Senar Temel
Hacettepe University, Education, Department Member
- Hacettepe University, Department of Chemistry Education, Faculty Memberadd
Background: Determining individuals’ views of the nature of science is quite important for researchers since it is both a component of scienti c literacy and a fundamental aim of science education. Purpose: This study aims to develop a... more
Background: Determining individuals’ views of the nature of science is quite important for researchers since it is both a component of scienti c literacy and a fundamental aim of science education. Purpose: This study aims to develop a NOSvs for assessing prospective teachers’views of the nature of science and to analyse their psychometric properties.
Sample: A total of 565 prospective teachers participated in the study. Design and methods: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) Index and Bartlett’s Sphericity Test were used in this study. Con rmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the construct validity of the scale. Cronbach’s Alpha (α) coe cient was calculated for the reliability of the study.
Results: It was consequently found that the KMO was larger than .50. That Bartlett’s Sphericity Test was also statistically signi cant. The items with item-total correlations smaller than .30 were removed from the scale. Cronbach’s α values calculated for each sub-scale were above .70. In consequence of the rst CFA performed, t indices were found to be below the expected level. For this reason, three more items with the least item-total correlations were removed from the scale. Following the CFA, the nal form of the scale included 36 items and ve sub-scales.
Sample: A total of 565 prospective teachers participated in the study. Design and methods: The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) Index and Bartlett’s Sphericity Test were used in this study. Con rmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the construct validity of the scale. Cronbach’s Alpha (α) coe cient was calculated for the reliability of the study.
Results: It was consequently found that the KMO was larger than .50. That Bartlett’s Sphericity Test was also statistically signi cant. The items with item-total correlations smaller than .30 were removed from the scale. Cronbach’s α values calculated for each sub-scale were above .70. In consequence of the rst CFA performed, t indices were found to be below the expected level. For this reason, three more items with the least item-total correlations were removed from the scale. Following the CFA, the nal form of the scale included 36 items and ve sub-scales.
Research Interests:
This research aims to adapt The Nature of Science Instrument Elementary Scale (NOSI-E) developed by Peoples (2012) into Turkish for secondary school students and to analyse the psychometric properties of the scale setting out from the... more
This research aims to adapt The Nature of Science Instrument Elementary Scale (NOSI-E) developed by Peoples (2012) into Turkish for secondary school students and to analyse the psychometric properties of the scale setting out from the fact that it is a necessity of science education aimed to achieve for students/prospective teachers to have adequate understanding of the nature of science. The validity analyses for the scale were performed with Con rma- tory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Cronbach alpha (α) coe cients were calculated for reliability. Following CFA, it was taken for granted that the t indices for the model met the goodness of t criterion. On exam- ining the t indices, the scale was regarded to attain construct validity due to the fact that the χ2/df ratio (1.42) was below 3, that the RMSEA value was at the level of .04 and that the NNFI and CFI (>.90) values were
at acceptable levels. On the other hand,
α coe cients, which were the internal consistency coe cients calculated for the reliability analysis of the scale, were found to range between .631 and .775, and for the overall scale was calculated as .814. These reliability index values were considered to be at acceptable levels.
at acceptable levels. On the other hand,
α coe cients, which were the internal consistency coe cients calculated for the reliability analysis of the scale, were found to range between .631 and .775, and for the overall scale was calculated as .814. These reliability index values were considered to be at acceptable levels.
Research Interests:
This study aims to analyse prospective chemistry teachers' cognitive structure related to the subject of covalent and ionic bonding. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants in order to determine their cognitive... more
This study aims to analyse prospective chemistry teachers' cognitive structure related to the subject of covalent and ionic bonding. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants in order to determine their cognitive structure, and the interviews were audio recorded to prevent the loss of data. The data were transcribed and transferred into the computer medium. Furthermore, a flow map was prepared for each prospective chemistry teacher and then was analysed firstly in terms of quantitative variables used in presenting cognitive structure in quantitative statements. Secondly, the statements in the flow maps were analysed in terms of comprehension level. In consequence, it was found through flow maps that prospective chemistry teachers were not very different from each other in terms of cognitive structure and that their cognitive structures were full of inadequacies and misconceptions. Having analysed the statements in the flow maps in terms of the levels of comprehension, the scope and richness of prospective chemistry teachers' cognitive structures were exhibited in more details.