Patricia Silva

Intrathoracic injections of bradykinin (1-100 micrograms/cavity) induced a dose-dependent increase in the number of eosinophils recovered from the rat pleural cavity 24 h later. Eosinophilia by bradykinin was preceded by a marked pleural neutrophil influx within 6 h and was absent only 72 h following stimulation. Bradykinin (10(-9)-10(-5) M) failed to induce in vitro eosinophil chemotaxis, indicating that its in vivo effect must be mediated by an intermediate messenger. BW 755C (25 mg/kg) and the more selective lipoxygenase inhibitor BW A4C (20 micrograms/cavity) suppressed the pleural eosinophilia induced by bradykinin (50 micrograms/cavity), whereas the platelet-activating factor (PAF)-acether antagonist BN 52021 was inactive. We conclude that bradykinin is able to attract eosinophil in vivo by a mechanism independent of PAF-acether and sensitive to the blockage of the lipoxygenase pathway.

This study was undertaken to investigate the possible contribution of the blockade of eotaxin generation to the anti-eosinophilotactic effect of phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 4 inhibitors. In some experiments, the putative synergistic interaction between PDE type 4 inhibitors and the β2-agonist salbutamol was also assessed.Sensitized guinea-pigs aerosolized with antigen (5% ovalbumin, OVA) responded with a significant increase in eotaxin and eosinophil levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) at 6 h. Eosinophil recruitment was inhibited by both PDE type 4 inhibitors rolipram (5 mg kg−1, i.p.) and RP 73401 (5 mg kg−1, i.p.) treatments. In contrast, only rolipram inhibited eotaxin production.Sensitized rats intrapleurally challenged (i.pl.) with antigen (OVA, 12 μg cavity−1) showed a marked eosinophil infiltration at 24 h, preceded by eotaxin generation at 6 h. Intravenous administration of a rabbit anti-mouse eotaxin antibody (0.5 mg kg−1) significantly reduced allergen-evoked eosinophilia in this model.Local pretreatment with rolipram (40 μg cavity−1) or RP 73401 (40 μg cavity−1) 1 h before challenge reduced eosinophil accumulation evaluated in the rat pleural effluent, but only the former was active against eotaxin generation. The inhibitors of PDE type 3 (SK&F 94836) and type 5 (zaprinast) failed to alter allergen-evoked eosinophil recruitment in rats.Local injection of β2-agonist salbutamol (20 μg cavity−1) inhibited both eosinophil accumulation and eotaxin production following pleurisy. The former was better inhibited when salbutamol and rolipram were administered in combination.Treatment with rolipram and RP 73401 dose-dependently inhibited eosinophil adhesion and migration in vitro. These effects were clearly potentiated by salbutamol at concentrations that had no effect alone.Our findings indicate that although rolipram and RP 73401 are equally effective in inhibiting allergen-induced eosinophil infiltration only the former prevents eotaxin formation, indicating that PDE 4 inhibitors impair eosinophil accumulation by mechanisms independent of eotaxin production blockade.This study was undertaken to investigate the possible contribution of the blockade of eotaxin generation to the anti-eosinophilotactic effect of phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 4 inhibitors. In some experiments, the putative synergistic interaction between PDE type 4 inhibitors and the β2-agonist salbutamol was also assessed.Sensitized guinea-pigs aerosolized with antigen (5% ovalbumin, OVA) responded with a significant increase in eotaxin and eosinophil levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) at 6 h. Eosinophil recruitment was inhibited by both PDE type 4 inhibitors rolipram (5 mg kg−1, i.p.) and RP 73401 (5 mg kg−1, i.p.) treatments. In contrast, only rolipram inhibited eotaxin production.Sensitized rats intrapleurally challenged (i.pl.) with antigen (OVA, 12 μg cavity−1) showed a marked eosinophil infiltration at 24 h, preceded by eotaxin generation at 6 h. Intravenous administration of a rabbit anti-mouse eotaxin antibody (0.5 mg kg−1) significantly reduced allergen-evoked eosinophilia in this model.Local pretreatment with rolipram (40 μg cavity−1) or RP 73401 (40 μg cavity−1) 1 h before challenge reduced eosinophil accumulation evaluated in the rat pleural effluent, but only the former was active against eotaxin generation. The inhibitors of PDE type 3 (SK&F 94836) and type 5 (zaprinast) failed to alter allergen-evoked eosinophil recruitment in rats.Local injection of β2-agonist salbutamol (20 μg cavity−1) inhibited both eosinophil accumulation and eotaxin production following pleurisy. The former was better inhibited when salbutamol and rolipram were administered in combination.Treatment with rolipram and RP 73401 dose-dependently inhibited eosinophil adhesion and migration in vitro. These effects were clearly potentiated by salbutamol at concentrations that had no effect alone.Our findings indicate that although rolipram and RP 73401 are equally effective in inhibiting allergen-induced eosinophil infiltration only the former prevents eotaxin formation, indicating that PDE 4 inhibitors impair eosinophil accumulation by mechanisms independent of eotaxin production blockade.British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 134, 283–294; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704233