Drafts by Roberto Angrisani
Les Cahier de l'EDEM, Nov 30, 2021
Cet article vise a à mettre en exergue les effets sur l'action extérieur de l'UE du recours aux a... more Cet article vise a à mettre en exergue les effets sur l'action extérieur de l'UE du recours aux accords formellement dépourvus de valeur juridique, tel que le joint way forward signé avec l'Afghanistan en 2016. L'analyse parte d'une mise en contexte du cadre légal de la coopération UE-Afghanistan en matière de réadmission pour ensuite englober l'ensemble des criticités soulevées par le recours aux accords non conventionnels dans l'action exterieur de l'UE.Au lendemain de la retraite des forces armées américaines et alliées du territoire afghan, une réflexion s'impose sur l'importance d'inscrire la diplomatie de l'UE dans le droit des traités, dans les valeurs qui les ont inspirés ainsi que dans le socle du le respect des droits fondamentaux. This article aims to highlight the effects on the EU's external action of the use of formally non-legally binding agreements, such as the joint way forward signed with Afghanistan in 2016. The analysis starts from a contextualisation of the legal framework of the EU-Afghanistan cooperation on readmission and then encompasses all the critical issues raised by the use of « non-treaty agreements » in the EU's external action.. In the aftermath of the withdrawal of US and allied armed forces from Afghan territory, it is necessary to reflect on the importance of ensuring that EU diplomacy is consistent with the law of the treaties, the values on which they are based and the respect for fundamental rights.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
« The European judges faced with migrations » Migration and Asylum Policies Systems (MAPS) , 2022
Migration and the other souverain domains of jurisdiction are becoming the 'test bed' for a praet... more Migration and the other souverain domains of jurisdiction are becoming the 'test bed' for a praetorian integration that could also set an example for other areas of EU law. Moreover, the response of the CJEU may lead to the emergence of a harmonized European criminal justice system in the field of migration.
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in the famous Celaj case, underlined the extent to which " [T]he prosecution and punishment of third-country nationals illegally staying on the territory of a Member State is the subject of heated debate" . This kind of debate is fuelled in particular by the reluctance of Member States to frame the migration phenomenon in an approach other than mere répression : "[e]ven bodies responsible for assessments in the light of legal rules often cannot resist the temptation to drift into legal policy in their arguments, as the two above-cited statements attempt to illustrate" .
The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) has clearly stated that "[t]he mere fact of being an irregular migrant should never be considered as sufficient grounds for detention" and this reflects the "useful effect" of EU law standards designed to regulate the crossing and stay of irregular migrants and applicants for international protection. It is a fact, however, that "[e]ven bodies whose task it is to make assessments under the law often cannot resist the temptation to slip elements of legal policy into their arguments, as the two examples cited above tend to illustrate“ .
This article thus aims to answer the question to what extent the case law of the CJEU influences developments in national and European (EU) migration law.
The analysis is based on the litigation on the criminalisation and repression of irregular migration and on the new legislative instruments that the EU proposes to adopt in order to put into practice the principles identified by the CJEU.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Proposal for ISA conference (accepted), 2022
Facial Emotion Recognition (FER) is the technology that analyses facial expressions from both sta... more Facial Emotion Recognition (FER) is the technology that analyses facial expressions from both static images and videos in order to reveal information on one’s emotional state. The potential use of this technology that aims to decrypt the complexity of facial expressions in border control context, raises significant risks for fundamental rights of migrants, notably with regard to personal data protection.
However, the ever-widening application of this technology and its potential developments based on artificial intelligence require an international consensus to determine a legal framework, as initiated by the Global Compact.
In the general absence of specific regulation so far, private companies and public bodies in both democracies and authoritarian states have been adopting this technology for a variety of uses. There is no consensus in society about the ethics of facial recognition, and doubts are growing as to its compliance with the law as well as its ethical sustainability over the long term.
It would be a mistake, however, to focus only on privacy issues. This is a fundamental ethical question for a democratic society. That is why this paper will have a multidisciplinary approach.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Espace Schengen et Systèmes d’information: le rôle de l’agence eu-LISA, 2016
L’Agence eu-LISA est l’expression de la transition digitale de la gestion des frontières de l'Uni... more L’Agence eu-LISA est l’expression de la transition digitale de la gestion des frontières de l'Union européenne. L’Agence européenne pour la gestion opérationnelle des systèmes d'information à grande échelle au sein de l’espace de liberté, sécurité et justice est chargée d'administrer et sécuriser les systèmes d'informations tels que VIS, SIS II. EURODAC, etc., qui sont aujourd'hui essentiels à la survie et au bon fonctionnement de l'espace de liberté, sécurité et justice.
Dans un système de compétences partagées, entre l'agence et les États membres il est parfois complexe de saisir les rôles et les responsabilités de chacun, notamment dans le traitement des données à caractère personnel.
The eu-LISA Agency is the expression of the digital transition of the border management of the European Union. The European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale Information Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice is responsible for administering and securing information systems such as VIS, SIS II. EURODAC, etc., which today are essential for the survival and functioning of the area of freedom, security and justice.
In a system of shared competences, between the agency and the Member States it is sometimes difficult to grasp the roles and responsibilities of each, especially in the processing of personal data
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Papers by Roberto Angrisani
L’étude défend la thèse selon laquelle la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne, avec son action ... more L’étude défend la thèse selon laquelle la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne, avec son action interprétative, joue un rôle majeur dans la définition du niveau de protection des droits fondamentaux des migrants en condition irrégulière dans l’UE. Les compétences limitées de l’UE en matière migratoire, partagées avec les États membres (article 4, § 2, lettre j TFUE), n’ont pas empêché la Cour de justice de contrecarrer l’action répressive mise en exergue par les États membres et parfois par l’UE elle-même. Néanmoins, l’interprétation faite par la CJUE du droit primaire et dérivé à la lumière de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’UE rencontre des limites majeures lorsqu’elle vise le contentieux pénal et administratif portant sur l’immigration irrégulière. La première partie de l’étude est consacrée aux limites de l’action interprétative de la CJUE. La dimension territoriale étant le fil conducteur de la recherche, l’analyse de la jurisprudence montre les obstacles qui s’opposent...
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Université de Bordeaux ; Université Laval (Québec, Canada). Faculté de droit, Dec 18, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Revue québécoise de droit international, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Cahier EDEM, 2020
CJUE-UE – Politique migratoire – TAR Sicile – ONG – Secours en mer – Sea Watch – Droits fondament... more CJUE-UE – Politique migratoire – TAR Sicile – ONG – Secours en mer – Sea Watch – Droits fondamentaux – criminalisation de la solidarité – crimmigration – nécropolitique
Le tribunal administratif de Palerme a publié, en date du 23 décembre 2020, l’ordonnance sur la légitimité de la détention administrative du navire Sea Watch 4 ordonnée par les autorités portuaires de Palerme. Suite à une première analyse des incongruences procédurales, le tribunal a saisi la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne d’une question préjudicielle d'urgence, se réservant le droit de procéder à l'examen de l'affaire sur la base de l'approche interprétative qui sera adoptée par la Cour.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
70 ans de la convention européenne des droits de l'homme, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Centro Europe Direct LUPT Federico II, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Le Club des juristes - Blog Coronavirus, 2020
En plein milieu des négociations concernant la réponse européenne à la crise sanitaire, des quoti... more En plein milieu des négociations concernant la réponse européenne à la crise sanitaire, des quotidiens allemands ont voulu « mettre en garde » Angela Merkel quant à l’opportunité de soutenir les mesures économiques de l’UE visant à venir en aide à l’Italie, craignant que la mafia ne devienne le réel bénéficiaire de ces transferts . Les lignes qui suivent visent d’abord à démontrer la perspective inverse, en expliquant à quel point l’hésitation de l’UE à intervenir pourrait renforcer les organisations criminelles – d’Italie et d’ailleurs – et avoir aussi un effet néfaste sur la gestion sanitaire de la pandémie (A). Ensuite, nous analyserons de plus près certaines distorsions de l’Union économique et monétaire pour comprendre les impacts de l’émergence sanitaire sur la courbe de la défiance entre États de l’UE(B).
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Risk Analysis Report , 2016
In a context of great political instability, the Constitutional Referendum proposed by the center... more In a context of great political instability, the Constitutional Referendum proposed by the center-left government in Italy in December 2016 created a veritable tsunami of worries over the holding of the Italian democratic system.
This Risk analysis report aims to respond to the worries of investors and international actors about the behavior of the Italian economic and political system, faced with the growing rise of populist movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dans un contexte de grande instabilité politique, le Référendum constitutionnel proposé par le gouvernement de centre gauche en Italie en décembre 2016 a créé un véritable tsunami d'inquiétudes sur la tenue du système démocratique italien.
Ce rapport se veut de répondre aux inquiétudes des investisseurs et des acteurs internationaux sur la tenue du système économique et politique italien, confronté à la montée croissante des mouvements populistes.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
RISE, 2019
This paper provides an insight into the evolution of the relationships between Italy and Libya as... more This paper provides an insight into the evolution of the relationships between Italy and Libya as a cooperation-in-externalisation model. Our aim is to show the paradoxical consequences of the “outsourcing” policy
of the EU and its Member States. According to such mechanism, every actor participates but apparently no one is responsible, thus some critical issues may be raised.
The migration policy of the EU and its Member States is following a “shift towards the informal”[4], which is underlined by the proliferation of a large number of “hybrid” and “non-legally binding” instruments used to regulate the relations between the States of departure or transit and the arrival States of migrants.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Books by Roberto Angrisani
L'aprés Covid-19 quel multilateralisme
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
L'Union européenne et l'Amerique du Nord à l'heure de la Nouvelle Route de la soie, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Drafts by Roberto Angrisani
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in the famous Celaj case, underlined the extent to which " [T]he prosecution and punishment of third-country nationals illegally staying on the territory of a Member State is the subject of heated debate" . This kind of debate is fuelled in particular by the reluctance of Member States to frame the migration phenomenon in an approach other than mere répression : "[e]ven bodies responsible for assessments in the light of legal rules often cannot resist the temptation to drift into legal policy in their arguments, as the two above-cited statements attempt to illustrate" .
The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) has clearly stated that "[t]he mere fact of being an irregular migrant should never be considered as sufficient grounds for detention" and this reflects the "useful effect" of EU law standards designed to regulate the crossing and stay of irregular migrants and applicants for international protection. It is a fact, however, that "[e]ven bodies whose task it is to make assessments under the law often cannot resist the temptation to slip elements of legal policy into their arguments, as the two examples cited above tend to illustrate“ .
This article thus aims to answer the question to what extent the case law of the CJEU influences developments in national and European (EU) migration law.
The analysis is based on the litigation on the criminalisation and repression of irregular migration and on the new legislative instruments that the EU proposes to adopt in order to put into practice the principles identified by the CJEU.
However, the ever-widening application of this technology and its potential developments based on artificial intelligence require an international consensus to determine a legal framework, as initiated by the Global Compact.
In the general absence of specific regulation so far, private companies and public bodies in both democracies and authoritarian states have been adopting this technology for a variety of uses. There is no consensus in society about the ethics of facial recognition, and doubts are growing as to its compliance with the law as well as its ethical sustainability over the long term.
It would be a mistake, however, to focus only on privacy issues. This is a fundamental ethical question for a democratic society. That is why this paper will have a multidisciplinary approach.
Dans un système de compétences partagées, entre l'agence et les États membres il est parfois complexe de saisir les rôles et les responsabilités de chacun, notamment dans le traitement des données à caractère personnel.
The eu-LISA Agency is the expression of the digital transition of the border management of the European Union. The European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale Information Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice is responsible for administering and securing information systems such as VIS, SIS II. EURODAC, etc., which today are essential for the survival and functioning of the area of freedom, security and justice.
In a system of shared competences, between the agency and the Member States it is sometimes difficult to grasp the roles and responsibilities of each, especially in the processing of personal data
Papers by Roberto Angrisani
Le tribunal administratif de Palerme a publié, en date du 23 décembre 2020, l’ordonnance sur la légitimité de la détention administrative du navire Sea Watch 4 ordonnée par les autorités portuaires de Palerme. Suite à une première analyse des incongruences procédurales, le tribunal a saisi la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne d’une question préjudicielle d'urgence, se réservant le droit de procéder à l'examen de l'affaire sur la base de l'approche interprétative qui sera adoptée par la Cour.
This Risk analysis report aims to respond to the worries of investors and international actors about the behavior of the Italian economic and political system, faced with the growing rise of populist movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dans un contexte de grande instabilité politique, le Référendum constitutionnel proposé par le gouvernement de centre gauche en Italie en décembre 2016 a créé un véritable tsunami d'inquiétudes sur la tenue du système démocratique italien.
Ce rapport se veut de répondre aux inquiétudes des investisseurs et des acteurs internationaux sur la tenue du système économique et politique italien, confronté à la montée croissante des mouvements populistes.
of the EU and its Member States. According to such mechanism, every actor participates but apparently no one is responsible, thus some critical issues may be raised.
The migration policy of the EU and its Member States is following a “shift towards the informal”[4], which is underlined by the proliferation of a large number of “hybrid” and “non-legally binding” instruments used to regulate the relations between the States of departure or transit and the arrival States of migrants.
Books by Roberto Angrisani
Advocate General Szpunar, in his opinion in the famous Celaj case, underlined the extent to which " [T]he prosecution and punishment of third-country nationals illegally staying on the territory of a Member State is the subject of heated debate" . This kind of debate is fuelled in particular by the reluctance of Member States to frame the migration phenomenon in an approach other than mere répression : "[e]ven bodies responsible for assessments in the light of legal rules often cannot resist the temptation to drift into legal policy in their arguments, as the two above-cited statements attempt to illustrate" .
The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) has clearly stated that "[t]he mere fact of being an irregular migrant should never be considered as sufficient grounds for detention" and this reflects the "useful effect" of EU law standards designed to regulate the crossing and stay of irregular migrants and applicants for international protection. It is a fact, however, that "[e]ven bodies whose task it is to make assessments under the law often cannot resist the temptation to slip elements of legal policy into their arguments, as the two examples cited above tend to illustrate“ .
This article thus aims to answer the question to what extent the case law of the CJEU influences developments in national and European (EU) migration law.
The analysis is based on the litigation on the criminalisation and repression of irregular migration and on the new legislative instruments that the EU proposes to adopt in order to put into practice the principles identified by the CJEU.
However, the ever-widening application of this technology and its potential developments based on artificial intelligence require an international consensus to determine a legal framework, as initiated by the Global Compact.
In the general absence of specific regulation so far, private companies and public bodies in both democracies and authoritarian states have been adopting this technology for a variety of uses. There is no consensus in society about the ethics of facial recognition, and doubts are growing as to its compliance with the law as well as its ethical sustainability over the long term.
It would be a mistake, however, to focus only on privacy issues. This is a fundamental ethical question for a democratic society. That is why this paper will have a multidisciplinary approach.
Dans un système de compétences partagées, entre l'agence et les États membres il est parfois complexe de saisir les rôles et les responsabilités de chacun, notamment dans le traitement des données à caractère personnel.
The eu-LISA Agency is the expression of the digital transition of the border management of the European Union. The European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale Information Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice is responsible for administering and securing information systems such as VIS, SIS II. EURODAC, etc., which today are essential for the survival and functioning of the area of freedom, security and justice.
In a system of shared competences, between the agency and the Member States it is sometimes difficult to grasp the roles and responsibilities of each, especially in the processing of personal data
Le tribunal administratif de Palerme a publié, en date du 23 décembre 2020, l’ordonnance sur la légitimité de la détention administrative du navire Sea Watch 4 ordonnée par les autorités portuaires de Palerme. Suite à une première analyse des incongruences procédurales, le tribunal a saisi la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne d’une question préjudicielle d'urgence, se réservant le droit de procéder à l'examen de l'affaire sur la base de l'approche interprétative qui sera adoptée par la Cour.
This Risk analysis report aims to respond to the worries of investors and international actors about the behavior of the Italian economic and political system, faced with the growing rise of populist movements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dans un contexte de grande instabilité politique, le Référendum constitutionnel proposé par le gouvernement de centre gauche en Italie en décembre 2016 a créé un véritable tsunami d'inquiétudes sur la tenue du système démocratique italien.
Ce rapport se veut de répondre aux inquiétudes des investisseurs et des acteurs internationaux sur la tenue du système économique et politique italien, confronté à la montée croissante des mouvements populistes.
of the EU and its Member States. According to such mechanism, every actor participates but apparently no one is responsible, thus some critical issues may be raised.
The migration policy of the EU and its Member States is following a “shift towards the informal”[4], which is underlined by the proliferation of a large number of “hybrid” and “non-legally binding” instruments used to regulate the relations between the States of departure or transit and the arrival States of migrants.