Janet Hapgood

Many different forms of hormonal contraception are used by millions of women worldwide. These contraceptives differ in the dose and type of synthetic progestogenic compound (progestin) used, as well as the route of administration and whether or not they contain estrogenic compounds. There is an increasing awareness that different forms of contraception and different progestins have different side-effect profiles, in particular their cardiovascular effects, effects on reproductive cancers and susceptibility to infectious diseases. There is a need to develop new methods to suit different needs and with minimal risks, especially in under-resourced areas. This requires a better understanding of the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, serum and tissue concentrations of progestins used in contraception as well as the biological activities of progestins and their metabolites via steroid receptors. Here we review the current knowledge on these topics and identify the research gaps. We show that there is a paucity of research on most of these topics for most progestins. We find that major impediments to clear conclusions on these topics include a lack of standardized methodologies, comparisons between non-parallel clinical studies and variability of data on serum concentrations between and within studies. The latter is most likely due, at least in part, to differences in intrinsic characteristics of participants. The review highlights the importance of insight on these topics in order to provide the best contraceptive options to women with minimal risks.

Antiretroviral therapy has slowed the HIV/AIDS pandemic and is currently being used as a prophylactic measure for individuals at high risk of infection. However, concerns over adverse effects of long-term use need to be explored. We hypothesize that this may occur, at least in part, through off-target effects via select steroid receptors (SRs) that broadly regulate multiple physiological processes. We investigated the effects of maraviroc (MVC), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and dapivirine (DPV) on progesterone receptor B (PR-B) transcriptional activity. We found that MVC and TDF activate PR-B transcription in the absence of progestogens on a PR-regulated promoter reporter construct and on endogenous PR-regulated genes. MVC and TDF exhibited no direct binding to PR-B; however, increased PR-B phosphorylation was detected with TDF but not MVC. DPV transactivated gilz and ptgs2 in the absence of progestogens and exhibited PR-B binding while showing no effects on phosphorylation, suggesting that it may activate PR-B through a direct mechanism. Our study shows that potential off-target immunomodulatory effects of MVC, TDF and DPV occur in vitro and these are most likely mediated by different mechanisms of PR-B activation.

Different progestogens are widely used in hormonal therapy and mediate their therapeutic actions via the progesterone receptor (PR). Little published data exist on their relative efficacies and potencies via the PR, while those available may be confounded by off-target receptors, different methodologies and model systems. We performed dose-response analysis to investigate the efficacies and potencies for transcription of progesterone and several progestins widely used in contraception via the B isoform of human PR (PR-B). We compared responses using three different cell lines and two different transient transfection conditions. Results show that in vitro biological responses via PR-B for the select progestogens can vary significantly in biocharacter, rank order and absolute values for efficacies and potencies, depending on the cell line and transfection condition. Progestogen rank orders for published relative binding affinities are mostly different to those for relative efficacies and potencies. These in vitro differences suggest that rank orders and absolute values of the efficacies and potencies of the progestogens are likely to vary in vivo in a cell-specific and progestogen-specific manner, and cannot easily be extrapolated from in vitro data, as is usually the practice. While obtaining such data in vivo is not possible, these in vitro data show proof of concept for likely significant cell- and progestogen-specific PR-B effects.

A variety of structurally and functionally distinct progestins is used in contraception and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). Some progestins elicit off-target effects by binding to steroid receptors other than the progesterone receptor, which may impact their therapeutic and side-effect profiles. We directly compared the binding affinities, efficacies and potencies of selected progestins via the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR). We did not detect a significant difference in the affinities of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), norethisterone acetate (NET-A), levonorgestrel (LNG), gestodene (GES), etonogestrel (ETG), nestorone (NES) and nomegestrel acetate (NoMAC) for the MR, while these were significantly lower compared to drospirenone (DRSP). While GES and NoMAC display affinities indistinguishable from progesterone (P4), the binding affinity of DRSP is significantly greater and all other progestins significantly lower than that of P4. Dose-response analyses showed that P4, GES and ETG display indistinguishable MR antagonist potencies for transactivation to the well-known MR antagonist spironolactone, while LNG, NoMAC and DRSP are significantly more potent than spironolactone and MPA, NET-A and NES are significantly less potent. Similar to our previous findings for NET-A, we show that LNG, GES, ETG and NES dissociate between transactivation and transrepression via the MR. Together our results provide strong evidence for progestin- and promoter-specific transcriptional effects via the MR, which are poorly predicted by relative binding affinities. A comparison of the binding affinities and potencies with reported free serum concentrations of progestins relative to the endogenous mineralocorticoid aldosterone, suggest that all progestins except MPA, NET-A and NES will likely compete with aldosterone for binding to the MR in vivo at doses used in hormonal therapy to elicit physiologically significant off-target effects.

Intramuscular depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) is the most widely used hormonal contraceptive in sub-Saharan Africa. Previous meta-analyses of observational studies found a significant 40%-50% increased risk associated with DMPA-IM use, relative to no contraception or infrequent condom use. This raised substantial concerns, although these studies had important limitations. Consequently, the open-label randomized Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes trial was conducted, designed primarily to detect a 50% or greater difference in HIV risk between DMPA-IM, the levonorgestrel (LNG) implant, and the copper-intrauterine device. The ECHO study, published in July 2019, concluded that there is no substantial difference in HIV risk among the methods evaluated, and that all three methods are safe and highly effective. In response, the WHO relaxed the Medical Eligibility Criteria for DMPA-IM use among women at high HIV risk in August 2019. However, two of the three comparisons in the ECHO trial could rule out neither a 50% increase nor no change in HIV risk for one contraceptive compared with another. The study had limitations and the results contained considerable uncertainty. They also did not inform on associated HIV risk for any one of the individual methods due to the absence of a control group such as no contraception or only infrequent condom use. The HIV risks associated with LNG implant and copper-IUD relative to no contraception or infrequent condom use are unknown and these cannot be seen as controls, nor did the authors claim them to be. The results will be discussed in the context of their limitations, what they add to the body of work to date on contraception and HIV acquisition, and the implications of the findings and reports thereof for future research and contraceptive choice.

Millions of women are exposed simultaneously to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) and progestin-based hormonal contraceptives. Yet the reciprocal modulation by ARVs and progestins of their intracellular functions is relatively unexplored. We investigated the effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and dapivirine (DPV), alone and in the presence of select steroids and progestins, on cell viability, steroid-regulated immunomodulatory gene expression, activation of steroid receptors, and anti-HIV-1 activity in vitro. Both TDF and DPV modulated the transcriptional efficacy of a glucocorticoid agonist via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in the U2OS cell line. In TZM-bl cells, DPV induced the expression of the proinflammatory interleukin 8 (IL-8) gene while TDF significantly increased medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)-induced expression of the anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) gene. However, peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and ectocervical explant tissue viability and gene expression results, along with TZM-bl HIV-1 infection data, are reassuring and suggest that TDF and DPV, in combination with dexamethasone (DEX) or MPA, do not reciprocally modulate key biological effects in primary cells and tissue. We show for the first time that TDF induces progestogen-independent activation of the progesterone receptor (PR) in a cell line. The ability of TDF and DPV to influence GR and PR activity suggests that their use may be associated with steroid receptor-mediated off-target effects. This, together with cell line and individual donor gene expression responses in the primary models, raises concerns that reciprocal modulation may cause side effects in a cell- and donor-specific manner in vivo.

Steroid hormones regulate a variety of physiological processes, including reproductive function, and are widely used in hormonal therapy. Synthetic progestogens, or progestins, were designed to mimic progesterone (P 4) for use in contraception and hormonal replacement therapy in women. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone (NET) are the most widely used injectable contraceptives in the developing world, while other progestins such as levonorgestrel (LNG), etonogestrel (ETG) and nestorone (NES) are used in or being developed for other forms of contraception. As concerns remain about the most appropriate choice of progestin and dosage, and the associated side-effects, the mechanisms and biological effects of progestins are frequently investigated in various in vitro mammalian cell line and tissue models. However, whether progestogens are differentially me-tabolised in different cell types in vivo or in vitro is unknown. For nine mammalian cell lines commonly used to investigate progestogen mechanisms of action, we developed and validated an ultra-high performance super-critical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPSFC-MS/MS) protocol for simultaneously quantifying the metabolism of the above-mentioned steroids. We show for the first time that, while 50-100% of P 4 was metabolised within 24 h in all cell lines, the metabolism of the progestins is progestin-and cell line-specific. We also show that MPA and NET are significantly metabolised in human cervical tissue, but to a lesser extent than P 4. Taken together, our findings suggest that differential progestogen metabolism may play a role in cell-specific therapeutic and side-effects. Relative affinities for binding to steroid receptors as well as potencies, efficacies and biocharacters for transcriptional activity of progestins, relative to P 4 , are most frequently determined using some of the cell lines investigated. Our results, however, suggest that differential metabolism of progestins and P 4 may confound these results. In particular, metabolism may underestimate the receptor-mediated intrinsic in vitro binding and dose-response values and predicted endogenous physiological effects of P 4 .

The intramuscular progestin-only injectable contraceptive, depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), is more widely used in Sub-Saharan Africa than another injectable contraceptive, norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN). Epidemiological data show a significant 1.4-fold increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition for DMPA-IM usage, while no such association is shown from limited data for NET-EN. We show that MPA, unlike NET, significantly increases R5-tropic but not X4-tropic HIV-1 replication ex vivo in human endocervical and ectocervical explant tissue from pre-menopausal donors, at physiologically relevant doses. Results support a mechanism whereby MPA, unlike NET, acts via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to increase HIV-1 replication in cervical tissue by increasing the relative frequency of CD4+ T cells and activated monocytes. We show that MPA, unlike NET, increases mRNA expression of the CD4 HIV-1 receptor and CCR5 but not CXCR4 chemokine receptors, via the GR. However, increased density of CD4 on CD3+ cells was not observed with MPA by flow cytometry of digested tissue. Results suggest that DMPA-IM may increase HIV-1 acquisition in vivo at least in part via direct effects on cervical tissue to increase founder R5-tropic HIV-1 replication. Our findings support differential biological mechanisms and disaggregation of DMPA-IM and NET-EN regarding HIV-1 acquisition risk category for use in high risk areas.

Access to safe and effective contraceptive choices is a reproductive right and contributes tremendously to improvements in maternal and child health. Progestin-only injectables, particularly intramuscularly injected depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM), have received increased attention given findings suggesting a potential association with increased HIV risk. For women at high risk of HIV, the World Health Organization's Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use currently aggregate recommendations for all progestin-only inject-ables, including DMPA-IM, subcutaneously injected DMPA (DMPA-SC) and intramuscularly injected norethin-drone/ norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), except in the case of some drug interactions. We considered whether published data indicate differences or similarities between these injectables relevant to risk of acquiring HIV. In vitro data confirm different biological activities of these distinct progestins, including that MPA, and not NET, binds and activates the glucocorticoid receptor resulting in different biological effects relevant to immune function. Limited clinical data suggest changes in immunologic activity following DMPA-IM and NET-EN initiation , but interstudy variation and study design differences diminish ability to determine clinical relevance and the degree to which DMPA-IM and NET-EN could act differentially. The highest-quality epidemiologic studies suggest a potential 40% increase in HIV incidence in users of DMPA-IM relative to women not using hormonal contraception but no significant increase in risk in users of NET-EN. In our opinion, most of the available biologic activity and epidemiologic data indicate that DMPA and NET-EN are likely to act differently, and data remain too limited to evaluate differences between DMPA-IM and DMPA-SC.

Background. The effects of the widely used progestin-only injectable contraceptives, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A), on host susceptibility to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) are unknown. Methods. We recruited human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected females, not taking any contraceptives, from Cape Town, South Africa, to evaluate the effect of MPA, NET-A, and dexamethasone on Mtb containment in monocyte-derived macrophages co-incubated with purified protein derivative (PPD)-driven peripheral blood-derived effector cells. Results. MPA (P < .005) and dexamethasone (P < .01), but not NET-A, significantly attenuated Mtb containment in Mtb-infected macrophages co-cultured with PPD-driven effector cells at physiologically relevant concentrations and in a dose-dependent manner. Antagonizing the glucocorticoid receptor with mifepristone (RU486) abrogated the reduction in Mtb containment. In PPD-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, MPA and dexamethasone, but not NET-A, upregulated (median [interquartile range]) regulatory T cells (5.3% [3.1%-18.2%]; P < .05), reduced CD4 + T-cell interferon-γ (21% [0.5%-28%]; P < .05) and granzyme B production (12.6% [7%-13.5%]; P < .05), and reduced CD8 + perforin activity (2.2% [0.1%-7%]; P < .05). RU486 reversed regulatory T-cell up-regulation and the inhibitory effect on Th1 and granzyme/perforin-related pathways. Conclusions. MPA, but not NET-A, subverts mycobacterial containment in vitro and downregulates pathways associated with protective CD8 +-and CD4 +-related host immunity via the glucocorticoid receptor. These data potentially inform the selection and use of injectable contraceptives in tuberculosis-endemic countries.

Persistence of the latent reservoir remains a challenge to curing HIV infection. Using shRNA screening, new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying latency regulation indicate that the estrogen receptor is a potent repressor of proviral reactivation and may serve as a promising therapeutic target in combination with other latency-reversing agents.

High usage of progestin-only injectable contraceptives, which include the intramuscular injectables depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM, Depo-Provera) and norethister-one (NET) enanthate (NET-EN or Nur-Isterate), correlates worldwide with areas of high HIV-1 prevalence. Epidemiological data show a significant association between usage of DMPA-IM and increased HIV-1 acquisition but no such association from limited data for NET-EN. Whether MPA and NET have similar effects on HIV-1 acquisition and pathogene-sis, and the relationship between these effects and the dose of MPA, are critical issues for women's health and access to suitable and safe contraceptives. We show for the first time that MPA, unlike NET, significantly increases HIV-1 replication in peripheral blood mononu-clear cells (PBMCs) and a cervical cell line model. The results provide novel evidence for a biological mechanism whereby MPA, acting via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), increases HIV-1 replication by at least in part increasing expression of the CCR5 HIV-1 coreceptor on target T-lymphocytes. MPA, unlike NET, also increases activation of T-cells and increases the CD4/CD8 ratio, suggesting that multiple mechanisms are involved in the MPA response. Our data offer strong support for different biological mechanisms for MPA versus NET, due to their differential GR activity. The dose-dependence of the MPA response suggests that significant effects are observed within the range of peak serum levels of progestins in DMPA-IM but not NET-EN users. Dose-response results further suggest that effects of contraceptives containing MPA on HIV-1 acquisition and disease progression may be critically dependent on dose, time after injection and intrinsic factors that affect serum concentrations in women.

Access to effective affordable contraception is critical for individual and public health. A wide range of hormonal contraceptives (HCs), which differ in composition, concentration of the progestin component, frequency of dosage, and method of administration, is currently available globally. However, the options are rather limited in settings with restricted economic resources that frequently overlap with areas of high HIV-1 prevalence. The predominant contraceptive used in sub-Saharan Africa is the progestin-only three-monthly injectable depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Determination of whether HCs affect HIV-1 acquisition has been hampered by behavioral differences potentially confounding clinical observational data. Meta-analysis of these studies shows a significant association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use and increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition, raising important concerns. No association was found for combined oral contraceptives containing levonorgestrel, nor for the two-monthly injectable contraceptive norethisterone enanthate, although data for norethisterone enanthate are limited. Susceptibility to HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted infections may, however, be dependent on the type of progestin present in the formulation. Several underlying biological mechanisms that may mediate the effect of HCs on HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted infection acquisition have been identified in clinical, animal, and ex vivo studies. A substantial gap exists in the translation of basic research into clinical practice and public health policy. To bridge this gap, we review the current knowledge of underlying mechanisms and biological effects of commonly used progestins. The review sheds light on issues critical for an informed choice of progestins for the identification of safe, effective, acceptable, and affordable contraceptive methods. (Endocrine Reviews 39: 36 – 78, 2018)

Pharmacological doses of glucocorticoids (GCs), acting via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to repress inflammation and immune function, remain the most effective therapy in the treatment of inflammatory and immune diseases. Since many patients on GC therapy exhibit GC-resistance and severe side-effects, much research is focussed on developing more selective GCs and combination therapies, with greater anti-inflammatory potency. GCs mediate their classical genomic transcriptional effects by binding to the cytoplasmic GR, followed by nuclear translocation and modulation of transcription of target genes by direct DNA-binding of the GR or its tethering to other transcription factors. Recent evidence suggests, however, that the responses mediated by the GR are much more complex and involve multiple parallel mechanisms integrating simultaneous signals from other receptors, both in the absence and presence of GCs, to shift the sensitivity of a target cell to GCs. The level of cellular stress, immune activation status, or the cell cycle phase may be crucial for determining GC sensitivity and GC responsiveness as well as subcellular localization of the GR and GR levels. Central to the development of new drugs that target GR signalling alone or as add-on therapies, is an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms of GC-independent GR desensitization, priming and activation of the unliganded GR, as well as synergy and cross-talk with other signalling pathways. This review will discuss the information currently available on these topics and their relevance to immunotherapy, as well as identify unanswered questions and future areas of research.

The importance of investigating the molecular mechanism of action of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A), two clinically important progestins used in hormone therapy (HT), has been highlighted by clinical evidence showing that MPA and norethisterone (NET) increase the risk of the development of breast cancer in HRT users, and that MPA may increase susceptibility to- and transmission of HIV-1. The aim of this study was to compare the molecular mechanisms of action of MPA, NET-A and progesterone (Prog) via the androgen receptor (AR) in a cell line model that can minimize confounding factors such as the presence of other steroid receptors. This study is the first to determine accurate apparent Ki values for Prog, MPA and NET-A toward the human AR in COS-1 cells. The results reveal that these ligands have a similar binding affinity for the AR to that of the natural androgen 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (Ki's for DHT, Prog, MPA and NET-A are 29.4, 36.6, 19.4 and 21.9 nM, respectively). Moreover, in both transactivation and transrepression transcriptional assays we demonstrate that, unlike Prog, MPA and NET-A are efficacious AR agonists, with activities comparable to DHT. One of the most novel findings of our study is that NET-A, like DHT, induces the ligand-dependent interaction between the NH2- and COOH-terminal domains (N/C-interaction) of the AR independent of promoter-context, while MPA does not induce the N/C interaction on a classical ARE and does so only weakly on an AR-selective ARE. This suggests that MPA and NET-A may exert differential promoter-specific actions via the AR in vivo. Consistent with this, molecular modeling suggests that MPA and NET-A induce subtle differences in the structure of the AR ligand binding domain. Taken together, the results from this study suggest that unlike Prog, both MPA and NET-A used in hormonal therapy are likely to compete with DHT and exert significant and promoter-specific off-target transcriptional effects via the AR, possibly contributing to some of the observed side-effects with the clinical use of MPA and NET-A.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), designed to mimic the actions of the endogenous hormone progesterone (P4), is extensively used by women as a contraceptive and in hormone replacement therapy. However, little is known about the steroid receptor-mediated molecular mechanisms of action of MPA in the female genital tract. In this study, we investigated the regulation of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin (IL)-12, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, by MPA versus P4, in an in vitro cell culture model of the female ectocervical environment. This study shows that P4 and MPA significantly increase the expression of the IL-12p40 and IL-12p35 genes, whereas IL-10 gene expression is suppressed in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, these effects were abrogated when reducing the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels with siRNA. Using a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), siRNA, and re-ChIP assays, we show that recruitment of the P4- and MPA-bound GR to the IL-12p40 promoter requires CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)-beta and nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB), although recruitment to the IL-10 promoter requires signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-3. These results suggest that both P4 and MPA may modulate inflammation in the ectocervix via this genomic mechanism.

Corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), a negative acute phase protein produced primarily in the liver, is responsible for the transport of glucocorticoids (GCs). It also modulates the bioavailability of GCs, as only free or unbound steroids are biologically active. Fluctuations in CBG levels therefore can directly affect GC bioavailability. This study investigates the molecular mechanism whereby GCs inhibit the expression of CBG. GCs regulate gene expression via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which either directly binds to DNA or acts indirectly via tethering to other DNA-bound transcription factors. Although no GC-response elements (GRE) are present in the Cbg promoter, putative binding sites for C/EBPbeta, able to tether to the GR, as well as HNF3alpha involved in GR signaling, are present. C/EBPbeta, but not HNF3alpha, was identified as an important mediator of DEX-mediated inhibition of Cbg promoter activity by using specific deletion and mutant promoter reporter constructs of Cbg. Furthermore, knockdown of C/EBPbeta protein expression reduced DEX-induced repression of CBG mRNA, confirming C/EBPbeta's involvement in GC-mediated CBG repression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) after DEX treatment indicated increased co-recruitment of C/EBPbeta and GR to the Cbg promoter, while C/EBPbeta knockdown prevented GR recruitment. Together, the results suggest that DEX repression of CBG involves tethering of the GR to C/EBPbeta.

Clinical studies suggest that the injectable contraceptive medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) increases susceptibility to infections such as HIV-1, unlike the injectable contraceptive norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN). We investigated the differential effects, molecular mechanism of action and steroid receptor involvement in gene expression by MPA as compared to NET and progesterone (P4) in the End1/E6E7 cell line model for the endocervical epithelium, a key point of entry for pathogens in the female genital mucosa. MPA, unlike NET-acetate (NET-A) and P4, increases mRNA expression of the anti-inflammatory GILZ and IkappaBalpha genes. Similarly, MPA unlike NET-A, decreases mRNA expression of the pro-inflammatory IL-6, IL-8 and RANTES genes, and IL-6 and IL-8 protein levels. The predominant steroid receptor expressed in the End1/E6E7 and primary endocervical epithelial cells is the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and GR knockdown experiments show that the anti-inflammatory effects of MPA are mediated by the GR. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation results suggest that MPA, unlike NET-A and P4, represses pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression in cervical epithelial cells via a mechanism involving recruitment of the GR to cytokine gene promoters, like the GR agonist dexamethasone. This is at least in part consistent with direct effects on transcription, without a requirement for new protein synthesis. Dose response analysis shows that MPA has a potency of approximately 24 nM for transactivation of the anti-inflammatory GILZ gene and approximately 4-20 nM for repression of the pro-inflammatory genes, suggesting that these effects are likely to be relevant at injectable contraceptive doses of MPA. These findings suggest that in the context of the genital mucosa, these GR-mediated glucocorticoid-like effects of MPA in cervical epithelial cells are likely to play a critical role in discriminating between the effects on inflammation caused by different progestins and P4 and hence susceptibility to genital infections, given the predominant expression of the GR in primary endocervical epithelial cells.

Cross-talk between the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and other receptors is emerging as a mechanism for fine-tuning cellular responses. We have previously shown that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) ligand-independently activates the GR and synergistically modulates glucocorticoid-induced transcription of an endogenous gene in LβT2 pituitary gonadotrope precursor cells. Here, we investigated GR and GnRH receptor (GnRHR) cross-talk that involves co-localization with lipid rafts in LβT2 cells. We report that the GnRHR and a small population of the GR co-localize with the lipid raft protein flotillin-1 (Flot-1) at the plasma membrane and that the GR is present in a complex with Flot-1, independent of the presence of ligands. We found that the SGK-1 gene is up-regulated by Dex and GnRH alone, whereas a combination of both ligands resulted in a synergistic increase in SGK-1 mRNA levels. Using siRNA-mediated knockdown and antagonist strategies, we show that the gene-specific synergistic transcriptional response requires the GR, GnRHR, and Flot-1 as well as the protein kinase C pathway. Interestingly, although several GR cofactors are differentially recruited to the SGK-1 promoter in the presence of Dex and GnRH, GR levels remain unchanged compared with Dex treatment alone, suggesting that lipid raft association of the GR has a role in enhancing its transcriptional output in the nucleus. Finally, we show that Dex plus GnRH synergistically inhibit cell proliferation in a manner dependent on SGK-1 and Flot-1. Collectively the results support a mechanism whereby GR and GnRHR cross-talk within Flot-1-containing lipid rafts modulates cell proliferation via PKC activation and SGK-1 up-regulation.

Cross-talk between the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and other receptors is emerging as a mechanism for fine-tuning cellular responses. We have previously shown that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) ligand-independently activates the GR and synergistically modulates glucocorticoid-induced transcription of an endogenous gene in LbetaT2 pituitary gonadotrope precursor cells. Here, we investigated GR and GnRH receptor (GnRHR) cross-talk that involves co-localization with lipid rafts in LbetaT2 cells. We report that the GnRHR and a small population of the GR co-localize with the lipid raft protein flotillin-1 (Flot-1) at the plasma membrane and that the GR is present in a complex with Flot-1, independent of the presence of ligands. We found that the SGK-1 gene is up-regulated by Dex and GnRH alone, whereas a combination of both ligands resulted in a synergistic increase in SGK-1 mRNA levels. Using siRNA-mediated knockdown and antagonist strategies, we show that the gene-specific synergistic transcriptional response requires the GR, GnRHR, and Flot-1 as well as the protein kinase C pathway. Interestingly, although several GR cofactors are differentially recruited to the SGK-1 promoter in the presence of Dex and GnRH, GR levels remain unchanged compared with Dex treatment alone, suggesting that lipid raft association of the GR has a role in enhancing its transcriptional output in the nucleus. Finally, we show that Dex plus GnRH synergistically inhibit cell proliferation in a manner dependent on SGK-1 and Flot-1. Collectively the results support a mechanism whereby GR and GnRHR cross-talk within Flot-1-containing lipid rafts modulates cell proliferation via PKC activation and SGK-1 up-regulation.

Whether hormonal contraceptives increase HIV-1 acquisition, transmission and disease progression are critical questions. Clinical research has been hampered by a lack of understanding that different progestins used in contraception exhibit differential off-target effects via steroid receptors other than the progesterone receptor. Of particular, relevance is the relative effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), widely used as injectable contraceptives in sub-Saharan Africa. While most high-quality clinical studies find no increased risk for HIV-1 acquisition with oral contraception or injectable NET-EN, most do find an increase with MPA, particularly in young women. Furthermore, mounting evidence from animal, ex vivo and biochemical studies are consistent with MPA acting to increase HIV-1 acquisition and pathogenesis, via mechanisms involving glucocorticoid-like effects on gene expression, in particular genes involved in immune function. We report that MPA, unlike NET and progesterone, represses inflammatory genes in human PBMCs in a dose-dependent manner, via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), at concentrations within the physiologically relevant range. These and published results collectively suggest that the differential GR activity of MPA versus NET may be a mechanism whereby MPA, unlike NET or progesterone, differentially modulates HIV-1 acquisition and pathogenesis in target cells where the GR is the predominant steroid receptor expressed.

Progestogens are widely used in contraception and in hormone therapy. Biochemical and molecular biological evidence suggests that progestogens differ widely in their affinities and transcriptional effects via different steroid receptors, and hence cannot be considered as a single class of compounds. Consistent with these observations, recent clinical evidence suggests that, despite their similar progestogenic actions, these differences underlie different side-effect profiles for cardiovascular disease and susceptibility to infectious diseases. However, choice of progestogen for maximal benefit and minimal side-effects is hampered by insufficient comparative clinical and molecular studies to understand their relative mechanisms of action, as well as their relative potencies for different assays and clinical effects. This review evaluates the usage, meaning and significance of the terms affinity, potency and efficacy in different models systems, with a view to improved understanding of their physiological and pharmacological significance.

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels vary between tissues and individuals and are altered by physiological and pharmacological effectors. However, the effects and implications of differences in GR concentration have not been fully elucidated. Using three statistically different GR concentrations in transiently transfected COS-1 cells, we demonstrate, using co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) and fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET), that high levels of wild type GR (wtGR), but not of dimerization deficient GR (GRdim), display ligand-independent dimerization. Whole-cell saturation ligand-binding experiments furthermore establish that positive cooperative ligand-binding, with a concomitant increased ligand-binding affinity, is facilitated by ligand-independent dimerization at high concentrations of wtGR, but not GRdim. The down-stream consequences of ligand-independent dimerization at high concentrations of wtGR, but not GRdim, are shown to include basal priming of the system as witnessed by ligand-independent transactivation of both a GRE-containing promoter-reporter and the endogenous glucocorticoid (GC)-responsive gene, GILZ, as well as ligand-independent loading of GR onto the GILZ promoter. Pursuant to the basal priming of the system, addition of ligand results in a significantly greater modulation of transactivation potency than would be expected solely from the increase in ligand-binding affinity. Thus ligand-independent dimerization of the GR at high concentrations primes the system, through ligand-independent DNA loading and transactivation, which together with positive cooperative ligand-binding increases the potency of GR agonists and shifts the bio-character of partial GR agonists. Clearly GR-levels are a major factor in determining the sensitivity to GCs and a critical factor regulating transcriptional programs.

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) levels vary between tissues and individuals and are altered by physiological and pharmacological effectors. However, the effects and implications of differences in GR concentration have not been fully elucidated. Using three statistically different GR concentrations in transiently transfected COS-1 cells, we demonstrate, using co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) and fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET), that high levels of wild type GR (wtGR), but not of dimerization deficient GR (GRdim), display ligand-independent dimerization. Whole-cell saturation ligand-binding experiments furthermore establish that positive cooperative ligand-binding, with a concomitant increased ligand-binding affinity, is facilitated by ligand-independent dimerization at high concentrations of wtGR, but not GRdim. The down-stream consequences of ligand-independent dimerization at high concentrations of wtGR, but not GRdim, are shown to include basal priming of the system as witnessed by ligand-independent transactivation of both a GRE-containing promoter-reporter and the endogenous glucocorticoid (GC)-responsive gene, GILZ, as well as ligand-independent loading of GR onto the GILZ promoter. Pursuant to the basal priming of the system, addition of ligand results in a significantly greater modulation of transactivation potency than would be expected solely from the increase in ligand-binding affinity. Thus ligand-independent dimerization of the GR at high concentrations primes the system, through ligand-independent DNA loading and transactivation, which together with positive cooperative ligand-binding increases the potency of GR agonists and shifts the bio-character of partial GR agonists. Clearly GR-levels are a major factor in determining the sensitivity to GCs and a critical factor regulating transcriptional programs.

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulates several physiological functions, including immune function and apoptosis. The HIV-1 virus accessory protein, viral protein R (Vpr), can modulate the transcriptional response of the GR. Glucocorticoids (GCs) and Vpr have been reported to induce apoptosis in various cells, including T-cells. We have previously shown that the injectable contraceptive, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is a partial to full agonist for the GR, unlike norethisterone acetate (NET-A). We investigated the functional cross talk between the GR and Vpr in inducing apoptosis in CD4(+) T-cells, in the absence and presence of GCs and these progestins, as well as progesterone. By using flow cytometry, we show that, in contrast to NET-A and progesterone, the synthetic GR ligand dexamethasone (Dex), cortisol and MPA induce apoptosis in primary CD4(+) T-cells. Furthermore, the C-terminal part of the Vpr peptide, or HIV-1 pseudovirus, together with Dex or MPA further increased the apoptotic phenotype, unlike NET-A and progesterone. By a combination of Western blotting, PCR and the use of receptor- selective agonists, we provide evidence that the GR and the estrogen receptor are the only steroid receptors expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These results, together with the findings that RU486, a GR antagonist, prevents Dex-, MPA- and Vpr-mediated apoptosis, provide evidence for the first time that GR agonists or partial agonists increase apoptosis in primary CD4(+) T-cells via the GR. We show that apoptotic induction involves differential expression of key apoptotic genes by both Vpr and GCs/MPA. This work suggests that contraceptive doses of MPA but not NET-A or physiological doses of progesterone could potentially accelerate depletion of CD4(+) T-cells in a GR-dependent fashion in HIV-1 positive women, thereby contributing to immunodeficiency. The results imply that choice of progestin used in contraception may be critical to susceptibility and progression of diseases such as HIV-1.

A more detailed understanding of the affinities and efficacies for transcriptional regulation by the synthetic progestins medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-A) via the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is required, to better understand their relative risk profiles. Both MPA and NET-A bind to the MR, although with about 100-fold lower affinities than that of Prog. MPA and NET-A exhibit no agonist activity, but NET-A, unlike MPA, has similar antagonistic efficacy to Prog on the endogenous mineralocorticoid/glucocorticoid response element (MRE/GRE)-containing genes, alpha-glycolytic protein or orosomucoid-1 (Orm-1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). This study is the first to show that NET-A, but not MPA, can dissociate between transrepression and transactivation via the MR. Given the relatively low affinity and potency of MPA and NET-A for the MR, our results suggest that these progestins are unlikeley to exert significant effects via the MR at doses used in hormonal therapy. However, considering their relative free concentrations compared to endogenous hormones, the possibility that NET-A may exhibit significant MR antagonist activity, with some possible cardiovascular protective benefits, should not be excluded.

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) concentrations and the ability of the GR to dimerize are factors which influence sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Upon glucocorticoid binding, the GR is actively transported into the nucleus, a crucial step in determining GR function. We examined the effects of GR concentration and the ability to dimerize on GR nuclear import, export and nuclear distribution using both live cell microscopy of GFP-tagged GR and immunofluorescence of untagged GR, with both wild type GR (GRwt) and dimerization deficient GR (GRdim). We found that the observed rate of GR nuclear import increases significantly at higher GR concentrations, at saturating concentrations of dexamethasone (10(-6) M) using GFP-tagged GR, while with untagged GR it is only discernable at sub-saturating ligand concentrations (10(-10)-10(-9) M). Loss of dimerization results in a slower observed rate of nuclear import (2.5- to 3.3-fold decrease for GFP-GRdim) as well as a decreased extent of GR nuclear localization (18-27% decrease for untagged GRdim). These results were linked to an increased rate of GR export at low GR concentrations (1.4- to 1.6-fold increase for untagged GR) and where GR dimerization is abrogated (1.5- to 1.7-fold increase for GFP-GRdim). Furthermore, GR dimerization was shown to be required for the appearance of discrete GC-dependent GR nuclear foci, the loss of which may explain the increased rate of GR export for the GRdim. The reduction in the observed rate of nuclear import and increased rate of nuclear export displayed at low GR concentrations and by the GRdim could explain the lowered glucocorticoid response under these conditions.

The safety of progestogens as a class has come under increased scrutiny after the publication of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial, particularly with respect to breast cancer and cardiovascular disease risk, despite the fact that only one progestogen, medroxyprogesterone acetate, was used in this study. Inconsistency in nomenclature has also caused confusion between synthetic progestogens, defined here by the term progestin, and natural progesterone. Although all progestogens by definition have progestational activity, they also have a divergent range of other properties that can translate to very different clinical effects. Endometrial protection is the primary reason for prescribing a progestogen concomitantly with postmenopausal estrogen therapy in women with a uterus, but several progestogens are known to have a range of other potentially beneficial effects, for example on the nervous and cardiovascular systems. Because women remain suspicious of the progestogen component of postmenopausal hormone therapy in the light of the Women's Health Initiative trial, practitioners should not ignore the potential benefits to their patients of some progestogens by considering them to be a single pharmacological class. There is a lack of understanding of the differences between progestins and progesterone and between individual progestins differing in their effects on the cardiovascular and nervous systems, the breast, and bone. This review elucidates the differences between the substantial number of individual progestogens employed in postmenopausal hormone therapy, including both progestins and progesterone. We conclude that these differences in chemical structure, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, affinity, potency, and efficacy via steroid receptors, intracellular action, and biological and clinical effects confirm the absence of a class effect of progestogens.

The safety of progestogens as a class has come under increased scrutiny after the publication of data from the Women's Health Initiative trial, particularly with respect to breast cancer and cardiovascular disease risk, despite the fact that only one progestogen, medroxyprogesterone acetate, was used in this study. Inconsistency in nomenclature has also caused confusion between synthetic progestogens, defined here by the term progestin, and natural progesterone. Although all progestogens by definition have progestational activity, they also have a divergent range of other properties that can translate to very different clinical effects. Endometrial protection is the primary reason for prescribing a progestogen concomitantly with postmenopausal estrogen therapy in women with a uterus, but several progestogens are known to have a range of other potentially beneficial effects, for example on the nervous and cardiovascular systems. Because women remain suspicious of the progestogen component of postmenopausal hormone therapy in the light of the Women's Health Initiative trial, practitioners should not ignore the potential benefits to their patients of some progestogens by considering them to be a single pharmacological class. There is a lack of understanding of the differences between progestins and progesterone and between individual progestins differing in their effects on the cardiovascular and nervous systems, the breast, and bone. This review elucidates the differences between the substantial number of individual progestogens employed in postmenopausal hormone therapy, including both progestins and progesterone. We conclude that these differences in chemical structure, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, affinity, potency, and efficacy via steroid receptors, intracellular action, and biological and clinical effects confirm the absence of a class effect of progestogens.

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone (NET) and its derivatives are widely used in female reproductive therapy, but little is known about their mechanisms of action via steroid receptors in the female genital tract. MPA used as a contraceptive has been implicated in effects on local immune function. However, the relative effects of progesterone (Prog), MPA and norethisterone acetate (NET-A) on cytokine gene expression in the female genital tract are unknown. Using two epithelial cell lines generated from normal human vaginal (Vk2/E6E7) and ectocervical (Ect1/E6E7) cells as in vitro cell culture model systems for mucosal immunity of the female cervicovaginal environment, we investigated steroid receptor expression and activity as well as regulation of cytokine/chemokine genes by MPA and NET-A, as compared to the endogenous hormone Prog. We show that the Prog, androgen, glucocorticoid and estrogen receptors (PR, AR, GR and ER, respectively) are expressed in both the Vk2/E6E7 and Ect1/E6E7 cell lines, and that the GR and AR are transcriptionally active. This study is the first to show ligand-, promoter- and cell-specific regulation of IL-6, IL-8 and RANTES (regulated-upon-activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) gene expression by Prog, MPA and NET-A in these cell lines. Moreover, we show that the repression of the TNF-α-induced RANTES gene by MPA in the Ect1/E6E7 cell line is mediated by the AR. Collectively, these data demonstrate that cell lines from different anatomical sites of the female genital tract respond differently to Prog and the synthetic progestins, most likely due to differential actions via different steroid receptors. The results highlight the importance of choice of progestins for immune function in the cervicovaginal environment. They further suggest that choice of progestins in endocrine therapy may have implications for women&amp;#39;s risk of susceptibility to infections due to differential actions on genes involved in inflammation and immune function.

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor for which a number of endogenous and synthetic ligands exist. A key question in steroid receptor biology is how different ligands elicit different maximal transcriptional responses via the same receptor and on the same promoter. This question was addressed quantitatively for the GR, using a panel of agonists, partial agonists and antagonists, on the endogenous GILZ gene in two different human cell lines. It was found that the extent of GR nuclear localization correlated with the efficacy for GILZ transactivation by the GR in U2OS cells. However, in A549 cells there was no significant correlation, with all ligands resulting in similar levels of GR nuclear localization, despite different levels of transcriptional activation of the GILZ gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis on the other hand, revealed ligand-specific differences in GILZ promoter occupancy in the A549 cells, which correlated with the transcriptional efficacy of the subset of ligands investigated. This suggests that ligand-specific differences in promoter occupancy by activated GR play a major role in discrimination between agonist, partial agonist and antagonist responses on the endogenous GILZ gene in A549 cells, while differences in nuclear localisation of liganded GR play a role in determining the transcriptional outcome in U2OS cells. These cell line-specific differences were not dependent on the amount of GR present, since transient overexpression of GR in U2OS did not alter the relative ligand-selective nuclear localisation. Our results show that there is a relationship between ligand-specific transactivation efficacy, extent of nuclear translocation and recruitment of GR to the promoter. However, the relative contribution of nuclear translocation and GR promoter recruitment to ligand-specific transactivation efficacy is cell-specific.

TNFα signaling and cytokine levels play a crucial role in cervical immunity and the host response to infections. We investigated the role of liganded and unliganded glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in IL-6 and IL-8 gene regulation in response to TNFα in the End1/E6E7 immortalized human endocervical epithelial cell line. In the absence of glucocorticoids, both decreasing GR protein levels by an siRNA strategy and results with the GR antagonist RU486 suggest a role for the unliganded GR in reduction of TNFα-induced IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA levels in End1/E6E7 cells. Moreover, GR-dependent repression of endogenous IL-6 mRNA as well as a minimal IL-6 promoter-reporter gene is also demonstrated in COS-1 cells in the absence of GR ligand, suggesting a transcriptional mechanism that is not cell-specific. TNFα induced recruitment of both the unliganded GR and GR-interacting protein type 1 (GRIP-1) to the IL-6 promoter. This, together with GRIP-1 overexpression studies, suggests a function for GRIP-1 as a GR co-repressor in this context. TNFα was shown to induce phosphorylation of the unliganded human GR at Ser-226 but not Ser-211, unlike dexamethasone, which induced hyperphosphorylation at both serine residues. Ser-226 is shown to be required for the ligand-independent GR-mediated repression of IL-6 in response to TNFα. Taken together, these results support a model whereby the unliganded GR attenuates TNFα-stimulated IL-6 transcription by a mechanism involving selective phosphorylation and recruitment of the unliganded GR and GRIP-1 to the IL-6 promoter. These findings suggest the presence of a novel autoregulatory mechanism that may prevent overproduction of IL-6 in the endocervix, possibly protecting against negative effects of excessive inflammation.

Synthetic progestins are used by millions of women as contraceptives and in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), although their molecular mechanisms of action are not well understood. The importance of investigating these mechanisms, as compared to those of progesterone, has been highlighted by clinical evidence showing that medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a first generation progestin, increases the risk of breast cancer and coronary heart disease in HRT users. A diverse range of later generation progestins with varying structures and pharmacological properties is available for therapeutic use and it is becoming clear that different progestins elicit beneficial and adverse effects to different extents. These differences in biological activity are likely to be due to many factors including variations in dose, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and regulation of, and/or binding, to serum-binding proteins and steroidogenic enzymes. Since the intracellular effects on gene expression and cell signaling of steroids are mediated via intracellular steroid receptors, differential actions via the progesterone and other steroid receptors and their isoforms, are likely to be the major cause of differential intracellular actions of progestins. Since many progestins bind not only to the progesterone receptor, but also to the glucocorticoid, androgen, mineralocorticoid, and possibly the estrogen receptors, it is plausible that synthetic progestins exert therapeutic actions as well as side-effects via some of these receptors. Here we review the molecular mechanisms of intracellular actions of old (MPA, norethisterone, levonorgestrel, gestodene) vs. new (drospirenone, dienogest, trimegestone) generation progestins, via steroid receptors.

A central question in glucocorticoid mechanism of action via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is what determines ligand-selective transcriptional responses. Using a panel of 12 GR ligands, we show that the extent of GR phosphorylation at S226 and S211, GR half-life and transcriptional response, occur in a ligand-selective manner. While GR phosphorylation at S226 was shown to inhibit maximal transcription efficacy, phosphorylation at S211 is required for maximal transactivation, but not for transrepression efficacy. Both ligand-selective GR phosphorylation and half-life correlated with efficacy for transactivation and transrepression. For both expressed and endogenous GR, in two different cell lines, agonists resulted in the greatest extent of phosphorylation and the greatest extent of GR downregulation, suggesting a link between these functions. However, using phosphorylation-deficient GR mutants we established that phosphorylation of the GR at S226 or S211 does not determine the rank order of ligand-selective GR transactivation. These results are consistent with a model whereby ligand-selective GR phosphorylation and half-life are a consequence of upstream events, such as ligand-specific GR conformations, which are maintained in the phosphorylation mutants.

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a steroid receptor that regulates diverse functions, which include the immune response. In humans, the GR acts via binding to cortisol, resulting in the transcriptional modulation of key host genes. Several lines of evidence suggest that the host GR could be a key protein exploited by HIV at multiple levels to ensure its pathogenic success. Endogenous and therapeutic glucocorticoids play important roles in patients with HIV due to their well-established effects on immune function. AIDS patients develop glucocorticoid hypersensitivity, consistent with a mechanism involving an HIV-1-induced increase in expression or activity of the GR. Both the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpr and the host GR affect transcription of viral proteins from the long terminal repeat (LTR) region of the HIV-1 promoter. In addition, Vpr modulates host GR function to affect transcription of host genes, most likely via direct interaction with the GR. Vpr appears to regulate GR function by acting as a co-activator for the GR. Since both the GR and Vpr are involved in apoptosis in T cells and dendritic cells, crosstalk between these proteins may also regulate apoptosis in these and other cells. Given that cortisol is not the only ligand that activates the GR, other endogenous as well as synthetic GR ligands such as progestins may also modulate HIV pathogenesis, in particular in the cervicovaginal environment. Investigating the molecular determinants, ligand-selectivity and role in HIV pathogenesis of the GR-Vpr interaction may lead to new strategies for development of anti-HIV drugs.

The role of GR phosphorylation in modulating GR-mediated transcription is not fully understood. Here we show that the hGR is rapidly phosphorylated at S211 and S226 in response to the synthetic agonist dexamethasone (dex) in COS-1 cells. Using a triple phosphorylation mutant hGR construct, we demonstrate that phosphorylation at one or more S residues (from S203, S211, and S226) is required for maximal hGR-mediated transcriptional activation on the MMTV promoter in response to dex in COS-1 cells, but that this effect is promoter selective. Phosphorylation at these residues does not affect unliganded or agonist-induced hGR degradation, suggesting that the mechanism whereby hGR phosphorylation at these residues regulates GR-mediated transactivation via a GRE does not involve changes in GR half-life. We have previously shown a direct correlation between efficacy for transactivation and interaction of the hGR with glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein-1 (GRIP-1). Here we show by pull-down assays in the absence and presence of glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) that phosphorylation of the hGR is required for GR-GRIP-1 interaction. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that hGR phosphorylation at one or more S residues (from S226, S211, and S203) is required for the recruitment of GRIP-1 to the synthetic MMTV promoter as well as to the endogenous GRE-containing glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) promoter in intact COS-1 cells, but not for nuclear localization. Our results support the conclusion that phosphorylation at S203, S211, and/or S226 of the hGR is required for a maximal transcriptional response via the synthetic MMTV and endogenous GILZ GREs in COS-1 cells, to enable recruitment of GRIP-1 to the hGR.

Compound A (CpdA), a dissociated glucocorticoid receptor modulator, decreases corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and luteneinizing hormone levels in rats. Whether this is due to transcriptional regulation by CpdA is not known. Using promoter reporter assays we show that CpdA, like dexamethasone (Dex), directly transrepresses these genes. Results using a rat Cbg proximal-promoter reporter construct in BWTG3 and HepG2 cell lines support a glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-dependent transrepression mechanism for CpdA. However, CpdA, unlike Dex, does not result in transactivation via glucocorticoid-responsive elements within a promoter reporter construct even when GR is co-transfected. The inability of CpdA to result in transactivation via glucocorticoid-responsive elements is confirmed on the endogenous tyrosine aminotransferase gene, whereas transrepression ability is confirmed on the endogenous CBG gene. Consistent with a role for CpdA in modulating GR activity, whole cell binding assays revealed that CpdA binds reversibly to the GR, but with lower affinity than Dex, and influences association of [(3)H]Dex, but has no effect on dissociation. In addition, like Dex, CpdA causes nuclear translocation of the GR, albeit to a lesser degree. Several lines of evidence, including fluorescence resonance energy transfer, co-immunoprecipitation, and nuclear immunofluorescence studies of nuclear localization-deficient GR show that CpdA, unlike Dex, does not elicit ligand-induced GR dimerization. Comparison of the behavior of CpdA in the presence of wild type GR to that of Dex with a dimerization-deficient GR mutant (GR(dim)) strongly supports the conclusion that loss of dimerization is responsible for the dissociated behavior of CpdA.

The GnRH receptor (GnRHR), a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, is a central regulator of reproductive function in all vertebrates. The peptide hormone GnRH exerts its effects via binding to the GnRHR in pituitary gonadotropes. We investigated the mechanisms of regulation of transcription of the mGnRHR gene in the mouse pituitary gonadotrope LT2 cell line by GnRH and dexamethasone (dex). Reporter assays with transfected mGnRHR promoter show that both dex and GnRH increase transcription of the mGnRHR gene via an activating protein-1 (AP-1) site. Real-time PCR confirmed this on the endogenous mGnRHR gene, and small interfering RNA experiments revealed a requirement for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) for both the dex and GnRH response. Chromatin immunoprecipita-tion (ChIP) and immunofluorescence assays provide evidence that both GnRH and dex up-regulate the GnRHR gene via nuclear translocation and interaction of the GR with the AP-1 region on the mGnRHR promoter. We show that GnRH activates the unliganded GR by rapid phosphorylation of the GR at Ser-234 in a GnRHR-dependent fashion to transactivate a GRE reporter gene in LT2 and COS-1 cells. Using kinase inhibitors, we established a direct link between GnRH-induced protein kinase C and MAPK activation, leading to unliganded GR phosphorylation at Ser-234 and transactivation of the glucocorticoid response element. Furthermore, we show that GnRH and dex synergistically activate the endogenous GnRHR promoter in LT2 cells, via a mechanism involving steroid receptor coactiva-tor-1 recruitment to the GnRHR AP-1 region. Our results suggest a novel mechanism of rapid non-genomic cross talk between the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes via GnRHR-dependent phosphorylation and activation of the unliganded GR in response to GnRH.

The mechanisms that determine ligand-selective transcriptional responses by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) are not fully understood. Using a wide panel of GR ligands, we investigated the relationships between the potency and maximal response for transactivation via a glucocorticoid response element (GRE) and transrepression via both nuclear factor small ka, CyrillicB (NFsmall ka, CyrillicB) and activator protein-1 (AP-1) sites, relative binding affinity for the GR, as well as interaction with both coactivators and corepressors. The results showed ligand-selective differences in potency and efficacy for each promoter, as well as for a particular ligand between the three promoters. Ligand potency correlated with relative affinity for the GR for agonists and partial agonists in transactivation but not for transrepression. Maximal response was unrelated to relative affinity of ligand for GR for both transactivation and transrepression. A good and significant correlation between full length coactivator binding in two-hybrid assays and efficacy as well as potency of different receptor-steroid complexes for both transactivation and transrepression supports a major role for coactivator recruitment in determination of ligand-selective transcriptional activity. Furthermore, ligand-selective GR binding to GRIP-1, as determined by both two-hybrid and DNA pull down assays, correlated positively with ligand-selective efficacy for transactivation of both a synthetic GRE reporter with expressed GR as well as of an endogenous gene via endogenous GR. The receptor interacting domain of the corepressor SMRT exhibited strong interaction with both agonists and partial agonists, similar to the results for coactivators, suggesting a possible role for SMRT in activation of transcription. However, there was no correlation between ligand affinity for the GR and cofactor interaction. These results provide strong quantitative biochemical support for a model in which GR-mediated ligand-selective differential interaction with GRIP-1, SRC-1A, NCoR and SMRT is a major determinant of ligand-selective and promoter-specific differences in potency and efficacy, for both transactivation and transrepression.

BACKGROUND:
There are two injectable progestogen-only contraceptives (IPCs) that have been available in many countries in the world since 1983. They are both still extensively used in many developing countries, forming a large proportion of the health system's expenditure on contraception. These are depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone oenanthate (NET-EN). These are both highly effective contraceptives that receive wide acceptance amongst women in their fertile years. They differ in frequency of administration that has implications on patient uptake. They also differ in cost that may significantly affect budgeting in the health system. A systematic comparison will aid to ensure their rational use.
OBJECTIVES:
To determine if there are differences between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate given at a dose of 150 mg IM every 3 months and norethisterone oenanthate given at a dose of 200mg IM every 2 months, in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, reversibility and discontinuation patterns, minor effects and major effects.
SEARCH STRATEGY:
We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE using PubMed, Popline, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Biblioline, LILACS, EMBASE and PASCAL for randomised controlled trials of DMPA versus NET-EN for long-acting progestogenic contraception. Studies were included regardless of language, and all databases were reviewed from the time that injectable progestogens have been in use.
SELECTION CRITERIA:
All randomised controlled comparisons of DMPA acetate given at a dose of 150 mg IM every 3 months versus NET-EN given at a dose of 200mg IM every 2 months, used for contraception, were included. Trials had to report on contraceptive efficiency and return to fertility, discontinuation risks and reasons for discontinuation, and clinical effects, both menstrual and non-menstrual.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
BD and CM evaluated the titles and abstracts obtained through applying the search strategy and applied the eligibility criteria. BD attempted to contact authors where clarification of the data was required, and contacted all main manufacturers of the contraceptives. After inclusion of the two studies, the data was abstracted and analysed with RevMan 4.2.
MAIN RESULTS:
Two trials were included in this review. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups for the frequency of discontinuation for either contraceptive, although the women on NET-EN were 4% more likely to discontinue for personal reasons than those on DPMA. Discontinuation because of accidental pregnancy did not differ between the groups. Although the duration of bleeding and spotting events was the same in each group, women on DPMA were 21% more likely to develop amenorrhoea. Mean changes in body weight at 12 and 24 months, and in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at 12 months did not differ significantly between the studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
While the choice between DPMA and NET-EN as injectable progestogen contraceptives may vary between both health providers and patients, data from randomized controlled trials indicate little difference between the effects of these methods, except that women on DMPA are more likely to develop amenorrhoea. There is inadequate data to detect differences in some non-menstrual major and minor clinical effects.

The identification of selective glucocorticoid receptor (GR) modifiers, which separate transactivation and transrepression properties, represents an important research goal for steroid pharmacology. Although the gene-activating properties of GR are mainly associated with undesirable side effects, its negative interference with the activity of transcription factors, such as NF-kappaB, greatly contributes to its antiinflammatory and immune-suppressive capacities. In the present study, we found that Compound A (CpdA), a plant-derived phenyl aziridine precursor, although not belonging to the steroidal class of GR-binding ligands, does mediate gene-inhibitory effects by activating GR. We demonstrate that CpdA exerts an antiinflammatory potential by down-modulating TNF-induced proinflammatory gene expression, such as IL-6 and E-selectin, but, interestingly, does not at all enhance glucocorticoid response element-driven genes or induce GR binding to glucocorticoid response element-dependent genes in vivo. We further show that the specific gene-repressive effect of CpdA depends on the presence of functional GR, displaying a differential phosphorylation status with CpdA as compared with dexamethasone treatment. The antiinflammatory mechanism involves both a reduction of the in vivo DNA-binding activity of p65 as well as an interference with the transactivation potential of NF-kappaB. Finally, we present evidence that CpdA is as effective as dexamethasone in counteracting acute inflammation in vivo and does not cause a hyperglycemic side effect. Taken together, this compound may be a lead compound of a class of antiinflammatory agents with fully dissociated properties and might thus hold great potential for therapeutic use.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), acting via its cognate GnRH receptor (GnRHR), is the primary regulator of mammalian reproductive function, and hence GnRH analogues are extensively used in the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases, as well as for assisted reproductive techniques. In addition to its established endocrine role in gonadotrophin regulation in the pituitary, evidence is rapidly accumulating to support the expression and functional roles for two forms of GnRHR (GnRHR I and GnRHR II) in multiple and diverse extra-pituitary mammalian tissues and cells. These findings, together with findings indicating that mutations of the GnRHR are linked to the disease hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and that GnRHRs play a direct role in neuronal migration and reproductive cancers, have presented new therapeutic targets and intensified research into the structure, function and mechanisms of regulation of expression of GnRHR genes. The present review focuses on the current knowledge on tissue-specific and hormonal regulation of transcription of mammalian GnRH receptor genes. Emerging insights, such as the discovery of diverse regulatory mechanisms in pituitary and extra-pituitary cell types, nonclassical mechanisms of steroid regulation, the use of composite elements for cell-specific expression, the increasing profile of hormones involved in regulation, the complexity of kinase pathways that target the GnRHR I gene, as well as species-differences, are highlighted. Although further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms of regulation of expression of GnRHR I and GnRHR II genes, the GnRHR is emerging as a potential target gene for facilitating cross-talk between neuroendocrine, immune and stress-response systems in multiple tissues via autocrine, paracrine and endocrine signalling.

The synthetic progestins, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and norethisterone acetate (NET-EN or NET-A), are widely used as female contraceptive agents and in hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Competitive binding revealed that MPA displays a higher relative binding affinity than NET-A and progesterone (prog) for the human GR (Kd of 4.2 nM for dexamethasone (dex) and Ki&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;#39;s of 10.8, 270 and 215 nM for MPA, NET-A and prog, respectively). Furthermore, MPA displays much greater glucocorticoid (GC) transactivation agonist potency than NET-A or prog (EC50s of 1.1, 7.2, &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;1000 and 280 nM for dex, MPA, NET-A and prog, respectively) and much greater GC agonist potency for transrepression than NET-A or prog (EC50s of 0.21, 2.7, &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;100 and 26 nM for dex, MPA, NET-A and prog, respectively). In addition, MPA induces phosphorylation of the GR at Ser 211 to a much greater extent than NET-A or prog and protects the GR from partial trypsin digestion in vitro to a much greater extent than NET-A or prog at saturating concentrations. Together these results suggest that the differences in biological activity of the progestins are not merely due to differences in their affinity for the GR but also due to the induction of different conformational changes in the liganded-GR. MPA and NET-A therefore display very different GC-like properties compared to each other and to prog, and are likely to exhibit different side effects via the GR.