Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

    Tio Ra

    Purpose: Recently, social interest in an organized trauma system for the treatment of patients has been increasing in government and academia and the establishment of trauma center is being considered across the country. However,... more
    Purpose: Recently, social interest in an organized trauma system for the treatment of patients has been increasing in government and academia and the establishment of trauma center is being considered across the country. However, establishing such a system has not been easy in Korea, because enormous experiences and resources are necessary. The objectives of this study were (1) to estimate a trauma patient’s demands during the course of treatment and (2) to provide appropriate direction for trauma centers to be established in Korea. Methods: The records of 207 patients who were admitted to the Department of Trauma Surgery in Ajou University Medical Center due to trauma were retrospectively reviewed for a 1 year period from March 2010 to February 2011. Patients were reviewed for general characteristics, number of hospital days, numbers and kinds of surgeries, numbers and kinds of consultations, ISS (Injury Severity Score) and number of patients with ISS more than 15. Results: All 207 patients were enrolled. The average number of hospital days was 36.7 days. The ICU stay was 15.9 days, and the general ward stay was 20.8 days. Admitted patients occupied 9.02 beds in ICU and 11.80 beds in the general ward per day. The average number of surgeries per patient was 1.4, and surgery at the Department of Trauma Surgery was most common. Number of consultations per patient was 14.23, and consultations with orthopedic surgeons were most common. The average ISS was 18.6. The number of patients with ISS more than 15 was 141 (61.8%) and the average number of patients treated per trauma surgeon as a major trauma patient was 94.3. The number of mortalities was 20, and the mortality rate was 9.7%. Conclusion: To reduce mortality and to provide proper treatment of patients with major trauma, hospitals need some number of beds, especially in the ICU, to treat patients and to prepare them for emergent surgery. An appropriate number of trauma surgeons and various specialists for consultation are also needed. (J Korean Soc Traumatol 2011;24:37-44)
    To evaluate changes in the management and outcome of severe liver injury after trauma center implementation. Trauma patients with severe liver injury (organ injury scale score ≥ 4) treated between January 2011 and December 2020 were... more
    To evaluate changes in the management and outcome of severe liver injury after trauma center implementation. Trauma patients with severe liver injury (organ injury scale score ≥ 4) treated between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A trauma center was built in 2016 at our institution, and patients were dichotomized into two groups: before trauma center (BTC) and after trauma center (ATC) group. Treatment methods and outcomes were compared between the groups with 1:1 propensity score matching. We included 50 patients in the BTC group and 104 patients in the ATC group. Patients in the ATC group had frequent utilization of angiography (16% vs 47.1%, p < 0.001), faster transfusion [84 (37–152) min vs 17 (10–79) min, p < 0.001], and less fluid administration within 24 h [8.3 (5.7–13.7) L vs 5.7 (3.1–10.1) L, p = 0.002]. However, mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (26.0% vs 20.2%, p = 0.416). 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using the variables of age, injury severity score, systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, and initial base excess level. After matching, the mortality rate (26.0% vs 10.0%, p = 0.037) and ventilator application (74.0% vs 54.0%, p = 0.037) significantly improved. Severe liver injury management improved after trauma center implementation.
    Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract Gyeonggi-do (Gyeonggi province) has the second highest number of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases in the Republic of Korea after Seoul, with approximately 25% of the... more
    Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract Gyeonggi-do (Gyeonggi province) has the second highest number of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases in the Republic of Korea after Seoul, with approximately 25% of the COVID-19 patients as of January 2021. Our center is a level I trauma center located in south Gyeonggi-do, and we aimed to evaluate whether the characteristics of trauma patients changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively reviewed the trauma patients registered with the Korea Trauma Database of the Center from February 2019 to January 2021. The patients were dichotomized into pre-coronavirus disease (pre-COVID) and coronavirus disease (COVID) groups, and their trauma volumes, injury characteristics, intentionality, and outcomes were compared. A total of 2628 and 2636 patients were included in the pre-COVID and COVID groups, respectively. During the COVID-19 period, motorcycle accidents, bicycle accidents, and penetrating injury cases increased, and pedestrian traffic accidents, slips, and injury by machines decreased. The average daily number of patients in the COVID group was lower in March (5.6 ± 2.6/day vs 7.2 ± 2.4/day, P = .014) and higher in September (9.9 ± 3.2/day vs 7.7 ± 2.0/day, P = .003) compared to the pre-COVID group. The COVID group also had a higher ratio of direct admissions (67.5% vs 57.2%, P < .001), proportion of suicidal patients (4.1% vs 2.7%, P = .005), and injury severity scores (14 [9–22] vs 12 [4–22], P < .001) than the pre-COVID group. The overall mortality (4.7% vs 4.9%, P = .670) and intensive care unit length of stay (2 [0–3] days vs 2 [0–4] days, P = .153) was not different between the 2 groups. Although the total number of patients did not change, the COVID-19 pandemic affected the number of monthly admissions and the injury mechanisms changed. More severely injured patients were admitted directly to the trauma center.
    Trauma is a significant public health issue worldwide, particularly affecting economically active age groups. Quality management of trauma care at the national level is crucial to improve outcomes of major trauma. In Korea, a biennial... more
    Trauma is a significant public health issue worldwide, particularly affecting economically active age groups. Quality management of trauma care at the national level is crucial to improve outcomes of major trauma. In Korea, a biennial nationwide survey on preventable trauma death rate is conducted. Based on the survey results, we analyzed opportunities for improving the trauma treatment process. Expert panels reviewed records of 8282 and 8482 trauma-related deaths in 2017 and 2019, respectively, identifying 258 and 160 cases in each year as preventable deaths. Opportunities for improvement were categorized into prehospital, interhospital, and hospital stages. Hemorrhage was the primary cause of death, followed by sepsis/multiorgan failure and central nervous system injury. Delayed hemostatic procedures and transfusions were common areas for improvement in hospital stage. Interhospital transfers experienced significant delays in arrival time. This study emphasizes the need to enhance...
    Background Ketamine and etomidate are commonly used as sedatives in rapid sequence intubation (RSI). However, there is no consensus on which agent should be favoured when treating patients with trauma. This study aimed to compare the... more
    Background Ketamine and etomidate are commonly used as sedatives in rapid sequence intubation (RSI). However, there is no consensus on which agent should be favoured when treating patients with trauma. This study aimed to compare the effects of ketamine and etomidate on first-pass success and mortality in patients with trauma after RSI-facilitated emergency intubation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 944 patients who underwent endotracheal intubation in a trauma bay at a Korean level 1 trauma centre between January 2019 and December 2021. Outcomes were compared between the ketamine and etomidate groups after propensity score matching to balance the overall distribution between the two groups. Results In total, 620 patients were included in the analysis, of which 118 (19.9%) were administered ketamine and the remaining 502 (80.1%) were treated with etomidate. Patients in the ketamine group showed a significantly faster initial heart rate (105.0 ± 25.7 vs. 97.7 ± 23.6, p = 0.003),...
    Purpose: To investigate the status of protein supply by comparing the recommended amount with the delivered amount of protein in patients in the trauma and surgical intensive care units (ICU). Feedback on the protein supply status was... more
    Purpose: To investigate the status of protein supply by comparing the recommended amount with the delivered amount of protein in patients in the trauma and surgical intensive care units (ICU). Feedback on the protein supply status was presented to each hospital, and we evaluated whether the protein supply had increased to an appropriate level.Methods: In this retrospective observational multicenter study, nutritional information on patients in the trauma and surgical ICUs who had received nutritional support intervention was collected on the 1st Wednesday of each month at two-month intervals from August 2020 to June 2021, from nine domestic hospitals in Korea. Every two months, the nutritional status of each hospital was shared with all hospitals, and each nutritional support team received feedback on protein supply status.Results: There were 246 patients from nine hospitals included in this study, and data over the study period from six protein days, were analyzed. The mean ratios ...
    To evaluate changes in the management and outcome of severe liver injury after trauma center implementation. Trauma patients with severe liver injury (organ injury scale score ≥ 4) treated between January 2011 and December 2020 were... more
    To evaluate changes in the management and outcome of severe liver injury after trauma center implementation. Trauma patients with severe liver injury (organ injury scale score ≥ 4) treated between January 2011 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A trauma center was built in 2016 at our institution, and patients were dichotomized into two groups: before trauma center (BTC) and after trauma center (ATC) group. Treatment methods and outcomes were compared between the groups with 1:1 propensity score matching. We included 50 patients in the BTC group and 104 patients in the ATC group. Patients in the ATC group had frequent utilization of angiography (16% vs 47.1%, p < 0.001), faster transfusion [84 (37–152) min vs 17 (10–79) min, p < 0.001], and less fluid administration within 24 h [8.3 (5.7–13.7) L vs 5.7 (3.1–10.1) L, p = 0.002]. However, mortality rate was not significantly different between the groups (26.0% vs 20.2%, p = 0.416). 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using the variables of age, injury severity score, systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, and initial base excess level. After matching, the mortality rate (26.0% vs 10.0%, p = 0.037) and ventilator application (74.0% vs 54.0%, p = 0.037) significantly improved. Severe liver injury management improved after trauma center implementation.
    Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract Gyeonggi-do (Gyeonggi province) has the second highest number of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases in the Republic of Korea after Seoul, with approximately 25% of the... more
    Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract Gyeonggi-do (Gyeonggi province) has the second highest number of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases in the Republic of Korea after Seoul, with approximately 25% of the COVID-19 patients as of January 2021. Our center is a level I trauma center located in south Gyeonggi-do, and we aimed to evaluate whether the characteristics of trauma patients changed after the COVID-19 pandemic. We retrospectively reviewed the trauma patients registered with the Korea Trauma Database of the Center from February 2019 to January 2021. The patients were dichotomized into pre-coronavirus disease (pre-COVID) and coronavirus disease (COVID) groups, and their trauma volumes, injury characteristics, intentionality, and outcomes were compared. A total of 2628 and 2636 patients were included in the pre-COVID and COVID groups, respectively. During the COVID-19 period, motorcycle accidents, bicycle accidents, and penetrating injury cases increased, and pedestrian traffic accidents, slips, and injury by machines decreased. The average daily number of patients in the COVID group was lower in March (5.6 ± 2.6/day vs 7.2 ± 2.4/day, P = .014) and higher in September (9.9 ± 3.2/day vs 7.7 ± 2.0/day, P = .003) compared to the pre-COVID group. The COVID group also had a higher ratio of direct admissions (67.5% vs 57.2%, P < .001), proportion of suicidal patients (4.1% vs 2.7%, P = .005), and injury severity scores (14 [9–22] vs 12 [4–22], P < .001) than the pre-COVID group. The overall mortality (4.7% vs 4.9%, P = .670) and intensive care unit length of stay (2 [0–3] days vs 2 [0–4] days, P = .153) was not different between the 2 groups. Although the total number of patients did not change, the COVID-19 pandemic affected the number of monthly admissions and the injury mechanisms changed. More severely injured patients were admitted directly to the trauma center.
    This study evaluated the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of the implementation of a trauma center and massive transfusion protocol (TCMTP) in a developing country without a well-established trauma system. We included patients (1)... more
    This study evaluated the effectiveness and clinical outcomes of the implementation of a trauma center and massive transfusion protocol (TCMTP) in a developing country without a well-established trauma system. We included patients (1) aged >15 years, (2) with an Injury Severity Score >15, (3) who received ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within 24 h, (4) who directly visited our institution from 2010 to 2016, and (5) who survived for ≥24 h. Patients treated during the post-TCMTP period (2015-2016) were compared with historical groups treated pre-TCMTP (2010-2012) and interim-TCMTP (2013-2014). Demographics, transfusion and fluid therapy performance, and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups. Overall, 190 patients were included: 64, 64, and 62 patients in the pre-TCMTP, interim-TCMTP, and post-TCMTP groups, respectively. Comparison between the three groups revealed significant differences in the fresh-frozen plasma/PRBC ratio (p = 0.001) and crystal...

    And 19 more