Platformization of Inequality: Gender and Race in Digital Labor Platforms
Article No.: 108, Pages 1 - 22
Abstract
We contribute empirical and conceptual insights regarding the roles of digital labor platforms in online freelancing, focusing attention to social identities such as gender, race, ethnicity, and occupation. Findings highlight how digital labor platforms reinforce and exacerbate identity-based stereotypes, bias and expectations in online freelance work. We focus on online freelancing as this form of working arrangement is becoming more prevalent. Online freelancing also relies on the market-making power of digital platforms to create an online labor market. Many see this as one likely future of work with less bias. Others worry that labor platforms' market power allows them to embed known biases into new working arrangements: a platformization of inequality. Drawing on data from 108 online freelancers, we discuss six findings: 1) female freelance work is undervalued; 2) gendered occupational expectations; 3) gendered treatment; 4) shared expectations of differential values; 5) racial stereotypes and expectations; and 6) race and ethnicity as an asset. We discuss the role of design in the platformization and visibility of social identity dimensions, and the implications of the reinforced identity perceptions and marginalization in digital labor platforms.
References
[1]
[n. d.]. 53 Million Americans Now Freelance, New Study Finds. https://www.upwork.com/press/releases/53-million-americans-now-freelance-new- study-finds-2. https://www.upwork.com/press/releases/53-million-americans-now-freelance-new-study-finds-2 Accessed: 2022--4--19.
[2]
[n.d.]. Upwork Study Finds 60 Million Americans Freelancing in 2022. https://www.upwork.com/press/releases/freelance-forward-upwork-study-finds-60-million-americans-freelancing-in-2022 Accessed: 2023--1--14.
[3]
[n. d.]. World Employment Social Outlook 2021: The role of digital labour platforms in transforming the world of work. https://www.ilo.org/digitalguides/en-gb/story/world-employment-social-outlook-2021#introduction/women-stand. https://www.ilo.org/digitalguides/en-gb/story/ world-employment-social-outlook-2021#introduction/women-stand Accessed: 2022--12--29.
[4]
2021. 2021 Freelance Forward Economist Report. Technical Report. Edelman Intelligence. https://www.upwork.com/research/freelance-forward-2021.
[5]
2021. Racial and ethnic differences stand out in the U.S. gig workforce. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/12/15/racial-and-ethnic-differences-stand-out-in-the-u-s-gig-workforce/. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/12/15/racial-and-ethnic-differences-stand-out-in- the-u-s-gig-workforce/ Accessed: 2022--3--8.
[6]
Mats Alvesson. 2004. Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms. OUP Oxford. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=deUSruSwCZYC.
[7]
Ira Anjali Anwar, Joyojeet Pal, and Julie Hui. 2021. Watched, but Moving: Platformization of Beauty Work and Its Gendered Mechanisms of Control. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3 (Jan. 2021), 1--20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432949.
[8]
Mohammad Amir Anwar and Mark Graham. 2020. Hidden transcripts of the gig economy: labour agency and the new art of resistance among African gig workers. Environ. Plan. A 52, 7 (Oct. 2020), 1269--1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19894584.
[9]
Stephen R Barley and Gideon Kunda. 2006. Contracting: A New Form of Professional Practice. AMP 20, 1 (Feb. 2006), 45--66. https://doi.org/10. 5465/amp.2006.19873409.
[10]
A Barzilay. 2019. Discrimination without discriminating: Learned gender inequality in the labor market and gig economy. Cornell J. Law Public Policy 28, 3 (2019), 545--568.
[11]
A Barzilay. 2019. The Technologies of Discrimination: How Platforms Cultivate Gender Inequality. Law & Ethics of Human Rights 13, 2 (2019), 179--202.
[12]
Arianne Renan Barzilay and Anat Ben-David. 2016. Platform inequality: Gender in the gig-economy. Seton Hall Law Rev. 47 (2016), 393. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/shlr47§ion=15&casa_token=WT27JDDedqsAAAAA:YPs6_Ntb- TC0S8L1UbkP8uBvhhivhZsnK8R-SZ7XRgWZ21P0oVlUsE7Am3Gz2SjUxBCj-90v5BY.
[13]
Janine Berg, Marianne Furrer, Ellie Harmon, Uma Rani, and M Six Silberman. 2018. Digital labour platforms and the future of work. Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Rapport de l'OIT (2018). http://wtf.tw/text/digital_labour_platforms_and_the_future_of_work.pdf .
[14]
Thor Berger, Carl Benedikt Frey, Guy Levin, and Santosh Rao Danda. 2019. Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ?Gig Economy'. Econ. Policy 34, 99 (July 2019), 429--477. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiz007.
[15]
Frank Blackler. 1995. Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies 16, 6 (Nov. 1995), 1021--1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600605.
[16]
Allie Blaising, Yasmine Kotturi, Chinmay Kulkarni, and Laura Dabbish. 2021. Making it Work, or Not: A Longitudinal Study of Career Trajectories Among Online Freelancers. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3 (Jan. 2021), 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432925.
[17]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10. 1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[18]
Eliane Léontine Bucher, Peter Kalum Schou, and Matthias Waldkirch. 2021. Pacifying the algorithm -- Anticipatory compliance in the face of algorithmic management in the gig economy. Organization (Lond.) 28, 1 (Jan. 2021), 44--67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961531.
[19]
Juan Carlos Alvarez de la Vega, Marta E. Cecchinato, and John Rooksby. 2021. ?Why lose control?" A Study of Freelancers' Experiences with Gig Economy Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21, Article 455). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445305.
[20]
Kimberle Crenshaw. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Rev. 43, 6 (1991), 1241--1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
[21]
Nathaniel Ming Curran. 2020. Intersectional English(es) and the Gig Economy: Teaching English Online. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 14, 0 (May 2020), 20. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11310.
[22]
Nathaniel Ming Curran. 2021. Discrimination in the gig economy: the experiences of Black online English teachers. Language and Education (Oct. 2021), 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1981928.
[23]
T R Dillahunt, X Wang, E Wheeler, H F Cheng, and others. 2017. The sharing economy in computing: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the (2017). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3134673.
[24]
Jan Drahokoupil and Maria Jepsen. 2017. The digital economy and its implications for labour. 1. The platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23, 2 (May 2017), 103--107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701380.
[25]
Michael Dunn, Isabel Munoz, and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2023. Dynamics of flexible work and digital platforms: Task and spatial flexibility in the platform economy. Digital Business 3, 1 (June 2023), 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100052.
[26]
Michael Dunn, Isabel Munoz, and Steve Sawyer. 2021. Gender Differences and Lost Flexibility in Online Freelancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Sociol 6 (Aug. 2021), 738024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.738024.
[27]
Eurofound. 2015. New forms of employment. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2806/012203.
[28]
Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5, 1 (March 2006), 80--92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.
[29]
Eureka Foong and Elizabeth Gerber. 2021. Understanding Gender Differences in Pricing Strategies in Online Labor Marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21, Article 135). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445636.
[30]
Eureka Foong, Nicholas Vincent, Brent Hecht, and Elizabeth M Gerber. 2018. Women (Still) Ask For Less: Gender Differences in Hourly Rate in an Online Labor Marketplace. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018), 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274322.
[31]
Hernan Galperin. 2021. ?This Gig Is Not for Women": Gender Stereotyping in Online Hiring. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 39, 6 (Dec. 2021), 1089--1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319895757.
[32]
Mark Graham, Isis Hjorth, and Vili Lehdonvirta. 2017. Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23, 2 (May 2017), 135--162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250.
[33]
Mary L Gray and Siddharth Suri. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=8AmXDwAAQBAJ.
[34]
François Grin. 2001. English as economic value: facts and fallacies. World Englishes 20, 1 (March 2001), 65--78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467--971x.00196.
[35]
Anikó Hannák, Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Alan Mislove, Markus Strohmaier, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1914--1933. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998327.
[36]
Madeline E Heilman. 2012. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior 32 (Jan. 2012), 113--135. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003.
[37]
Andrea M Herrmann, Petra M Zaal, Maryse M H Chappin, Brita Schemmann, and Amelie Lühmann. 2023. ?We don't need no (higher) education" - How the gig economy challenges the education-income paradigm. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 186 (Jan. 2023), 122136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2022.122136.
[38]
Debra Howcroft and Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn. 2019. A typology of crowdwork platforms. Work Employ. Soc. 33, 1 (Feb. 2019), 21--38. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760136.
[39]
Ursula Huws, Neil H Spencer, and Simon Joyce. 2016. Crowd work in Europe feps studies. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/21934/ crowd_work_in_europe_draft_report_last_version.pdf.
[40]
Basileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova, and John Heidemann. 2021. Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (WWW '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3767--3778. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3450077.
[41]
Al James. 2022. Women in the gig economy: feminising ?digital labour'. Work in the Global Economy 2, 1 (July 2022), 2--26. https://doi.org/10.1332/ 273241721x16448410652000.
[42]
Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Will Sutherland, Sarah Beth Nelson, and Steve Sawyer. 2020. Platformic management, boundary resources for gig work, and worker autonomy. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 29, 1--2 (April 2020), 153--189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09368--7.
[43]
Ria Kasliwal. 2020. Gender and the gig economy: A qualitative study of gig platforms for women workers. Observer Research Foundatio, ORF Issue Brief359 (2020). https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ORF_IssueBrief_359_GenderGig.pdf.
[44]
Otto Kässi and Vili Lehdonvirta. 2018. Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 137 (Dec. 2018), 241--248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.056.
[45]
Otto Kässi, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Fabian Stephany. 2021. How Many Online Workers are there in the World? A Data-Driven Assessment. arXiv:2103.12648 [econ, q-fin, stat] (April 2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12648.
[46]
Siou Chew Kuek, Cecilia Paradi-Guilford, Toks Fayomi, Saori Imaizumi, Panos Ipeirotis, Patricia Pina, and Manpreet Singh. 2015. The global opportunity in online outsourcing. (June 2015). https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/22284.
[47]
Ming D Leung and Sharon Koppman. 2018. Taking a Pass: How Proportional Prejudice and Decisions Not to Hire Reproduce Gender Segregation. 762--813 pages. https://doi.org/10.1086/700677.
[48]
Ning F Ma, Veronica A Rivera, Zheng Yao, and Dongwook Yoon. 2022. ?Brush it Off": How Women Workers Manage and Cope with Bias and Harassment in Gender-agnostic Gig Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22, Article 397). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517524.
[49]
Isabel Munoz. 2023. Marginalization in the Future of Work: The Role of Intersectional Identities and Platforms in the Trajectories of Online Freelancers. Ph. D. Dissertation. Syracuse University. https://search.proquest.com/openview/7a1f6ff17e0406c47df4c7830c16db03/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl= 18750&diss=y.
[50]
Isabel Munoz, Michael Dunn, and Steve Sawyer. 2022. Flexibility, Occupation and Gender: Insights from a Panel Study of Online Freelancers. In Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future. Springer International Publishing, 311--318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-030--96957--8_27.
[51]
Isabel Munoz, Michael Dunn, Steve Sawyer, and Emily Michaels. 2022. Platform-mediated Markets, Online Freelance Workers and Deconstructed Identities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555092.
[52]
Isabel Munoz, Steve Sawyer, and Michael Dunn. 2022. New futures of work or continued marginalization? The rise of online freelance work and digital platforms. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (Durham, NH, USA) (CHIWORK 2022, Article 18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533412.
[53]
Robert A Peterson. 2022. Heterogeneity in the US gig economy with a focus on gender. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 15, 3 (Jan. 2022), 365--384. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2022.122641.
[54]
Amanda Peticca-Harris, Nadia deGama, and M N Ravishankar. 2020. Postcapitalist precarious work and those in the ?drivers' seat: Exploring the motivations and lived experiences of Uber drivers in Canada. 36--59 pages. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418757332.
[55]
Walter W Powell and Kaisa Snellman. 2004. The Knowledge Economy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30 (2004), 199--220. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29737691.
[56]
Joel Ross, Lilly Irani, M Six Silberman, Andrew Zaldivar, and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Who are the crowdworkers? shifting demographics in mechanical turk. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI EA '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2863--2872. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753873.
[57]
Shruti Sannon and Dan Cosley. 2022. Toward a More Inclusive Gig Economy: Risks and Opportunities for Workers with Disabilities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1--31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555755.
[58]
S Sawyer, M Dunn, I Munoz, F Stephany, R Raheja, and others. 2020. Freelancing online during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2020). https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/freelancing-online-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/.
[59]
Andrey Shevchuk and Denis Strebkov. 2018. Safeguards against opportunism in freelance contracting on the internet. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 56, 2 (June 2018), 342--369. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12283.
[60]
Andrey Shevchuk, Denis Strebkov, and Shannon N Davis. 2019. The Autonomy Paradox: How Night Work Undermines Subjective Well-Being of Internet-Based Freelancers. ILR Review 72, 1 (Jan. 2019), 75--100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918767114.
[61]
Ashley Stahl. 2022. Say Goodbye To The 9 To 5: How To Master The Gig Economy. Forbes (Sept. 2022). https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2022/09/02/say-goodbye-to-the-9-to-5-how-to-master-the-gig-economy/.
[62]
Fabian Stephany, Otto Kässi, Uma Rani, and Vili Lehdonvirta. 2021. Online Labour Index 2020: New ways to measure the world's remote freelancing market. Big Data & Society 8, 2 (July 2021), 20539517211043240. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211043240.
[63]
[A Strauss and J M Corbin. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
[64]
Elisabetta Stringhi. 2022. Addressing gendered affordances of the platform economy: The case of UpWork. Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation 11, 1 (2022), 1--28. https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/254272.html.
[65]
Will Sutherland, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Michael Dunn, and Sarah Beth Nelson. 2020. Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing. Work Employ. Soc. 34, 3 (June 2020), 457--475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019886511.
[66]
Susan Trentham and Laurie Larwood. 1998. Gender Discrimination and the Workplace: An Examination of Rational Bias Theory. Sex Roles 38, 1 (Jan. 1998), 1--28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018782226876.
[67]
N Vyas. 2020. Gender inequality- now available on digital platform': an interplay between gender equality and the gig economy in the European Union. European Labour Law Journal (2020).
[68]
Natasha A Webster and Qian Zhang. 2020. Careers Delivered from the Kitchen? Immigrant Women Small-scale Entrepreneurs Working in the Growing Nordic Platform Economy. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 28, 2 (April 2020), 113--125. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08038740.2020.1714725.
[69]
Langdon Winner. 1989. Do Artifacts Have Politics? In The whale and the reactor a search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 19--39. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=557593.
[70]
Alex J Wood, Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. 2019. Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work Employ. Soc. 33, 1 (Feb. 2019), 56--75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.
Index Terms
- Platformization of Inequality: Gender and Race in Digital Labor Platforms
Recommendations
The Influence of Gender-Ethnic Intersectionality on Gender Stereotypes about IT Skills and Knowledge
One line of investigation in attempting to better understand the gender imbalance in the information technology (IT) field is to examine gender stereotypes about the skills and knowledge in the IT profession. A survey of 4046 university students in the ...
Understanding underrepresentation in IT through intersectionality
iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConferenceResults of an investigation of the effect of intersectionality on perceptions of university students about IT careers are presented. This analysis deepens the discussion began at the 2011 iConference by presenting an examination of responses of African ...
Embracing intersectionality in gender and IT career choice research
SIGMIS-CPR '12: Proceedings of the 50th annual conference on Computers and People ResearchResults of an examination of with-gender variation in gender stereotypes about the skills and knowledge in the IT profession demonstrates the value of applying an intersectionality perspective in the study of under represented groups in the IT field. ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 26 April 2024
Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 574Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)574
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)115
Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in