Talk:Balenciaga

Untitled

changed order, as in any hierarchical system. You wouldnt say of me, a californian writer born in america, but an american writer born in california —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.246.73 (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Correct and I reassessed this article. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Balenciaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123224424/http://www.vam.ac.uk:80/collections/fashion/features/1960s/fashion_designers/balenciaga/index.html to http://www.vam.ac.uk/collections/fashion/features/1960s/fashion_designers/balenciaga/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Balenciaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vam.ac.uk/collections/fashion/features/1960s/fashion_designers/balenciaga/index.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fc%2Fa%2F2010%2F10%2F27%2FSB6G1FF6R0.DTL
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528051824/http://www.otis.edu/life_otis/faculty_life/faculty_development/grantee_reports/aiko_beall.html to http://www.otis.edu/life_otis/faculty_life/faculty_development/grantee_reports/aiko_beall.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417110533/http://weandfashion.ru/balenciaga.html to http://weandfashion.ru/balenciaga.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Balenciaga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015003230/http://www.barco.com/corporate/en/pressreleases/show.asp?index=1003 to http://www.barco.com/corporate/en/pressreleases/show.asp?index=1003
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927101723/http://www.slide.com/s/RTPEFK_M7j9VhJlBabaAVMfAotBEIKiw?referrer=hlnk to http://www.slide.com/s/RTPEFK_M7j9VhJlBabaAVMfAotBEIKiw?referrer=hlnk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

I be lit bro

i wear this every day ma nibba PaoloDybala (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Removed 'vandalism' (kinda?)

I reverted back to an older edit, since the last two edits weren't really how a controversy should be described (I'd say something less attacking under 'Controversies' would be more fitting). Araoro (talk) 01:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, can you remember what the two controversies were? Also, why would you delete them? Couldn’t you just edit them to be more in tune with how you think “controversy should be described”? In light of recent events concerning Balenciagra and the child porn case papers on the table of a photo shoot with a child holding a teddy bear, those controversies may show a pattern. It’s essential the public is made aware of such significant trends from a major retail department. Disciple4lif (talk) 09:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Looking at the edit history,[1] it concerned fashion designer Tra My Nguyen accusing Balenciaga of stealing her idea. Given there are several reliable sources discussing it,[2] I support putting it back in. 70.163.208.142 (talk) 15:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

The child pornography stuff..

what the fuck 87.120.248.7 (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Can you elaborate? Are you shocked at the photo shoot? Disciple4lif (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Is the reference to the case law accurate? The clearest image I can find seems to be of an early version of United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008). In the authorised PDF version, p 293 (PDF p 354) shows the same text. EUNlCE ^{talk • contributions} 07:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Could we illustrate the article with one of the images? The wording doesn't make justice on how this was so controversial. I know copyright is an issue but there's plenty of fair use cases across Wikipedia when it's newsworthy this one has been used for a lot of news articles already. Loganmac (talk) 09:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Punctuation.

There should be a comma after Franco as it is a non-defining clause Historians believe that Balenciaga's continued activity during the Nazi occupation of Paris was made possible by Balenciaga's connections with Spanish dictator General Francisco Franco, who was Adolf Hitler's close ally — Preceding unsigned comment added by SolinQu (talk • contribs) 14:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2022

I would like to edit the timeline for Balenciaga. Vmarinabney (talk) 19:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Terasail^[✉️] 19:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

A great deal for a great idea

U would like to make a deal for my adea that make good things for both of us 125.139.19.1 (talk) 08:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Battle against the Chambre

In "Battle against the Chambre" it is claimed that Balenciaga couture was never a member of the chambre syndicale de la haute couture. However, other sources (Vogue, WWD and DN-mag; also Haute couture) claim that Balenciaga was a full member of the Chambre Syndicale de la Haute Couture until 1957. Unsure how to proceed. Btravessas (talk) 02:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)