Talk:Ronald McDonald

Merger proposal

• Weak oppose I see no particular reason for the merger. Both are short articles but both can become bigger. They are clearly two separate ideas even if closely linked. --Matilda (talk) 01:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Pretty much. Expansion should solve the issue. Synergy 01:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry - pretty much is a bit cryptic? Do you support or oppose?--Matilda (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

• Support as nominator - both articles are too short....if/when Ronald's article becomes big enough then split it off.-- ✧ CM16  04:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

• Strong oppose I have to agree with Matilda on the same grounds. A1a2s (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

• Too short isn't a reason for merging, otherwise we must merge several thousand of articles, because they are short. Barras || talk 19:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

joeeeehoee