Joseph Stramondo
San Diego State University, Philosophy, Faculty Member
- Philosophy, Feminist Theory, Bioethics, Disability Studies, Feminist Philosophy, Ethics, and 22 moreSocial and Political Philosophy, Moral Philosophy, Applied Ethics, Medical Ethics, Pragmatism, Critical Disability Studies, Bioethics Reproductive Technology, Pragmatism (Philosophy), Reproductive Ethics, American Pragmatism, Feminist Ethics, Biomedical Ethics, Feminist Bioethics, Disability Theory, Public Policy Studies, Ethics & Disability, Gender Studies, Gender, Moral Psychology, Social Epistemology, Moral Epistemology, and Normative Ethicsedit
- I am an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Associate Director of the Institute for Ethics and Public Affairs at Sa... moreI am an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Associate Director of the Institute for Ethics and Public Affairs at San Diego State University, where I teach a variety of courses in value theory.The overarching trajectory of my research is focused on how social and political forces shape the institutions and practices of bio-medicine in the United States. Namely, I am interested in how various systems of oppression have influenced bioethical thought and education, especially ableism and sexism. This brings me into contact with a wide variety of literature in ethics, but particularly: applied ethics, normative ethics, feminist philosophy, philosophy of disability, social-political philosophy, neuroethics, and moral psychology.edit
Research Interests:
While it may be surprising to some, there is a history of persistent, sometimes heated conflict between the profession of bioethics and the disability movement. Namely, the disability movement has engaged mainstream bioethics in an... more
While it may be surprising to some, there is a history of persistent, sometimes heated conflict between the profession of bioethics and the disability movement. Namely, the disability movement has engaged mainstream bioethics in an adversarial way because of radically divergent positions on topics such as: prenatal diagnosis, health care rationing, growth attenuation interventions, physician assisted suicide, and euthanasia. In my dissertation, I argue that this tension between the analyses of the disability movement and mainstream bioethics is not merely a conflict between two insular communities of “disability activists” and “bioethicists” but between those who have experienced disability and those who have not. That is, I maintain that it is a mistake to think of this conflict as arising just from a difference in ideology or political commitments, because it represents a much deeper difference—one rooted in moral psychology and epistemology. Analyzing the causes and effects of nuanced differences between the disability movement and field of bioethics’ respective moral psychologies and epistemologies--and then suggesting both theoretical and practical changes that might dissolve the conflict produced by these unacknowledged differences--is the key task of my dissertation.