Talk:Fracture (Movie)

Question on the "according to Hasbro, Fracture is Crasher" thing. Is it really supposed to be as literal as the current text implies? Unless Fracture's bio indicates that she dimension jumped from the GoBots universe into the Movie universe, I would have assumed otherwsie. --KilMichaelMcC 20:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Reports from the Con say that Hasbro said "it is Crasher, is female, has Crasher's powers" and they wanted to name her Crasher but couldn't get the rights. That's what the trivia note says.--ZacWilliam 21:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

But is she the Movie continuity version of Crasher, or is she THE Crasher, who hopped between dimensions and is causing shit for the Movie cast? -hx 14:19, 28 April 2008 (UTC) (not that it matters, she's going on my Classics shelf with her casemates)

Don't believe there's any reason they'd muddy movie continuity with a statement like that.--Rosicrucian ^Talk 15:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Her bio. --ItsWalky 19:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

GoBots Fracture

Wouldn't that go on the Crasher page, since this article is more for the Cybertronian movieverse Fracture? Saix (talk) 12:34, 2 March 2016 (EST)

We're cutting the Crasher page soon-ish anyway. I thought it belonged here, especially since AVP previously established that movieverse Fracture originated as a reality-jumping Crasher. --Riptide (talk) 12:44, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Well, we do have Crasher (Animated), who is more obviously GoBots Crasher in retrospect. And, yeah, movie Fracture has that retcon, but I consider them to be different kinds of Fractures. One is Cybertronian and exists across multiple stories; the other is still a GoBot and no longer "exists". Saix (talk) 12:55, 2 March 2016 (EST)

Eeeh, we don't have Cyclonus and Scourge share pages with their original incarnations. I don't really see a reason to have Crasher and Spoons keep their pages with these toys as repurposings when the story has them transformed into the movie characters. --Riptide (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2016 (EST)

So we are keeping this package art with Movieverse Fracture, right? S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent 47 (talk) 14:33, 2 March 2016 (EST)

It's being used here, so I don't see we why wouldn't keep it. --Ascendron (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2016 (EST)