Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3613905.3651891acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Conversational AI in health: Design considerations from a Wizard-of-Oz dermatology case study with users, clinicians and a medical LLM

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 May 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although skin concerns are common, access to specialist care is limited. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools to support medical decisions may provide patients with feedback on their concerns while also helping ensure the most urgent cases are routed to dermatologists. Although AI-based conversational agents have been explored recently, how they are perceived by patients and clinicians is not well understood. We conducted a Wizard-of-Oz study involving 18 participants with real skin concerns. Participants were randomly assigned to interact with either a clinician agent (portrayed by a dermatologist) or an LLM agent (supervised by a dermatologist) via synchronous multimodal chat. In both conditions, participants found the conversation to be helpful in understanding their medical situation and alleviate their concerns. Through qualitative coding of the conversation transcripts, we provide insight on the importance of empathy and effective information-seeking. We conclude with design considerations for future AI-based conversational agents in healthcare settings.

Footnotes

  1. Both authors contributed equally.

  2. Both authors advised equally.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3613905.3651891-talk-video.mp4

Talk Video

mp4

24.4 MB

References

  1. Dominique Ansell, James A G Crispo, Benjamin Simard, and Lise M Bjerre. 2017. Interventions to reduce wait times for primary care appointments: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17, 1 (April 2017), 295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Gopi J Astik, Nita Kulkarni, Rachel M Cyrus, Chen Yeh, and Kevin J O’Leary. 2021. Implementation of a triage nurse role and the effect on hospitalist workload. Hospital Practice 49, 5 (2021), 336–340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Adam Baker, Yura Perov, Katherine Middleton, Janie Baxter, Daniel Mullarkey, Davinder Sangar, Mobasher Butt, Arnold DoRosario, and Saurabh Johri. 2020. A comparison of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosis. Frontiers in artificial intelligence 3 (2020), 543405.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Neeli M Bendapudi, Leonard L Berry, Keith A Frey, Janet Turner Parish, and William L Rayburn. 2006. Patients’ perspectives on ideal physician behaviors. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 81. Elsevier, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, England, UK, 338–344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. PA Cameron, Belinda Jane Gabbe, Karen Smith, and Biswadev Mitra. 2014. Triaging the right patient to the right place in the shortest time. British journal of anaesthesia 113, 2 (2014), 226–233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolin Cao, Shiyi Huang, and Weiming Tang. 2024. AI triage or manual triage? Exploring medical staffs’ preference for AI triage in China. Patient Education and Counseling 119 (2024), 108076.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Deborah Cline, Carolyn Reilly, and Jayne F Moore. 2004. What’s behind RN turnover?: Uncover the “real reason” nurses leave. Holistic Nursing Practice 18, 1 (2004), 45–48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mukhamad Fathoni, Hathairat Sangchan, and Praneed Songwathana. 2013. Relationships between triage knowledge, training, working experiences and triage skills among emergency nurses in East Java, Indonesia. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing 3, 1 (2013), 511–525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Thomas B Fitzpatrick. 1988. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of dermatology 124, 6 (1988), 869–871.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Karen A Funk and Malia Davis. 2015. Enhancing the role of the nurse in primary care: the RN “co-visit” model. Journal of general internal medicine 30, 12 (2015), 1871–1873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Aidan Gilson, Conrad W Safranek, Thomas Huang, Vimig Socrates, Ling Chi, Richard Andrew Taylor, David Chartash, 2023. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States medical licensing examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education 9, 1 (2023), e45312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Katelyn R Glines, Wasim Haidari, Leena Ramani, Zeynep M Akkurt, and Steven R Feldman. 2020. Digital future of dermatology. Dermatology online journal 26, 10 (2020), N/A.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Derek Haggett. 2022. N.B. woman shocked at four-year wait time to see dermatologist. https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/n-b-woman-shocked-at-four-year-wait-time-to-see-dermatologist-1.5975452. Accessed: 2023-11-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Eunkyung Jo, Daniel A. Epstein, Hyunhoon Jung, and Young-Ho Kim. 2023. Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Deploying Conversational AI Leveraging Large Language Models for Public Health Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany,) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. William R. Kearns, Neha Kaura, Myra Divina, Cuong Vo, Dong Si, Teresa Ward, and Weichao Yuwen. 2020. A Wizard-of-Oz Interface and Persona-based Methodology for Collecting Health Counseling Dialog. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Honolulu, HI, USA,) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382902Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rafal Kocielnik, Elena Agapie, Alexander Argyle, Dennis T Hsieh, Kabir Yadav, Breena Taira, and Gary Hsieh. 2019. HarborBot: a chatbot for social needs screening. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 2019. American Medical Informatics Association, American Medical Informatics Association, USA, 552.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Liliana Laranjo, Adam G Dunn, Huong Ly Tong, Ahmet Baki Kocaballi, Jessica Chen, Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Blanca Gallego, Farah Magrabi, Annie YS Lau, 2018. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 25, 9 (2018), 1248–1258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Brenna Li, Tetyana Skoropad, Puneet Seth, Mohit Jain, Khai Truong, and Alex Mariakakis. 2023. Constraints and Workarounds to Support Clinical Consultations in Synchronous Text-based Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany,) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 342, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Society of Dermatology Physician Assistants. 2023. Patients Are Waiting: America’s Dermatology Wait Times Crisis. https://www.dermpa.org/page/GAPP. Accessed: 2023-11-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vikas N O’Reilly-Shah. 2017. Factors influencing healthcare provider respondent fatigue answering a globally administered in-app survey. PeerJ 5 (2017), e3785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Maria Panagioti, Efharis Panagopoulou, Peter Bower, George Lewith, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Shoba Dawson, Harm Van Marwijk, Keith Geraghty, and Aneez Esmail. 2017. Controlled interventions to reduce burnout in physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA internal medicine 177, 2 (2017), 195–205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Marisa Shrimpling. 2002. Redesigning triage to reduce waiting times. Emerg. Nurse 10, 2 (May 2002), 34–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S Sara Mahdavi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, 2023. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature 620, 7972 (2023), 172–180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Karan Singhal, Tao Tu, Juraj Gottweis, Rory Sayres, Ellery Wulczyn, Le Hou, Kevin Clark, Stephen Pfohl, Heather Cole-Lewis, Darlene Neal, Mike Schaekermann, Amy Wang, Mohamed Amin, Sami Lachgar, Philip Mansfield, Sushant Prakash, Bradley Green, Ewa Dominowska, Blaise Aguera y Arcas, Nenad Tomasev, Yun Liu, Renee Wong, Christopher Semturs, S. Sara Mahdavi, Joelle Barral, Dale Webster, Greg S. Corrado, Yossi Matias, Shekoofeh Azizi, Alan Karthikesalingam, and Vivek Natarajan. 2023. Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Models. arxiv:2305.09617 [cs.CL]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Augustin Toma, Patrick R Lawler, Jimmy Ba, Rahul G Krishnan, Barry B Rubin, and Bo Wang. 2023. Clinical Camel: An Open-Source Expert-Level Medical Language Model with Dialogue-Based Knowledge Encoding.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Conversational AI in health: Design considerations from a Wizard-of-Oz dermatology case study with users, clinicians and a medical LLM

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 2024
          4761 pages
          ISBN:9798400703317
          DOI:10.1145/3613905

          Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 May 2024

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Work in Progress
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI PLAY '24
          The Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
          October 14 - 17, 2024
          Tampere , Finland
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)516
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)516

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format