Books and Monographs by Johannes Hackl
with the collaboration of J. Wende, N. J. C. Kouwenberg, N. Rudik, J. Hackl, , F. Simons and E. Zomer: Supplement to the Akkadian Dictionaries, Volume D, T, Tet = Leipziger Altorientalistische Studien 7,2 (2019). lxviii, 120 pp.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Spätbabylonische Briefe Band 1 (SbB 1). AOAT 414/1 (2014)
In this volume – the first of a series that will publish a full (re-)edition of the Late Babyloni... more In this volume – the first of a series that will publish a full (re-)edition of the Late Babylonian letter corpus – 243 letters from private archives are edited. Eighty of these letters have not been published before, and an additional 58 have never been edited and are not included in Ebeling’s now quite dated edition of the corpus. Almost all of the tablets have been collated, and the editions are preceded by an analysis of the letters’ formal structure and content. Accompanying commentary contextualizes the letters and establishes their archival background. The book includes a glossary and numerous indices.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
"The present study investigates the diplomatics of the Late Achaemenid and Hellenistic archival t... more "The present study investigates the diplomatics of the Late Achaemenid and Hellenistic archival texts from Northern Babylonia as well as the socio-economic background of the archives that can be reconstructed on the basis of this textual material. It is supplemented by c. 420 text editions and transcriptions.
The corpus comprises some 1250 tablets, of which less than 700 are currently available in publication. They were either recovered by illicit diggers or excavated by early archaeologists (especially by H. Rassam on behalf of the British Museum) during the second half of the 19th and first decades of the 20th centuries and are now housed in the British Museum, the Vorderasiatische Museum, the Louvre, the Yale Babylonian Collection and other minor collections in the western world. The temporal range of our corpus extends from the second year of Xerxes until the eventual disappearance of cuneiform legal and economic texts during the first decade of the first century BCE (484–93 BC). Its beginning is thus set by the watershed formed by the revolts of the Babylonian elite against Xerxes and the following social upheavals. The particular focus on textual material drafted in Northern Babylonia is warranted by the current state of research, as no comprehensive study of the available textual material has ever been undertaken.
The first section of this study focuses on the intrinsic (textual) and extrinsic (physical) aspects of the tablets resulting from certain conventions as well as techniques that have been employed by the Babylonian scribes when drafting legal or administrative records. The most important results of the research carried out in this section can be summarized as follows. Overall, the formulae and clauses employed in Late Achaemenid and Hellenistic archival texts from Northern Babylonia display a pronounced resemblance to those that one encounters in the pertinent text types from the long sixth century (~ 626–484 BCE). These strong links of continuity notwithstanding, there are also some areas in which innovations can be observed in the course of the fifth and fourth centuries BC. As for the intrinsic aspects, marriage contracts and slave sales deserve particular attention in this respect, since the formulae of both contract types exhibit major changes that seem to have occurred during the reign of Artaxerxes I. Also, some contract types evolved for the first time in the period under consideration (e.g., records of deposit with added clauses and ‘genuine’ service contracts). As far as the extrinsic aspects are concerned, we see a clear development in sealing practices which were accompanied by the emergence of new tablet formats. The latter were necessary to accommodate the gradually increasing number of seals that were applied to each tablet. In sum, the methodological refinement that was reached in this study can thus be used to help date undated or imprecisely dated tablets, especially when dating from the reign of an Artaxerxes.
The second section focuses on archival studies. Numerous institutional and private archives, including hitherto unknown smaller archives and dossiers from Babylon, have been reconstructed and described, both in terms of textual composition and socio-economic background. Especially, the in-depth studies of the two largest institutional archives (i.e., the Late Achaemenid and Early Hellenistic Esangila archive and the brewer’s archive) have yielded substantial new insights in the organization of the temple households in Northern Babylonia in this period. As was demonstrated, there is strong reason to believe that the prebendary system as it is known from the long sixth century had been abolished. Likewise, our sources point to a complete restructuring of the temple administration, as the highest temple officials of the long sixth century are almost absent from our sources. The evidence presented here thus makes it difficult to escape the conclusion that these fundamental changes were prompted by royal intervention, presumably instigated by the Babylonian revolts against Persian rule in the second year of Xerxes.
"
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
AOAT 341 (2007)
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Articles and Shorter Notices by Johannes Hackl
Published in Orientalia 92/2 (2023), pp. 1-16.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes (2021), pp. 81-98.
This article presents an edition of seven unpublished Ur III administrative documents, housed in ... more This article presents an edition of seven unpublished Ur III administrative documents, housed in the Egyptian and Near Eastern Collection of the Kunsthistorisches Museum (Vienna). They fall into two groups. The texts of group A come from the "Central Bureau" at Puzriš-Dagān, dated in the reigns of Šulgi, Amar-Suen and Šu-Suen. The concerns of those of group B make it likely that they belonged to the Provincial Archive from Umma. An appendix contains a transliteration and translation of the most common Gudea inscription (RIME 3/1, 1.7.37), found on a foundation peg (clay nail), also in the collection of the Kunsthistorisches Museum.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Archiv für Orientforschung (2021), pp. 2-45.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History (2021), pp. 39-71.
It is by now well established that authors and copyists of scholarly works also drafted legal doc... more It is by now well established that authors and copyists of scholarly works also drafted legal documents, if only occasionally. This article examines newly available prosopographical information concerning the scribal activities of the Sîn-lēqi-unnīnī during the mid to late fourth century BCE. It offers new datings of learned texts that have been known to academic circles for a long time and argues that the extant archival texts from Early Hellenistic Uruk mainly belonged to the archives of the Aḫûtu and Ekur-zakir families. In addition, it presents cases of transference of linguistic items peculiar to one or the other genre, giving rise to some general remarks on cross-genre imprints.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Journal of Cuneiform Studies 73 (2021), pp. 211-245.
The article presents editions of all known texts belonging to the archive of the Sipparean preben... more The article presents editions of all known texts belonging to the archive of the Sipparean prebendary Marduk-bēlšunu, son of Nabû-balāssu-iqbi, that is, the Balīḫû archive. It is the second part of a series of articles that aims to make available the so-called satellite archives of the Ṣāḫiṭ-ginê A archive (“Mardukrēmanni archive”) and related and unrelated smaller archives from Sippar, all dating to the long sixth century BCE.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in: J.-P. Vita (ed.), History of the Akkadian Language. Vol. 1: Linguistic Background and Early Periods. Vol. 2: The Second and First Millennia BCE. Afterlife. Handbook of Oriental Studies vol. 152. Leiden-Chicago: Brill: 1459-1477., 2021
This chapter surveys the language death (or rather extinction) of Akkadian.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in: J.-P. Vita (ed.), History of the Akkadian Language. Vol. 1: Linguistic Background and Early Periods. Vol. 2: The Second and First Millennia BCE. Afterlife. Handbook of Oriental Studies vol. 152. Leiden-Chicago: Brill: 1431-1458., 2021
This chapter offers a description of Late Babylonian, the latest variety of Akkadian, including t... more This chapter offers a description of Late Babylonian, the latest variety of Akkadian, including the language of the Babylonian version of the Behistun inscription.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Publishedin Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 111 (2021), pp. 88-99 [Ahead of Print in Zeitschrift für Assyriologie (2020)], 2020
This article revisits the question of whether the sanctuary named é ud.1.kam and the New Year Fes... more This article revisits the question of whether the sanctuary named é ud.1.kam and the New Year Festival house (bīt akīti) are one and the same or whether they are separate entities. It presents new evidence that suggests reading the logographic name as bīt ūmakkal, and argues that the latter refers to a sanctuary which was situated in the juniper garden surrounding Marduk’s temple Esangila. In addition, it calls into question P. J. Kosmin’s assumption that the é ud.1.kam may have been founded or repurposed to commemorate in cult the “idealized” Seleucid Era epoch.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Klio 102/2 (2020), pp. 560-578.
This article presents a hitherto unpublished cuneiform document from the Liagre Böhl Collection (... more This article presents a hitherto unpublished cuneiform document from the Liagre Böhl Collection (Leiden) that sheds new light on the length of the coregency of Seleucos I Nicator and his son Antiochos (I Soter). Judging by the date mentioned in this document (LB 863), it is plausible to suppose that Antiochos was made coregent at least two years earlier than generally assumed. Furthermore, this discovery accords well with the peculiar date of another cuneiform document (D.T. 189) that has so far defied explanation.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Xerxes and Babylonia. The Cuneiform Evidence. Edited by C. Waerzeggers and M. Seire. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 277 (2018), pp. 165-187.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Klio 100/3 (2018), pp. 688-708.
A number of Babylonian archival, astronomical and other texts show that the Achaemenid ruler know... more A number of Babylonian archival, astronomical and other texts show that the Achaemenid ruler known as Arses (338–336 BCE) bore the throne name Artaxerxes (IV). The Babylonian sources thus present a picture that fits well with the evidence offered by other sources, including the Xanthos trilingual inscription. This contribution explores the criteria for assigning Babylonian texts to Artaxerxes IV.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Reallexikon der Assyriologie 15/7-8 (2018), pp. 403–411.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Vom Alten Orient bis zum Esperanto. Edited by S. Fink, M. Lang and M. Schretter. dubsar 2 (2018), pp. 209-238. [IAA prize for the best first article written after the Ph.D. in Assyriology and Mesopotamian archaeology 2017]
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
In collaboration with J. Oelsner, published in Orientalia 86/1 (2017), pp. 42-96 and tab. I-IV
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Published in Wandering Arameans: Arameans Outside Syria. Textual and Archaeological Perspectives. Edited by A. Berlejung, A. M. Maeir and A. Schüle. LAOS 5 (2017), pp. 125-140.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Books and Monographs by Johannes Hackl
The corpus comprises some 1250 tablets, of which less than 700 are currently available in publication. They were either recovered by illicit diggers or excavated by early archaeologists (especially by H. Rassam on behalf of the British Museum) during the second half of the 19th and first decades of the 20th centuries and are now housed in the British Museum, the Vorderasiatische Museum, the Louvre, the Yale Babylonian Collection and other minor collections in the western world. The temporal range of our corpus extends from the second year of Xerxes until the eventual disappearance of cuneiform legal and economic texts during the first decade of the first century BCE (484–93 BC). Its beginning is thus set by the watershed formed by the revolts of the Babylonian elite against Xerxes and the following social upheavals. The particular focus on textual material drafted in Northern Babylonia is warranted by the current state of research, as no comprehensive study of the available textual material has ever been undertaken.
The first section of this study focuses on the intrinsic (textual) and extrinsic (physical) aspects of the tablets resulting from certain conventions as well as techniques that have been employed by the Babylonian scribes when drafting legal or administrative records. The most important results of the research carried out in this section can be summarized as follows. Overall, the formulae and clauses employed in Late Achaemenid and Hellenistic archival texts from Northern Babylonia display a pronounced resemblance to those that one encounters in the pertinent text types from the long sixth century (~ 626–484 BCE). These strong links of continuity notwithstanding, there are also some areas in which innovations can be observed in the course of the fifth and fourth centuries BC. As for the intrinsic aspects, marriage contracts and slave sales deserve particular attention in this respect, since the formulae of both contract types exhibit major changes that seem to have occurred during the reign of Artaxerxes I. Also, some contract types evolved for the first time in the period under consideration (e.g., records of deposit with added clauses and ‘genuine’ service contracts). As far as the extrinsic aspects are concerned, we see a clear development in sealing practices which were accompanied by the emergence of new tablet formats. The latter were necessary to accommodate the gradually increasing number of seals that were applied to each tablet. In sum, the methodological refinement that was reached in this study can thus be used to help date undated or imprecisely dated tablets, especially when dating from the reign of an Artaxerxes.
The second section focuses on archival studies. Numerous institutional and private archives, including hitherto unknown smaller archives and dossiers from Babylon, have been reconstructed and described, both in terms of textual composition and socio-economic background. Especially, the in-depth studies of the two largest institutional archives (i.e., the Late Achaemenid and Early Hellenistic Esangila archive and the brewer’s archive) have yielded substantial new insights in the organization of the temple households in Northern Babylonia in this period. As was demonstrated, there is strong reason to believe that the prebendary system as it is known from the long sixth century had been abolished. Likewise, our sources point to a complete restructuring of the temple administration, as the highest temple officials of the long sixth century are almost absent from our sources. The evidence presented here thus makes it difficult to escape the conclusion that these fundamental changes were prompted by royal intervention, presumably instigated by the Babylonian revolts against Persian rule in the second year of Xerxes.
"
Articles and Shorter Notices by Johannes Hackl
The corpus comprises some 1250 tablets, of which less than 700 are currently available in publication. They were either recovered by illicit diggers or excavated by early archaeologists (especially by H. Rassam on behalf of the British Museum) during the second half of the 19th and first decades of the 20th centuries and are now housed in the British Museum, the Vorderasiatische Museum, the Louvre, the Yale Babylonian Collection and other minor collections in the western world. The temporal range of our corpus extends from the second year of Xerxes until the eventual disappearance of cuneiform legal and economic texts during the first decade of the first century BCE (484–93 BC). Its beginning is thus set by the watershed formed by the revolts of the Babylonian elite against Xerxes and the following social upheavals. The particular focus on textual material drafted in Northern Babylonia is warranted by the current state of research, as no comprehensive study of the available textual material has ever been undertaken.
The first section of this study focuses on the intrinsic (textual) and extrinsic (physical) aspects of the tablets resulting from certain conventions as well as techniques that have been employed by the Babylonian scribes when drafting legal or administrative records. The most important results of the research carried out in this section can be summarized as follows. Overall, the formulae and clauses employed in Late Achaemenid and Hellenistic archival texts from Northern Babylonia display a pronounced resemblance to those that one encounters in the pertinent text types from the long sixth century (~ 626–484 BCE). These strong links of continuity notwithstanding, there are also some areas in which innovations can be observed in the course of the fifth and fourth centuries BC. As for the intrinsic aspects, marriage contracts and slave sales deserve particular attention in this respect, since the formulae of both contract types exhibit major changes that seem to have occurred during the reign of Artaxerxes I. Also, some contract types evolved for the first time in the period under consideration (e.g., records of deposit with added clauses and ‘genuine’ service contracts). As far as the extrinsic aspects are concerned, we see a clear development in sealing practices which were accompanied by the emergence of new tablet formats. The latter were necessary to accommodate the gradually increasing number of seals that were applied to each tablet. In sum, the methodological refinement that was reached in this study can thus be used to help date undated or imprecisely dated tablets, especially when dating from the reign of an Artaxerxes.
The second section focuses on archival studies. Numerous institutional and private archives, including hitherto unknown smaller archives and dossiers from Babylon, have been reconstructed and described, both in terms of textual composition and socio-economic background. Especially, the in-depth studies of the two largest institutional archives (i.e., the Late Achaemenid and Early Hellenistic Esangila archive and the brewer’s archive) have yielded substantial new insights in the organization of the temple households in Northern Babylonia in this period. As was demonstrated, there is strong reason to believe that the prebendary system as it is known from the long sixth century had been abolished. Likewise, our sources point to a complete restructuring of the temple administration, as the highest temple officials of the long sixth century are almost absent from our sources. The evidence presented here thus makes it difficult to escape the conclusion that these fundamental changes were prompted by royal intervention, presumably instigated by the Babylonian revolts against Persian rule in the second year of Xerxes.
"