Talk:Cowra

Home of the world's largest eagle?

reference the claim of large eagles: I could not find anything via "q=%22world%27s+largest+eagle%22+cowra"btnG=Search"meta= Google on the world's largest eagle and a link to Cowra (other than this article).

At http://www.birdphotos.com.au/harold.htm has a picture of an eagle shot in Cowra in 1935 that measured 7 foot 2 inches (220cm) from wing tip to wing tip. However Harpy Eagles in South America are said to have a wing span of 8.2 feet or 2.5 m.[1] So this Cowra eagle was large, but almost cetainly not the largest. For the moment have removed the assertion. Please cite sources if editing back in. Note that same editor (User:Patricknoddy) added a reference with broken link to Taree, New South Wales about the world's largest oyster - he meant the "big oyster" tourist attraction but I "q=%22big+eagle%22+cowra"btnG=Search"meta= do not believe there is a "big eagle" tourist attraction. --AYArktos 23:04, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Cowra Suicide Rate

I quote from the article, "Cowra also has an unusually high suicide rate compared to metro, and other similar size country centers." Could you provide a reference to back this up. How is it relevant to the Cowra breakout? - well it not but this page is about Cowra and not the Breakout anyway.

Infobox Update

This page has had its infobox updated to [[Template:Infobox Australian Place|Infobox Australian Place. This update has been automatically preformed by TheJoshBot. The following infomation has been lost in the transition, and will need to be converted to the document prose:

Field Value
firstsurveyed
river	[[Lachlan River]]
pophistoric	3,981 (1911), 7,900 (1981)
railway	1886
proclaimedcity
proclaimedmunicipality	1888
highway	[[Olympic Way]], [[Mid-Western Highway]]
pop2001
latandlong
firstexplored	1815

Featured Picture

Congratulations Cowra.

The main picture of the Cowra Japanese Gardens, Image:07. Japanese Garden Pano, Cowra, NSW, 22.09.2006.jpg, has recently been voted a Featured picture, which means that members of the community have identified it as one of the finest images on the English Wikipedia. --211.29.231.154 10:44, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Notable former Cowra residents

It is proposed the article include a section listing prominent former Cowra residents (in this case a footballer and a Wiggle). I've never been a fan of "notable residents" lists in place articles, because the lists are never complete, are rarely sourced and are a magnet for current non-notable residents to add their own names. They usually resemble an indiscriminate mass of information, with little context or relevance to the subject of the article (the town itself)

I also doubt there is much useful information to be gained from them - if a current or former resident made a contribution to the subject of the article (the town itself) then this can easily be explained in the article text. An example:

• Don Bradman gew up in Bowral. His cricketing fame has influenced his birthplace in that Bowral is home to the Bradman Museum and to occasional matches involving Australian cricketers. Bowral has become associated in public consciousness with cricket and Bradman. Appropriately therefore, Bradman is extensively mentioned in the Bowral article.
• Ita Buttrose was born in Bowral. Her media fame has given her instant name recognition Australia-wide, but none of it is in association with Bowral. Bowral's culture, employment or tourism potential is unaffected by its association with Buttrose. Ita's birthplace is relevant to Ita and her own article, but not to Bowral.

I'm not proposing the mass removal of "notable residents" section from any article that has them. I'm suggesting however that we don't need one here unless the former residents in question actually contributed something to the subject of the article - the town itself.

Any other views? Euryalus (talk) 01:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

sp experiecne ?

experience ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.170.88.72 (talk) 15:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

George Wilson Evans

should be George William Evans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.178.19.86 (talk) 04:54, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Fixed! Thanks for pointing out the error! Kerry (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cowra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050901171134/http://www.naa.gov.au/Publications/fact_sheets/fs198.html to http://www.naa.gov.au/Publications/fact_sheets/fs198.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cowra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615114035/http://www2b.abc.net.au/EventCentral/View/event.aspx?p=25&e=4380450 to http://www2b.abc.net.au/EventCentral/View/event.aspx?p=25&e=4380450

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

What is meant by "ceded"

in the section "Japanese War Cemetery and Garden"? Does this mean that the land title of the cemetery was given to the Japanese Government? ?? (Some references here would be useful) MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

There are several references that just say the land was 'ceded' to Japan (including the NSW Government war memorials register), but the best explanation I have seen is in The Australia-Japan Political Alignment: 1952 to the Present by Alan Rix (page 14 – Google Books link), so I have rewritten the text based on this. --Canley (talk) 10:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks @Canley: Glad you found something to explain it. Makes much more sense. MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Japanese War Cemetery.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Associated caption removed from photo section. --Luke.wilson59 (talk) 07:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding statement: "The first mobile telephone exchange was established in 1901"

While the first local telephone exchange may have been constructed in 1901, it was not a "mobile" telephone exchange, mobile telephones having not been invented for several more decades. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dark Angel1970 (talk • contribs) 20:45, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

I'm sure you realise the word mobile existed in the English language long before even 1901. It simply means something that can move. Although the claim in this article is unfortunately not sourced, I've no doubt it refers to the same sort of thing as is being discussed in this article from 1947, also long before mobile phones existed - [2]. It's the exchange that's mobile, not the phones. HiLo48 (talk) 00:59, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Where is Cowra

The information box to the side of the article informs us that Cowra is southwest of Sydney. This is not true - it's due west of Sydney. I haven't been able to change that info on the edit page for some reason. Pontificateus (talk) 07:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)