Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3626705.3631789acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Through the Looking Glass: The Role of Virtual Mirrors in Shaping Empathy in Virtual Reality Perspective Taking

Published: 03 December 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In this study, we explored the effect of seeing one’s avatar in a virtual mirror during a virtual reality (VR) perspective taking experience. Participants were divided into two groups, with one experiencing the VR environment with the presence of a mirror showcasing their avatar and the other without. Results revealed that the sense of presence was comparable across both groups. However, a notable difference emerged in terms of empathy; participants who viewed their avatars in the mirror exhibited reduced empathic responses. These findings illuminate the nuanced dynamics of self-representation in virtual environments, suggesting that inducing self-awareness through a virtual mirror in VR might have unintended emotional consequences.

    References

    [1]
    Domna Banakou, Parasuram D Hanumanthu, and Mel Slater. 2016. Virtual embodiment of white people in a black virtual body leads to a sustained reduction in their implicit racial bias. Frontiers in human neuroscience (2016), 601.
    [2]
    Domna Banakou, Sameer Kishore, and Mel Slater. 2018. Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 917.
    [3]
    C Daniel Batson, Shannon Early, and Giovanni Salvarani. 1997. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and social psychology bulletin 23, 7 (1997), 751–758.
    [4]
    Victoria Groom, Jeremy N Bailenson, and Clifford Nass. 2009. The influence of racial embodiment on racial bias in immersive virtual environments. Social Influence 4, 3 (2009), 231–248.
    [5]
    D Fox Harrell and S Veeragoudar Harrell. 2012. Imagination, computation, and self-expression: Situated character and avatar mediated identity. Leonardo electronic almanac 17, 2 (2012).
    [6]
    D Fox Harrell and Chong-U Lim. 2017. Reimagining the avatar dream: Modeling social identity in digital media. Commun. ACM 60, 7 (2017), 50–61.
    [7]
    Fernanda Herrera, Jeremy Bailenson, Erika Weisz, Elise Ogle, and Jamil Zaki. 2018. Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PloS one 13, 10 (2018), e0204494.
    [8]
    Fernanda Herrera and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2021. Virtual reality perspective-taking at scale: Effect of avatar representation, choice, and head movement on prosocial behaviors. new media & society 23, 8 (2021), 2189–2209.
    [9]
    Lara Maister, Natalie Sebanz, Günther Knoblich, and Manos Tsakiris. 2013. Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition 128, 2 (2013), 170–178.
    [10]
    A Nikolaou, A Schwabe, and H Boomgaarden. 2022. Changing social attitudes with virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of the International Communication Association 46, 1 (2022), 30–61.
    [11]
    Soo Youn Oh, Jeremy Bailenson, Erika Weisz, and Jamil Zaki. 2016. Virtually old: Embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat. Computers in Human Behavior 60 (2016), 398–410.
    [12]
    Tabitha C Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M Aglioti, and Mel Slater. 2013. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and cognition 22, 3 (2013), 779–787.
    [13]
    Thomas Schubert, Frank Friedmann, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10, 3 (2001), 266–281.
    [14]
    Mel Slater and Martin Usoh. 1993. Presence in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE virtual reality annual international symposium. IEEE, 90–96.
    [15]
    Hui-Hsuan Tsao, Xin Lei, and Pei-Luen Patrick Rau. 2020. Design, development, and evaluation of a virtual aging simulation system. Educational Gerontology 46, 6 (2020), 317–330.
    [16]
    Austin Van Loon, Jeremy Bailenson, Jamil Zaki, Joshua Bostick, and Robb Willer. 2018. Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PloS one 13, 8 (2018), e0202442.
    [17]
    Nick Yee and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2006. Walk a mile in digital shoes: The impact of embodied perspective-taking on the reduction of negative stereotyping in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings of PRESENCE 24 (2006), 26.
    [18]
    Caglar Yildirim and D Fox Harrell. 2022. On the Plane: A Roleplaying Game for Simulating Ingroup-Outgroup Biases in Virtual Reality. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR). IEEE, 207–209.

    Index Terms

    1. Through the Looking Glass: The Role of Virtual Mirrors in Shaping Empathy in Virtual Reality Perspective Taking

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '23: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      December 2023
      607 pages
      ISBN:9798400709210
      DOI:10.1145/3626705
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 03 December 2023

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. VR perspective taking
      2. empathy
      3. looking in the mirror
      4. mirrors

      Qualifiers

      • Poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      MUM '23

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 48
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media