Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Adolescent sexual behaviour may show clustering in neighbourhoods, schools and friendship networks. This study aims to assess how experience with sexual intercourse clusters across the social world of adolescents and whether predictors... more
Adolescent sexual behaviour may show clustering in neighbourhoods, schools and friendship networks. This study aims to assess how experience with sexual intercourse clusters across the social world of adolescents and whether predictors implicated by life history theory or personality traits can account for its between-individual variation and social patterning. Using data on 2877 adolescents from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, we ran logistic multiple classification models to assess the clustering of sexual experience by approximately 17.5 years in schools, neighbourhoods and friendship networks. We examined how much clustering at particular levels could be accounted for by life history predictors and Big Five personality factors. Sexual experience exhibited substantial clustering in friendship networks, while clustering at the level of schools and neighbourhoods was minimal, suggesting a limited role for socio-ecological influences at those levels. While life history predictors did account for some variation in sexual experience, they did not explain clustering in friendship networks. Personality, especially extraversion, explained about a quarter of friends' similarity. After accounting for life history factors and personality, substantial unexplained similarity among friends remained, which may reflect a tendency to associate with similar individuals or the social transmission of behavioural norms.
Research Interests:
In Christmas gift giving, the value of a gift is broadly representative of the strength of the relationship between gift-giver and recipient. In this study we examine the effects of relatedness, social proximity, and donor gender on... more
In Christmas gift giving, the value of a gift is broadly representative of the strength of the relationship between gift-giver and recipient. In this study we examine the effects of relatedness, social proximity, and donor gender on self-reported patterns of Christmas gift-giving. As is consistent with kin selection and social network theory, respondents bought gifts of greater value for more closely related kin, and individuals in more proximate social network layers. Although men and women spent similar amounts on gifts for kin and close network layers, there was a striking gender difference in spending on friends and the most distant network layer, with women spending significantly more.