Specification and Scaffolding in Project-Based Learning of Systems Architecture
Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Project-based learning (PBL) through open-ended group projects is praised for fostering technical communication, collaboration, and leadership skills. We examine PBL in the group project element of Web Systems Architecture, an upper-level undergraduate systems course. We investigate learning outcomes, team dynamics, technical communication, and confidence-building. Our observations suggest that while learning outcomes are similarly achieved with and without additional specification and scaffolding, when given a choice for receiving further specification and scaffolding, students are inclined towards more specification and avoid taking risks in open-ended projects. Specifically, 86% of our students decided to choose the scaffolded project stream, and by the end of the project, 41% of the students (58% of survey respondents) indicated their preference for even a more specified project. We explore the factors influencing this choice and discuss design alternatives to further motivate risk-taking, and our initial results using them.
References
[1]
Phyllis C Blumenfeld, Elliot Soloway, Ronald W Marx, Joseph S Krajcik, Mark Guzdial, and Annemarie Palincsar. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational psychologist 26, 3-4 (1991), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
[2]
Merijke Coenraad, Jen Palmer, David Weintrop, Donna Eatinger, Zachary Crenshaw, Hoang Pham, and Diana Franklin. 2021. The Effects of Providing Starter Projects in Open-Ended Scratch Activities. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432390
[3]
Alden Jack Edson. 2017. Learner-controlled scaffolding linked to open-ended problems in a digital learning environment. ZDM 49, 5 (2017), 735–753.
[4]
[4] AWS Educate. 2021. https://aws.amazon.com/education/awseducate/, Last accessed on 2021-05-1.
[5]
S. Fincher and M. Petre. 1998. Project-based learning practices in computer science education. In Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 3. 1185–1191. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1998.738607
[6]
Maria Lydia Fioravanti, Bruno Sena, Leo Natan Paschoal, Laíza R. Silva, Ana P. Allian, Elisa Y. Nakagawa, Simone R.S. Souza, Seiji Isotani, and Ellen F. Barbosa. 2018. Integrating Project Based Learning and Project Management for Software Engineering Teaching: An Experience Report. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’18). ACM, 806–811.
[7]
Susan R. Fisk, Tiah Wingate, Lina Battestilli, and Kathryn T. Stolee. 2021. Increasing Women’s Persistence in Computer Science by Decreasing Gendered Self-Assessments of Computing Ability. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (Virtual Event, Germany) (ITiCSE ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430665.3456374
[8]
Cindy E Hmelo-Silver, Ravit Golan Duncan, and Clark A Chinn. 2007. Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational psychologist 42, 2 (2007), 99–107.
[9]
Chris Kerslake and Ouldooz Baghban Karimi. 2021. Project-Based Learning of Web Systems Architecture. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2 (Virtual Event, Germany) (ITiCSE ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 656. https://doi.org/10.1145/3456565.3460067
[10]
Dimitra Kokotsaki, Victoria Menzies, and Andy Wiggins. 2016. Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools 19, 3 (2016), 267–277.
[11]
J. S. Krajcik and P. Blumenfeld. 2005. Project-based learning. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, R. K. Sawyer (Ed.). Cambridge, New York, Chapter 19, 317–333.
[12]
Christopher Lange, Jamie Costley, and Seung Lock Han. 2016. Informal cooperative learning in small groups: The effect of scaffolding on participation. Issues in educational research 26, 2 (2016), 260–279.
[13]
Katherine Mcneill, David Lizotte, Joseph Krajcik, and Ronald Marx. 2006. Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (04 2006), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
[14]
Javier Melero Gallardo, Davinia Hernández Leo, and Josep Blat. 2012. A review of constructivist learning methods with supporting tooling in ict higher education: Defining different types of scaffolding. (2012).
[15]
Julie E Mills and David F Treagust. 2003. Engineering education: Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian journal of engineering education 3, 2 (2003), 2–16.
[16]
Roy Pea. 2004. The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (07 2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6
[17]
Beatriz Pérez and Ángel L. Rubio. 2020. A Project-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing Learning Skills and Motivation in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Portland, OR, USA) (SIGCSE ’20). ACM, 309–315.
[18]
Jantien Smit, Henriëtte A. A. van Eerde, and Arthur Bakker. 2013. A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British educational research journal 39, 5 (2013), 817–834.
[19]
Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG) Program. 2020-2021. G0422: Specification and Scaffolding in Project-Based Learning of Systems Architecture. https://www.sfu.ca/istld/faculty/programs/projects/fas/G0422.html, Last accessed on 2023-04-23.
[20]
Charles Thevathayan. 2018. Evolving Project Based Learning to Suit Diverse Student Cohorts. In International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (Christchurch, New Zealand) (EASE’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210459.3210472
[21]
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[22]
Ünal Çakiroğlu and Turgay Erdemir. 2019. Online project based learning via cloud computing: exploring roles of instructor and students. Interactive learning environments 27, 4 (2019), 547–566.
Index Terms
- Specification and Scaffolding in Project-Based Learning of Systems Architecture
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Learning from achievement: scaffolding student projects in software engineering
It has become almost a truism that students learn more from working on projects than from lectures. This is reflected in pedagogical approaches such as Problem-based Learning, Project-based Learning (PBL) and Work-based Learning. A problem in PBL, ...
Project-based Learning of Web Systems Architecture
ITiCSE '21: Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2Effective technical communication, collaboration, and leadership are among essential skills required from computer scientists. Project-based learning using open-ended projects is praised for fostering these skills in the context of software development. ...
Impact of technology-enabled project-based assessments on learner outcomes in higher education
The classroom based applied-research explores a shift towards technology-enabled formative and summative project-based assessments as a replacement to campus-based assessments conducted in the context of polytechnics in Singapore. The investigation ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 19 July 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- SFU Transforming Inquiry into Learning and Teaching (TILT)
Conference
WCCCE '23
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 78 of 117 submissions, 67%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 23Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)19
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 11 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format