Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3546155.3546692acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Postphenomenological Dimensions of Digitally Mediated Domestic Heating

Published: 08 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Designing interactive technology to support and reduce domestic energy consumption has occupied HCI researchers for decades. This paper extends this body of HCI research by using postphenomenology as an analytical lens to understand how the digital energy assistant’ Watts’ mediates domestic district heating. We base our inquiry on empirical insights from a two-year study. We conducted informal meetings, focus groups with seven households before Watts’ distribution, two rounds of semi-structured interviews with seven household representatives using Watts, and 304 questionnaire respondents. We illustrate findings in three postphenomenological dimensions - practical, ontological, and epistemological - showing a two-sidedness of technology-mediated domestic district heating. For instance, Watts enables some to reduce heating by magnifying certain new aspects of consumption, but also constrains others from doing the same by concealing the ”raw” consumption data. Finally, we discuss four tensions of Watts mediation and how postphenomenology can complement HCI studies on domestic energy consumption.

References

[1]
Julio Abascal and Colette Nicolle. 2005. Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interacting with computers 17, 5 (2005), 484–505.
[2]
Madeleine Akrich. 1992. The de-scription of technical objects.
[3]
Alper T Alan, Mike Shann, Enrico Costanza, Sarvapali D Ramchurn, and Sven Seuken. 2016. It is too hot: An in-situ study of three designs for heating. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5262–5273.
[4]
Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, and John Antanitis. 2012. Critical Design and Critical Theory: The Challenge of Designing for Provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318001
[5]
Jesse Josua Benjamin, Arne Berger, Nick Merrill, and James Pierce. 2021. Machine Learning Uncertainty as a Design Material: A Post-Phenomenological Inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[6]
Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 503–512.
[7]
Jacky Bourgeois, Stefan Foell, Gerd Kortuem, Blaine A Price, Janet Van Der Linden, Eiman Y Elbanhawy, and Christopher Rimmer. 2015. Harvesting green miles from my roof: an investigation into self-sufficient mobility with electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 1065–1076.
[8]
Jacky Bourgeois, Janet Van Der Linden, Gerd Kortuem, Blaine A Price, and Christopher Rimmer. 2014. Conversations with my washing machine: an in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 459–470.
[9]
Hronn Brynjarsdottir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl DiSalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 947–956.
[10]
Enrico Costanza, Joel E Fischer, James A Colley, Tom Rodden, Sarvapali D Ramchurn, and Nicholas R Jennings. 2014. Doing the laundry with agents: a field trial of a future smart energy system in the home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 813–822.
[11]
Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on designing interactive systems. 1–10.
[12]
Daniel Fallman. 2011. The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1051–1060.
[13]
Joel E Fischer, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James A Colley, Enrico Costanza, Michael O Jewell, and Sarvapali D Ramchurn. 2016. ” Just whack it on until it gets hot” Working with IoT Data in the Home. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5933–5944.
[14]
Derek Foster, Shaun Lawson, Jamie Wardman, Mark Blythe, and Conor Linehan. 2012. ” Watts in it for me?” design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2357–2366.
[15]
Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI the next wave?ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 1(2019), 1–27.
[16]
Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, and James Landay. 2010. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1999–2008.
[17]
Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, Marilyn Ostergren, Solai Ramanathan, Josh Peterson, Inness Wragg, Eric Larson, Fabia Fu, Mazhengmin Bai, Shwetak Patel, 2012. The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2367–2376.
[18]
Anton Gustafsson and Magnus Gyllenswärd. 2005. The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 1423–1426.
[19]
Hanna Hasselqvist, Cristian Bogdan, and Filip Kis. 2016. Linking data to action: Designing for amateur energy management. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 473–483.
[20]
Sabrina Hauser, Doenja Oogjes, Ron Wakkary, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2018. An annotated portfolio on doing postphenomenology through research products. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference. 459–471.
[21]
Sabrina Hauser, Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Peter-Paul Verbeek, Audrey Desjardins, Henry Lin, Matthew Dalton, Markus Schilling, and Gijs De Boer. 2018. Deployments of the table-non-table: A Reflection on the Relation Between Theory and Things in the Practice of Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[22]
Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research 15, 9 (2005), 1277–1288.
[23]
Don Ihde. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. (1990).
[24]
Don Ihde. 1995. Postphenomenology: Essays in the postmodern context. Northwestern University Press.
[25]
Mads Møller Jensen and Jesper Aagaard. 2018. A postphenomenological method for HCI research. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 242–251.
[26]
Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2016. HeatDial: beyond user scheduling in eco-interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction. 1–10.
[27]
Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2018. Washing with the Wind: A Study of Scripting towards Sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1387–1400.
[28]
Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Yolande Strengers, Jesper Kjeldskov, Larissa Nicholls, and Mikael B Skov. 2018. Designing the desirable smart home: A study of household experiences and energy consumption impacts. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.
[29]
Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Michael Kvist Svangren, Mikael B Skov, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2019. Investigating EV Driving as Meaningful Practice. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction. 42–52.
[30]
Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Maurizio Teli, Simon Bjerre Jensen, Mikkel Gram, and Mikkel Harboe Sørensen. 2021. Designing Eco-Feedback Systems for Communities: Interrogating a Techno-solutionist Vision for Sustainable Communal Energy. In C&T’21: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Wicked Problems in the Age of Tech. 245–257.
[31]
Li Jönsson, Loove Broms, and Cecilia Katzeff. 2010. Watt-Lite: energy statistics made tangible. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 240–243.
[32]
Asle H Kiran. 2015. Four dimensions of technological mediation. Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human—technology relations (2015), 123–140.
[33]
Jesper Kjeldskov, Mikael B Skov, Jeni Paay, Dennis Lund, Tue Madsen, and Michael Nielsen. 2015. Eco-forecasting for domestic electricity use. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1985–1988.
[34]
Charlotte BA Kobus, Ruth Mugge, and Jan PL Schoormans. 2013. Washing when the sun is shining! How users interact with a household energy management system. Ergonomics 56, 3 (2013), 451–462.
[35]
Stacey Kuznetsov and Martin Tomitsch. 2018. A study of urban heat: Understanding the challenges and opportunities for addressing wicked problems in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[36]
Steinar Kvale. 1994. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.Sage Publications, Inc.
[37]
Michael Kvist Svangren, Louise Krog, Alisa Ananjeva, John Stouby Persson, Peter Axel Nielsen, Camilla Brunsgaard, and Karl Sperling. 2020. Investigating One-Time Actions for Domestic Energy Reduction: The Case of District Heating. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. 1–11.
[38]
Henrik Lund. 2014. Renewable energy systems: a smart energy systems approach to the choice and modeling of 100% renewable solutions. Academic Press.
[39]
Line Valdorff Madsen and Kirsten Gram-Hanssen. 2017. Understanding comfort and senses in social practice theory: Insights from a Danish field study. Energy Research & Social Science 29 (2017), 86–94.
[40]
Rahuvaran Pathmanathan, Jon Pearce, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Wally Smith. 2011. Using mobile phones for promoting water conservation. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 243–252.
[41]
James Pierce. 2009. Material awareness: promoting reflection on everyday materiality. In CHI’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4459–4464.
[42]
James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2011. A phenomenology of human-electricity relations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2405–2408.
[43]
James Pierce, Diane J Schiano, and Eric Paulos. 2010. Home, habits, and energy: examining domestic interactions and energy consumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1985–1994.
[44]
Dimitrios Raptis, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2017. Aesthetic, functional and conceptual provocation in research through design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 29–41.
[45]
Majken K Rasmussen, Mia Kruse Rasmussen, Nervo Verdezoto, Robert Brewer, Laura L Nielsen, and Niels Olof Bouvin. 2017. Exploring the flexibility of everyday practices for shifting energy consumption through clockcast. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 296–306.
[46]
Johnny Rodgers and Lyn Bartram. 2010. Ambient and artistic visualization of residential resource use. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 588. Citeseer, 17–19.
[47]
Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2015. A field guide to postphenomenology. Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (2015), 9–41.
[48]
Elizabeth Shove, Mika Pantzar, and Watson Matt. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. SAGE Publications.
[49]
Stephen Snow, Frederik Auffenberg, and MC Schraefel. 2017. Log it while it’s hot: Designing human interaction with smart thermostats for shared work environments. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1595–1606.
[50]
Stephen Snow, Stephen Viller, Mashhuda Glencross, and Neil Horrocks. 2019. Where Are They Now? Revisiting Energy Use Feedback a Decade After Deployment. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction. 397–401.
[51]
Erik Stolterman. 2021. The challenge of improving designing. International Journal of Design 15, 1 (2021), 65–74.
[52]
Yolande Strengers. 2014. Smart energy in everyday life: are you designing for resource man?interactions 21, 4 (2014), 24–31.
[53]
Yolande AA Strengers. 2011. Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2135–2144.
[54]
Michael K Svangren, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Mikael B Skov, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2018. Driving on sunshine: aligning electric vehicle charging and household electricity production. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 439–451.
[55]
Michael K Svangren, Mikael B Skov, and Jesper Kjeldskov. 2017. The connected car: an empirical study of electric cars as mobile digital devices. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 1–12.
[56]
Karlijn L van den Broek. 2019. Household energy literacy: A critical review and a conceptual typology. Energy Research & Social Science 57 (2019), 101256.
[57]
Pauline van Dongen, Ron Wakkary, Oscar Tomico, and Stephen Wensveen. 2019. Towards a postphenomenological approach to wearable technology through design journeys. In Proceeding of the 2019 Textile Intersections Conference.
[58]
Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2008. Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies 31, 1 (2008), 11–26.
[59]
Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2015. COVER STORY Beyond interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory. interactions 22, 3 (2015), 26–31.
[60]
Peter-Paul Verbeek and Petran Kockelkoren. 1998. The things that matter. Design Issues 14, 3 (1998), 28–42.
[61]
Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, Henry WJ Lin, and Sabrina Hauser. 2018. Philosophers living with the tilting bowl. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.
[62]
Stina Wessman, Rebekah Olsen, and Cecilia Katzeff. 2015. THAT’S THE SMELL OF PEACETIME-DESIGNING FOR ELECTRICITY LOAD BALANCING. Nordes 1, 6 (2015).
[63]
Rayoung Yang and Mark W Newman. 2012. Living with an intelligent thermostat: advanced control for heating and cooling systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 1102–1107.
[64]
Robert K Yin. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. sage.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)New Perspectives for Phenomenology in Interaction DesignProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685404(1-7)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

Index Terms

  1. Postphenomenological Dimensions of Digitally Mediated Domestic Heating

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference
    October 2022
    1091 pages
    ISBN:9781450396998
    DOI:10.1145/3546155
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 October 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. district heating
    2. postphenomenology
    3. sustainability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    NordiCHI '22

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)New Perspectives for Phenomenology in Interaction DesignProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685404(1-7)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media