ABSTRACT This article analyses the impact of decision-making methods on democratic deliberation. ... more ABSTRACT This article analyses the impact of decision-making methods on democratic deliberation. An experiment was designed to study the effects of two distinct decision-making methods. This citizen deliberation experiment took place in November 2006. The topic was: ‘Should a sixth nuclear power plant be built in Finland?’ A random sample of 2,500 people was first polled and invited to take part in the deliberation experiment. Eventually, 135 people took part in the event where they read written information, heard an expert panel and deliberated in small groups. The participants were randomly divided into two treatments. In the first treatment, the small group decisions were made through a secret ballot. In the second treatment, each group was asked to formulate a common statement reflecting the group's opinion. The present article analyses changes in the participants' opinions and knowledge, as well as indicators of social pressures. There were no systematic differences between the treatments in terms of opinion changes but the participants' knowledge increased more in the common statement groups. When it comes to social pressures, the results show no systematic differences between the treatments.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2012
In this article, findings are presented from a pilot experiment carried out on-line via a platfor... more In this article, findings are presented from a pilot experiment carried out on-line via a platform designed specifically for citizen deliberation. The purpose of the experiment was to assess how on-line deliberation works in practice and also to test several hypotheses concerning the effects of taking part in an on-line deliberation has onparticipants. Additionally, an examination is made to ascertain whether a variation in the deliberative procedure affects the outcome. The findings show that carrying out an on-line deliberation has its problems – especially technical ones. Moreover, the effects of deliberation are somewhat modest. Knowledge gains and opinion changes were indeed traced but regarding other potential effects only a few significant changes were found. The article also comes up with some recommendations regarding the organization of on-line discussions.
ABSTRACT This article analyses the impact of decision-making methods on democratic deliberation. ... more ABSTRACT This article analyses the impact of decision-making methods on democratic deliberation. An experiment was designed to study the effects of two distinct decision-making methods. This citizen deliberation experiment took place in November 2006. The topic was: ‘Should a sixth nuclear power plant be built in Finland?’ A random sample of 2,500 people was first polled and invited to take part in the deliberation experiment. Eventually, 135 people took part in the event where they read written information, heard an expert panel and deliberated in small groups. The participants were randomly divided into two treatments. In the first treatment, the small group decisions were made through a secret ballot. In the second treatment, each group was asked to formulate a common statement reflecting the group's opinion. The present article analyses changes in the participants' opinions and knowledge, as well as indicators of social pressures. There were no systematic differences between the treatments in terms of opinion changes but the participants' knowledge increased more in the common statement groups. When it comes to social pressures, the results show no systematic differences between the treatments.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 2012
In this article, findings are presented from a pilot experiment carried out on-line via a platfor... more In this article, findings are presented from a pilot experiment carried out on-line via a platform designed specifically for citizen deliberation. The purpose of the experiment was to assess how on-line deliberation works in practice and also to test several hypotheses concerning the effects of taking part in an on-line deliberation has onparticipants. Additionally, an examination is made to ascertain whether a variation in the deliberative procedure affects the outcome. The findings show that carrying out an on-line deliberation has its problems – especially technical ones. Moreover, the effects of deliberation are somewhat modest. Knowledge gains and opinion changes were indeed traced but regarding other potential effects only a few significant changes were found. The article also comes up with some recommendations regarding the organization of on-line discussions.
Uploads
Papers by Kimmo Grönlund