Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RPP Audio Support HIP - Spectrogram #433

Open
wants to merge 62 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

r-abishek
Copy link
Member

@r-abishek r-abishek commented Aug 22, 2024

  • Updates version to RPP 1.9.3
  • Adds RPP audio support for Spectrogram on HIP backend.
  • Adds relevant qa tests and performance tests.

made changes to compute num_windows in executor instead of recomputing everytime inside kernel
combined processing of FT and TF layouts in single kernel
made changes to compute windowOutput stride from dstDescPtr
@kiritigowda kiritigowda added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 23, 2024
@kiritigowda
Copy link
Collaborator

@r-abishek -- merge conflicts

// copy the hanning window values to hip memory
Rpp32f *d_windowFn = handle.GetInitHandle()->mem.mgpu.scratchBufferHip.floatmem;
CHECK_RETURN_STATUS(hipMemcpyAsync(d_windowFn, windowFn, windowLength * sizeof(Rpp32f), hipMemcpyHostToDevice, handle.GetStream()));
CHECK_RETURN_STATUS(hipStreamSynchronize(handle.GetStream()));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove CHECK_RETURN_STATUS(hipStreamSynchronize(handle.GetStream()))); from here and line 198 and move it to after the last hipLaunchKernelGGL call.

@r-abishek
Copy link
Member Author

@AryanSalmanpour This PR addresses verbal comments from the code review now

@r-abishek
Copy link
Member Author

All Jenkins CI passing. Waiting on Azure - https://dev.azure.com/ROCm-CI/ROCm-CI/_build/results?buildId=10403&view=results

Copy link
Contributor

@randyh62 randyh62 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci:precheckin enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants