
  7. laboratory
  8. learning
  9. remote
  10. tangibles

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)430
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)43
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Bridging minds and machines in Industry 5.0: neurobiological approachFrontiers in Human Neuroscience10.3389/fnhum.2024.142751218Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
  • (2024)ProtoBricks: A Research Toolkit for Tangible Prototyping & Data PhysicalizationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661573(476-495)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)CoAR-TV: Design and Evaluation of Asynchronous Collaboration in AR-Supported TV ExperiencesProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656320(231-245)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
  • (2024)HapticPilotProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314537:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Effect of Viewing Attributes of Mobile AR Interfaces on Remote Collaborative and Competitive TasksIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345617730:11(7288-7298)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • (2024)Conclusions, Challenges, and Emerging TrendsCyber-Collaborative Algorithms and Protocols10.1007/978-3-031-56196-2_8(145-160)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Touch to Learn: A Review of Haptic Technology's Impact on Skill Development and Enhancing Learning Abilities for ChildrenAdvanced Intelligent Systems10.1002/aisy.2023007316:6Online publication date: 7-May-2024
  • (2023)InstruMentAR: Auto-Generation of Augmented Reality Tutorials for Operating Digital Instruments Through Recording Embodied DemonstrationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581442(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)LearnIoTVR: An End-to-End Virtual Reality Environment Providing Authentic Learning Experiences for Internet of ThingsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581396(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)DualStream: Spatially Sharing Selves and Surroundings using Mobile Devices and Augmented Reality2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR59233.2023.00028(138-147)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media