Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 December 27

< December 26	December 28 >

December 27

File:French Cochinchina Sapeque 1879.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Cochinchina Sapeque 1879.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that the copyright holder has released the photo to the public domain, yet the source contains no copyright statement as far as I can tell. Stefan2 (talk) 01:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am the owner of art-hanoi.com and all images are free, as it is stated on the [1].

If there is something wrong with the copyright notices on the images, please feel free to fix it. You can probably do it better than me as I'm not a copyright lawyer :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyvanet (talk • contribs) 04:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Moved, permission linked Bulwersator (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:French Cochinchina Sapeque 1875.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Cochinchina Sapeque 1875.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The uploader claims PD photo, the source contains no information about this. Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Moved, permission linked Bulwersator (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:French Cochinchina 50 Cents 1879.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Cochinchina 50 Cents 1879.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The uploader claims PD photo, the source contains no information about this. Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Moved, permission linked Bulwersator (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Coin will3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coin will3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Dubious copyright tags: it both says that it is copyrighted and that it isn't copyrighted. I'd assume that the coin is a crown copyright, meaning that it expired long ago. There is no information about who the photographer is, so the image should probably be deleted per commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Stefan2 (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:French Indochina Sapeque 1902.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Indochina Sapeque 1902.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The uploader claims PD photo, the source contains no information about this. Stefan2 (talk) 01:33, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved, problem fixed Bulwersator (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:South Vietnam 1 Dong 1966.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Vietnam 1 Dong 1966.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Currency#Vietnam. Might be {{PD-Vietnam}} if the author died soon after making the design and the design was made during the first few years of the South Vietnamese dong era. Stefan2 (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:South Vietnam 1 Dong 1955.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Vietnam 1 Dong 1955.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Currency#Vietnam. Might be {{PD-Vietnam}} if the author died soon after making the design and the design was made during the first few years of the South Vietnamese dong era. Stefan2 (talk) 01:41, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:South Vietnam 500 Dong 1966.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Vietnam 500 Dong 1966.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Currency#Vietnam. Stefan2 (talk) 01:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:South Vietnam 10000 Dong 1975.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Commons:Currency#Vietnam. Stefan2 (talk) 01:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vietnam 1 dong 1976.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vietnam 1 dong 1976.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See Commons:Commons:Currency#Vietnam. Stefan2 (talk) 01:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:South Vietnam 50 Dong 1975.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Vietnam 50 Dong 1975.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Coin: unfree, see Commons:Commons:Currency#Vietnam. Photo: says PD on this page, no PD statement on source URL. Stefan2 (talk) 01:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tonkin Sapeque 1905.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tonkin Sapeque 1905.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No copyright statement at source URL, so it isn't possible to tell if the photo really is in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 01:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Moved, permission linked Bulwersator (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ROM9211.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROM9211.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Lacks licensing terms for the photo. Only shows licence for the coin. Stefan2 (talk) 01:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ahshshshs.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Slon02 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahshshshs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

tvtropes.org does have a cc-by-sa license, but that most likely only applies to the text, not necessarily to images they've taken from somewhere else. This image was originally sourced from The List; tvtropes copy is smaller and cropped. dave pape (talk) 04:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This picture, however, is used on numerous other websites such as the BBC, Cambridge News, and the Radio Times:

[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

None of these websites have the slightest credit to the creator of the image, all claiming it to be theirs, writing at the bottom of the website a copyright statement, even though this picture is widespread throughout the internet. This is definitely a free file from the creative commons, as specified. Rifasj123 (talk) 05:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Actually based on some of the links you provided, I can see that the image is copyright of the BBC, especially when this and this clearly and specifically attribute the BBC for the image itself. The source given by the uploader would clearly be copyfraud if they actually claim the image itself is freely licenced but most likely the CC licence statement, as dave pape mentions above, is for the text and not the image. Even if the sites mentioned do not attribute the image properly, they will likely claim journalistic fair-use, but we don't accept fair-use images on the commons and even on some of our language wikis non-free images are not accepted for living people either while some don't accept any non-free images of any find. ww2censor (talk) 06:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tradedollar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tradedollar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission to use the image on Wikipedia doesn't sound free enough. Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Two cent obverse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two cent obverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The original uploader wrote "photo taken by me" but didn't add any licensing terms for the photographing task. Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Two cent reverse.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two cent reverse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The original uploader wrote "photo taken by me" but didn't add any licensing terms for the photographing task. Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CappedBustLetteredHalf.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CappedBustLetteredHalf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Permission given for using this on Wikipedia doesn't sound free enough and there is no source of this permission. Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Columbian expo 1892 obv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbian expo 1892 obv.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"© Copyright 1999-2008 Collectors Universe, Inc. - all rights reserved worldwide." Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Columbian expo 1892 rev.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbian expo 1892 rev.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

© Copyright 1999-2008 Collectors Universe, Inc. - all rights reserved worldwide. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:WendyLawrenceT38.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WendyLawrenceT38.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unable to confirm PD-NASA status, source website is dead and IA failed to save image Bulwersator (talk) 11:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're one of these useless little meddlers, aren't you, with nothing of your own to contribute, unwilling to work, just coming here to wreck things and puff yourself up, a little toad? Well you just go ahead and do whatever you like. I'm not going to waste my time building a sand castle on a beach with a tide of fools coming in. — Xiong熊talk* 21:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, replacing 516 × 387 px files with bigger version 6,000 × 6,000 is thoroughly useless or 400 × 395 with 1,852 × 1,827. On topic: it is PD-NASA rather than PD-I-think-it-is-NASA or PD-you-are-little-toad :D Bulwersator (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: considering the source link provided does not work therefore we cannot verify the claim this is a NASA image, so it must be deleted. Remember that we err on the side of caution. ww2censor (talk) 17:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does the code at the start of the description, JSC2004-E-01411 [JSC=Johnson Space Center], show that it is a NASA image? In any case, it means that a live page identical to the old one with the image can be found. There's nothing about it being copyright, though no explicit statement it is public domain, but it seems to be enough and what you're looking for. —innotata 17:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Generally all NASA image are free and most images that are not their own are specifically attributed as such, so you will not find a public domain statement beside or near their own images. We now have a live link and there is no external attribution. ww2censor (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Vostok rocket launch.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vostok rocket launch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Without source to confirm PD-NASA status. It is a russsian rocket so it is probably case of "The NASA website hosts a large number of images from the Soviet/Russian space agency, and other non-American space agencies. These are not in the public domain." (from PD-NASA template) Bulwersator (talk) 11:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, it's Vostok, from the 1960s, so before collaboration between the agencies as far as I know —innotata 18:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Temperature global.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temperature global.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unable to confirm PD-NASA status, source website is dead and IA failed to save image. Low quality. Easy to replace with File:NASA global temperature 1880-2007.png. Bulwersator (talk) 11:55, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the uploadeder. The source is as given, from NASA. Its possible replacement is irrelevant to its PD status. 'This file is in the public domain because it was created by NASA. NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". (NASA copyright policy page or JPL Image Use Policy)' -- SEWilco (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "This file is in the public domain because it was created by NASA." - hosting on NASA server is irrelevant. But maybe it can pass as PD-shape? Bulwersator (talk) 08:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Go up one level in the URL and you'll find that it is an image from NASA's GISTEMP. -- SEWilco (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Source website is no longer dead. -- SEWilco (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stipple.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stipple.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

I am not convinced that "This was scanned from page 394, fig. 112 of Libbie H. Hyman, The Invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora, V. 1" (c) 1940 by McGraw-Hill Book Company. Search on the U. S. Copyright Office website under author "Hyman, Libbie" and under title "Invertebrates" show entries volumes 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (published later) are under copyright, but there is no entry for volume 1 and therefore I believe the copyright has lapsed." is effective way to prove PD status of this work. Published after 1923. Bulwersator (talk) 12:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- copyright.gov's online records only go back to 1978; a 1940 book would have been renewed in about 1968. Stanford's database covers earlier renewals, and indicates that the copyright on the 1940 volume was renewed - http://collections.stanford.edu/copyrightrenewals/bin/detail?fileID=131362777X --dave pape (talk) 19:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete though nominator should have known that there are searchable records for books from all dates. —innotata 18:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SRI MIDN ANC.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SRI MIDN ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unfortunately, insignia are probably copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- These three insignia were likely designed over 50 years ago, in which case they could be public domain (see {{PD-AustraliaGov}}). —innotata 17:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SRI WO ANC.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SRI WO ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unfortunately, insignia are probably copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SRI CPO ANC.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SRI CPO ANC.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unfortunately, insignia are probably copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 13:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Moncada barracks.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moncada barracks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Without source, unable to confirm PD status. Bulwersator (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Canisgalaxy 2mass.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canisgalaxy 2mass.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

this image is copyrighted various owners, only one of them being NASA. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 13:18, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Template:PD-NASA: "Images featured on the Astronomy Picture of the Day (APOD) web site may be copyrighted. [3]", delete as copyvio. Bulwersator (talk) 13:34, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Liberty Nickel With Cents Reverse.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liberty Nickel With Cents Reverse.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

"©2011 Stack's Bowers Galleries. All Rights Reserved " Stefan2 (talk) 13:31, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete claimed to be PD as a photo of a 2D object, but coins are 3D. —innotata 17:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LibertyCapLeftHalfCent.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LibertyCapLeftHalfCent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

"©2011 Stack's Bowers Galleries. All Rights Reserved " Stefan2 (talk) 13:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LibertyCapRightHalfCent.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:LibertyCapRightHalfCent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ninger.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ninger.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It is work of Emanuel Ninger rather than "work of the United States Federal Government". Without source. Too early to use PD-old. Fair use? Bulwersator (talk) 13:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: but I think {{PD-US}} applies. ww2censor (talk) 15:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep probably one would say this is a derivative work by Ninger, and it's from before 1923. —innotata 17:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Handyandy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handyandy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Product Label - 2D art Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hanuman 44.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hanuman 44.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of picture Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:29, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HapsiDalaras.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HapsiDalaras.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source of image is shown as "Η ζωη μου τραγούδι το τραγούδι ζωή, ISBN 978-960-631-793-4" - suggests copied from a book. Links at Special:BookSources/9789606317934 show no hits. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Haras Fyre and Norbert Haug at Formula 1 Motorsport Parties.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haras Fyre and Norbert Haug at Formula 1 Motorsport Parties.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Main image is a photo of an unknown newspaper Ronhjones ^(Talk) 16:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HarasFyre.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HarasFyre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Haras Fyre with Juan Nunez Natasha Zreveva and Magdalena Brzeska.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haras Fyre with Juan Nunez Natasha Zreveva and Magdalena Brzeska.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Composite photos of unknown origin. If they are from http://www.harasfyre.com that shows © 1996 - 2011 Dr. jur. Haras Fyre All Rights Reserved Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Some sort of logo or poster - appears to be a composite as main image can be found at http://www.vivahaterecords.com/bilder/ldc_logo_white.jpg Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Hardcandy madonna jellybeans.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hardcandy madonna jellybeans.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of an image. Question 2D or 3D? I think it's meant to be seen as a 2D image as it's in a flat frame, and therefore cannot be non-free. If it is 3D (it's made of 3D objects) then FoP for UK is OK. An oil painting is always 2D, and has about as much texture as this image. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Harivarasanam KJYesudas.ogg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harivarasanam KJYesudas.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcQCkkVKC5w does not indicate recording is >60 years old Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:26, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SilverwareStatue.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SilverwareStatue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No FOP in Japan for statues etc. Only for buildings. MGA73 (talk) 20:24, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Libre office.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libre office.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MSPLRT.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MSPLRT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

http://web.archive.org/web/20090424062316/http://www.metrotransit.org/aboutUs/imagedownload.asp - "These images may not be used in any manner likely to cause confusion among customers, or in any manner that disparages or discredits Metro Transit. Metro Transit images may not be modified in any manner that substantially alters the content, subject or meaning of the image." - not free, unused. Bulwersator (talk) 22:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not free, Metropolitan Council never has made media free to use. —innotata 17:34, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the image definitely not PD and is currently found on this webpage which has the copyright details at the top of the page confirming Metro Transit's ownership and restrictions on image use. ww2censor (talk) 17:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.