Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SripalMulpatyRao/Archive
SripalMulpatyRao
SripalMulpatyRao (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
08 August 2022
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Anbilrajesh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Both love to edit only Ganja Karuppu and Pujita Ponnada. For Ganja Karuppu, both like to add "Katta Erumbu Karuppu" to Ganja Karuppu. Here by SripalMulpatyRao and here by Anbilrajesh. Furthermore, the last revision of the page by SripalMulpaty Rao here and the first revision of Anbilrajesh here are the same in that both contain the words:
- "Ganja Karuppu (born as Karuppu Raja Sudalaimuthu) aka Katta Erumbu Karuppu is an Indian actor who has predominantly appeared in comedy roles in Tamil cinema.In 2021 he rose to fame when he was pranked by the infamous Katta Erambu YouTube channel and the video soon started trending and went viral. During the prank he got irked and force fed rice to a prankster. This shocked the audience at his violent behavior and received wide negative attention on his already slumping career"
On Pujita Ponnada, both like to add husband information. Here by SripalMulpatyRao and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pujita_Ponnada&diff=prev&oldid=1097515776 here by Anbilrajesh.
Why this is problematic: Ganja Karuppu did not get fame from Katta Erumbu YouTube channel. It is sad that Apple blatantly copied wrong information from Wikipedia to make his bio. DareshMohan (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- I don't see this as socking. Even assuming the two accounts belong to the same person, the master hasn't edited since January of this year, and other than one warning was never sanctioned. The sock made a handful of edits on July 11 and after receiving two warnings, stopped editing. Unless the master resumes editing (unlikely) or there is a third suspected account, I don't see a good basis for sanctions. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)