Mauricio Ruiz

The purpose of the study was to validate the criteria used in the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Severe pneumonia was defined as admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Overall 331 nonsevere (84%) and 64 severe cases (16%) of CAP were prospectively studied. Mortality was 19 of 395 (5%) and 19 of 64 (30%), respectively. Single severity criteria as well as the ATS definition of severe pneumonia were assessed calculating the operative indices. A modified prediction rule including minor (baseline) and major (baseline or evolutionary) criteria was derived. Single minor criteria at admission had a low sensitivity and positive predictive value. Defining severe pneumonia according to the ATS guidelines had a high sensitivity (98%). However, specificity and positive predictive value were low (32% and 24%, respectively). A modified prediction rule (presence of two or three minor criteria [systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, multilobar involvement, PaO2/FIO2 < 250] or one of two major criteria [requirement of mechanical ventilation, presence of septic shock]) had a sensitivity of 78%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 75%, and a negative predictive value of 95%. The ATS definition of severe pneumonia was highly sensitive but insufficiently specific and had a low positive predictive value. Our suggested modified rule had a more balanced performance and, if validated in an independent population, may represent a more accurate definition of severe CAP.

The aim of the study was to determine risk factors for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as well as to compare microbial patterns of severe CAP to a previous study from our respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) originating from 1984 to 1987. Patients admitted to the ICU according to clinical judgment were defined as having severe CAP. For the study of risk factors, a hospital-based case-control design was used, matching each patient with severe CAP to a patient hospitalized with CAP but not requiring ICU admission. Microbial investigation included noninvasive and invasive techniques. Overall, 89 patients with severe CAP were successfully matched to a control patient. The presence of an alcohol ingestion of >/= 80 g/d (odds ratio [OR] 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 10.6, p = 0.008) was found to be an independent risk factor for severe CAP and prior ambulatory antimicrobial treatment (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.79, p = 0.009) to be protective. Streptococcus pneumoniae (24%) continued to be the most frequent pathogen; however, 48% of strains were drug-resistant. "Atypical" bacterial pathogens were significantly more common (17% versus 6%, p = 0.006) and Legionella spp. less common (2% versus 14%, p = 0.004) than in our previous study, whereas gram-negative enteric bacilli (GNEB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa continued to represent important pathogens (6% and 5%, respectively). Our findings provide additional evidence for the importance of the initiation of early empiric antimicrobial treatment for a favorable outcome of CAP. Variations of microbial patterns are only in part due to different epidemiological settings. Therefore, initial empiric antimicrobial treatment will also have to take into account local trends of changing microbial patterns.

The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for drug resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and its impact on the outcome among hospitalized patients of pneumococcal pneumonia acquired in the community. Consecutive patients with culture-proven pneumococcal pneumonia were prospectively studied with regard to the incidence of pneumococcal drug resistance, potential risk factors, and in-hospital outcome variables. A total of 101 patients were studied. Drug resistance to penicillin, cephalosporin, or a macrolide drug was found in pneumococci from 52 of the 101 (52%) patients; 49% of these isolates were resistant to penicillin (16% intermediate resistance, 33% high resistance), 31% to cephalosporin (22% intermediate and 9% high resistance), and 27% to a macrolide drug. In immunocompetent patients, age > 65 yr was significantly associated with resistance to cephalosporin (odds ratio [OR]: 5.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 18.8, p = 0. 01), and with the presence of > 2 comorbidities with resistance to penicillin (OR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.2 to 19.1; p < 0.05). In immunosuppressed patients, bacteremia was inversely associated with resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.45; p < 0.005; and OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.93; p < 0.05, respectively). Length of hospital stay, severity of pneumonia, and complications were not significantly affected by drug resistance. Mortality was 15% in patients with any drug resistance, as compared with 6% in those without resistance. However, any drug resistance was not significantly associated with death (relative risk [RR]: 2. 5; 95% CI: 0.7 to 8.9; p = 0.14). Moreover, attributable mortality in the presence of discordant antimicrobial treatment was 12%, as compared with 10% (RR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.3 to 5.3; p = 0.67) in the absence of such treatment. We conclude that the incidence of drug-resistant pneumococci was high. Risk factors for drug resistance included advanced age, comorbidity, and (inversely) bacteremia. Outcome was not significantly affected by drug resistance.

Noninvasive and invasive diagnostic techniques have been shown to achieve comparable performances in the evaluation of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). We studied the impact of both approaches on outcome in a prospective, open, and randomized study in three intensive care units (ICUs) of a 1,000-bed tertiary care university hospital. Patients with suspected VAP were randomly assigned to noninvasive (Group 1) versus invasive (Group 2) investigation (tracheobronchial aspirates [TBAS] versus bronchoscopically retrieved protected specimen brush [PSB] and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]. Samples were cultured quantitatively, and BAL fluid (BALF) was examined for intracellular organisms (ICO) additionally. Initial empiric antimicrobial treatment was administered following the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and adjusted according to culture results (and ICO counts in Group 2). Outcome variables included length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation as well as mortality. Overall, 76 patients (39 noninvasive, 37 invasive) were investigated. VAP was microbiologically confirmed in 23 of 39 (59%) and 23 of 37 (62%) (p = 0.78). There were no differences with regard to the frequencies of community-acquired and potentially drug-resistant microorganisms (PDRM). Antimicrobial treatment was changed in seven patients (18%) of Group 1 and 10 patients (27%) of Group 2 because of etiologic findings (including five of 17 with ICO = 2% (p = not significant [NS]). Length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilation were also not significantly different in both groups. Crude 30-d mortality was 31 of 76 (41%), and 18 of 39 (46%) in Group 1 and 14 of 37 (38%) in Group 2 (p = 0.46). Adjusted mortality was 16% versus 11% (p = 0.53), and mortality of microbiologically confirmed pneumonia 10 of 23 (44%) in both groups (p = 1.0). We conclude that the outcome of VAP was not influenced by the techniques used for microbial investigation.