Talk:Battle of Mu'tah
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Mu'tah article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2005. The result of the discussion was KEEP. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 14 October 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the the powers from 100k romans 100k arab Christians (both exaggerated) to 100k romans 100k arabs (Islamic sources) Jrdndnnftm (talk) 08:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please provide reliable sources for any changes you wish to make. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
(questionable source?)
editThe second paragraph paints a vague description of the causes for the battle and there is no source for the following sentence: "According to Byzantine sources, the Muslims planned to launch their attack on a feast day". I think this should be clarified by combining it with the paragraph in "Background" to mention a slightly longer account of the emissary that was sent by the Muslims (Al-Harith bin Umair Al-Azdi) and to where (Busra) who was killed by Shurhabil who was the governor of Al-Balqa'a - and close ally to Ceasar.
Furthermore, Power's book "Muhammad Is Not the Father of Any of Your Men" is cited several times. The motive of the author is malicious, he paints a negative and unfounded claims to the losses suffered. Zakster31 (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)