User talk:WikiGeoffrey

Hello, WikiGeoffrey, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You are welcome! Happy editing. Red Director (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Circle Authors (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Red Circle Authors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Red Circle Authors, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiGeoffrey! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, WikiGeoffrey. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi WikiGeoffrey! You created a thread called Help on draft article Red Circle Authors and future ones at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi WikiGeoffrey! You created a thread called Follow-up to Help on draft article Red Circle Authors and future ones at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Red Circle Authors has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Red Circle Authors. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 14:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Red Circle Authors has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Red Circle Authors. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 16:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Circle Authors has been accepted

Red Circle Authors, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~Kvng (talk) 14:38, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Red Circle Authors, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Mishima's anti-Marxist views

Hi,

I saw you left a source for the passage about Mishima's criticism of Marxism on his wiki page (https://www.rferl.org/a/inside-the-soviet-kgb-s-secret-war-on-western-books/29894541.html). I want to thank you, but I remain unconvinced.

I read the passage about Sun and Steel in the article; and I understand from this that he was deemed anti-Marxist by default, as he "promote[d] the so-called neo-samuraiism". There is a huge difference between "fiercely" criticizing Marxist ideologies and being described as anti-Marxist by the secret services of USSR - a politicaly motivated agency.

The phrasing of the passage on Mishima's wiki page implies he, well, fiercely criticized Marxism, not that he was described as such by KGB because he promoted another ideology.

If the article is the only source, then the passage should be rephrased as "Considered anti-Marxist by the KGB" - which is exactly what is described by the article.

What do you think?

Arhelt (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi WikiGeoffrey! You created a thread called Getting tone right for Draft: Red Circle Authors at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]