Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Design Implications to Support Integrative Medicine in Pregnancy Care

Published: 11 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

The use of integrative medicine (IM) practices during pregnancy are on the rise in the United States and a growing number of individuals seek pregnancy support outside of the conventional medical system every year. There is a variety of integrative medicine providers (IMPs) who work outside the clinical system to fill the gaps in pregnancy support by providing a set of services such as midwifery, doula care, childbirth education, and lactation support. Evidence suggests integrative medicine providers positively impact pregnancy experiences, yet IMPs are often marginalized and excluded from the conventional pregnancy healthcare system. We present results from an ongoing investigation that seeks to understand the roles IMPs play in pregnancy healthcare journeys, and the pregnancy ecology. We interviewed 12 integrative medicine providers to understand their needs and challenges concerning technology, business models, and communication practices. Our findings reflect on a broad range of topics including the intersection of personal and professional journeys, legitimacy within the healthcare system, and the provision of personalized care. We discuss the potential for technology to support IMPs and present implications for the design of future pregnancy support technologies. Improving collaborative care and communication technologies for the IM community has the potential to improve professional experiences and the quality of care provided by IMPs. WARNING: This paper includes detailed personal narratives of individuals' pregnancy healthcare journey including information about, pregnancy, labor, delivery, birth stories, and pregnancy loss.

References

[1]
ACNM. 2005. Position Statement on Home Birth. Technical Report. American College of Nurse-Midwives.
[2]
Kim Adams, Sarah Hean, Patrick Sturgis, and Jill Macleod Clark. 2006. Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learning in health and social care, Vol. 5, 2 (2006), 55--68.
[3]
K Ainscough, M Kennelly, KL Lindsay, EJ O'Sullivan, and FM McAuliffe. 2016. Impact of an mHealth supported healthy lifestyle intervention on behavioural stage of change in overweight and obese pregnancy. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, Vol. 75, OCE3 (2016).
[4]
Hana AlJaberi. 2018. Developing culturally sensitive mHealth apps for Caribbean immigrant women to use during pregnancy: focus group study. JMIR human factors, Vol. 5, 4 (2018), e29.
[5]
Nazanin Andalibi. 2021. Symbolic annihilation through design: Pregnancy loss in pregnancy-related mobile apps. New Media & Society, Vol. 23, 3 (3 2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820984473
[6]
Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing Pregnancy Loss on Facebook: A Decision-Making Framework for Stigmatized Disclosures on Identified Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 158, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173732
[7]
Maria Antoniak, David Mimno, and Karen Levy. 2019. Narrative paths and negotiation of power in birth stories. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.
[8]
Amy M Ashman, Clare E Collins, Leanne J Brown, Kym M Rae, and Megan E Rollo. 2016. A Brief Tool to Assess Image-Based Dietary Records and Guide Nutrition Counselling Among Pregnant Women: An Evaluation. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol. 4, 4 (11 2016), e123. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6469
[9]
American Public Health Association et al. 2002. Increasing access to out-of-hospital maternity care services through state-regulated and nationally-certified direct-entry midwives. Am J Public Health, Vol. 92, 3 (2002), 453--455.
[10]
Isabelle Aujoulat, William d'Hoore, and Alain Deccache. 2007. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony? Patient education and counseling, Vol. 66, 1 (2007), 13--20.
[11]
Naveen Bagalkot, Nervo Verdezoto, Anushri Ghode, Shipra Purohit, Lakshmi Murthy, Nicola Mackintosh, and Paula Griffiths. 2020. Beyond Health Literacy: Navigating Boundaries and Relationships During High-risk Pregnancies: Challenges and Opportunities for Digital Health in North-West India. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. 1--15.
[12]
Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Ed Jenkins, Selina Sutton, and Andrew Garbett. 2015. FeedFinder: A location-mapping mobile application for breastfeeding women. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1709--1718.
[13]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1301--1310.
[14]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 675--684.
[15]
Bruce Barrett, Dave Rakel, Betty Chewning, Lucille Marchand, David Rabago, Roger Brown, Jo Scheder, Raandi Schmidt, James E Gern, Kerry Bone, et al. 2007. Rationale and methods for a trial assessing placebo, echinacea, and doctor-patient interaction in the common cold. Explore, Vol. 3, 6 (2007), 561--572.
[16]
Marguerite Barry, Kevin Doherty, Jose Marcano Belisario, Josip Car, Cecily Morrison, and Gavin Doherty. 2017. mHealth for maternal mental health: everyday wisdom in ethical design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2708--2756.
[17]
Amna Batool, Samia Razaq, Maham Javaid, Beenish Fatima, and Kentaro Toyama. 2017. Maternal complications: Nuances in mobile interventions for maternal health in urban Pakistan. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--12.
[18]
Urie Bronfenbrenner. 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.
[19]
Gibson Burell and Gareth Morgan. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Elements of the sociology of corporate life (1979).
[20]
Grace Burleson, Mustafa Naseem, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. An Exploration of African-American Pregnant Women's Information-Seeking Behavior in Detroit. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. 1--12.
[21]
Helen Varney Burst. 1998. History of nurse-midwifery in reproductive health care. Journal of nurse-midwifery, Vol. 43, 6 (1998), 526--529.
[22]
Virginia Campbell and Mary Nolan. 2019. ?It definitely made a difference': a grounded theory study of yoga for pregnancy and women's self-efficacy for labour. Midwifery, Vol. 68 (2019), 74--83.
[23]
Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, Louis Faust, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2018. Towards an Integrated mHealth Platform for Community-based Maternity Health Workers in Low-Income Communities. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 118--127.
[24]
Beenish M Chaudhry, Louis Faust, and Nitesh V Chawla. 2019. From Design to Development to Evaluation of a Pregnancy App for Low-Income Women in a Community-Based Setting. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1--11.
[25]
Melissa Cheyney, Courtney Everson, and Paul Burcher. 2014. Homebirth transfers in the United States: narratives of risk, fear, and mutual accommodation. Qualitative health research, Vol. 24, 4 (2014), 443--456.
[26]
Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Elizabeth Victoria Eikey, Melissa Mazmanian, and Yunan Chen. 2018. Engaging with health data: The interplay between self-tracking activities and emotions in fertility struggles. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--20.
[27]
Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Clara Caldeira, Tera L. Reynolds, Sean Victory, Kai Zheng, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Self-Tracking for Fertility Care: Collaborative Support for a Highly Personalized Problem. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 1, CSCW, Article 36 (Dec. 2017), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134671
[28]
Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Thu Huynh, Anna Takei, Daniel A Epstein, and Yunan Chen. 2021. Goals, life events, and transitions: examining fertility apps for holistic health tracking. JAMIA Open, Vol. 4, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab013
[29]
Unn Dahlberg and Ingvild Aune. 2013. The woman's birth experience-The effect of interpersonal relationships and continuity of care. Midwifery, Vol. 29, 4 (2013), 407--415.
[30]
AJ Dawson, AM Nkowane, and A Whelan. 2015. Approaches to improving the contribution of the nursing and midwifery workforce to increasing universal access to primary health care for vulnerable populations: a systematic review. Human resources for health, Vol. 13, 1 (2015), 97.
[31]
Catherine D'Ignazio, Alexis Hope, Becky Michelson, Robyn Churchill, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2016. A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I First Saw a Breast Pump I Was Wondering If It Was a Joke" .Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2612--2622. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858460
[32]
Kevin Doherty, José Marcano-Belisario, Martin Cohn, Nikolaos Mastellos, Cecily Morrison, Josip Car, and Gavin Doherty. 2019. Engagement with mental health screening on mobile devices: Results from an antenatal feasibility study. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.
[33]
Barbara Ehrenreich and Deirdre English. 2010. Witches, midwives, & nurses: A history of women healers. The Feminist Press at CUNY.
[34]
William Douglas Evans, Jasmine L Wallace, and Jeremy Snider. 2012. Pilot evaluation of the text4baby mobile health program. BMC public health, Vol. 12, 1 (2012), 1031.
[35]
Mayara Costa Figueiredo, H. Irene Su, and Yunan Chen. 2020. AN EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL FERTILITY APPS: ALGORITHMIC PREDICTIONS AND USERS' PERCEPTIONS. Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 114, 3 (9 2020), e552--e553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.091
[36]
Jennifer Foster, Lindsey Miller, Sheila Isbell, Tekesia Shields, Natasha Worthy, and Anne Lang Dunlop. 2015. mHealth to promote pregnancy and interconception health among African-American women at risk for adverse birth outcomes: a pilot study. Mhealth, Vol. 1 (2015).
[37]
Yuan Gao, Xinying Li, Yu-Hsuan Lin, Xin Liu, and Lin Pang. 2014. Nuwa: enhancing the pregnancy experience for expectant parents. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 257--262.
[38]
Julie A Gazmararian, Lisa Elon, Baiyu Yang, Megan Graham, and Ruth Parker. 2014. Text4baby program: an opportunity to reach underserved pregnant and postpartum women? Maternal and child health journal, Vol. 18, 1 (2014), 223--232.
[39]
Shelagh K Genuis. 2015. 'The transfer of information through word of mouth is powerful': interpersonal information interactions. In Proceedings of ISIC: the information behaviour conference.
[40]
Lorna Gibson and Vicki L Hanson. 2013. Digital motherhood: How does technology help new mothers?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 313--322.
[41]
Amy L Gilliland. 2002. Beyond holding hands: The modern role of the professional doula. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, Vol. 31, 6 (2002), 762--769.
[42]
Maren Goetz, Mitho Müller, Lina Maria Matthies, Jenny Hansen, Anne Doster, Akos Szabo, Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich, Harald Abele, Christof Sohn, Markus Wallwiener, et al. 2017. Perceptions of patient engagement applications during pregnancy: a qualitative assessment of the patient's perspective. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol. 5, 5 (2017), e73.
[43]
Shelley D Golden and Jo Anne L Earp. 2012. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts: twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health education & behavior, Vol. 39, 3 (2012), 364--372.
[44]
Xinning Gui, Yu Chen, Yubo Kou, Katie Pine, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Investigating support seeking from peers for pregnancy in online health communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--19.
[45]
Xinning Gui, Yunan Chen, and Kathleen H Pine. 2018. Navigating the Healthcare Service" Black Box" Individual Competence and Fragmented System. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--26.
[46]
Jeannie L Haggerty, Robert J Reid, George K Freeman, Barbara H Starfield, Carol E Adair, and Rachael McKendry. 2003. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. Bmj, Vol. 327, 7425 (2003), 1219--1221.
[47]
Eklund J Håkansson, Inger K Holmström, Tomas Kumlin, Elenor Kaminsky, Karin Skoglund, Jessica Höglander, Annelie J Sundler, Emelie Condén, and Meranius M Summer. 2019. " Same same or different?" A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient education and counseling, Vol. 102, 1 (2019), 3.
[48]
Sydney L Hans, Renee C Edwards, and Yudong Zhang. 2018. Randomized controlled trial of doula-home-visiting services: impact on maternal and infant health. Maternal and Child Health Journal, Vol. 22, 1 (2018), 105--113.
[49]
Inger Holmström and Marta Röing. 2010. The relation between patient-centeredness and patient empowerment: a discussion on concepts. Patient education and counseling, Vol. 79, 2 (2010), 167--172.
[50]
Sarah Homewood, Laurens Boer, and Anna Vallgrarda. 2020. Designers in White Coats: Deploying Ovum, a Fertility Tracking Device. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376528
[51]
Julian C Hughes, Claire Bamford, and Carl May. 2008. Types of centredness in health care: themes and concepts. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 11, 4 (2008), 455--463.
[52]
Mary Hui, Christine Ly, and Carman Neustaedter. 2012. MammiBelli: sharing baby activity levels between expectant mothers and their intimate social groups. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1649--1654.
[53]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth Mynatt. 2013a. Cancer Compass: Examining Personal Health Record Usage Among Breast Cancer Survivors. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Venice, Italy) (PervasiveHealth '13). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 264--265. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252036
[54]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. [n.d.]. My Journey Compass: A Preliminary Investigation of a Mobile Tool for Cancer Patients (CHI '14). ACM, 1467--1478.
[55]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2013b. Perceptions of Breast Cancer Navigation from Survivors and Oncologists. In Workshop on Interactive Systems in Healthcare (Washington DC).
[56]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2014. Cancer Navigation: Opportunities and Challenges for Facilitating the Breast Cancer Journey (CSCW '14). ACM, 1467--1478. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531645
[57]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2015a. Comparing Health Information Sharing Preferences of Cancer Patients, Doctors, and Navigators (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11.
[58]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2015b. Lessons Learned from a Yearlong Deployment of Customizable Breast Cancer Tablet Computers. In Proceedings of the Conference on Wireless Health (Bethesda, Maryland) (WH '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2811780.2811951
[59]
Maia Jacobs, James Clawson, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2016. A Cancer Journey Framework: Guiding the Design of Holistic Health Technology. In Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Cancun, Mexico) (PervasiveHealth '16). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium, 114--121. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3021319.3021337
[60]
Sophia Johnson. 2014. "Maternal devices", social media and the self-management of pregnancy, mothering and child health. Societies, Vol. 4, 2 (2014), 330--350.
[61]
Anirudha Joshi, Debjani Roy, Aakash Ganju, Manjiri Joshi, and Susmita Sharma. 2019. ICT Acceptance for Information Seeking Amongst Pre-and Postnatal Women in Urban Slums. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 152--160.
[62]
Zoë Julian, Diana Robles, Sara Whetstone, Jamila B Perritt, Andrea V Jackson, Rachel R Hardeman, and Karen A Scott. 2020. Community-informed models of perinatal and reproductive health services provision: a justice-centered paradigm toward equity among Black birthing communities. In Seminars in perinatology. Elsevier, 151267.
[63]
Elizabeth Kaziunas, Michael S Klinkman, and Mark S Ackerman. 2019. Precarious Interventions: Designing for Ecologies of Care. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.
[64]
Ida Kilias Svenningsen and Teresa Almeida. 2020. Embodying the Emotional Pregnancy: Design Explorations of a Prenatal Yoga Multi-Sensorial Environment. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 189--197.
[65]
K Cassie Kresnye, Mona Y Alqassim, Briana Hollins, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Maria K Wolters, and Katie A Siek. 2020. What to Expect When You are No Longer Expecting: Information Needs of Women who Experienced a Miscarriage. In Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 85--96.
[66]
Neha Kumar and Richard J Anderson. 2015. Mobile phones for maternal health in rural India. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual acm conference on human factors in computing systems. 427--436.
[67]
Eloise-Kate Litterbach, Catherine G Russell, Sarah Taki, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson, Karen J Campbell, and Rachel A Laws. 2017. Factors influencing engagement and behavioral determinants of infant feeding in an mHealth program: qualitative evaluation of the growing healthy program. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol. 5, 12 (2017), e196.
[68]
Nancy K Lowe. 1993. Maternal confidence for labor: Development of the childbirth self-efficacy inventory. Research in nursing & health, Vol. 16, 2 (1993), 141--149.
[69]
Marian F MacDorman, Eugene Declercq, and TJ Mathews. 2011. United States home births increase 20 percent from 2004 to 2008. Birth, Vol. 38, 3 (2011), 185--190.
[70]
Victoria Maizes, David Rakel, and Catherine Niemiec. 2009. Integrative medicine and patient-centered care. Explore, Vol. 5, 5 (2009), 277--289.
[71]
Jordan Matthews, Andrea Bialocerkowski, and Matthew Molineux. 2019. Professional identity measures for student health professionals--a systematic review of psychometric properties. BMC medical education, Vol. 19, 1 (2019), 1--10.
[72]
Christine W Mburu, Chelsea-Joy Wardle, Yaseen Joolay, and Melissa Densmore. 2018. Co-designing with mothers and neonatal unit staff: use of technology to support mothers of preterm infants. In Proceedings of the Second African Conference for Human Computer Interaction: Thriving Communities. 1--10.
[73]
Carol L McWilliam, M Stewart, N Del Maestro, BJ Pittman, JB Brown, S McNair, K Desai, and ML Patterson. 1997. Creating empowering meaning: an interactive process of promoting health with chronically ill older Canadians. Health Promotion International, Vol. 12, 2 (1997), 111--123.
[74]
Andrew D Miller, Sonali R Mishra, Logan Kendall, Shefali Haldar, Ari H Pollack, and Wanda Pratt. 2016. Partners in care: design considerations for caregivers and patients during a hospital stay. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 756--769.
[75]
Jennifer E Moore, Karen E George, and Karen Shea. 2020. Community-Based Maternal Support Services: The Role of Doulas and Community Health Workers in Medicaid. (2020).
[76]
Sarah Munro, Amber Hui, Vanessa Salmons, Carolyn Solomon, Emily Gemmell, Nahal Torabi, and Patricia A Janssen. 2017. SmartMom Text Messaging for Prenatal Education: A qualitative focus group study to explore Canadian women's perceptions. JMIR public health and surveillance, Vol. 3, 1 (2017), e7.
[77]
Elizabeth L Murnane, Tara G Walker, Beck Tench, Stephen Voida, and Jaime Snyder. 2018. Personal informatics in interpersonal contexts: towards the design of technology that supports the social ecologies of long-term mental health management. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--27.
[78]
Maryam Mustafa, Amna Batool, Beenish Fatima, Fareeda Nawaz, Kentaro Toyama, and Agha Ali Raza. 2020. Patriarchy, maternal health and spiritual healing: Designing maternal health interventions in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[79]
Jennifer Nicoloro-SantaBarbara, Lisa Rosenthal, Melissa V Auerbach, Christina Kocis, Cheyanne Busso, and Marci Lobel. 2017. Patient-provider communication, maternal anxiety, and self-care in pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 190 (2017), 133--140.
[80]
American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Person-Centered Care, Kenneth Brummel-Smith, Dawn Butler, Miryam Frieder, Nancy Gibbs, Maureen Henry, Eileen Koons, Elizabeth Loggers, Davina Porock, David B Reuben, et al. 2016. Person-centered care: A definition and essential elements. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 64, 1 (2016), 15--18.
[81]
Ruth M Parker, Elena Dmitrieva, Sergei Frolov, and Julie A Gazmararian. 2012. Text4baby in the United States and Russia: an opportunity for understanding how mHealth affects maternal and child health. Journal of health communication, Vol. 17, sup1 (2012), 30--36.
[82]
Dilisha Patel, Ann Blandford, and Judith Stephenson. 2018. So You're Planning a Baby? A Review of Preconception Care Apps. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 63--70. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236112.3236121
[83]
Teresa Pellino, Audrey Tluczek, Mary Collins, Sharon Trimborn, et al. 1998. Increasing self-efficacy through empowerment: preoperative education for orthopaedic patients. Orthopaedic Nursing, Vol. 17, 4 (1998), 48.
[84]
Hilde Perdok, Corine J Verhoeven, Jeroen van Dillen, Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker, Karla Hoogendoorn, Jolanda Colli, Francc ois G Schellevis, and Ank de Jonge. 2018. Continuity of care is an important and distinct aspect of childbirth experience: findings of a survey evaluating experienced continuity of care, experienced quality of care and women's perception of labor. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, Vol. 18, 1 (2018), 13.
[85]
Trevor Perrier, Nicola Dell, Brian DeRenzi, Richard Anderson, John Kinuthia, Jennifer Unger, and Grace John-Stewart. 2015. Engaging pregnant women in Kenya with a hybrid computer-human SMS communication system. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1429--1438.
[86]
Noelyn Perriman, Deborah Lee Davis, and Sally Ferguson. 2018. What women value in the midwifery continuity of care model: A systematic review with meta-synthesis. Midwifery, Vol. 62 (2018), 220--229.
[87]
Tamara Peyton. 2014. Pregnancy Ecologies As Teachable Moments For The Lifecourse: Changing The mHealth Design Paradigm. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. 269--271.
[88]
Tamara Peyton, Erika Poole, Madhu Reddy, Jennifer Kraschnewski, and Cynthia Chuang. 2014. "Every Pregnancy is Different": Designing mHealth for the Pregnancy Ecology. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 577--586. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598572
[89]
Tamara Peyton and Pamela Wisniewski. 2019. Improving a design space: Pregnancy as a collaborative information and social support ecology. In Future of Information and Communication Conference. Springer, 505--525.
[90]
Katie Pine. 2012. Fragmentation and choreography: caring for a patient and a chart during childbirth. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work. 887--896.
[91]
Annu Sible Prabhakar, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Anne Effron, Vanessa M Kleinschmidt, Maggie Driscoll, Charles Peters, Vanessa Pereira, Majdah Alshehri, Tom Ongwere, and Katie A Siek. 2017a. " let me know if you need anything" support realities of new mothers. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare. 31--40.
[92]
Annu Sible Prabhakar, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Anne Effron, Vanessa M. Kleinschmidt, Maggie Driscoll, Charles Peters, Vanessa Pereira, Majdah Alshehri, Tom Ongwere, and Katie A. Siek. 2017b. "Let Me Know if You Need Anything": Support Realities of New Mothers. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Barcelona, Spain) (PervasiveHealth '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154863
[93]
Divya Ramachandran, Vivek Goswami, and John Canny. 2010. Research and reality: using mobile messages to promote maternal health in rural India. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on information and communication technologies and development. 1--10.
[94]
Maria J Santana, Kimberly Manalili, Rachel J Jolley, Sandra Zelinsky, Hude Quan, and Mingshan Lu. 2018. How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health Expectations, Vol. 21, 2 (2018), 429--440.
[95]
Hanna Schneider, Julia Wayrauther, Mariam Hassib, and Andreas Butz. 2019. Communicating uncertainty in fertility prognosis. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[96]
Kerri Durnell Schuiling, Theresa Ann Sipe, and Judith Fullerton. 2010. Findings from the analysis of the American College of Nurse-Midwives' membership surveys: 2006--2008. Journal of midwifery & women's health, Vol. 55, 4 (2010), 299--307.
[97]
Moira Stewart. 2001. Towards a global definition of patient centred care: the patient should be the judge of patient centred care.
[98]
Daniel Stokols. 1996. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American journal of health promotion, Vol. 10, 4 (1996), 282--298.
[99]
Gareth Martin Thomas and Deborah Lupton. 2015. Playing pregnancy: the ludification and gamification of expectant motherhood in smartphone apps. M/C Journal, Vol. 18, 5 (2015).
[100]
Gareth M. Thomas and Deborah Lupton. 2016. Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption. Health, Risk and Society, Vol. 17, 7--8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2015.1127333
[101]
Ellen L Tilden, Aaron B Caughey, Christopher S Lee, and Cathy Emeis. 2016. The effect of childbirth self-efficacy on perinatal outcomes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, Vol. 45, 4 (2016), 465--480.
[102]
Austin L Toombs, Kellie Morrissey, Emma Simpson, Colin M Gray, John Vines, and Madeline Balaam. 2018. Supporting the complex social lives of new parents. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.
[103]
Matthijs R Van Dijk, Nicole A Huijgen, Sten P Willemsen, Joop SE Laven, Eric AP Steegers, and Régine PM Steegers-Theunissen. 2016. Impact of an mHealth platform for pregnancy on nutrition and lifestyle of the reproductive population: a survey. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, Vol. 4, 2 (2016), e53.
[104]
Patty M. Vari, Joan Camburn, and Susan J. Henly. 2005. Professionally Mediated Peer Support and Early Breastfeeding Success. Journal of Perinatal Education, Vol. 9, 1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1624/105812400x87473
[105]
Saraswathi Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Sarah White, Jessica Aaker, and Laura Schummers. 2009. Nurse-Midwives' Experiences with Planned Home Birth: Impact on Attitudes and Practice. Birth, Vol. 36, 4 (2009), 274--282.
[106]
Nervo Verdezoto, Francisca Carpio-Arias, Valeria Carpio-Arias, Nicola Mackintosh, Parisa Eslambolchilar, Verónica Delgado, Catherine Andrade, and Galo Vásconez. 2020. Indigenous Women Managing Pregnancy Complications in Rural Ecuador: Barriers and Opportunities to Enhance Antenatal Care. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. 1--9.
[107]
Chelsea-Joy Wardle, Mitchell Green, Christine Wanjiru Mburu, and Melissa Densmore. 2018. Exploring Co-design with Breastfeeding Mothers. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 482, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174056
[108]
Christel A Woodward, Julia Abelson, Sara Tedford, and Brian Hutchison. 2004. What is important to continuity in home care?: Perspectives of key stakeholders. Social science & medicine, Vol. 58, 1 (2004), 177--192.
[109]
Deepika Yadav, Anushka Bhandari, and Pushpendra Singh. 2019a. LEAP: Scaffolding Collaborative Learning of Community Health Workers in India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--27.
[110]
Deepika Yadav, Prerna Malik, Kirti Dabas, and Pushpendra Singh. 2019b. Feedpal: Understanding opportunities for chatbots in breastfeeding education of women in india. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--30.
[111]
Zhe Zhang, Timothy Bickmore, Krissy Mainello, Meghan Mueller, Mary Foley, Lucia Jenkins, and Roger A. Edwards. 2014. Maintaining Continuity in Longitudinal, Multi-method Health Interventions Using Virtual Agents: The Case of Breastfeeding Promotion. 504--513. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319-09767--1_61 io

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Therapy for Therapists: Design Opportunities to Support the Psychological Well-being of Mental Health WorkersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869578:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Unpacking the Lived Experience of Collaborative Pregnancy TrackingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642652(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

Index Terms

  1. Design Implications to Support Integrative Medicine in Pregnancy Care

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue CSCW2
    CSCW
    November 2022
    8205 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3571154
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 November 2022
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 6, Issue CSCW2

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. birth
    2. care coordination
    3. healthcare journey
    4. integrative medicine
    5. maternal care
    6. pregnancy

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)86
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Therapy for Therapists: Design Opportunities to Support the Psychological Well-being of Mental Health WorkersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869578:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Unpacking the Lived Experience of Collaborative Pregnancy TrackingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642652(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media