Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3575879.3576003acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Evaluating the Design of an Art Student Framework Supporting XR Exhibitions: Evaluating an Art Student Framework

Published: 29 March 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    A successful system design may lead to a successfully implemented system. This paper demonstrates the followed evaluation procedure for the creation of a system dedicated to art schools. Specifically, we focus on meeting the needs of art teachers, art students, and visitors who are the stakeholders of such a system. Art teachers need to be able to initiate art exhibitions for their students and assess them, art students to create virtual exhibitions, and art exhibition visitors to have immersive and interactive experiences. This evaluation is a part of an EU-funded research project, namely CREAMS which aims to design, develop end evaluate a framework and open-source tools based on virtual, augmented, and mixed reality for the creation of virtual exhibitions for art students. Here, we present the followed user-centered design methodology that we followed to reach the first system design. The methodology begins with the literature review and continues with the filtering of review findings by experts, the creation of the corresponding mockups, the evaluation of the mockups by the end users, the specification of quantitative and qualitative metrics on employing XR technologies in Higher Education Institutions and concludes with the identification of a set of specifications that drives the development of a specific conceptual system design.

    References

    [1]
    Chadia Abras, Diane Maloney-Krichmar, and Jennifer Preece. 2004. User-centered design. In Encycl. Human-Computer Interact. Sage Publ., Thousand Oaks, CA, 37, 4, 445–456. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6918.003.0015
    [2]
    Hadi Ardiny and Esmaeel Khanmirza. 2019. The Role of AR and VR Technologies in Education Developments: Opportunities and Challenges. In the Proceedings of the 6th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (IcRoM’18). IEEE, 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICROM.2018.8657615
    [3]
    Budi Arifitama, Ade Syahputra, and Silvester D. H. Permana. 2017. Augmented Reality Interaction on Property Developer Using User Centered Design Approach. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (CSAI’17). Association for Computing Machinery, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3168390.3168424
    [4]
    Art Visualiser. 2022. Visualise Art on your wall with ourAugmented Reality App. Retrieved from https://artvisualiser.com/.
    [5]
    Artsonia. 2000. Welcome to the world's largest collection of Online Student Art Portfolios. Retrieved from https://www.artsonia.com/.
    [6]
    Artsteps. 2022. Make your own VR Exhibitions. Retrieved from https://www.artsteps.com/.
    [7]
    Art of London. 2022. Augmented Reality Art Gallery. Retrieved from https://artoflondon.co.uk/events/augmented-reality-art-gallery.
    [8]
    Hoverlay. 2022. Your Doorway to Immersive Experiences. Retrieved from https://www.hoverlay.com/.
    [9]
    Ronald T. Azuma. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4 (Aug. 1997), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
    [10]
    Regina Back, David A. Plecher, Rainer Wenrich, Birgit Dorner, and Gudrun Klinker. 2019. Mixed reality in art education. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR'19). IEEE, 1583–1587. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798101
    [11]
    Julie Carmigniani and Borko Furht. 2011. Augmented Reality: An Overview. In Handbook of Augmented Reality. Springer, New York, 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_1
    [12]
    Andrea Casu, Lucio D. Spano, Fabio Sorrentino, and Riccardo Scateni. 2015. RiftArt: Bringing Masterpieces in the Classroom through Immersive Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the Italian Chapter Conference 2015 - Smart Tools Apps Graph. (Eurographics 2015). The Eurographics Association, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.2312/stag.20151294
    [13]
    Chiu-Shui Chan, JelenaBogdanovic, and Vijay Kalivarapu. 2021. Applying immersive virtual reality for remote teaching architectural history. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27, 4365–4397. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-021-10786-8
    [14]
    ArtPlacer. 2022. Discover ArtPlacer Galleries. Retrieved from https://discover.artplacer.com/.
    [15]
    Mana Farshid, Jeannette Paschen, Theresa Eriksson, and Jan Kietzmann. 2018. Go boldly!: Explore augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) for business. Bus. Horiz. 61, 5 (Sept.-Oct. 2018), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2018.05.009
    [16]
    Arnau Gifreu-Castells. 2019. Approach to the Curatorship of Virtual Reality Exhibitions. In A Companion to Curation. Wiley Online Library, 360–374. https://doi.org/0.1002/9781119206880.CH19
    [17]
    Mariana D. González-Zamar and Emilio Abad-Segura. 2020. Implications of virtual reality in arts education: Research analysis in the context of higher education. Educ. Sci. 10, 9, Article 225 (Sept. 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI10090225
    [18]
    Google Arts & Culture. 2022. Retrieved from https://artsandculture.google.com/.
    [19]
    Claudia Hart. 2020. The Romantic App: Augmented Reality in Fine Art Education. In Augmented Reality in Education. Springer Ser. Cult. Comput., 279–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_16/FIGURES/47.
    [20]
    Artivive. 2016. Discover AR-ART with ARTIVIVE. Retrieved from https://artivive.com/.
    [21]
    MoSA. 2022. Museum of Stolen Art. Retrieved from https://museumofstolenart.com/.
    [22]
    Wolfgang Honig, Christina Milanes, Lisa Scaria, Thai Phan, Mark Bolas, and Nora Ayanian. 2015. Mixed reality for robotics. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'15). IEEE, Hamburg, Germany, 5382–5387. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7354138.
    [23]
    Evelyn M. R. Huaman, Roni G. A. Aceituno, and Olha Sharhorodska. 2019. Application of Virtual Reality and Gamification in the Teaching of Art History. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCII'19). Springer Cham 11591, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21817-1_17
    [24]
    Ikonospace. 2022. Digital Architects. Retrieved from https://www.ikonospace.com/.
    [25]
    Gunther Kress. 2005. Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Comput. Compos. 22, 1 (Jan. 2005), 5–22, Jan. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPCOM.2004.12.004
    [26]
    Richard A. Krueger and Mary A. Casey. 2008. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Edition 4. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    [27]
    Natalie LeBlanc and Rita L. Irwin. 2019. A/r/tography. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190264093.013.393
    [28]
    Chih-Long Lin, Si-Jing Chen, and Rungtai Lin. 2020. Efficacy of virtual reality in painting art exhibitions appreciation. Appl. Sci. 10, 9 (Apr. 2020), Article 3012, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093012
    [29]
    Lev Manovich. 2002. The language of new media. The MIT Press.
    [30]
    Ji-Ye Mao, Karel Vredenburg, Paul W. Smith, and Tom Carey. 2001. User-centered design methods in practice: a survey of the state of the art. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research (CASCON'01). IBM Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 12 pages. https://dl.acm.or/doi/10.5555/782096.782108
    [31]
    Richard E. Mayer. 2009. Multimedia Learning. Edition 2. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
    [32]
    Paul Milgram, Haruo Takemura, Akira Utsumi, and Fumio Kishino. 2015. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum, In Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. SPIE 2351, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
    [33]
    Janet Murray. 1999. Hamlet en la holocubierta. PAIDOS, Barcelona, Spain.
    [34]
    Stylianos Mystakidis. 2022. Metaverse. Encycl. 2, 1 (Feb. 2022), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ENCYCLOPEDIA2010031.
    [35]
    Danakorn Nincarean, Mohamad B. Alia, Noor D. A. Halim, and Mohd H. A. Rahman. 2013. Mobile Augmented Reality: The Potential for Education. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 103, 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.10.385
    [36]
    KUNSTMATRIX. 2022. Present, manage and sell your art. Retrieved from https://www.kunstmatrix.com/en.
    [37]
    Nikolaos Pellas, Ioannis Kazanidis, and George Palaigeorgiou. 2020. A systematic literature review of mixed reality environments in K-12 education. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25, 4 (Jul. 2020), 2481–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-019-10076-4/TABLES/11.
    [38]
    Yahui Qiu, Yao Xiao, and Tao Jiang. 2020. An Online College Student Art Exhibition App Based on Virtual Reality Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and Information Science (CCCIS'19). IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 750, Article 012132 (Feb. 2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/750/1/012132
    [39]
    J. Riman, N. Winters, J. Zelenak, I. Yucel, and J. G. Tromp, “Mixed reality use in Higher Education: Results from an international survey,” In Emerging Extended Reality Technologies for Industry 4.0. Wiley Online Library, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119654674.CH1
    [40]
    Marc Ericson C. Santos, Angie Chen, Takafumi Taketomi, Goshiro Yamamoto, Jun Miyazaki, and Hirokazu Kato. 2014. Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 7, 1 (Jan.-Mar. 2014), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37
    [41]
    Ángela Di Serio, Maria Blanca Ibáñez, and Carlos Delgado Kloos. 2013. Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Comput. Educ. 68, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.03.002
    [42]
    Yan Song and Lihua Li. 2018. Research on application of vr technology in art design teaching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Simulation and Intelligent Control (ESAIC'18). IEEE, 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESAIC.2018.00086
    [43]
    S. Y. Sun and Li-Hsun Peng. 2020. Study of the virtual reality education and digitalization in China. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1456, 1, Article 012042 (Jan. 2020), 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012042
    [44]
    Stella Sylaiou and Panagiotis Dafiotis. 2020. Storytelling in Virtual Museums: Engaging A Multitude of Voices. In Visual Computing for Cultural Heritage. Springer Ser. Cult. Comput., Springer Cham, 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37191-3_19
    [45]
    Stella Sylaiou, Katerina Mania, Ioannis Paliokas, Laia Pujol-Tost, Vassilis Killintzis, and Fotis Liarokapis. 2017. Exploring the educational impact of diverse technologies in online virtual museums. Int. J. Arts Technol. 10, 1 (May 2017), 58-84. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2017.083907
    [46]
    THEVOV. 2022. Retrieved from https://www.thevov.art/.
    [47]
    V21 Artspace. 2017. Interactive 3D Exhibition Tours & Immersive VR Experiences. Retrieved from https://v21artspace.com/.
    [48]
    VR-All-Art. 2022. VR Art Platform - Explore and create VR art exhibitions. Retrieved from https://vrallart.com/.
    [49]
    QinPing Zhao. 2009. A survey on virtual reality. Sci. China Ser. F Inf. Sci. 52, 3 (Mar. 2009), 348–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11432-009-0066-0

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Natural Language Processing Influence on Digital Socialization and Linguistic Interactions in the Integration of the Metaverse in Regular Social LifeElectronics10.3390/electronics1307133113:7(1331)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2024
    • (2024)CulturAI: Exploring Mixed Reality Art Exhibitions with Large Language Models for Personalized Immersive ExperiencesAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664874(102-105)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
    • (2024)From physical to virtual art exhibitions and beyond: Survey and some issues for consideration for the metaverseJournal of Cultural Heritage10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.00266(86-98)Online publication date: Mar-2024

    Index Terms

    1. Evaluating the Design of an Art Student Framework Supporting XR Exhibitions: Evaluating an Art Student Framework
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            PCI '22: Proceedings of the 26th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
            November 2022
            414 pages
            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 29 March 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions for this article.

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Funding Sources

            • Greek State Scholarship?s Foundation (IKY)

            Conference

            PCI 2022
            PCI 2022: 26th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
            November 25 - 27, 2022
            Athens, Greece

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 390 submissions, 49%

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)208
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            Cited By

            View all
            • (2024)Natural Language Processing Influence on Digital Socialization and Linguistic Interactions in the Integration of the Metaverse in Regular Social LifeElectronics10.3390/electronics1307133113:7(1331)Online publication date: 2-Apr-2024
            • (2024)CulturAI: Exploring Mixed Reality Art Exhibitions with Large Language Models for Personalized Immersive ExperiencesAdjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3631700.3664874(102-105)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
            • (2024)From physical to virtual art exhibitions and beyond: Survey and some issues for consideration for the metaverseJournal of Cultural Heritage10.1016/j.culher.2023.11.00266(86-98)Online publication date: Mar-2024

            View Options

            View options

            PDF

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format.

            HTML Format

            Get Access

            Login options

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media