Let Information Flow Into Awareness: A Design Space for Human-Like Experiences to Promote Informal Communication for Hybrid Work
Authors: 
Lu Liu, Harm Van Essen, Berry EggenAuthors Info & Claims
Lu Liu, Harm Van Essen, Berry EggenAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 1666 - 1680
Abstract
This paper addresses the challenges of promoting awareness among coworkers and teams for hybrid work, thereby promoting informal communication. Derived from the merits of onsite experiences, we intend to design human-like experiences to let information naturally flow into awareness. Through annotated portfolios and documented design space schemas, we filtered a design space comprising three aspects: social cues as information carriers, processing information with ambiguity, and ambient information delivery. All aspects are equipped with actionable options. To assess the effectiveness of our design space, we conducted structured workshops with design researchers. Through thematic analysis of workshop data, we informed our design space with one more aspect: built-in lightweight interactions. This design-space thinking process helped us gain an in-depth understanding of human-like experiences and insights into using our design space for ideation.
References
[1]
Wataru Akahori, Naomi Yamashita, Jack Jamieson, Momoko Nakatani, Ryo Hashimoto, and Masahiro Watanabe. 2023. Impacts of the Strength and Conformity of Social Norms on Well-Being: A Mixed-Method Study Among Hybrid Workers in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 870, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581383
[2]
Andrea Alexander, Rich Cracknell, Aaron De Smet, Meredith Langstaff, Mihir Mysore, and Dan Ravid. 2021. What executives are saying about the future of hybrid work. Technical Report. Mckinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/what-executives-are-saying-about-the-future-of-hybrid-work#/
[3]
Okechukwu Ethelbert Amah. 2023. Linking the COVID-19 work experience of SMEs employees to post-COVID-19 superior productivity of SMEs. Journal of the International Council for Small Business 4, 2 (2023), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2021.2019565
[4]
Paul M. Aoki and Allison Woodruff. 2005. Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1054998
[5]
Jose Maria Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, and Steven J. Davis. 2021. Why Working from Home Will Stick. Working Paper 28731. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731
[6]
Michael Mose Biskjaer, Peter Dalsgaard, and Kim Halskov. 2014. A Constraint-Based Understanding of Design Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598533
[7]
Anna Bleakley, Daniel Rough, Justin Edwards, Philip Doyle, Odile Dumbleton, Leigh Clark, Sean Rintel, Vincent Wade, and Benjamin R. Cowan. 2022. Bridging social distance during social distancing: exploring social talk and remote collegiality in video conferencing. Human–Computer Interaction 37, 5 (2022), 404–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1994859
[8]
Kirsten Boehner and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2006. Advancing ambiguity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124789
[9]
Ettore Bolisani, Enrico Scarso, Christine Ipsen, Kathrin Kirchner, and John Paulin Hansen. 2020. Working from home during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and issues. Management & Marketing 15, s1 (2020), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.2478/MMCKS-2020-0027
[10]
Michael Boyle and Saul Greenberg. 2005. The language of privacy: Learning from video media space analysis and design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2 (jun 2005), 328–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067868
[11]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
[12]
Johanna Brewer, Amanda Williams, and Paul Dourish. 2007. A handle on what’s going on: combining tangible interfaces and ambient displays for collaborative groups. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) (TEI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226971
[13]
Derya Ozcelik Buskermolen and Jacques Terken. 2012. Co-constructing stories: a participatory design technique to elicit in-depth user feedback and suggestions about design concepts. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases - Volume 2 (Roskilde, Denmark) (PDC ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348144.2348156
[14]
Maria Charalampous, Christine Anne Grant, and Carlo Tramontano. 2022. “It needs to be the right blend”: a qualitative exploration of remote e-workers’ experience and well-being at work. Employee Relations 44, 2 (2022), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2021-0058
[15]
Jielin Chen and Rudi Stouffs. 2023. The ‘Atlas’ of Design Conceptual Space: A Design Thinking Framework with Cognitive and Computational Footings. In Design Computing and Cognition’22(DCC 2022), John S. Gero (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_22
[16]
Yu-Ling Chien, Ting-Wei Wu, and Yung-Ju Chang. 2019. Exploring the Design of Availability Status in Mobile IM Messaging with User Enactments. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Taipei, Taiwan) (MobileHCI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 61, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338286.3344409
[17]
Kadian Davis, Loe Feijs, Jun Hu, Lucio Marcenaro, and Carlo Regazzoni. 2016. Improving Awareness and Social Connectedness through the Social Hue: Insights and Perspectives. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations (Kochi, Japan) (ITAP ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/2996267.2996269
[18]
Paul Dourish and Sara Bly. 1992. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Monterey, California, USA) (CHI ’92). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142982
[19]
Melanie Duckert, Louise Barkhuus, and Pernille Bjørn. 2023. Collocated Distance: A Fundamental Challenge for the Design of Hybrid Work Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 612, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580899
[20]
Berry Eggen, Marco Rozendaal, and Othmar Schimmel. 2003. Home Radio - Extending the Home Experience beyond the Boundaries of the Physical House. In Proceedings of the Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics international conference on ’the networked home and the home of the future’ (Irvine, California, USA). University of California Press, Oakland, CA, USA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229068027_Home_Radio_Extending_the_home_experience_beyond_the_physical_boundaries_of_the_house
[21]
Thomas Erickson and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2000. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 1 (mar 2000), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/344949.345004
[22]
Eva Eriksson, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Olof Torgersson, and Staffan Bjork. 2021. The CoCe Design Space: Exploring the Design Space for Co-Located Collaborative Games that Use Multi-Display Composition. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 718–733. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462023
[23]
Anne-Laure Fayard, John Weeks, and Mahwesh Khan. 2021. Designing the Hybrid Office: From workplace to "culture" Space. Harvard Business Review (mar 2021). https://hbr.org/2021/03/designing-the-hybrid-office
[24]
Denae Ford, Margaret-Anne Storey, Thomas Zimmermann, Christian Bird, Sonia Jaffe, Chandra Maddila, Jenna L. Butler, Brian Houck, and Nachiappan Nagappan. 2021. A Tale of Two Cities: Software Developers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 31, 2, Article 27 (dec 2021), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487567
[25]
Sarah Gallacher, Jenny O’Connor, Jon Bird, Yvonne Rogers, Licia Capra, Daniel Harrison, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Mood Squeezer: Lightening up the Workplace through Playful and Lightweight Interactions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CSCW ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675170
[26]
Bill Gaver and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated Portfolios. Interactions 19, 4 (jul 2012), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889
[27]
William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: how design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1551–1560. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979169
[28]
William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653
[29]
Erving Goffman. 2016. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. In Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives (2nd. ed.). Routledge, New York, Chapter 37. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357
[30]
Carl Gutwin and Saul Greenberg. 2002. A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11, 3 (2002), 411–446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021271517844
[31]
Carl Gutwin, Saul Greenberg, and Mark Roseman. 1996. Workspace Awareness in Real-Time Distributed Groupware: Framework, Widgets, and Evaluation. In People and Computers XI, Martina Angela Sasse, R. Jim Cunningham, and Russel L. Winder (Eds.). Springer, London, 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3588-3_18
[32]
Edward Hallowell. 1999. The Human Moment at Work. Harvard Business Review (jan 1999). https://hbr.org/1999/01/the-human-moment-at-work
[33]
Kim Halskov and Caroline Lundqvist. 2021. Filtering and Informing the Design Space: Towards Design-Space Thinking. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28, 1, Article 8 (jan 2021), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434462
[34]
Jeff Hancock, Jeremy Birnholtz, Natalya Bazarova, Jamie Guillory, Josh Perlin, and Barrett Amos. 2009. Butler lies: awareness, deception and design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518782
[35]
Scott E. Hudson and Ian Smith. 1996. Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (CSCW ’96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240295
[36]
Jörn Hurtienne. 2009. Cognition in HCI: An Ongoing Story. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments 5, 1 (2009). http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-20094141408
[37]
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn, Joy van Baren, Natalia Romero, and Panos Markopoulos. 2003. The unbearable lightness of being there: contrasting approaches to presence engineering. In Visual Communications and Image Processing, Touradj Ebrahimi and Thomas Sikora (Eds.). Vol. 5150. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.509894
[38]
Reuben Kirkham, Sebastian Mellor, David Green, Jiun-Shian Lin, Karim Ladha, Cassim Ladha, Daniel Jackson, Patrick Olivier, Peter Wright, and Thomas Ploetz. 2013. The break-time barometer: an exploratory system forworkplace break-time social awareness. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Zurich, Switzerland) (UbiComp ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493468
[39]
Robert Kraut, Carmen Egido, and Jolene Galegher. 1988. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’88). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62267
[40]
Robert E. Kraut, Robert S. Fish, Robert W Root, and Barbara L. Chalfonte. 1990. Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology. In Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applies Social Psychology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, USA. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:153915264
[41]
Robert E. Kraut, Susan R. Fussell, Susan E. Brennan, and Jane Siegel. 2002. Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work. In Distributed Work. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2464.003.0010
[42]
Jan Kučera, James Scott, Siân Lindley, and Patrick Olivier. 2021. Bedtime Window: A Field Study Connecting Bedrooms of Long-Distance Couples Using a Slow Photo-Stream and Shared Real-Time Inking. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 333, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445121
[43]
Banita Lal, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, and Markus Haag. 2023. Working from Home During Covid-19: Doing and Managing Technology-enabled Social Interaction With Colleagues at a Distance. Information Systems Frontiers 25 (2023), 1333–1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10182-0
[44]
Yi-Na Li, Dong-Jin Li, and Kang Zhang. 2015. Metaphoric Transfer Effect in Information Visualization Using Glyphs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction (Tokyo, AA, Japan) (VINCI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2801040.2801062
[45]
Lu Liu, Harm van Essen, and Berry Eggen. 2022. An exploratory study of how to design interventions to support informal communication in remote work. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference (Aarhus, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3546673
[46]
Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge. Interactions 20, 1 (jan 2013), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2405716.2405725
[47]
Panos Markopoulos, Wijnand IJsselsteijn, Claire Huijnen, and Boris de Ruyter. 2005. Sharing experiences through awareness systems in the home. Interacting with Computers 17, 5 (sept 2005), 506–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2005.03.004
[48]
Tara Matthews, Anind K. Dey, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott Carter, and Tye Rattenbury. 2004. A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Santa Fe, NM, USA) (UIST ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029676
[49]
Julia M. Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, and Quentin Jones. 2015. Making Social Matching Context-Aware: Design Concepts and Open Challenges. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702343
[50]
Jessica R. Methot, Emily H. Rosado-Solomon, Patrick E. Downes, and Allison S. Gabriel. 2021. Office Chitchat as a Social Ritual: The Uplifting Yet Distracting Effects of Daily Small Talk at Work. Academy of Management Journal 64, 5 (2021), 1445–1471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1474
[51]
Beatrice Monastero and David K. McGookin. 2018. Traces: Studying a Public Reactive Floor-Projection of Walking Trajectories to Support Social Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174061
[52]
Rikke Ørngreen and Karin Tweddell Levinsen. 2017. Workshops as a Research Methodology. Electronic Journal of E-Learning 15, 1, Article 569 (2017), 12 pages. https://vbn.aau.dk/en/publications/workshops-as-a-research-methodology
[53]
David Pinelle, Carl Gutwin, and Saul Greenberg. 2003. Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10, 4 (dec 2003), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/966930.966932
[54]
Courtney N. Reed, Paul Strohmeier, and Andrew P. McPherson. 2023. Negotiating Experience and Communicating Information Through Abstract Metaphor. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 185, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580700
[55]
Natalia Romero, Panos Markopoulos, Joy Van Baren, Boris De Ruyter, Wijnand IJsselsteijn, and Babak Farshchian. 2007. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11 (2007), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0089-0
[56]
Daniel Russo, Paul H.P. Hanel, Seraphina Altnickel, and Niels van Berkel. 2021. Predictors of well-being and productivity among software professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic – a longitudinal study. Empirical Software Engineering 26, 4 (apr 2021), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10664-021-09945-9
[57]
Donald A. Schön. 1992. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1st ed.). Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
[58]
Leon D. Segal. 1994. Effects of checklist interface on non-verbal crew communications. NASA Technical Reports NASA-CR-177639. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940030409
[59]
Norbert Streitz, Thorsten Prante, Carsten Röcker, Daniel van Alphen, Richard Stenzel, Carsten Magerkurth, Saadi Lahlou, Valery Nosulenko, Francois Jegou, Frank Sonder, and Daniela Plewe. 2007. Smart Artefacts as Affordances for Awareness in Distributed Teams. In The Disappearing Computer: Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments, Norbert Streitz, Achilles Kameas, and Irene Mavrommati (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72727-9_1
[60]
Jaime Teevan, Nancy Baym, Jenna Butler, Brent Hecht, Sonia Jaffe, Kate Nowak, Abigail Sellen, Longqi Yang, Marcus Ash, Kagonya Awori, Mia Bruch, Piali Choudhury, Adam Coleman, Scott Counts, Shiraz Cupala, Mary Czerwinski, Ed Doran, Elizabeth Fetterolf, Mar Gonzalez Franco, Kunal Gupta, Aaron L Halfaker, Constance Hadley, Brian Houck, Kori Inkpen, Shamsi Iqbal, Eric Knudsen, Stacey Levine, Siân Lindley, Jennifer Neville, Jacki O’Neill, Rick Pollak, Victor Poznanski, Sean Rintel, Neha Parikh Shah, Siddharth Suri, Adam D. Troy, and Mengting Wan. 2022. Microsoft New Future of Work Report 2022. Technical Report MSR-TR-2022-3. Microsoft. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/microsoft-new-future-of-work-report-2022/
[61]
Lars Erik Udsen and Anker Helms Jørgensen. 2005. The aesthetic turn: unravelling recent aesthetic approaches to human-computer interaction. Digital Creativity 16, 4 (2005), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626260500476564
[62]
Thomas Visser, Martijn H. Vastenburg, and David V. Keyson. 2011. Designing to Support Social Connectedness: The Case of SnowGlobe. International Journal of Design 5, 3 (2011). http://ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/710
[63]
Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1995. Designing Calm Technology. (1995). https://donhopkins.com/home/WeiserDesigningCalmTechnology.pdf
[64]
Steve Whittaker, David Frohlich, and Owen Daly-Jones. 1994. Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (CHI ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191726
[65]
Steve Whittaker and Brid O’Conaill. 1997. The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. In Video-mediated communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 23–49. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08440-001
[66]
Rebecca Zheng, Marina Fernández Camporro, Hugo Romat, Nathalie Henry Riche, Benjamin Bach, Fanny Chevalier, Ken Hinckley, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2021. Sketchnote Components, Design Space Dimensions, and Strategies for Effective Visual Note Taking. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 466, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445508
[67]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704
Index Terms
- Let Information Flow Into Awareness: A Design Space for Human-Like Experiences to Promote Informal Communication for Hybrid Work
Recommendations
An exploratory study of how to design interventions to support informal communication in remote work
NordiCHI '22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction ConferenceRemote work has become widely accepted after COVID-19 but comes with many complaints. This paper considers the lack of informal communication among colleagues in remote and hybrid settings. Former studies have acknowledged the value of informal ...
Information System Design Space for Sustainability
DESRIST 2015: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on New Horizons in Design Science: Broadening the Research Agenda - Volume 9073The interdisciplinary nature of human-computer interaction HCI makes it possible to contribute towards an improved thinking in design and the process of information system designs. It is, however, a challenging aim, because the transformation of ...
The Futures of Hybrid Work - Participatory Futuring in Practice
GROUP '23: Companion Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group WorkThroughout the last years, but especially with the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, our workplaces and way of ’going to work’ has changed a lot. One might even claim that the nature of work is ’in limbo’, a transitional phase between the traditional ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
3616 pages
ISBN:9798400705830
DOI:10.1145/3643834
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
DIS '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 208Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)208
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)83
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in