Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Next Article in Journal
Suitability of Different Thermometers for Measuring Body Core and Skin Temperatures in Suckling Piglets
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Single and Triple Testicular Biopsy Using Biopty Gun on Spermatogenesis in Pubertal Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Differentially Expressed Gene Patterns in Ascarid-Infected Chickens of Higher- or Lower-Performing Genotypes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation in Large Animals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Alkyphenol Exposure Alters Steroidogenesis in Male Lizard Podarcis siculus

1
Department of Biology, University of Naples ‘‘Federico II’’, 80126 Naples, Italy
2
National Institute of Biostructures and Biosystems (INBB), 00136 Rome, Italy
3
Center for Studies on Bioinspired Agro-environmental Technology (BAT Center), 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
First two authors equally contributed.
Animals 2021, 11(4), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041003
Submission received: 8 March 2021 / Revised: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 29 March 2021 / Published: 2 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Animal Spermatogenesis)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The non-stop release and increase in the ecosystem of toxic and polluting substances such as endocrine disrupting chemicals pose a threat to the survival of wildlife. Nonylphenol and Octylphenol are well known xenobiotics, with estrogen-like properties, widely used to optimize the manufacturing of different products, and due to their hydrophobicity and low solubility, they are persistent and ubiquitous in many environmental matrices. The goal of the present study was to investigate the effects of these compounds on the testis of the lizard Podarcis siculus during the reproductive period, focusing our attention on the steroidogenesis process. The lizard P. siculus has been chosen as animal model as it is usually used as a sentinel species and because the morphology and physiology of testis between lizards and mammals do not change, allowing a fine correlation of observed effects to human health. Obtained results showed that both substances used in this study, are able to alter testis histology and localization of key steroidogenic enzymes such as 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and P450 aromatase, which represents the major target of these two alkylphenols. In conclusion, Nonylphenol and Octylphenol inhibit steroidogenesis, interfering with the reproductive capacity of the lizard Podarcis siculus.

Abstract

Background: Nonylphenol (NP) and Octylphenol (OP) are persistent and non-biodegradable environmental contaminants classified as endocrine disruptor chemicals (EDCs). These compounds are widely used in several industrial applications and present estrogen-like properties, which have extensively been studied in aquatic organisms. The present study aimed to verify the interference of these compounds alone, and in mixture, on the reproductive cycle of the male terrestrial vertebrate Podarcis siculus, focusing mainly on the steroidogenesis process. Methods: Male lizards have been treated with different injections of both NP and OP alone and in mixture, and evaluation has been carried out using a histological approach. Results: Results obtained showed that both substances are able to alter both testis histology and localization of key steroidogenic enzymes, such as 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD), 17β- hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17β-HSD) and P450 aromatase. Moreover, OP exerts a preponderant effect, and the P450 aromatase represents the major target of both chemicals. Conclusions: In conclusion, NP and OP inhibit steroidogenesis, which in turn may reduce the reproductive capacity of the specimens.

1. Introduction

In the last few decades, the survival of wildlife has been seriously threatened by the continuous and rapid increase in the process of urbanization and industrialization.
Notwithstanding the man-made products, which apparently represent a great benefit, they are not very compatible with the environment, and represent one of the main causes of the dissipation of natural resources and the non-stop release and increase into the ecosystem of toxic and polluting substances. Over the period 2011–2018, sales of chemicals belonging to the family of endocrine disruptors chemicals (EDCs) were seen to remain stable at around 360 million kg/year in the European Union (EU), and the main four agricultural countries, France, Spain, Italy and Germany, accounted for more than two thirds of these sales in the EU [1]. This evidence is particularly important as a high rate of sale is directly proportional to a greater use and consequently greater release of residues into the surrounding environment, resulting in a threat to the entire terrestrial ecosystem [2].
EDCs represent a large family of substances capable of interfering with the endocrine system at multiple levels and therefore, contribute to an increased risk of adverse health outcomes throughout life [3,4].
Nonylphenol (NP) and Octylphenol (OP) are well known EDCs widely used to optimize the manufacturing of several common products such as pesticides, herbicides, lubricants, plastics, detergents and cosmetics [5,6]. These compounds own high hydrophobicity and low solubility, thus, they are persistent and ubiquitous in many environmental matrices, such as aquatic ecosystems, agriculture soil and sediments [7,8], and they have also been detected in airborne particles and indoor air [6]. Moreover, they can easily enter the food chain as they have been found to accumulate in a variety of seafood and aquatic organisms [9,10], as well as having been detected in drinking water [11]. In addition, recent studies have pointed out the presence of traces of these substances in human blood, serum, breast milk, amniotic fluid and urine [12,13] indicating that human exposure is unavoidable [14].
Due to their affinity to bind to the estrogen receptors (ERs), even if it is lower compared to the endogenous hormone 17-b-estradiol (E2), their mode of action is thought to be mediated by an interaction with ERs [15,16,17,18], thus envisaging agonistic or antagonistic activity on the target tissues [19].
Accumulating evidence reported that the main target is represented by the male and female reproductive systems. In males, this can negatively affect sperm vitality and density and testicular cancer, as well as prostate cancer; in females, the exposure is associated with menstrual cycle alteration, sex ratio imbalance and breast cancer [15,16,20,21,22].
Moreover, alkylphenols (APs) are capable of interfering with the reproductive hormonal system in different organisms [23,24,25], and most of the studies have been conducted on aquatic vertebrates where it has been shown that APs, due to their estrogenic potency, cause adverse effects on both testis and ovaries with a consequent marked alteration in sexual development, including gonadal maturation, spawning time, egg and sperm production [26,27]. Nonylphenol exposure in female mice induces the early beginning of puberty and pathohistological abnormalities in the uterus and ovaries [28]; in male specimens, it causes disruption of Sertoli cells, oxidative stress, and alters sex hormone production, thereby disrupting spermatogenesis [29]. In addition, NP affects the spermatogenesis and the morpho-physiology of both testis and epididymis of the terrestrial vertebrate Podarcis siculus [30].
Thus, in light of the above data, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of NP and OP on the testis of the lizard Podarcis siculus during the reproductive period, focusing our attention on the localization of key steroidogenic enzymes involved in the endocrine regulation of the spermatogenic cycle and, considering that one concern about EDCs is their potential cocktail effects, compounds given have been tested alone, and in mixture.
Podarcis siculus presents a tubular testis organization with a seasonal reproductive cycle whereby gonads are active only when temperature and photoperiod are more favorable [31,32], and for this reason it is a powerful experimental model for studying reproduction [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]; moreover, it is widespread in Southern Italy inhabiting pristine areas, city parks and cultivated fields, and its ecological and life history features make it an excellent sentinel species for the biomonitoring of the ecotoxicological impact of EDCs [41,42].

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Nonylphenol (NP) and Octylphenol (OP) were obtained from FLUKA (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.2. Animals

Animal experiments were performed according to the ethical provisions imposed by the European Union and permitted by the National Committee of the Italian Ministry of Health on in vivo experimentation.
Male specimens of the lizard (Podarcis siculus) were captured during the reproductive period (May–June 2013) in Campania (Southern Italy; Latitude: 41°19′54″ N; Longitude: 13°59′29″ E) and precisely, in the area near the metropolitan city of Naples, which is the one with the highest population density in Europe.
Animals were placed in large soil-filled terraria containing heather and, indoors subjected to a photoperiod (11 h of daylight) and natural temperatures (15–24 °C); moreover, they were daily fed with live fly larvae Tenebrio molitor, water was available ad libitum, and to reverse capture-related stress conditions, an acclimatization period of 15 days was allowed before starting the treatments [43].

2.3. Treatments

NP and OP were dissolved in 50 µL of corn oil used, respectively, at concentrations of 0.172 µg and 0.161 µg based on previously studies [44,45,46,47] and administered through intraperitoneal injections every 2 days.
Lizards were divided into five groups each consisting of ten animals:
Group Control: lizards intraperitoneally injected with twelve (12) injections, each of 50 µL of corn oil and sacrificed 24 h after the last injection.
Group I: lizards treated with twelve (12) intraperitoneal injections of NP and sacrificed 24 h after the last injection.
Group II: lizards treated with twelve (12) intraperitoneal injections of OP and sacrificed 24 h after the last injection.
Group III: lizards treated with ten (10) intraperitoneal injections of NP + OP and sacrificed 24 h after the last injection.
Group IV: lizards treated with seventeen (17) intraperitoneal injections of NP + OP and sacrificed 24 h after the last injection.
Lizards were inspected daily for signs of toxicity and death, and the day after the last injection, were anesthetized and sacrificed by decapitation.

2.4. Histological and Immunohistochemistry Analysis

To evaluate testicular morphology, testes were fixed in Bouin for 24 h at room temperature, dehydrated in ascending alcohols, paraffin embedded, and cut into 5-μm serial sections using a rotative microtome. Subsequently, the sections were subjected to routine histological analysis and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Morphometric evaluation was carried out measuring connective tissue height, germ cell area and testis cord diameters, which were measured as previously reported in Di Lorenzo et al. [48].
For immunohistochemistry, poly-L-lysine slides (Menzel-Glaser, Braunschweig, Germany) with 5-µm thick sections were dewaxed, rehydrated in a graded series of alcohol, heat-treated (microwave) for 20 min in 10 mM citrate (pH 6.0) antigen-retrieval buffer, and then washed in PBS [49,50]. Briefly, to reduce endogenous peroxidase activity, sections were treated with 2.5% H2O2 for 40 min at room temperature, and then blocked for 1 h at room temperature with normal goat serum (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
Slides were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies diluted in normal goat serum:
Rabbit anti-human 3β-HSD (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA);
Rabbit anti-mouse 17β-HSD (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA);
Rabbit anti-human P450 aromatase (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
These antibodies have been previously validated in Podarcis siculus as described in Rosati et al. [51]. The day after, sections were washed in PBS and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat-anti rabbit/mouse secondary antibody diluted 1:200 in normal goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, sections were stained using diaminobenzidine (DAB) as chromogen, and counterstained with Meyer’s hematoxylin. Negative controls were carried out by omitting incubation with primary antibody.
Histology slides were observed using a Zeiss Axioskop microscope and the images were acquired using Axiovision 4.7 Software (Zeiss).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Data obtained were expressed as means ± standard error of mean (SEM). The statistical significance was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test, and differences were considered statistically significant when the p values were at least p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. NP and OP Induce Alteration in Testis Morphology

In the testis of the control group, the seminiferous tubules, as expected in the reproductive period, showed Sertoli cells and germ cells in all stages of the spermatogenic cycle from spermatogonia (Spg) to spermatozoa (Spz); moreover, Leydig cells (LC) were present in the interstitial spaces (Figure 1A). Furthermore, in the examples of control, the tubules are characterized by a large lumen and many layers of superimposed germ cells (Figure 2A,B).
In specimens treated with 12 I NP, it was still possible to highlight the presence of germ cells in all stages of differentiation, but only a few spermatozoa were detectable in the wide lumen of the tubules (Figure 1B). In addition, the treatment with 12 I NP induced, compared to the control group, a reduction of tubule diameter, an area of the connective tissue surrounding the tubules and thickness of the germinative epithelium (Figure 2A,B). Moreover, tubules also showed several evident empty spaces, as in accordance with a reduction in the total amount of germ cells. This reduction of germ cells was more prominent after treatment with 12 I OP which, in turn, caused a further increase in the area of the connective tissue (Figure 2A–C). In addition, in the tubules treated with 12I OP, spermatids and spermatozoa were absent (Figure 1C).
Morphological analysis of the testis in specimens treated with 10 injections of the mixture NP + OP showed a huge reduction in the area of connective tissue and in addition, a reduction in the diameter of the tubules, and in the thickness of the germinative epithelium (Figure 2A–C), which resulted composed by spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), few spermatids (Spd), and no spermatozoa in the lumen (Figure 1D).
After 17 injections of NP + OP, testes displayed a strong reduction of both tubule diameters and germinative epithelium thickness and were made up of only spermatogonia (Spg) and spermatocytes (Spc I and II) (Figure 1E and Figure 2A,B). Interestingly, this dose did not seem to determine any change in the connective tissue area compared to the control group (Figure 2C).
Furthermore, all the treatments did not cause significant alterations in the Sertoli and Leydig cells, which appeared to be distributed in a similar manner in all experimental groups (Figure 1B–E).

3.2. Immunohistochemistry for 3 βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 Aromatase

During the reproductive period in male lizard Podarcis siculus, immunopositivity for 3βHSD, 17 βHSD was recorded both in germ and somatic cells, as previously reported in Rosati et al. [51]. Differently, P450 localization was detected within Leydig cells, spermatidis and spermatozoa with a faint signal in spermatogonia and Sertoli cells, and an absent signal among spermatocytes I and II [38].
After 12 injections of NP, germ cells as spermatogonia and spermatocytes I and II, as well as Sertoli cells, showed a signal for 3βHSD; moreover, the immunohistochemical signal was strong in spermatids and spermatozoa, and in the cytoplasm of Leydig cells (Figure 3A,B). The immunopositive signal for 17βHSD was recorded in spermatogonia, in spermatocytes I and II, in the tail of spermatozoa, and in the cytoplasm of Leydig and Sertoli cells. A faint signal was labeled in spermatids (Figure 3C–E). The signal for P450 aromatase was dully highlighted in spermatogonia, spermatocytes I and II, and cytoplasm of Leydig cells. A strong immunohistochemical signal was found in spermatids and spermatozoa. No signal was detected in Sertoli cells (Figure 3C–E).
In testes treated with 12 injections of OP, 3βHSD showed markedly weaker staining in spermatogonia, spermatocytes I and II, and in Sertoli cells; no signal was detected in the cytoplasm of Leydig cells (Figure 4A,B, insert B). Similarly, no signal for 17 βHSD was found within Leydig cells (Figure 4C,D). Moreover, a signal for 17 βHSD was detected in mitotic and meiotic germ cells as spermatogonia and spermatocytes I and II, and in the cytoplasm of the somatic Sertoli cells (Figure 4C,D). P450 aromatase was weakly labeled only in spermatocytes I and II (Figure 4E–G).
After treatment with 10 injections of the mixture NP + OP, a weak signal for 3βHSD was evident in the cytoplasm of spermatocytes I and II, and a faint signal was also present in spermatogonia, spermatids, and Leydig and Sertoli cells (Figure 5A–C, insert C). Regarding 17 βHSD, a tenuous signal was revealed only in spermatogonia, spermatocytes I and II, and in the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells (Figure 5., D, E, insert E). A faint signal was evident in spermatids (Figure 5, insert E). No signal was found in Leydig cells (Figure 5E). Finally, P450 aromatase was weakly localized only at the level of spermatocytes I and the few spermatids (Figure 5F–H).
Overlapping results were obtained after treatment with 17 I NP + OP regarding 3βHSD localization. In detail, a signal was present in the cytoplasm of spermatocytes I and in the cytoplasm of Leydig cells. Meanwhile, a faint signal was evident in spermatogonia and spermatocytes II, as well as Sertoli cells (Figure 6A,B). In testes treated with 17 I NP + OP, the immunopositive signal for 17βHSD was recorded in germ cells as spermatogonia, spermatocytes I and II. A light signal was labeled also in the cytoplasm of Leydig and Sertoli cells (Figure 6C,D). Moreover, no signal was recorded for P450 aromatase neither at the level of germ cells, except spermatocytes I, nor at the level of somatic cells (Figure 6E,F).
No immunohistochemical signal was found in the negative control sections (Figure 3, insert F; Figure 4, insert E; Figure 5, insert H; Figure 6, insert E).

4. Discussion

Results described above highlight that alkylphenols administered during the reproductive period affect the morpho-physiology of testis of the seasonal breeder Podarcis siculus.
Spermatogenesis, in fact, is regulated by pituitary gonadotropins, environmental factors and local testicular factors, including testosterone and 17-β-estradiol [40,52,53,54]. Specifically, spermatogenesis is arrested when 17-β-estradiol titers are high and testosterone titers are low and conversely, it is resumed when 17-β-estradiol titers are low and testosterone titers are higher [39]; consequently, it is clear that the balance of intratesticular levels of both androgens and estrogens acts as an on/off switch for spermatogenesis control [31,39]. For this reason, the presence in Podarcis testis of the enzymes directly involved in the sex hormones production, as 3β HSD, 17β HSD and P450 aromatase, play a pivotal role in the control of spermatogenesis [39,51]. Thus, considering the xenoestrogenic activity of both NP and OP, the purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanisms by which these chemicals affect spermatogenesis.
We demonstrated that both AP alter testis histo-architecture with a more preponderant harmful effect of OP than NP, indeed, in the group treated with 12 I of OP, compared to samples treated with 12 I of NP, it was possible to detect the absence of the last stages of differentiation (spermatids and spermatozoa), and a reduction of both seminiferous tubule diameter and area of germinative epithelium, indicating a failure in replacement of cells from the basis of the tubules. In addition, we have registered also an increase of intratesticular connective tissue.
The gonadotoxicity of APs has been already demonstrated in some fishes [24,55,56]; moreover, recently it has been shown that a NP-diet could induce apoptosis in testicular germ cells [30] and previously, a similar effect has been shown following treatment with the fungicide methyl thiophane [57]. Particularly intricate and interesting were the results obtained following the treatment with the mixture of alkylphenols, where it was again possible to notice the preponderant action of OP. especially in the group treated with 17I NP + OP. Indeed, the treatment with 10 I NP + OP determined a similar effect found in the samples treated with NP 12I, because likewise, the samples had a reduction in both tubule lumen and area of germinative epithelium, though testis treated with 10I NP+ OP are missing only spermatozoa. Differently, the treatment with NP + OP 17 I has determined an effect similar but stronger, than the treatment with the OP 10 I, indicating that the greater amount of OP present in the mixture may have won in competition with NP. This data confirms that exposure to multiple endocrine disrupting chemicals with similar or different modes of action lead to “cocktail” effects, and the combined exposure can lead to additive and synergistic effects [58,59,60]. Morphological results were supported by the localization of key enzymes requested for the biosynthesis of testosterone and 17-β-estradiol such as 3βHSD, 17βHSD and P450 aromatase.
Recently it has been demonstrated that all these enzymes are differently expressed from both germ and somatic cells during the different phases of the reproductive cycle, and that especially P450 aromatase, achieves a pivotal role in local control of spermatogenesis, and in particular spermiohistogenesis [39].
NP and OP both alone and in mixture significantly alter these enzyme localizations during the reproductive period and in this case, it is possible also to note prominent OP effects. Treatments induce alternation in the pattern of localization of all three studied enzymes and the inhibition of both 3βHSD and 17βHSD indicate that the treatments cause an altered biosynthesis of testosterone [61].
The major effects were about P450 aromatase, which converts androgens into estrogens [62], and this is quite interesting as P450 aromatase represents a balance molecule between androgen and estrogens levels as its absence also in germ cells, indicates a failure in the proliferative and meiotic phases of gametogenesis, which consequently leads to a failure in spermiogenesis. Taken all together, these findings suggested that APs, especially OP, could determine a reduction of the enzymes involved in the production of sex hormones, and in particular 3 β-HSD and P450 aromatase, which in turn, alter the balance between androgen and estrogen levels, thus affecting spermatogenesis, especially the spermiohistogenesis. This data could explain also in the testes treated, especially with OP, the absence of germ cells in the last stages of differentiation as spermatids and spermatozoa.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, NP and OP inhibit steroidogenesis, which in turn, may reduce the reproductive capacity of the specimens.
Podarcis siculus proves to be once again an excellent experimental model, not only for the study of the mechanisms that control spermatogenesis, but also for the study of the effects of environmental pollutants on gonads.

Author Contributions

Investigation, M.D.L., A.M., L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.L., M.D.F. and L.R.; conceptualization, V.L. and M.D.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by departmental research funds of the University of Naples Federico II.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the ethical provisions imposed by the European Union and permitted by the National Committee of the Italian Ministry of Health on in vivo experimentation before 2013. All treatments were performed before 2013, the samples were collected and stored at the Department of Biology and analyzed to obtain present results.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

References

  1. Eurostat, 2020. Sales of Pesticides in the EU. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20200603-1 (accessed on 3 June 2020).
  2. Xie, Y.; Jiang, H.; Chang, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, H. Gonadal disruption after single dose exposure of prothioconazole and prothioconazole-desthio in male lizards (Eremias argus). Environ. Poll. 2019, 255, 113297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kassotis, C.D.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Demeneix, B.A.; Porta, M.; Slama, R.; Trasande, L. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: Economic, regulatory, and policy implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. La Merrill, M.A.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Smith, M.T.; Goodson, W.; Browne, P.; Patisaul, H.B.; Guyton, K.Z.; Kortenkamp, A.; Cogliano, V.J.; Woodruff, T.J.; et al. Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Salgueiro-González, N.; Muniategui-Lorenzo, S.; López-Mahía, P.; Prada-Rodríguez, D. Trends in analytical methodologies for the determination of alkylphenols and bisphenol A in water samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 962, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Asimakopoulos, A.G.; Thomaidis, N.S.; Koupparis, M.A. Recent trends in biomonitoring of bisphenol A, 4-t-octylphenol, and 4-nonylphenol. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 210, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Careghini, A.; Mastorgio, F.; Saponaro, S.; Sezenna, E. Bisphenol A, nonylphenols, benzophenons, and benzotriazoles in soils, groundwater, surface water, sediments and food: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2015, 8, 5711–5741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Zhang, Z.; Ren, N.; Kannan, K.; Nan, J.; Liu, L.; Ma, W.; Qi, H.; Li, Y. Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting phenols and estrogens in water and sediment of the Songhua river, northeastern China. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 66, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salgueiro-Gonzáles, N.; Turnes-Carou, I.; Viñas, L.; Besada, V.; Muniategui-Lorenzo, S.; López-Mahía, P.; Prada-Rodríguez, D. Occurrence of alkylphenols and bisphenol A in wild mussel samples from the Spanish Atlantic coast and Bay of Biscay. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 106, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Luo, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Li, H.P.; Luo, Z.F.; Qu, Z.P.; Yang, Z.G. Determination of 4-n-octylphenol, 4-n-nonylphenol and bisphenol A in fish samples from lake and rivers within Hunan Province China. Microchem. J. 2017, 132, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maggioni, S.; Balaguer, S.; Chiozzotto, P.; Benfenati, E. Screening of endocrinig disrupting phenols, herbicides, steroid estrogens, and estrogenicity in drinking water from the waterworks of 35 Italian cities and from PET-bottled mineral water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20, 1649–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ademollo, N.; Ferrara, F.; Delise, M.; Fabietti, F.; Funari, E. Nonylphenol and octylphenol in human breast milk. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 984–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shekhar, S.; Sood, S.; Showkat, S.; Lite, C.; Chandrasekhar, A.; Vairamani, M.; Barathi, S.; Santosh, W. Detection of phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) from maternal blood plasma and amniotic fluid in Indian population. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2017, 241, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nappi, F.; Barrea, L.; Di Somma, C.; Savanelli, M.C.; Muscogiuri, G.; Orio, F.; Savastano, S. Endocrine aspects of environmental “obesogen” pollutants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 765–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Forte, M.; Di Lorenzo, M.; Carrizzo, A.; Valiante, S.; Vecchione, C.; Laforgia, V.; De Falco, M. Nonylphenol effects on human prostate non tumorigenic cells. Toxicology 2016, 357, e358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Forte, M.; Di Lorenzo, M.; Iachetta, G.; Mita, D.G.; Laforgia, V.; De Falco, M. Nonylphenol acts on prostate adenocarcinoma cells via estrogen molecular pathways. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 180, e419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Laws, S.C.; Carey, S.A.; Ferrell, J.M.; Bodman, G.J.; Cooper, R.L. Estrogenic activity of octylphenol, nonylphenol, bisphenol A and methoxychlor in rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2000, 54, e167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, C.; Lai, Y.; Ouyang, J.; Yang, T.; Guo, Y.; Yang, J.; Huang, S. Influence of nonylphenol and octylphenol exposure on 5-HT, 5-HT transporter, and 5-HT2A receptor. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, e8286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Acconcia, F.; Fiocchetti, M.; Marino, M. Xenoestrogen regulation of ERa/ERb balance in hormone-associated cancers. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 457, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Annamalai, J.; Namasivayam, V. Endocrine disrupting chemicals in the atmosphere: Their effects on humans and wildlife. Environ. Int. 2015, 76, 78–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, M.; Tang, R.; Fu, G.; Xu, B.; Zhu, P.; Qiao, S.; Chen, X.; Xu, B.; Qin, Y.; Lu, C.; et al. Association of exposure to phenols and idiopathic male infertility. J. Hazard Mater. 2013, 250–251, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bian, Q.; Qian, J.; Xu, L.; Chen, J.; Song, L.; Wang, X. The toxic effects of 4-tertoctylphenol on the reproductive system of male rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Puy-Azurmendi, E.; Olivares, A.; Vallejo, A.; Ortiz-Zarragoitia, M.; Piña, B.; Zuloaga, O.; Cajara ville, M.P. Estrogenic effects of nonylphenol and octylphenol isomers in vitro by recombinant yeast assay (RYA) and in vivo with early life stages of zebrafish. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466–467, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Del Giudice, G.; Prisco, M.; Agnese, M.; Verderame, M.; Rosati, L.; Limatola, E.; Andreuccetti, P. Effects of nonylphenol on vitellogenin synthesis in adult males of the spotted ray Torpedo marmorata. J. Fish Biol. 2012, 80, 2112–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Di Lorenzo, M.; Barra, T.; Rosati, L.; Valiante, S.; Capaldo, A.; De Falco, M.; Laforgia, V. Adrenal gland response to endocrine disrupting chemicals in fishes, amphibians and reptiles: A comparative overview. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2020, 297, 113550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. El-Sayed Ali, T.; Abdel-Aziz, S.H.; El-Sayed, A.F.; Zeid, S. Structural and functional effects of early exposure to 4-nonylphenol on gonadal development of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): A-histological alterations in ovaries. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 40, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, Q.; Zhang, S.C.; Hu, J.H.; Xu, Y.Y. Sperm of rosy barb (Puntius conchonius) as an in vitro assay system of nonylphenol cytotoxicity. J. Environ. Sci. 2006, 18, 417–419. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Y.B.; Cheon, Y.P.; Choi, D.; Lee, S.H. Histological Analysis of Reproductive System in Low-Dose Nonylphenol-treated F1 Female Mice. Dev. Repr. 2020, 24, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Malmir, M.; Faraji, T.; Ghafarizadeh, A.A.; Khodabandelo, H. Effect of nonylphenol on spermatogenesis: A systematic review. Andrologia 2020, 52, e13748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Verderame, M.; Limatola, E. Interferences of an environmental pollutant with estrogen-like action in the male reproductive system of the terrestrial vertebrate Podarcis sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2015, 213, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Angelini, F.; Botte, V. Spermatogenesis in Reptiles: Dynamic and regulatory aspect. Sex Orig. Evol. 1992, 6, 211–230. [Google Scholar]
  32. Angelini, F.; Picariello, O.; Botte, V. Influence of Photoperiod and Temperature on the Testicular Activity of the Lizard, Lacerta S. Sicula Raf. Ital. J. Zool. 1976, 43, 11–123. [Google Scholar]
  33. Agnese, M.; Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Coraggio, F.; Valiante, S.; Scudiero, R.; Andreuccetti, P. The VIP/VPACR system in the reproductive cycle of male lizard Podarcis sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 205, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rosati, L.; Andreuccetti, P.; Prisco, M. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) localization in the epididymis of two vertebrate species. C. R. Biol. 2017, 340, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Paolucci, M.; Di Fiore, M.M. Putative steroid-binding receptors and non receptor components ad testicular activity in the lizard Podarcis sicula sicula. Reproduction 1992, 96, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Raucci, F.; Di Fiore, M.M. The reproductive activity in the testis of Podarcis s. sicula involves D-aspartic acid: A study on c-kit receptor protein, tyrosine kinase activity and PCNA protein during annual sexual cycle. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2009, 161, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Raucci, F.; D’Aniello, S.; Di Fiore, M.M. Endocrine roles of D-aspartic acid in the testis of lizard Podarcis s. sicula. J. Endocrinol. 2005, 187, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Coraggio, F.; Valiante, S.; Scudiero, R.; Laforgia, V.; Andreuccetti, P.; Agnese, M. PACAP and PAC1 receptor in the reproductive cycle of male lizard Podarcis sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2014, 205, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rosati, L.; Agnese, M.; Di Fiore, M.M.; Andreuccetti, P.; Prisco, M. P450 aromatase: A key enzyme in the spermatogenesis of the Italian wall lizard, Podarcis sicula. J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 219, 2402–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Rosati, L.; Agnese, M.; Di Lorenzo, M.; Barra, T.; Valiante, S.; Prisco, M. Spermatogenesis and regulatory factors in the wall lizard Podarcis sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2020, 298, 113579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Verderame, M.; Limatola, E.; Scudiero, R. Ectopic synthesis of vitellogenin in testis and epididymis of estrogen-treated lizard Podarcis sicula. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2016, 235, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Verderame, M.; Limatola, E.; Scudiero, R. Estrogenic contamination by manure fertilizer in organic farming: A case study with the lizard Podarcis sicula. Ecotoxicol. 2016, 25, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Di Lorenzo, M.; De Falco, M.; Andreuccetti, P. Immunolocalization of aromatase P450 in the epididymis of Podarcis sicula and Rattus rattus. Eur. J. Histochem. 2020, 64, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. De Falco, M.; Sellitti, A.; Sciarrillo, R.; Capaldo, A.; Valiante, S.; Iachetta, G.; Forte, M.; Laforgia, V. Nonylphenol effects on the HPA axis of the bioindicator vertebrate, Podarcis sicula lizard. Chemosphere 2014, 104, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Di Lorenzo, M.; Sciarrillo, R.; Rosati, L.; Sellitti, A.; Barra, T.; De Luca, A.; Laforgia, V.; De Falco, M. Effects of alkylphenols mixture on the adrenal gland of the lizard Podarcis sicula. Chemosphere 2020, 258, 127239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sciarrillo, R.; Capaldo, A.; Valiante, S.; Gay, F.; Sellitti, A.; Laforgia, V.; De Falco, M. Thyroid Hormones as Potential Early Biomarkers of Exposure to Nonylphenol in Adult Male Lizard (Podarcis sicula). Open Zool. J. 2010, 17, 3. [Google Scholar]
  47. Sciarrillo, R.; Di Lorenzo, M.; Valiante, S.; Rosati, L.; De Falco, M. OctylPhenol (OP) alone and in combination with NonylPhenol (NP) alters the structure and the function of thyroid gland of the lizard Podarcis siculus. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Di Lorenzo, M.; Winge, S.B.; Svingen, T.; De Falco, M.; Boberg, J. Intrauterine exposure to diethylhexyl phthalate disrupts gap junctions in the fetal rat testis. Curr. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 1, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Prisco, M.; Rosati, L.; Agnese, M.; Aceto, S.; Andreuccetti, P.; Valiante, S. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in the testis of the quail Coturnix coturnix: Expression, localization, and phylogenetic analysis. Evol. Dev. 2019, 218, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rosati, L.; Di Fiore, M.M.; Prisco, M.; Di Giacomo Russo, F.; Venditti, M.; Andreuccetti, P.; Chieffi Baccari, G.; Santillo, A. Seasonal expression and cellular distribution of star and steroidogenic enzymes in quail testis. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2019, 332, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Rosati, L.; Santillo, A.; Di Fiore, M.M.; Andreuccetti, P.; Prisco, M. Testicular steroidogenic enzymes in the lizard Podarcis sicula during the spermatogenic cycle. C. R. Biol. 2017, 340, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chieffi, P.; Colucci D’Amato, L.; Guarino, F.; Salvatore, G.; Angelini, F. 17 betaestradiol induces spermatogonial proliferation through mitogen-activated protein kinase (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) activity in the lizard (Podarcis s. sicula). Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2002, 61, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Di Fiore, M.M.; Santillo, A.; Sciarrillo, R.; Valiante, S.; Laforgia, V.; Andreuccetti, P. Sex steroid hormone secretion in the wall lizard Podarcis sicula testis: The involvement of VIP. J. Exp. Zool. Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 2015, 323, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rosati, L.; Prisco, M.; Di Fiore, M.M.; Santillo, A.; Valiante, S.; Andreuccetti, P.; Agnese, M. Role of PACAP on Testosterone and 17βestradiol production in the testis of wall lizard Podarcis sicula. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2016, 191, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Weber, L.P.; Kiparissis, Y.; Hwang, G.S.; Niimi, A.J.; Janz, D.M.; Metcalfe, C.D. Increased cellular apoptosis after chronic aqueous exposure to nonylphenol and quercetin in adult medaka (Oryzias latipes). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2002, 131, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kaptaner, B.; Unal, G. Effects of 17α-ethynylestradiol and nonylphenol on liver and gonadal apoptosis and histopathology in Chacalburnus tarichii. Environ. Toxicol. 2011, 26, 610–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cardone, A. Testicular toxicity of methyl thiophanate in the Italian wall lizard (Podarcis sicula): Morphological and molecular evaluation. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 512–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kortenkamp, A. Ten years of mixing cocktails: A review of combination effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Vandenberg, L.N.; Colborn, T.; Hayes, T.B.; Heindel, J.J.; Jacobs, D.R., Jr.; Lee, D.H.; Myers, J.P.; Shioda, T.; Soto, A.M.; von Saal, F.M.; et al. Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology. Reprod. Toxicol. 2013, 38, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Vandenberg, L.N. Non-monotonic dose responses in studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals: Bisphenol A as a case study. Dose-Response 2014, 12, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ying, F.; Ding, C.; Ge, R.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Yu, B.; Rong, J.; Han, X. Comparative evaluation of nonylphenol isomers on steroidogenesis of rat Leydig cells. Toxicol. Vitro 2012, 26, 1114–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cooke, P.S.; Nanjappa, M.K.; Ko, C.; Prins, G.S.; Hess, R.A. Estrogens in male physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2017, 97, 995–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Testis from reproductive period. (A) Testis control. (B) Testis treated with 12I Nonylphenol (NP). (C) Testis treated with 12I Octylphenol (OP). (D) Testis treated with 10I NP + OP. (E) Testis treated with 17I NP + OP. Arrow: Sertoli cells; double arrowhead LC: Leydig cells, Spg: Spermatogonia, Spc I: Spermatocytes I, Spc II: Spermatocytes II, Spt: Spermatids, and Spz: Spermatozoa. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in Figure 1A–E.
Figure 1. Testis from reproductive period. (A) Testis control. (B) Testis treated with 12I Nonylphenol (NP). (C) Testis treated with 12I Octylphenol (OP). (D) Testis treated with 10I NP + OP. (E) Testis treated with 17I NP + OP. Arrow: Sertoli cells; double arrowhead LC: Leydig cells, Spg: Spermatogonia, Spc I: Spermatocytes I, Spc II: Spermatocytes II, Spt: Spermatids, and Spz: Spermatozoa. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in Figure 1A–E.
Animals 11 01003 g001
Figure 2. Morphometric analysis of Podarcis siculus testis treated with NP and OP during the reproductive period. (A) Diameter of the seminiferous tubules. (B) Area germ cells. (C) Area connective tissue. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Morphometric analysis of Podarcis siculus testis treated with NP and OP during the reproductive period. (A) Diameter of the seminiferous tubules. (B) Area germ cells. (C) Area connective tissue. * p < 0.05.
Animals 11 01003 g002
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromatase in Podarcis testis treated with 12I NP. (A,B) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow) and Leydig (LC) cells, as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt) and spermatozoa (Spz). (CE) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow) and Leydig (LC) cells, as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt) and spermatozoa (Spz). (FI)) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is evident in Leydig (LC) and germ cells as in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt) and spermatozoa (Spz). No signal is present in Sertoli cells (arrow). Insert (F) No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,C,F) 5 µm in (B,D,E,GI) and 50 µm in (F) insert.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromatase in Podarcis testis treated with 12I NP. (A,B) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow) and Leydig (LC) cells, as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt) and spermatozoa (Spz). (CE) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow) and Leydig (LC) cells, as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt) and spermatozoa (Spz). (FI)) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is evident in Leydig (LC) and germ cells as in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt) and spermatozoa (Spz). No signal is present in Sertoli cells (arrow). Insert (F) No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,C,F) 5 µm in (B,D,E,GI) and 50 µm in (F) insert.
Animals 11 01003 g003
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromaatse in Podarcis testis treated with 12I OP. (A,B) Insert (B) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). No signal is present in Leydig cells (LC). (C,D) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). No signal is present in Leydig cells (LC). (EG) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is weakly evident only in spermatocytes I and II. No signal is present in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), as well as in spermatogonia (Spg). Insert (E) No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,C,E) 5 µm in (B), (B) insert, (D,F,G) and 50 µm in insert (E).
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromaatse in Podarcis testis treated with 12I OP. (A,B) Insert (B) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). No signal is present in Leydig cells (LC). (C,D) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). No signal is present in Leydig cells (LC). (EG) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is weakly evident only in spermatocytes I and II. No signal is present in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), as well as in spermatogonia (Spg). Insert (E) No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,C,E) 5 µm in (B), (B) insert, (D,F,G) and 50 µm in insert (E).
Animals 11 01003 g004
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromatase in Podarcis testis treated with 10I NP + OP. (AC) Insert (C) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), and spermatids (Spt). (D,E)- insert E) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt). No signal is present in Leydig cells (LC). (FH) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is weakly evident only in spermatocytes I (Spc I) and spermatids (Spt). No signal is present in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), and spermatocytes II (Spc II). Insert (H): No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,D,F) 5 µm in (B,C), insert (C,E), insert (E,G,H), and 50 µm in insert (H).
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromatase in Podarcis testis treated with 10I NP + OP. (AC) Insert (C) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), and spermatids (Spt). (D,E)- insert E) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II), spermatids (Spt). No signal is present in Leydig cells (LC). (FH) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is weakly evident only in spermatocytes I (Spc I) and spermatids (Spt). No signal is present in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), and spermatocytes II (Spc II). Insert (H): No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,D,F) 5 µm in (B,C), insert (C,E), insert (E,G,H), and 50 µm in insert (H).
Animals 11 01003 g005
Figure 6. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromatase in Podarcis testis treated with 17I NP + OP. (A,B)) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). (C,D)) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow) and Leydig cells, in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). (E,F)) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is weakly evident only in spermatocytes I (Spc I). No signal is present in Leydig (LC) cells and Sertoli cells (arrow), as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), and spermatocytes II (Spc II). Insert (E): No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,C,E), 5 µm in (B,D,F) and 50 µm in insert (E).
Figure 6. Immunohistochemical localization (brown areas) of 3βHSD, 17 βHSD and P450 aromatase in Podarcis testis treated with 17I NP + OP. (A,B)) 3βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Leydig (LC) and Sertoli cells (arrow), in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). (C,D)) 17βHSD distribution. Signal is evident in Sertoli (arrow) and Leydig cells, in spermatogonia (Spg), spermatocytes I (Spc I) and II (Spc II). (E,F)) P450 aromatase distribution. Signal is weakly evident only in spermatocytes I (Spc I). No signal is present in Leydig (LC) cells and Sertoli cells (arrow), as well as in spermatogonia (Spg), and spermatocytes II (Spc II). Insert (E): No signal is evident in control section. Scale bars correspond to 20 µm in (A,C,E), 5 µm in (B,D,F) and 50 µm in insert (E).
Animals 11 01003 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Lorenzo, M.; Mileo, A.; Laforgia, V.; De Falco, M.; Rosati, L. Alkyphenol Exposure Alters Steroidogenesis in Male Lizard Podarcis siculus. Animals 2021, 11, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041003

AMA Style

Di Lorenzo M, Mileo A, Laforgia V, De Falco M, Rosati L. Alkyphenol Exposure Alters Steroidogenesis in Male Lizard Podarcis siculus. Animals. 2021; 11(4):1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Lorenzo, Mariana, Aldo Mileo, Vincenza Laforgia, Maria De Falco, and Luigi Rosati. 2021. "Alkyphenol Exposure Alters Steroidogenesis in Male Lizard Podarcis siculus" Animals 11, no. 4: 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop