Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Abhidharma Buddhist philosophy presents a version of what is now often called “panprotopsychism.” The most pressing group of problems for the Abhidharma panprotopsychism, like all other panpsychist views, is what Seager calls “the... more
Abhidharma Buddhist philosophy presents a version of what is now often called “panprotopsychism.” The most pressing group of problems for the Abhidharma panprotopsychism, like all other panpsychist views, is what Seager calls “the combination problem.” There are at least three versions of the problem: the subject-combination problem; the quality-combination problem; and the structure-combination problem. I begin with the Abhidharma Buddhist version of panprotopsychism and its account of conscious experience. The main focus of this paper is to show that Abhidharma panprotopsychist account of conscious experience solves the quality-combination problem. In the last and closing Section, I look at other versions of the combination problem, primarily the subject-combination problem and the structural problem and provide a sketch of the Abhidharma Buddhist response to these.
This paper defends the realist representationalist version of the Buddhist-Abhidharma account of consciousness. The account explains the intentionality and the phenomenality of conscious experiences by appealing to the doctrine of... more
This paper defends the realist representationalist version of the Buddhist-Abhidharma account of consciousness. The account explains the intentionality and the phenomenality of conscious experiences by appealing to the doctrine of self-awareness. Concerns raised by Buddhist Mādhyamika philosophers about the compatibility of reflexive awareness and externality of the objects of perception are addressed. Similarly, the Hindu critiques on the incoherence of the Buddhist doctrine of reflexive awareness with the doctrines of no-self and momentariness are also answered.
The Buddhist no-self and no-person revisionary metaphysics aims to produce a better structure that is motivated by the normative goal of eliminating, or at least reducing, suffering. The revised structure, in turn, entails a major... more
The Buddhist no-self and no-person revisionary metaphysics aims to produce a better structure that is motivated by the normative goal of eliminating, or at least reducing, suffering. The revised structure, in turn, entails a major reconsideration of our ordinary everyday person-related concerns and practices and interpersonal attitudes, such as moral responsibility, praise and blame, compensation, and social treatment. This essay explores the extent to which we must alter and perhaps discard some of our practical commitments in light of the Buddhist revisionism. I do not argue here that we should change our ordinary practices, concerns, and attitudes, or that the Buddhist metaphysics does succeed in presenting a better structure. Rather, I offer it as an alternative structure that should be considered seriously.
This is a book review of Nirmalangshu Mukherji's book Reflections on Human Inquiry, Springer, 2017.
In a recent debate in this journal, Arindam Chakrabarti (2004) astutely identifies a new problem space that has opened up in the debate on nirvikalpaka perceptions. He indicates that the problem space is a grid arising out of the possible... more
In a recent debate in this journal, Arindam Chakrabarti (2004) astutely identifies a new problem space that has opened up in the debate on nirvikalpaka perceptions. He indicates that the problem space is a grid arising out of the possible answers to three distinct but interrelated ...
This chapter discusses the Yogācāra doctrine of reflexive self-awareness (svasaṃvedana) as introduced by Dignāga and defended by Dharmakīrti against Hindu opponents as well as later Buddhist Mādhyamikas. It explains the doctrine of... more
This chapter discusses the Yogācāra doctrine of reflexive self-awareness (svasaṃvedana) as introduced by Dignāga and defended by Dharmakīrti against Hindu opponents as well as later Buddhist Mādhyamikas. It explains the doctrine of reflexive awareness and the arguments offered by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti. It appears that the doctrine of reflexive awareness is in conflict with other central commitments of Buddhist philosophers: the no-self theory and the theory of momentariness. The distinctive contribution of this chapter is to explicate a constitutive role for reflexive awareness in the account of conscious experience and point toward a resolution of the apparent conflict.
In a recent debate in this journal, Arindam Chakrabarti (2004) astutely identifies a new problem space that has opened up in the debate on nirvikalpaka perceptions. He indicates that the problem space is a grid arising out of the possible... more
In a recent debate in this journal, Arindam Chakrabarti (2004) astutely identifies a new problem space that has opened up in the debate on nirvikalpaka perceptions. He indicates that the problem space is a grid arising out of the possible answers to three distinct but interrelated ...
Abstract In this paper I aim to situate the Naiyayika theory of perception in contemporary philosophy of mind. Following the ancients, I suggest we reconsider the taxonomy and the assumed interactions between kinds of perceptual content.... more
Abstract In this paper I aim to situate the Naiyayika theory of perception in contemporary philosophy of mind. Following the ancients, I suggest we reconsider the taxonomy and the assumed interactions between kinds of perceptual content. This reclassification will lead us to reconsider some ...
P ± sn the sen e of n expli it definition of on eptD99 s sh ll e working with minim list l im out on epts th t is un ontroversi lF h tever else they my eD on epts reD t le stD vehi les to stru ture the input from senseEo je t ont tF his... more
P ± sn the sen e of n expli it definition of on eptD99 s sh ll e working with minim list l im out on epts th t is un ontroversi lF h tever else they my eD on epts reD t le stD vehi les to stru ture the input from senseEo je t ont tF his working definition is neutr l on the re listGnomin list de ...

And 11 more