research-article

Exploring Users' Pointing Performance on Virtual and Physical Large Curved Displays

Authors:

A K M Amanat Ullah,

William Delamare,

Khalad HasanAuthors Info & Claims

VRST '23: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology

Article No.: 7, Pages 1 - 11

https://doi.org/10.1145/3611659.3615710

Published: 09 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Large curved displays have emerged as a powerful platform for collaboration, data visualization, and entertainment. These displays provide highly immersive experiences, a wider field of view, and higher satisfaction levels. Yet, large curved displays are not commonly available due to their high costs. With the recent advancement of Head Mounted Displays (HMDs), large curved displays can be simulated in Virtual Reality (VR) with minimal cost and space requirements. However, to consider the virtual display as an alternative to the physical display, it is necessary to uncover user performance differences (e.g., pointing speed and accuracy) between these two platforms. In this paper, we explored users’ pointing performance on both physical and virtual large curved displays. Specifically, with two studies, we investigate users’ performance between the two platforms for standard pointing factors such as target width, target amplitude as well as users’ position relative to the screen. Results from user studies reveal no significant difference in pointing performance between the two platforms when users are located at the same position relative to the screen. In addition, we observe users’ pointing performance improves when they are located at the center of a semi-circular display compared to off-centered positions. We conclude by outlining design implications for pointing on large curved virtual displays. These findings show that large curved virtual displays are a viable alternative to physical displays for pointing tasks.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File

Video - short version

Download
32.05 MB

MP4 File

Teaser-29secs

Download
4.93 MB

References

[1]

Sung Hee Ahn, Byungki Jin, Sanghyun Kwon, and Myung Hwan Yun. 2014. A research on curved display comparing to flat display regarding posture, tilt angle, focusing area and satisfaction. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea 33, 3 (2014), 191–202.

[2]

TLX @ NASA Ames. 2023. Home.Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/tlx/.

[3]

Christopher Andrews, Alex Endert, Beth Yost, and Chris North. 2011. Information visualization on large, high-resolution displays: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Information Visualization 10, 4 (2011), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611415997 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611415997

Digital Library

[4]

Carmelo Ardito, Paolo Buono, Maria Francesca Costabile, and Giuseppe Desolda. 2015. Interaction with Large Displays: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 3, Article 46 (feb 2015), 38 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2682623

Digital Library

[5]

Teo Babic, Harald Reiterer, and Michael Haller. 2018. Pocket6: A 6DoF Controller Based On A Simple Smartphone Application. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Berlin, Germany) (SUI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267782.3267785

Digital Library

[6]

Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Moaaz Hudhud Mughrabi, Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2022. Effect of Stereo Deficiencies on Virtual Distal Pointing. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Tsukuba, Japan) (VRST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3562939.3565621

Digital Library

[7]

Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca, Duc Minh Pham, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2019. Do Head-Mounted Display Stereo Deficiencies Affect 3D Pointing Tasks in AR and VR?. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797975

[8]

Patrick Baudisch, Nathaniel Good, and Paul Stewart. 2001. Focus plus Context Screens: Combining Display Technology with Visualization Techniques. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Orlando, Florida) (UIST ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/502348.502354

Digital Library

[9]

Jeremy P. Birnholtz, Tovi Grossman, Clarissa Mak, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. An Exploratory Study of Input Configuration and Group Process in a Negotiation Task Using a Large Display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240638

Digital Library

[10]

Lizhou Cao, Chao Peng, and Jeffery T. Hansberger. 2019. A Large Curved Display System in Virtual Reality for Immersive Data Interaction. In 2019 IEEE Games, Entertainment, Media Conference (GEM). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM.2019.8811550

[11]

SK Card, JD Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman. 1999. Information Visualization. Readings in Information Visualization.

[12]

Stuart K. Card, William K. English, and Betty J. Burr. 1978. Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 8 (1978), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931762 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931762

[13]

Marco Cavallo, Mishal Dholakia, Matous Havlena, Kenneth Ocheltree, and Mark Podlaseck. 2019. Dataspace: A Reconfigurable Hybrid Reality Environment for Collaborative Information Analysis. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797733

[14]

Sohan Chowdhury, A K M Amanat Ullah, Nathan Bruce Pelmore, Pourang Irani, and Khalad Hasan. 2022. Wriarm: Leveraging wrist movement to design wrist+ arm based teleportation in vr. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 317–325.

[15]

Andy Cockburn, Amy Karlson, and Benjamin B. Bederson. 2009. A Review of Overview+detail, Zooming, and Focus+context Interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 1, Article 2 (jan 2009), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456650.1456652

Digital Library

[16]

Edward RFW Crossman. 1956. The measurement of perceptual load in manual operations. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Birmingham.

[17]

Joachim Deisinger, Carolina Cruz-Neira, Oliver Riedel, and Jürgen Symanzik. 1997. The Effect of Different Viewing Devices for the Sense of Presence of Immersion in Virtual Environments: A Comparison of Stereoprojections Based on Monitors, HMDs and Screens. In HCI (2). 881–884.

[18]

Barrett Ens, David Ahlström, and Pourang Irani. 2016. Moving Ahead with Peephole Pointing: Modelling Object Selection with Head-Worn Display Field of View Limitations. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Tokyo, Japan) (SUI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2983310.2985756

Digital Library

[19]

Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of experimental psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392

[20]

Paul M Fitts. 1992. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121, 3 (1992), 262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262

[21]

Google. 2023. Firebase realtime database: store and SYNC data in Real time. Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://firebase.google.com/products/realtime-database.

[22]

Tovi Grossman and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Pointing at Trivariate Targets in 3D Environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985749

Digital Library

[23]

John Paulin Hansen, Vijay Rajanna, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Per Bækgaard. 2018. A Fitts’ Law Study of Click and Dwell Interaction by Gaze, Head and Mouse with a Head-Mounted Display. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Communication by Gaze Interaction (Warsaw, Poland) (COGAIN ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206343.3206344

Digital Library

[24]

Faizan Haque, Mathieu Nancel, and Daniel Vogel. 2015. Myopoint: Pointing and Clicking Using Forearm Mounted Electromyography and Inertial Motion Sensors. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3653–3656. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702133

Digital Library

[25]

Fabian Hennecke, Alexander De Luca, Ngo Dieu Huong Nguyen, Sebastian Boring, and Andreas Butz. 2013. Investigating Pointing Tasks across Angularly Coupled Display Areas. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 720–727.

[26]

ERROL R. HOFFMANN. 1995. Effective target tolerance in an inverted Fitts task. Ergonomics 38, 4 (1995), 828–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925153 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925153

[27]

Errol R. Hoffmann, Colin G. Drury, and Carol J. Romanowski. 2011. Performance in one-, two- and three-dimensional terminal aiming tasks. Ergonomics 54, 12 (2011), 1175–1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.614356 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.614356PMID: 22103725.

[28]

Errol R Hoffmann and Ilyas H Sheikh. 1994. Effect of varying target height in a Fitts’ movement task. Ergonomics 37, 6 (1994), 1071–1088.

[29]

Juan Pablo Hourcade and Natasha Bullock-Rest. 2012. How Small Can You Go? Analyzing the Effect of Visual Angle in Pointing Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207706

Digital Library

[30]

ISO ISO. 2000. 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (FDIS-Final Draft International Standard), 2000. International Organization for Standardization (2000).

[31]

Izabelle Janzen, Vasanth K. Rajendran, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2016. Modeling the Impact of Depth on Pointing Performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858244

Digital Library

[32]

J. Adam Jones, J. Edward Swan, Gurjot Singh, Eric Kolstad, and Stephen R. Ellis. 2008. The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Motion Parallax on Egocentric Depth Perception. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (Los Angeles, California) (APGV ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394281.1394283

Digital Library

[33]

Ricardo Jota, Miguel A. Nacenta, Joaquim A. Jorge, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. A Comparison of Ray Pointing Techniques for Very Large Displays. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010 (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) (GI ’10). Canadian Information Processing Society, CAN, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.5555/1839214.1839261

Digital Library

[34]

Eng Tat Khoo, Tim Merritt, and Adrian David Cheok. 2008. Designing physical and social intergenerational family entertainment. Interacting with Computers 21, 1-2 (11 2008), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.10.009 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/21/1-2/76/2164289/iwc21-0076.pdf

Digital Library

[35]

G.V. Kondraske. 1994. An angular motion Fitt’s Law for human performance modeling and prediction. In Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vol. 1. 307–308 vol.1. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1994.412031

[36]

Regis Kopper, Doug A. Bowman, Mara G. Silva, and Ryan P. McMahan. 2010. A human motor behavior model for distal pointing tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 10 (2010), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.001

Digital Library

[37]

Régis Augusto Poli Kopper. 2011. Understanding and improving distal pointing interaction. Ph. D. Dissertation. Virginia Tech. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28183

[38]

AJ Kovacs, JJ Buchanan, and CH Shea. 2008. Perceptual influences on Fitts’ law. Experimental Brain Research 190, 1 (2008), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1497-3

[39]

Alexander Kulik, André Kunert, and Bernd Froehlich. 2020. On Motor Performance in Virtual 3D Object Manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 5 (2020), 2041–2050. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.2973034

[40]

Gyouhyung Kyung and Sungryul Park. 2021. Curved versus flat monitors: Interactive effects of display curvature radius and display size on visual search performance and visual fatigue. Human Factors 63, 7 (2021), 1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820922717

[41]

Jan Leusmann and Sven Mayer Katrin Angerbauer. 2021. A literature review on distant object selection methods. (2021). https://doi.org/10.18419/opus-12060

[42]

Lars Lischke, Valentin Schwind, Kai Friedrich, Albrecht Schmidt, and Niels Henze. 2016. MAGIC-Pointing on Large High-Resolution Displays. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1706–1712. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892479

Digital Library

[43]

Jiazhou Liu, Arnaud Prouzeau, Barrett Ens, and Tim Dwyer. 2020. Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00081

[44]

Jiazhou Liu, Arnaud Prouzeau, Barrett Ens, and Tim Dwyer. 2022. Effects of Display Layout on Spatial Memory for Immersive Environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, ISS (2022), 468–488.

Digital Library

[45]

Mingyu Liu, Mathieu Nancel, and Daniel Vogel. 2015. Gunslinger: Subtle Arms-down Mid-Air Interaction. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807489

Digital Library

[46]

I. Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, 1 (mar 1992), 91–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3

Digital Library

[47]

I. Scott MacKenzie and William Buxton. 1992. Extending Fitts’ Law to Two-Dimensional Tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Monterey, California, USA) (CHI ’92). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142794

Digital Library

[48]

Mechdyne. 2023. Mechdyne Corporation. Retrieved June 15, 2023 from https://www.mechdyne.com/.

[49]

Meta. 2023. Meta quest 2: Advanced all-in-one VR headset.Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://www.meta.com/gb/en/quest/products/quest-2.

[50]

Abdeldjallil Naceri, Ryad Chellali, Fabien Dionnet, and Simone Toma. 2010. Depth perception within virtual environments: comparison between two display technologies. International Journ. on Advances in Intelligent Systems 3 (2010).

[51]

Mathieu Nancel, Olivier Chapuis, Emmanuel Pietriga, Xing-Dong Yang, Pourang P. Irani, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2013. High-Precision Pointing on Large Wall Displays Using Small Handheld Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470773

Digital Library

[52]

Jasminko Novak, Mattias Aggeler, and Gerhard Schwabe. 2008. Designing Large-Display Workspaces for Cooperative Travel Consultancy. In CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI EA ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2877–2882. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358777

Digital Library

[53]

OptiTrack. 2023. OptiTrack - Motion Capture Systems. Retrieved June 15, 2023 from https://optitrack.com/.

[54]

Sungryul Park, Donghee Choi, Jihhyeon Yi, Songil Lee, Ja Eun Lee, Byeonghwa Choi, Seungbae Lee, and Gyouhyung Kyung. 2017. Effects of display curvature, display zone, and task duration on legibility and visual fatigue during visual search task. Applied Ergonomics 60 (2017), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.012

[55]

Sungryul Park, Gyouhyung Kyung, Donghee Choi, Jihhyeon Yi, Songil Lee, Byeonghwa Choi, and Seungbae Lee. 2019. Effects of display curvature and task duration on proofreading performance, visual discomfort, visual fatigue, mental workload, and user satisfaction. Applied Ergonomics 78 (2019), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.014

[56]

Robert G. Radwin, Gregg C. Vanderheiden, and Mei-Li Lin. 1990. A Method for Evaluating Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices Using Fitts’ Law. Human Factors 32, 4 (1990), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089003200405 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089003200405PMID: 2150065.

Digital Library

[57]

Arvind Satyanarayan, Daniel Strazzulla, Clemens N. Klokmose, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2013. The CHI 2013 Interactive Schedule. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2987–2990. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479591

Digital Library

[58]

Jürgen Scheible and Timo Ojala. 2005. MobiLenin Combining a Multi-Track Music Video, Personal Mobile Phones and a Public Display into Multi-User Interactive Entertainment. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (Hilton, Singapore) (MULTIMEDIA ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1145/1101149.1101178

Digital Library

[59]

Sarah Sharples, Sue Cobb, Amanda Moody, and John R. Wilson. 2008. Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays 29, 2 (2008), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005 Health and Safety Aspects of Visual Displays.

[60]

Mengdi Shi, Tao Hu, and Jiawen Yu. 2022. Pointing Cursor Interaction in Virtual Reality from the Perspective of Distance Perception.Traitement du Signal 39, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18280/ts.390209

[61]

Garth Shoemaker, Takayuki Tsukitani, Yoshifumi Kitamura, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2012. Two-Part Models Capture the Impact of Gain on Pointing Performance. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 4, Article 28 (dec 2012), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2395131.2395135

Digital Library

[62]

Lauren Shupp, Christopher Andrews, Margaret Dickey-Kurdziolek, Beth Yost, and Chris North. 2009. Shaping the display of the future: The effects of display size and curvature on user performance and insights. Human–Computer Interaction 24, 1-2 (2009), 230–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020902739429

[63]

Shaishav Siddhpuria, Sylvain Malacria, Mathieu Nancel, and Edward Lank. 2018. Pointing at a Distance with Everyday Smart Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173747

Digital Library

[64]

R. William Soukoreff and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61, 6 (2004), 751–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001 Fitts’ law 50 years later: applications and contributions from human-computer interaction.

Digital Library

[65]

Tomomi Takashina, Mitsuru Ito, Hitoshi Nagaura, and Eisuke Wakabayashi. 2021. Evaluation of Curved Raycasting-based Interactive Surfaces in Virtual Environments. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 534–535. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00149

[66]

Da Tao, Xiaofeng Diao, Tieyan Wang, Jingya Guo, and Xingda Qu. 2021. Freehand interaction with large displays: Effects of body posture, interaction distance and target size on task performance, perceived usability and workload. Applied Ergonomics 93 (2021), 103370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103370

[67]

Unity technologies. 2023. Unity Real-Time Development Platform | 2D, 3D, VR & AR Engine.Retrieved January 15, 2023 from https://unity.com/.

[68]

Eleftherios Triantafyllidis and Zhibin Li. 2021. The Challenges in Modeling Human Performance in 3D Space with Fitts’ Law. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 56, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3443442

Digital Library

[69]

A K M Amanat Ullah, William Delamare, and Khalad Hasan. 2023. Exploring Users Pointing Performance on Large Displays with Different Curvatures in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023).

[70]

Jacqueline Urakami, Henrique Matulis, Shio Miyafuji, Zhengqing Li, Hideki Koike, and Mark Chignell. 2021. Comparing immersiveness and perceptibility of spherical and curved displays. Applied Ergonomics 90 (2021), 103271.

[71]

Xinyong Zhang, Hongbin Zha, and Wenxin Feng. 2012. Extending Fitts’ Law to Account for the Effects of Movement Direction on 2d Pointing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3185–3194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208737

Digital Library

Cited By

Sultana SAlam M(2024)Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR DisplaysProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670984(1-11)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670947.3670984
Sultana SAlam A(2024)Investigating the Effects of Display Layouts on Text Readability in Virtual Reality2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00207(821-822)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00207
Ullah ADelamare WHasan K(2023)Exploring Users Pointing Performance on Large Displays with Different Curvatures in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332024229:11(4535-4545)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3320242

Index Terms

Exploring Users' Pointing Performance on Virtual and Physical Large Curved Displays
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Exploring the effect of display size on pointing performance
ITS '13: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces

In this paper, we studied how display size affects human pointing performance given the same display field of view when using a mouse device. In total, four display sizes (10.6, 27, 46, 55 inches) and three display field of views (20°, 34° and 45°) were ...
Calibrating multi-projector cylindrically curved displays for "wallpaper" projection
PROCAMS '08: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Workshop on Projector camera systems

This paper presents a novel algorithm for calibrating multiple casually placed projectors, via a single uncalibrated camera, to produce a "wallpaper" projection, which is equivalent to printing a single image onto a flat sheet of paper and pasting it to ...
Towards understanding spontaneous interaction on curved displays
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Vertically curved displays feature a curved segment that seamlessly combines a horizontal with a vertical display segment. A potential application domain for such displays is their use in public settings. We created a quiz game on our curved display and ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

VRST '23: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology

October 2023

542 pages

ISBN:9798400703287

DOI:10.1145/3611659

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 October 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

NSERC Discovery Grant

Conference

VRST 2023

Sponsor:

VRST 2023: 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology

October 9 - 11, 2023

Christchurch, New Zealand

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
229
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)229
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13

Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sultana SAlam M(2024)Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR DisplaysProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670984(1-11)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3670947.3670984
Sultana SAlam A(2024)Investigating the Effects of Display Layouts on Text Readability in Virtual Reality2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00207(821-822)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00207
Ullah ADelamare WHasan K(2023)Exploring Users Pointing Performance on Large Displays with Different Curvatures in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332024229:11(4535-4545)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3320242

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents