Andrea Gaucci
Andrea Gaucci holds a Bachelor of Arts in Archaeological Heritage (2005) and a Master degree in Archaeology and Cultures of the Ancient World (2007) at the University of Bologna with a thesis in Etruscology and Italic Archaeology, and he is specialist at the Postgraduate School in Archaeological Heritage of the same University (2009). He holds a Doctorate at the University of Padua with a research project on the study of the Etruscan necropolis of Valle Trebba in Spina (Fe), complemented by archaeometrical analysis of the blackglazed pottery of the grave goods.
He has been participating since 2004 uninterruptedly in the excavation campaignes in the Etruscan town of Marzabotto conducted by the Section of Archaeology of the DiSCi of the University of Bologna under the direction of Prof. G. Sassatelli and Prof. E. Govi. He is responsible since 2008 for the area of excavation and documentation. He participated with contributions at the full edition of House 1 of Regio IV, 2, and collaborating on the study and the complete edition of the current excavation in the Regio I, 5 including the urban temple. He also contributed to the development of a GIS of the area. Since 2006 he has been guide for the visiting public at the National Archaeological Museum of Marzabotto and the next archaeological area.
Between 2014 and 2017 he has been Principal Investigator of the FIRB project KAINUA. Reconstructing, perceiving, disseminating the lost reality. Transmedial technologies for the Etruscan city of Marzabotto.
Between 2018 and 2021, he was Assistant Professor of Etruscology and Italic antiquities at the University of Bologna, and since 2021 he is Associate Professor in the same discipline.
He has been participating since 2004 uninterruptedly in the excavation campaignes in the Etruscan town of Marzabotto conducted by the Section of Archaeology of the DiSCi of the University of Bologna under the direction of Prof. G. Sassatelli and Prof. E. Govi. He is responsible since 2008 for the area of excavation and documentation. He participated with contributions at the full edition of House 1 of Regio IV, 2, and collaborating on the study and the complete edition of the current excavation in the Regio I, 5 including the urban temple. He also contributed to the development of a GIS of the area. Since 2006 he has been guide for the visiting public at the National Archaeological Museum of Marzabotto and the next archaeological area.
Between 2014 and 2017 he has been Principal Investigator of the FIRB project KAINUA. Reconstructing, perceiving, disseminating the lost reality. Transmedial technologies for the Etruscan city of Marzabotto.
Between 2018 and 2021, he was Assistant Professor of Etruscology and Italic antiquities at the University of Bologna, and since 2021 he is Associate Professor in the same discipline.
less
Related Authors
InterestsView All (50)
Uploads
Papers by Andrea Gaucci
incredible repository for the study of many materials, among which a collection of black-gloss ware of primary
importance. The study of the Valle Trebba necropolis in Spina, headed by the Chair of Etruscology at Bologna
University, offers an opportunity to discuss the black-gloss ware produced in this important Etruscan port on
the Adriatic sea during the Hellenistic period, while firstly outlining the methodological issues related to the development of an updated study of this class of ware.
incredible repository for the study of many materials, among which a collection of black-gloss ware of primary
importance. The study of the Valle Trebba necropolis in Spina, headed by the Chair of Etruscology at Bologna
University, offers an opportunity to discuss the black-gloss ware produced in this important Etruscan port on
the Adriatic sea during the Hellenistic period, while firstly outlining the methodological issues related to the development of an updated study of this class of ware.
In the first chapter (P. Moscati), the reader will be introduced into the world of digital archeology, which establishes the disciplinary boundaries, within which the development for new digital methodologies is set. After this overview, the following chapters address to the topics of Information Systems (M. Gaiani) and virtual archaeology (A. Gaucci), which cover the basics to understand the potentialities of BIM process in the field of ‘lost heritage’, particularly architectural artefacts that are completely or almost lost.
Compared to a contemporary BIM workflow, the ArchaeoBIM follows an ‘opposite timeline’: hypotheses on reconstructions, validated by a robust approach in managing and gathering archaeological information, lead to a specific point in time where buildings and sites are virtually re-built, without any possible subjective interference.
The last chapter (S. Garagnani) deals with this practical approach, illustrating typical uses for digital models and how they can be authored in order to produce scientific, accurate reconstructions of lost buildings and sites.
Here a list of the sites on the two main maps of the book (figg. 1-2): https://www.academia.edu/67641823/CIE_IV_e_Gaucci_2021_figg_1_2
A cura di Sassatelli Giuseppe e Gaucci Andrea
Anno di Edizione: 2018
Edizione: L'ERMA di BRETSCHNEIDER
Collane:
Corpus Speculorum Etruscorum. Italia, 8
ISBN: 978-88-913-1705-6
Rilegatura: Rilegato
Pagine: 296, 200 ill. B/N
Formato: 23 x 32 cm
Nel 1981 quando nell' ambito dell' iniziativa del Corpus Speculorum Etruscorum fu inaugurata la serie dei musei italiani con la pubblicazione degli specchi conservati al Museo Civico Archeologico di Bologna (CSE Bologna 1 per gli specchi di collezione e CSE Bologna 2 per gli specchi di scavo di Bologna e territorio) ci si rese immediatamente conto che la ripartizione dei fascicoli del Corpus per musei, tuttora in vigore, presentava qualche problema con particolare riguardo al fatto che per alcuni musei il numero degli esemplari conservati non era sufficiente per programmare un fascicolo autonomo. E già allora all' interno della Commissione Italiana che si occupa del Corpus fu prospettata l' idea di raggruppare in un unico fascicolo tutti gli specchi conservati in musei minori' di una stessa regione che non necessariamente doveva corrispondere ad un assetto amministrativo, ma che poteva anche riferirsi ad un' area culturale e storica. Se si prescinde dal caso un po' particolare di un gruppo di specchi da Palestrina, conservati sia a Palestrina che a Villa Giulia, riuniti in un unico volume per mantenere l' unità del luogo di rinvenimento (CSE Villa Giulia 2), con la pubblicazione di questo fascicolo viene messo in atto, credo per la prima volta in Italia mentre è consuetudine largamente utilizzata per i Musei stranieri, l' accorpamento in un unico volume degli specchi conservati in diversi musei di una stessa regione o area culturale con una soluzione che potrebbe rivelarsi utile anche in altri casi. Questo fascicolo comprende infatti tutti gli specchi conservati negli altri musei, oltre a Bologna, non tanto dell' Emilia Romagna quanto dell' Etruria Padana, una ripartizione che si giustifica pienamente nel caso degli specchi etruschi tenendo conto della coesione culturale del territorio. I musei interessati sono il Museo Nazionale Etrusco Pompeo Aria' di Marzabotto (15 esemplari), il Museo Civico Archeologico Luigi Fantini' di Monterenzio (6 esemplari), il Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Spina a Ferrara (16 esemplari), il Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Adria (3 esemplari), il Museo Civico Archeologico Etnologico di Modena (2 esemplari), i Musei Civici di Reggio Emilia (6 esemplari) e il Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Parma (20 esemplari) per un totale di 68 esemplari. Nei Musei di Marzabotto, Monterenzio, Adria, Spina e Modena sono conservati solo specchi che provengono da scavi di queste località e dei loro rispettivi territori; nei Musei di Reggio Emilia e Parma sono conservati solo specchi di collezione.
The Conference is in honour of Professor Giuseppe Sassatelliʼs 70th birthday, who always encourages students and scholars to a multidisciplinary research in Archaeology. Regarding the Etruscan city of Marzabotto, his uninterrupted work has opened a new season of research and has changed the histo- rical perspective of this ancient city.
Abstracts:
http://www.kainuaproject.eu/__index.php/kainua2017/kainua17/schedConf/presentations
millennia.
Topics we are particularly interested in include:
- The role of memory and related places, objects and practices in promoting clash or mutual respect between identities of newcomers and established communities. In what ways is memory mobilised to trigger acceptance instead of exclusion?
- The articulation of memory in situations of displacement where individual or groups have been completely removed from their original place, such as those currently characterising the eastern coast of the Middle Sea (as well as many other areas). What happens in these cases? What strategies are/ can be employed to mitigate the loss of
and/or to help re-creating memory?
- The ethics and politics of the memory of mobility. How is ancient mobility used nowadays to reinforce or dismiss claims of legitimacy to certain places made by certain groups?