Telepresence Robots for Remote Participation in Higher Education
Article No.: 6, Pages 1 - 14
Abstract
Telepresence robotics enable people to synchronously communicate and interact at a distance. The Covid-19 pandemic caused in-person teaching and research activities to migrate online in almost all society sectors (including higher education). In hybrid learning environments, telepresence robots have the potential to increase the effectiveness of distance learning by enhancing user presence, allowing students to remain physically embodied and socially connected. However, to be accepted, trusted, and adopted in higher education, more work is needed to investigate the specific requirements of telepresence robotics in these settings. In this paper, we present the results of a mixed methods study exploring how the use of a telepresence robot in a simulated learning and research environment affects trust in and user experience of telepresence robots used in higher education. We aimed to understand users’ attitudes and requirements for the use of telepresence robots in academic teaching and research. Our findings suggest that the level of trust is contingent upon the user, the performance of the robot, and the credibility of the developing organisation. We additionally map out the current challenges encountered by the use of telepresence robots in these settings and provide suggestions to improve user experience by highlighting new software and hardware capabilities.
References
[1]
[n. d.]. Double Robotics - Double 3. https://www.doublerobotics.com/double3.html. Accessed: 2023-08-23.
[2]
Andriana Boudouraki, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sean Rintel. 2021. "I Can’t Get Round": Recruiting Assistance in Mobile Robotic Telepresence. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW3, Article 248 (jan 2021), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432947
[3]
Mitchell RM Bruce, Alice E Bruce, Sarah E Bernard, Andrew N Bergeron, Ahmad AL Ahmad, Timothy A Bruce, Duwage C Perera, Shyam Pokhrel, Sfoog Saleh, Anna Tyrina, 2021. Designing a remote, synchronous, hands-on general chemistry lab course. Journal of Chemical Education 98, 10 (2021), 3131–3142.
[4]
Elizabeth Cha, Samantha Chen, and Maja J Mataric. 2017. Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 683–688.
[5]
Charles LT Corsby and Anna Bryant. 2020. “I felt like I was missing out on something”: an evaluation of using remote technology in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies 25 (2020), 4897–4914.
[6]
Cassandra Jane Fernandez, Rachana Ramesh, and Anand Shankar Raja Manivannan. 2022. Synchronous learning and asynchronous learning during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study in India. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal 17, 1 (2022), 1–14.
[7]
Patricia Fidalgo, Joan Thormann, Oleksandr Kulyk, and José Alberto Lencastre. 2020. Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International journal of educational Technology in Higher Education 17, 1 (2020), 1–18.
[8]
Andy Field. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. sage.
[9]
Laurent Gallon, Angel Abénia, Françoise Dubergey, and Maïté Negui. 2019. Using a Telepresence Robot in an Educational Contex. In 15th Int’l Conf on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS 2019).
[10]
Saso Koceski and Natasa Koceska. 2016. Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. Journal of medical systems 40 (2016), 1–7.
[11]
Mika Koverola, Anton Kunnari, Jukka Sundvall, and Michael Laakasuo. 2022. General attitudes towards robots scale (GAToRS): A new instrument for social surveys. International Journal of Social Robotics 14, 7 (2022), 1559–1581.
[12]
Ming Lei, Ian M Clemente, and Ying Hu. 2019. Student in the shell: The robotic body and student engagement. Computers & Education 130 (2019), 59–80.
[13]
Janika Leoste, Kaido Kikkas, Kalle Tammemäe, Martin Rebane, Edmund Laugasson, and Kristiina Hakk. 2022. Telepresence robots in higher education–the current state of research. In International Conference on Robotics in Education (RiE). Springer, 124–134.
[14]
James R Lewis. 2002. Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 14, 3-4 (2002), 463–488.
[15]
M Lister, J Vaughn, J Brennan-Cook, M Molloy, M Kuszajewski, and RJ Shaw. 2018. Telehealth and telenursing using simulation for pre-licensure USA students. Nurse education in practice 29 (2018), 59–63.
[16]
Moira Maguire and Brid Delahunt. 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars.All Ireland Journal of Higher Education 9, 3 (2017).
[17]
Nicolas Mascret and Jean-Jacques Temprado. 2023. Acceptance of a Mobile Telepresence Robot, before Use, to Remotely Supervise Older Adults’ Adapted Physical Activity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, 4 (2023), 3012.
[18]
Francois Michaud, Patrick Boissy, Daniel Labonte, Helene Corriveau, Andrew Grant, Michel Lauria, Richard Cloutier, Marc-André Roux, Daniel Iannuzzi, and Marie-Pier Royer. 2007. Telepresence Robot for Home Care Assistance. In AAAI spring symposium: multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics. California, USA, 50–55.
[19]
Carman Neustaedter, Gina Venolia, Jason Procyk, and Daniel Hawkins. 2016. To Beam or Not to Beam: A Study of Remote Telepresence Attendance at an Academic Conference. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819922
[20]
Christopher Pappas. 2015. Synchronous learning advantages and disadvantages in corporate training. E-learning Industry 19 (2015).
[21]
Cecily Pepper, Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Ana Rita Pena, Liz Dowthwaite, Camilla M Babbage, Hanne Wagner, Elena Nichele, and Joel E Fischer. 2022. Understanding trust and changes in use after a year with the NHS COVID-19 contact tracing app in the United Kingdom: Longitudinal mixed methods study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, 10 (2022), e40558.
[22]
Irene Rae, Leila Takayama, and Bilge Mutlu. 2013. In-body experiences: embodiment, control, and trust in robot-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1921–1930.
[23]
Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Isaac Phypers, Andriana Boudouraki, Dominic Price, Joel Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Maria Galvez Trigo, and Horia Maior. 2023. Augmented robotic telepresence (ART): A prototype for enhancing remote interaction and participation. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems. 1–6.
[24]
Alexander P Schouten, Tijs C Portegies, Iris Withuis, Lotte M Willemsen, and Komala Mazerant-Dubois. 2022. Robomorphism: Examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Computers in Human Behavior 126 (2022), 106980.
[25]
Laerd Statistics. 2012. SPSS statistics. SPEARMAN’S CORRELATION (2012).
[26]
TelepresenceRobots.com. [n. d.]. What Is a Telepresence Robot and What Can They Do?https://telepresencerobots.com/what-telepresence-robot-and-what-can-they-do/. Accessed: 2023-09-04.
[27]
Luca Tonin, Tom Carlson, Robert Leeb, and José del R Millán. 2011. Brain-controlled telepresence robot by motor-disabled people. In 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 4227–4230.
[28]
Maria J. Galvez Trigo, Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Horia A. Maior, Cecily Pepper, Dominic Price, Pauline Leonard, Chira Tochia, Richard Hyde, Nicholas Watson, and Joel E. Fischer. 2023. “They’re not going to do all the tasks we do”: Understanding Trust and Reassurance towards a UV-C Disinfection Robot. In 2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 2140–2147. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN57019.2023.10309364
[29]
Katherine M Tsui, Munjal Desai, Holly A Yanco, and Chris Uhlik. 2011. Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction. 11–18.
[30]
Hsin-Yun Wang and Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun. 2022. Influences of Online Synchronous VR Co-Creation on Behavioral Patterns and Motivation in Knowledge Co-Construction. Educational Technology & Society 25, 2 (2022), 31–47.
[31]
Richard Waterstone, Julie M Robillard, and Tony J Prescott. 2022. Robot telepresence as a practical tool for responsible and open research in trustworthy autonomous systems. Journal of Responsible Technology 12 (2022), 100050.
[32]
Ben Williamson, Rebecca Eynon, and John Potter. 2020. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency., 107–114 pages.
[33]
Joey Wong, Erika Young, Lillian Hung, Jim Mann, and Lynn Jackson. 2023. Beyond Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle–staff perceptions on facilitators and barriers to the implementation of telepresence robots in long-term care. BMC Health Services Research 23, 1 (2023), 772.
Index Terms
- Telepresence Robots for Remote Participation in Higher Education
Recommendations
Augmented Robotic Telepresence (ART): A Prototype for Enhancing Remote Interaction and Participation
TAS '23: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous SystemsMobile robotic telepresence (MRP) allows remote users’ access and mobility in a range of local environments. MRP devices have been adopted in societally significant domains such as workplaces, museums, commerce, education, and healthcare, especially ...
Multiple Device Controlled Design for Implementing Telepresence Robot in Schools
Blended Learning. Education in a Smart Learning EnvironmentAbstractTelepresence robots have shown their capabilities to perform remote teaching. In this research, the telepresence robot was designed and developed specifically for teaching from a remote location. The robot was intended to surpass the limitation of ...
Semi-Autonomous Telepresence Robot for Adaptively Switching Operation Using Inhibition and Disinhibition Mechanism
HAI '18: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent InteractionIn research on semi-autonomous telepresence robots, a problem in which remote operators become frustrated with autonomous operations that do not match their intention has been reported. However, in previous research, a general-purpose method for ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2024
297 pages
ISBN:9798400710179
DOI:10.1145/3663384
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 25 June 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
CHIWORK 2024
CHIWORK 2024: Annual Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
June 25 - 27, 2024
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 23Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)23
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 01 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format