Zahid iqbal

Abstract—This paper proposes a semantic enhance person-alization framework for connected set-top-box (STB) home environment. It introduces the mobile phone as context-sensor. Furthermore, semantic web technologies are used to develop user profile ontology and ...

This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) in percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. SVGs develop atherosclerosis at high rates and often require repeat revascularization. Percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents has become the preferred method of revascularization due to higher restenosis with bare metal stents and increased morbidity and mortality with repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. We sought to compare the rate of major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis between SESs and PESs in patients undergoing SVG intervention. A multicenter analysis of 172 patients with SVG lesions treated with SESs or PESs was performed. The 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes of 102 patients receiving SESs were compared to those of 70 patients receiving PESs. There was no significant difference in baseline demographic, angiographic, and procedural characteristics between the SES and PES treatment groups. There was no statistical difference in major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and at 1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 3.23, log-rank p = 0.21). There was also no difference in survival (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.25, log-rank p = 0.69) or target vessel revascularization (HR 2.54, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.72, log-rank p = 0.09). In conclusion, this multicenter analysis of real-world patients demonstrated that SESs and PESs have similar clinical outcomes when used in SVG intervention.

This meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared to drug-eluting stenting (DES) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). CABG has been the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with diabetes compared to DES. Drug-eluting stents reduce the rate of target vessel revascularization compared to bare-metal stents. The ideal revascularization strategy for patients with diabetes with multivessel CAD in the DES era is unknown. A search of published reports was performed to identify clinical studies comparing CABG with DES in patients with diabetes with multivessel CAD with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Five studies including 1,543 patients with diabetes (757 who underwent CABG and 786 who underwent DES) met the selection criteria. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range 12 to 36). Compared to DES, CABG was associated with a lower risk for major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36 to 0.65), driven mainly by a lower risk for repeat revascularization (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.30), despite having a higher percentage of triple-vessel disease. There was no significant difference in death (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.39) or myocardial infarction (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.61). Patients in the CABG group had a higher risk for cerebrovascular events (OR 2.15, 95% CI 0.99 to 4.68). In conclusion, PCI with DES is safe and may represent a viable alternative to CABG for selected patients with diabetes with multivessel CAD.

Prior studies find that stock returns to bidders depend on merger outcome, bid order, payment method and managerial resistance. Using a sample of bidders in multiple-bidder merger contests, we find that these variables are associated with one another. Significant associations between these variables imply that their effects on bidders' stock returns should be examined jointly. Our regression results indicate that

Managers place a low value on equity-based compensation because it exposes them to the risk of the firm. Such undervaluation and the need to achieve diversification may force a manager to sell his own stock of the firm in response to equity-based awards. In this paper we examine whether such stock selling by an executive depends on the aggregate level of management ownership of the firm. We argue that stock selling occurs at a high level of aggregate ownership where an executive has a low probability of being replaced. Our findings support this “management ownership” argument of compensation-based stock trading. One implication is that the board's effort to minimize agency conflicts becomes less effective once aggregate ownership increases to a certain threshold level. (JEL G30, G32)