Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition and Distinguishability of Textile Icons in Pairs
Authors: Oliver Nowak, 
René Schäfer, Elisabeth Jane Buttkus, Lea Emilia Schirp, Heiko Müller, Jan BorchersAuthors Info & Claims
René Schäfer, Elisabeth Jane Buttkus, Lea Emilia Schirp, Heiko Müller, Jan BorchersAuthors Info & ClaimsArticle No.: 22, Pages 1 - 13
Abstract
Textile interfaces enable silent and discreet input on clothing, accessories, and smart home furniture. While researchers already presented approaches to make them technologically feasible, it is not fully clear how users experience textile interfaces and how well users perform when vision-free usage is encouraged. Recently, designs of single textile icons, i.e., symbols used as textile buttons or labels, were investigated. Practical user interfaces, however, typically consist of entire groups of nearby icons. Their haptic distinguishability is key for seamless operation. Furthermore, it is unclear whether icon recognition benefits or suffers when comparing neighboring icons is possible. We conducted a study where users blindly palpated icon pairs, tried to recognize the individual shapes and rated how easy they were to tell apart. We present our observations on haptic distinguishability, which, inter alia, show that more haptic cues via neighboring icons do not impact shape recognition.
Supplemental Material
supp
Additional data set
- Download
- 31.56 KB
References
[1]
Roland Aigner, Mira Alida Haberfellner, and Michael Haller. 2022. SpaceR: Knitting Ready-Made, Tactile, and Highly Responsive Spacer-Fabric Force Sensors for Continuous Input. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Bend, OR, USA) (UIST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 68, 15 pages.
[2]
Daniel Bühler, Fabian Hemmert, and Jörn Hurtienne. 2020. Universal and Intuitive? Scientific Guidelines for Icon Design. In Proceedings of Mensch Und Computer 2020 (Magdeburg, Germany) (MuC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–103.
[3]
S. Cecchetto and R. Lawson. 2015. Simultaneous Sketching Aids the Haptic Identification of Raised Line Drawings. Perception 44, 7 (2015), 743–754. PMID: 26541052.
[4]
Ben P. Challis and Alistair D.N. Edwards. 2001. Design principles for tactile interaction. In Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, Stephen Brewster and Roderick Murray-Smith (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 17–24.
[5]
Scott Gilliland, Nicholas Komor, Thad Starner, and Clint Zeagler. 2010. The Textile Interface Swatchbook: Creating graphical user interface-like widgets with conductive embroidery. In International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) 2010. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Seoul, South Korea, 1–8.
[6]
Maas Goudswaard, Abel Abraham, Bruna Goveia da Rocha, Kristina Andersen, and Rong-Hao Liang. 2020. FabriClick: Interweaving Pushbuttons into Fabrics Using 3D Printing and Digital Embroidery. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 379–393.
[7]
Chris Harrison and Scott E. Hudson. 2009. Providing Dynamically Changeable Physical Buttons on a Visual Display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 299–308.
[8]
Paul Holleis, Albrecht Schmidt, Susanna Paasovaara, Arto Puikkonen, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2008. Evaluating Capacitive Touch Input on Clothes. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (MobileHCI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–90.
[9]
Pradthana Jarusriboonchai, Emma Napari, Oskar Juhlin, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2019. Exploring Non-Emissive Wearable Display as a Clothing Accessory. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (London, United Kingdom) (UbiComp/ISWC ’19 Adjunct). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 89–92.
[10]
Amy A Kalia and Pawan Sinha. 2011. Tactile picture recognition: Errors are in shape acquisition or object matching. Seeing and Perceiving 24 (2011), 1–16.
[11]
Pouya M Khorsandi, Lee Jones, Vandad Davoodnia, Timothy J Lampen, Aliya Conrad, Ali Etemad, and Sara Nabil. 2023. FabriCar: Enriching the User Experience of In-Car Media Interactions with Ubiquitous Vehicle Interiors Using E-Textile Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1438–1456.
[12]
Konstantin Klamka, Raimund Dachselt, and Jürgen Steimle. 2020. Rapid Iron-On User Interfaces: Hands-on Fabrication of Interactive Textile Prototypes. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.
[13]
Lisa J. Larsson, Géraldine Morin, Antoine Begault, Raphaëlle Chaine, Jeannine Abiva, Evelyne Hubert, Monica Hurdal, Mao Li, Beatriz Paniagua, Giang Tran, and Marie-Paule Cani. 2015. Identifying Perceptually Salient Features on 2D Shapes. In Research in Shape Modeling, Kathryn Leonard and Sibel Tari (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 129–153.
[14]
Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[15]
Samuel Lebaz, Christophe Jouffrais, and Delphine Picard. 2012. Haptic identification of raised-line drawings: high visuospatial imagers outperform low visuospatial imagers. Psychological research 76, 5 (2012), 667–675.
[16]
Susan J. Lederman and Lynette A. Jones. 2011. Tactile and Haptic Illusions. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 4, 4 (2011), 273–294.
[17]
Fabrizio Leo, Caterina Baccelliere, Aleksander Waszkielewicz, Elena Cocchi, and Luca Brayda. 2018. Tactile Symbol Discrimination on a Small Pin-Array Display. In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Multimedia for Accessible Human Computer Interface (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (MAHCI’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–15.
[18]
Yiyue Luo, Kui Wu, Tomás Palacios, and Wojciech Matusik. 2021. KnitUI: Fabricating Interactive and Sensing Textiles with Machine Knitting. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 668, 12 pages.
[19]
Sara Mlakar, Mira Alida Haberfellner, Hans-Christian Jetter, and Michael Haller. 2021. Exploring Affordances of Surface Gestures on Textile User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1159–1170.
[20]
Sara Mlakar and Michael Haller. 2020. Design Investigation of Embroidered Interactive Elements on Non-Wearable Textile Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10.
[21]
Annika Muehlbradt, Gregory Whiting, Shaun Kane, and Laura Devendorf. 2022. Knitting Access: Exploring Stateful Textiles with People with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1058–1070.
[22]
Sara Nabil, Lee Jones, and Audrey Girouard. 2021. Soft Speakers: Digital Embroidering of DIY Customizable Fabric Actuators. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 12 pages.
[23]
Annie W. Y. Ng and Alan H. S. Chan. 2014. Tactile symbol matching of different shape patterns: Implications for shape coding of control devices. In Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists, Vol. 2. 5 pages.
[24]
Oliver Nowak, René Schäfer, Anke Brocker, Philipp Wacker, and Jan Borchers. 2022. Shaping Textile Sliders: An Evaluation of Form Factors and Tick Marks for Textile Sliders. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 214, 14 pages.
[25]
Patrick Parzer, Adwait Sharma, Anita Vogl, Jürgen Steimle, Alex Olwal, and Michael Haller. 2017. SmartSleeve: Real-Time Sensing of Surface and Deformation Gestures on Flexible, Interactive Textiles, Using a Hybrid Gesture Detection Pipeline. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Québec City, QC, Canada) (UIST ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 565–577.
[26]
Yuecheng Peng, Danchang Yan, Haotian Chen, Yue Yang, Ye Tao, Weitao Song, Lingyun Sun, and Guanyun Wang. 2024. IntelliTex: Fabricating Low-cost and Washable Functional Textiles using A Double-coating Process. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 859, 18 pages.
[27]
Myrthe A Plaisier, Wouter M Bergmann Tiest, and Astrid ML Kappers. 2009. Salient features in 3-D haptic shape perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 2 (2009), 421–430.
[28]
Ivan Poupyrev, Nan-Wei Gong, Shiho Fukuhara, Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Carsten Schwesig, and Karen E. Robinson. 2016. Project Jacquard: Interactive Digital Textiles at Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4216–4227.
[29]
Emmi Pouta and Jussi Ville Mikkonen. 2022. Woven ETextiles in HCI — a Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1099–1118.
[30]
Jeff Sauro and James R Lewis. 2016. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[31]
René Schäfer, Oliver Nowak, Lovis Bero Suchmann, Sören Schröder, and Jan Borchers. 2023. What’s That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile Icons. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 580, 12 pages.
[32]
Maarten W.A. Wijntjes, Thijs van Lienen, Ilse M. Verstijnen, and Astrid M.L. Kappers. 2008. Look what I have felt: Unidentified haptic line drawings are identified after sketching. Acta Psychologica 128, 2 (2008), 255–263.
[33]
Tony Wu, Shiho Fukuhara, Nicholas Gillian, Kishore Sundara-Rajan, and Ivan Poupyrev. 2020. ZebraSense: A Double-Sided Textile Touch Sensor for Smart Clothing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Virtual Event, USA) (UIST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 662–674.
Index Terms
- Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition and Distinguishability of Textile Icons in Pairs
Recommendations
What’s That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile Icons
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsTextile surfaces, such as on sofas, cushions, and clothes, offer promising alternative locations to place controls for digital devices. Textiles are a natural, even abundant part of living spaces, and support unobtrusive input. While there is solid work ...
Icons R icons
AUIC '03: Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian user interface conference on User interfaces 2003 - Volume 18Icons are used in almost every graphical user-interface to computer software. Despite this, there is a serious lack of comprehension of what they are and how they work. The application of semiotics to user-interface icons can help to solve this problem ...
Using icons to find documents: simplicity is critical
CHI '93: Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA common task at almost any computer interface is that of searching for documents, which GUIs typically represent with icons. Oddly, little research has been done on the processes underlying icon search. This paper outlines the factors involved in icon ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2025
1305 pages
ISBN:9798400711978
DOI:10.1145/3689050
Copyright © 2025 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 04 March 2025
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
Conference
TEI '25
Sponsor:
TEI '25: Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
March 4 - 7, 2025
Bordeaux/Talence, France
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,367 submissions, 29%
Upcoming Conference
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 21Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)21
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)40
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025