Playful Telepresence Robots with School Children
Authors: 
Jennifer A Rode, Yifan Feng, Hanlin Zhang, Ria Rosman, Amanda S. Bastaman, 
John King, Madeline H. Samson, Xinyue Dong, Adam Walker, 
Matthew Horton, Janet C. Read, Martin Oliver, Houda ElmimouniAuthors Info & Claims
Jennifer A Rode, Yifan Feng, Hanlin Zhang, Ria Rosman, Amanda S. Bastaman, John King, Madeline H. Samson, Xinyue Dong, Adam Walker, Matthew Horton, Janet C. Read, Martin Oliver, Houda ElmimouniAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 33, Pages 1 - 16
Abstract
Telepresence robots offer potential enhancements to real-time classroom participation and social interaction for remotely located children. This mixed-method study, including observation and questionnaires, examines the safety and effectiveness of these technologies in an educational environment, with 22 children aged 9-11 using GoBe mobile telepresence robots. Participants were divided into eight groups. They engaged in activities designed to simulate driving experiences, including navigating an obstacle course, participating in a treasure hunt, and parking the robot. Through thematic analysis of observation notes and statistical analysis of task performance measurements, we identified challenges such as initial connection issues, navigation difficulties in tight spaces, and inconsistent docking. These underscore the need for improvements in network compatibility, user interface, and automation. Our findings indicate that children are capable of safely operating the robots and collaborating effectively. Further, our data indicates that there may be gender differences affecting confidence and adjustment to driving tasks. This study suggests enhancements in robot design and instructional practices to better integrate telepresence robots into educational settings, ensuring their safety and utility for children.
References
[1]
[n. d.]. Pupil absence in schools in England: Academic Year 2022/23. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/pupil-absence-in-schools-in-england. Accessed: 2023-04-25.
[2]
Veronica Ahumada-Newhart, Taffeta S Wood, Erin R Taylor, Francesca O Johnson, Siena Saltzen, and Sanjay S Joshi. 2023. Study of Telerobot Personalization for Children: Exploring Qualitative Coding of Artwork. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 536–539.
[3]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 675–684.
[4]
Anil Ufuk Batmaz, Jens Maiero, Ernst Kruijff, Bernhard E Riecke, Carman Neustaedter, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2020. How automatic speed control based on distance affects user behaviours in telepresence robot navigation within dense conference-like environments. Plos one 15, 11 (2020), e0242078.
[5]
Laura Beckwith, Cory Kissinger, Margaret Burnett, Susan Wiedenbeck, Joseph Lawrance, Alan Blackwell, and Curtis Cook. 2006. Tinkering and gender in end-user programmers’ debugging. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 1, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124808
[6]
Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Andrew Miller, Brandyn White, and Tom Yeh. 2010. VizWiz::LocateIt - enabling blind people to locate objects in their environment. In 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops. 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2010.5543821
[7]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[8]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 21, 1 (2021), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/capr.12360.
[9]
V. Braun, V. Clarke, N. Hayfield, and G. Terry. 2019. Thematic Analysis. In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, P. Liamputtong (Ed.). Springer, Singapore, 843–860.
[10]
Emeline Brulé and Katta Spiel. 2019. Negotiating gender and disability identities in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on communities & technologies-transforming communities. 218–227.
[11]
Emeline Brulé. 2020. How to do a Thematic Analysis. https://medium.com/usabilitygeek/thematic-analysis-in-hci-57edae583ca9 Accessed: 2024-04-09.
[12]
Tom Carlson and Yiannis Demiris. 2012. Collaborative control for a robotic wheelchair: evaluation of performance, attention, and workload. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) 42, 3 (2012), 876–888.
[13]
Justine Cassell and Henry Jenkins. 2000. From Barbie® to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. MIT press.
[14]
Elizabeth Cha, Samantha Chen, and Maja J Mataric. 2017. Designing telepresence robots for K-12 education. In 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 683–688.
[15]
Yuan-Chia Chang, Daniel J. Rea, and Takayuki Kanda. 2024. Investigating the Impact of Gender Stereotypes in Authority on Avatar Robots. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (, Boulder, CO, USA,) (HRI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610977.3634985
[16]
Chien-Hsiung Chen and Meng-Xi Chen. 2020. Wayfinding in virtual environments with landmarks on overview maps. Interacting with Computers 32, 3 (2020), 316–329.
[17]
Karen B Chen, Ryan A Kimmel, Aaron Bartholomew, Kevin Ponto, Michael L Gleicher, and Robert G Radwin. 2014. Manually locating physical and virtual reality objects. Human factors 56, 6 (2014), 1163–1176.
[18]
Luca Chittaro and Stefano Burigat. 2004. 3D location-pointing as a navigation aid in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Gallipoli, Italy) (AVI ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1145/989863.989910
[19]
Laura A Chubb, Christa B Fouché, Margaret Agee, and Andrew Thompson. 2023. ‘Being there’: technology to reduce isolation for young people with significant illness. International Journal of Inclusive Education 27, 14 (2023), 1712–1729.
[20]
Tim RH Cutmore, Trevor J Hine, Kerry J Maberly, Nicole M Langford, and Grant Hawgood. 2000. Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53, 2 (2000), 223–249.
[21]
Doble. 2024. Double 3-Overview. https://www.doublerobotics.com/double3.html/
[22]
Houda Elmimouni, Jennifer A Rode, and Selma Šabanović. 2024. Articulation work for supporting the values of students attending class via telepresence robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2024), 103318.
[23]
Houda Elmimouni, Cooper Young, Selma Sabanovic, and Jennifer Rode. 2023. Does Robotic Telepresence Make the Classroom Accessible?. In Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 194–197.
[24]
Naomi T Fitter, Yasmin Chowdhury, Elizabeth Cha, Leila Takayama, and Maja J Matarić. 2018. Evaluating the effects of personalized appearance on telepresence robots for education. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 109–110.
[25]
German Flores and Roberto Manduchi. 2018. Easy Return: An App for Indoor Backtracking Assistance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Montreal QC, Canada,) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173591
[26]
Christopher Frauenberger, Alissa N. Antle, Monica Landoni, Janet C. Read, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2018. Ethics in interaction design and children: a panel and community dialogue. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Trondheim, Norway) (IDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 748–752. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3210802
[27]
Elihu M Gerson and Susan Leigh Star. 1986. Analyzing due process in the workplace. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 4, 3 (1986), 257–270.
[28]
Akira Goda. 2022. Exploring the barriers and facilitating factors of the telepresence robot on the children’s participation with functional limitations in leisure activities: A Scoping Review. (2022).
[29]
Evan Golub, Brenna McNally, Becky Lewittes, Alazandra Shorter, and The Kids of Kidsteam. 2017. Life as a Robot (at CHI) Challenges, Benefits, and Prospects for Attending Conferences via Telepresence. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 758–769.
[30]
Uwe Gruenefeld, Lars Prädel, and Wilko Heuten. 2019. Locating nearby physical objects in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365620
[31]
M. L. Hatzenbueher and Pachankis J.E.2016. Stigma and Minority Stress as Social Determinants of Health Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth: Research Evidence and Clinical Implications.Pediatric Clinics of North America 63, 6 (2016), 985–997.
[32]
Yasamin Heshmat, Brennan Jones, Xiaoxuan Xiong, Carman Neustaedter, Anthony Tang, Bernhard E Riecke, and Lillian Yang. 2018. Geocaching with a beam: Shared outdoor activities through a telepresence robot with 360 degree viewing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.
[33]
M Lutfi Hidayetoglu, Kemal Yildirim, and Aysu Akalin. 2012. The effects of color and light on indoor wayfinding and the evaluation of the perceived environment. Journal of environmental psychology 32, 1 (2012), 50–58.
[34]
Matthew Horton, Janet C. Read, Emanuela Mazzone, Gavin Sim, and Daniel Fitton. 2012. School friendly participatory research activities with children. In CHI ’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI EA ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2223759
[35]
Baptiste Isabet, Maribel Pino, Manon Lewis, Samuel Benveniste, and Anne-Sophie Rigaud. 2021. Social telepresence robots: a narrative review of experiments involving older adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 7 (2021), 3597.
[36]
Emma F Jackson and Kay Bussey. 2024. Conceptualizing transgender experiences in psychology: Do we have a ‘true’gender?British Journal of Psychology (2024).
[37]
Petra Jansen-Osmann and Petra Fuchs. 2006. Wayfinding behavior and spatial knowledge of adults and children in a virtual environment: The role of landmarks. Experimental Psychology 53, 3 (2006), 171–181.
[38]
Lars EF Johannessen, Erik Børve Rasmussen, and Marit Haldar. 2023. Student at a distance: exploring the potential and prerequisites of using telepresence robots in schools. Oxford Review of Education 49, 2 (2023), 153–170.
[39]
Omer Keidar, Yisrael Parmet, Samuel A Olatunji, and Yael Edan. 2024. Comparison of proactive and reactive interaction modes in a mobile robotic telecare study. Applied Ergonomics 118 (2024), 104269.
[40]
Femke Kirschner, Fred Paas, and Paul A Kirschner. 2011. Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25, 4 (2011), 615–624.
[41]
Paul A Kirschner, John Sweller, Femke Kirschner, and Jimmy Zambrano R. 2018. From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning 13 (2018), 213–233.
[42]
Annica Kristoffersson, Silvia Coradeschi, and Amy Loutfi. 2013. A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2013 (2013), 3–3.
[43]
Sébastien Laniel, Dominic Létourneau, François Grondin, Mathieu Labbé, François Ferland, and François Michaud. 2021. Toward enhancing the autonomy of a telepresence mobile robot for remote home care assistance. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 12, 1 (2021), 214–237.
[44]
Carol A Lawton. 1994. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex roles 30 (1994), 765–779.
[45]
Mi Jung Lee, Erica Poulin, Gail Castañeda, and Sergio Romero. 2020. Use of telepresence robots for home safety evaluations: A feasibility study. Annals of International Occupational Therapy 3, 3 (2020), 119–126.
[46]
Janika Leoste, Matti Rossi, Katrin Kangur, Aleksei Talisainen, Karin Muoni, Kristel Marmor, Fuad Budagov, Kadri Strömberg-Järvis, and Anne-Mari Rebane. 2024. The Opinions of Basic School Students Regarding the Use of Telepresence Robots for Teaching and Learning.
[47]
Janika Leoste, Sirje Virkus, Aleksei Talisainen, Kalle Tammemäe, Katrin Kangur, and Izabella Petriashvili. 2022. Higher education personnel’s perceptions about telepresence robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 9 (2022), 976836.
[48]
Zecai Lin, Tianxue Zhang, Zhenglong Sun, Hongyan Gao, Xiaojie Ai, Weidong Chen, Guang-Zhong Yang, and Anzhu Gao. 2022. Robotic Telepresence Based on Augmented Reality and Human Motion Mapping for Interventional Medicine. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics 4, 4 (2022), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2022.3201652
[49]
University College London. 2023. Health and Safety Policy. Retrieved July 29, 2024 from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/safety-services/policies/2023/nov/health-and-safety-policy
[50]
Joseph B Lyons. 2013. Being transparent about transparency: A model for human-robot interaction. In 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.
[51]
Jane Margolis and Allan Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press.
[52]
Achille Mbembé. 2003. Necropolitics. Public culture 15, 1 (2003), 11–40. Translated by Libby Meintjes.
[53]
Conor McGinn, Aran Sena, and Kevin Kelly. 2017. Controlling robots in the home: factors that affect the performance of novice robot operators. Applied ergonomics 65 (2017), 23–32.
[54]
Nathan J McNeese, Mustafa Demir, Nancy J Cooke, and Christopher Myers. 2018. Teaming with a synthetic teammate: Insights into human-autonomy teaming. Human factors 60, 2 (2018), 262–273.
[55]
Ascher K Munion, Jeanine K Stefanucci, Ericka Rovira, Peter Squire, and Michael Hendricks. 2019. Gender differences in spatial navigation: Characterizing wayfinding behaviors. Psychonomic bulletin & review 26 (2019), 1933–1940.
[56]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart and Judith S Olson. 2017. My student is a robot: How schools manage telepresence experiences for students. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 342–347.
[57]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart and Judith S Olson. 2019. Going to School on a Robot: Robot and User Interface Design Features that Matter.ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 26, 4 (2019), 25–1.
[58]
Veronica Ahumada Newhart, Mark Warschauer, and Leonard Sender. 2016. Virtual inclusion via telepresence robots in the classroom: An exploratory case study. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning 23, 4 (2016), 9–25.
[59]
Maja Nordtug and Lars EF Johannessen. 2023. The social robot? Analyzing whether and how the telepresence robot AV1 affords socialization. Convergence 29, 6 (2023), 1683–1697.
[60]
Marion Nys, Valérie Gyselinck, and Eric Orriols. 2015. Landmark and route knowledge in children’s spatial representation of a virtual environment. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2015), 119384.
[61]
OhmniLabs. 2024. OhmniLabs. https://store.ohmnilabs.com/products/ohmni-1
[62]
Kristina R Olson, Lily Durwood, Madeleine DeMeules, and Katie A McLaughlin. 2016. Mental health of transgender children who are supported in their identities. Pediatrics 137, 3 (2016).
[63]
Grace Pan, Thea Weiss, Seyed Amirhosein Mohaddesi, John Szura, and Jeffrey Krichmar. 2022. The Benefits of Autonomous Navigation in Telepresence Robots and its Effect on Cognitive Load. (2022).
[64]
Emilee Patrick, Dennis Cosgrove, Aleksandra Slavkovic, Jennifer A. Rode, Thom Verratti, and Greg Chiselko. 2000. Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands) (CHI ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332479
[65]
Francesca Pazzaglia, Chiara Meneghetti, Enia Labate, and Lucia Ronconi. 2017. Are wayfinding self-efficacy and pleasure in exploring related to shortcut finding? A study in a virtual environment. In Spatial Cognition X: 13th Biennial Conference, KogWis 2016, Bremen, Germany, September 26–30, 2016, and 10th International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2016, Philadelphia, PA, USA, August 2–5, 2016, Revised Selected Papers 10. Springer, 55–68.
[66]
Maria Perifanou, Anastasios A Economides, Polina Häfner, and Thomas Wernbacher. 2022. Mobile telepresence robots in education: strengths, opportunities, weaknesses, and challenges. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. Springer, 573–579.
[67]
Patrick Péruch, Jean-Louis Vercher, and Gabriel M Gauthier. 1995. Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments. Ecological Psychology 7, 1 (1995), 1–20.
[68]
Michael I Posner. 1980. Orienting of attention. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology 32, 1 (1980), 3–25.
[69]
Stanislava Rangelova, Karolin Rehm, Sarah Diefenbach, Daniel Motus, and Elisabeth André. 2020. Gender differences in simulation sickness in static vs. moving platform VR automated driving simulation. In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Automated Driving and In-Vehicle Experience Design: Second International Conference, MobiTAS 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 22. Springer, 146–165.
[70]
Caleb Rascon and Ivan Meza. 2017. Localization of sound sources in robotics: A review. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 96 (2017), 184–210.
[71]
Janet C Read, Matthew Horton, Gavin Sim, Peggy Gregory, Daniel Fitton, and Brendan Cassidy. 2013. CHECk: a tool to inform and encourage ethical practice in participatory design with children. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 187–192.
[72]
Janet C. Read and Stuart MacFarlane. 2006. Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Tampere, Finland) (IDC ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139073.1139096
[73]
Andy Elliot Ricci. 2023. This body doesn’t represent me: Exploring telepresence robots and self-presentation. (2023).
[74]
Katharine A Rimes, Nicola Goodship, Greg Ussher, Dan Baker, and Elizabeth West. 2020. Non-binary and binary transgender youth: Comparison of mental health, self-harm, suicidality, substance use and victimization experiences. In Non-binary and Genderqueer Genders. Routledge, 112–122.
[75]
GoBe Robots. 2024. GoBe Blue Ocean Robotics. https://gobe.blue-ocean-robotics.com/
[76]
Jennifer A. Rode. 2011. Reflexivity in digital anthropology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978961
[77]
Jennifer A. Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (sep 2011), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005
[78]
Jennifer Ann Rode, Louise Barkhuus, and Andri Ioannou. 2024. Exploring Gender, Computational Making and E-Textiles using the BBC Micro:bit. In Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 554, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3644056
[79]
Jennifer A. Rode and Erika Shehan Poole. 2018. Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT (Heilbronn, Germany) (GenderIT ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196845
[80]
Jennifer A Rode and Erika Shehan Poole. 2018. Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT. 79–90.
[81]
Ronotemi. 2024. TEMI robots as a service. https://www.robotemi.com/
[82]
Matthew Rueben, Mohammad Syed, Emily London, Mark Camarena, Eunsook Shin, Yulun Zhang, Timothy S Wang, Thomas R Groechel, Rhianna Lee, and Maja J Matarić. 2021. Long-term, in-the-wild study of feedback about speech intelligibility for k-12 students attending class via a telepresence robot. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 567–576.
[83]
Alexander P Schouten, Tijs C Portegies, Iris Withuis, Lotte M Willemsen, and Komala Mazerant-Dubois. 2022. Robomorphism: Examining the effects of telepresence robots on between-student cooperation. Computers in Human Behavior 126 (2022), 106980.
[84]
Kyoung Wan Cathy Shin and Jeonghey Han. 2016. Children’s perceptions of and interactions with a telepresence robot. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 521–522.
[85]
Edward Slone, Ford Burles, Keith Robinson, Richard Levy, and Giuseppe Iaria. 2014. Floor Plan Connectivity Influences Wayfinding Performance in Virtual Environments. Environment and Behavior Online ahead of print (05 2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514533189
[86]
Katta Spiel, Oliver L Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: a guide for HCI researchers. Interactions 26, 4 (2019), 62–65.
[87]
Anselm Strauss. 1988. The articulation of project work: An organizational process. Sociological Quarterly 29, 2 (1988), 163–178.
[88]
John Sweller. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science 12, 2 (1988), 257–285.
[89]
Aleksei Talisainen, Janika Leoste, and Sirje Virkus. 2023. Comparative Analysis of Telepresence Robots’ Video Performance: Evaluating Camera Capabilities for Remote Teaching and Learning. Applied Sciences 14, 1 (2023), 233.
[90]
Chieh-Hsin Tang, Wu-Tai Wu, and Ching-Yuan Lin. 2009. Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. Applied ergonomics 40, 4 (2009), 722–730.
[91]
Aleksandar Velinov, Saso Koceski, and Natasa Koceska. 2021. A review of the usage of telepresence robots in education. Balkan Journal of Applied Mathematics and Informatics 4, 1 (2021), 27–40.
[92]
Mette Weibel, Martin Kaj Fridh Nielsen, Martha Krogh Topperzer, Nanna Maria Hammer, Sarah Wagn Møller, Kjeld Schmiegelow, and Hanne Bækgaard Larsen. 2020. Back to school with telepresence robot technology: A qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment. Nursing open 7, 4 (2020), 988–997.
[93]
Mette Weibel, Sofie Skoubo, Charlotte Handberg, Lykke Brogaard Bertel, Nonni Camilla Steinrud, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Inger Kristensson Hallström, and Hanne Bækgaard Larsen. 2023. Telepresence robots to reduce school absenteeism among children with cancer, neuromuscular diseases, or anxiety—the expectations of children and teachers: A qualitative study in Denmark. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 10 (2023), 100280.
[94]
Candace West and Don H Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & society 1, 2 (1987), 125–151.
[95]
Rua M Williams. 2023. All Robots Are Disabled. Social Robots in Social Institutions: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 366 (2023), 229.
[96]
Iris Marion Young. 1990. Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. (1990).
Index Terms
- Playful Telepresence Robots with School Children
Recommendations
Why Do Children Abuse Robots?
HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended AbstractsWe found that children sometimes abuse a social robot in a hallway of a shopping mall. They spoke bad words, repeatedly obstructed the robot's path, and sometimes even kicked and punched the robot. To investigate why they abused it, we conducted a field ...
Designing a Robot Companion for Children with Neuro-Developmental Disorders
IDC '17: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenThe paper describes the design of a robot companion for children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. This work; being informed by general design guidelines reported in the current literature, lessons learned from our own previous experience, meetings ...
Robots, children, and helping: do children help a robot in need?
HRI '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interactionThis study examined the interactions between children and robots by observing whether children help a robot complete a task under five conditions to determine which elicited the most help. Each condition had an experimental and control group, with 20-32 ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2024
1236 pages
ISBN:9798400709661
DOI:10.1145/3679318
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 13 October 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
NordiCHI 2024
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 215Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)215
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)57
Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatLogin options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in