research-article

Conception centrée utilisateur d’un environnement virtuel pour la prise de décision collaborative : état de l’art pluridisciplinaire et analyse des besoins.

Authors:

Morgane Burgues,

Stéphanie Philippe,

Régis MollardAuthors Info & Claims

ErgoIA '21: Proceedings of the 17th “Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée” Conference

Article No.: 4, Pages 1 - 12

https://doi.org/10.1145/3486812.3486834

Published: 25 August 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In military operations, each action is planned. Experts with varied skills are organized in a staff to work on the operational planning following a specific method. For the experts, this work consists in understanding the context of a mission, then analyze and synthesize data from various sources and formats to allow the leader to decide between several options in order to generate adapted instructions to orchestrate the military body towards the achievement of the goals. Thus, issues of information overload, remote collaboration and time saving emerge, to which innovative tools based on immersive technologies could be relevant. The partners of the VR-Decision project, including Manzalab, Immersalis Consulting and the Plateforme d’Évaluation, de Prototypage et de teSts d’usageS (PEPSS) of ESTIA, aim to propose a demonstrator that will allow the evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Virtual Environments for collaborative decision making. The environment developed will allow staff officers to collaborate to analyze situations, synthesize a proposal and share it, especially with the chief. This article aims to present the first phases of the user-centered methodology that was implemented for the design of this new interface, in particular the state of the art and the needs analysis.

References

[1]

1998. ISO 9241-11 : Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). The international organization for standardization. (1998).

[2]

2019. ISO 9241-210 : Ergonomie de l’interaction homme-système — Partie 210 : Conception centrée sur l’opérateur humain pour les systèmes interactifs. (2019).

[3]

Abdelkader Adla. 2010. Aide à la Facilitation pour une prise de Décision Collective: Proposition d’un Modèle et d’un Outil. Ph. D. Dissertation. Université Paul Sabatier-Toulouse III.

[4]

Abdelkader Adla. 2010. Aide à la Facilitation pour une prise de Décision Collective : Proposition d’un Modèle et d’un Outil. phdthesis. Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00514908

[5]

Philippe Allain. 2013. La prise de décision: aspects théoriques, neuro-anatomie et évaluation. Revue de neuropsychologie 5, 2 (2013), 69–81.

[6]

René Amalberti. 1996. La conduite de systèmes à risques. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris. https://www.puf.com/content/La_conduite_de_syst%C3%A8mes_%C3%A0_risques

[7]

Rafael Ballagas, Michael Rohs, Jennifer G Sheridan, and Jan Borchers. 2004. Byod: Bring your own device. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ubiquitous Display Environments, Ubicomp, Vol. 2004.

[8]

Liam J Bannon and Kjeld Schmidt. 1989. CSCW: Four characters in search of a context. In ECSCW 1989: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Computer Sciences Company, London.

[9]

Mark Billinghurst, Maxime Cordeil, Anastasia Bezerianos, and Todd Margolis. 2018. Collaborative Immersive Analytics. In Immersive Analytics, Kim Marriott, Falk Schreiber, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Nathalie Henry Riche, Takayuki Itoh, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Bruce H. Thomas (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 221–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01388-2_8

[10]

Susanne Bødker and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2012. Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. 448–457.

Digital Library

[11]

Nathalie Bonnardel. 2009. Activités de conception et créativité: de l’analyse des facteurs cognitifs à l’assistance aux activités de conception créatives. Le travail humain 72, 1 (2009), 5–22.

[12]

Corinne Bornet and Éric Brangier. 2013. La méthode des personas : principes, intérêts et limites. Bulletin de psychologie Numéro 524, 2 (May 2013), 115–134. https://www.cairn.info/journal-bulletin-de-psychologie-2013-2-page-115.htm Publisher: Groupe d’études de psychologie.

[13]

Éric Brangier, Corinne Bornet, Joseph Maurice Christian Bastien, and Robin Vivian. 2012. Effets des personas et contraintes fonctionnelles sur l’idéation dans la conception d’une bibliothèque numérique. Le travail humain Vol. 75, 2 (July 2012), 121–145. https://www.cairn.info/revue-le-travail-humain-2012-2-page-121.htm Publisher: Presses Universitaires de France.

[14]

Frederik Brudy, Joshua Kevin Budiman, Steven Houben, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2018. Investigating the Role of an Overview Device in Multi-Device Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173874

Digital Library

[15]

Frederik Brudy, Christian Holz, Roman Rädle, Chi-Jui Wu, Steven Houben, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2019. Cross-Device Taxonomy: Survey, Opportunities and Challenges of Interactions Spanning Across Multiple Devices. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300792

Digital Library

[16]

D Bryant, F M J Lichacz, J Hollands, and J Baranski. [n.d]. Modeling Situation Awareness in an Organizational Context: Military Command and Control. ([n.d]), 13.

[17]

Simon Butscher, Sebastian Hubenschmid, Jens Müller, Johannes Fuchs, and Harald Reiterer. 2018. Clusters, Trends, and Outliers: How Immersive Technologies Can Facilitate the Collaborative Analysis of Multidimensional Data. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173664

Digital Library

[18]

Stéphane Caid, Daniel Hauret, Marion Wolff, and Régis Mollard. 2016. Fatigue study and discourse analysis of french uninhabited aerial vehicle (UAV) operators to understand operational issues. In Proceedings of the 15th Ergo’IA ”Ergonomie Et Informatique Avancée” Conference(Ergo’IA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3050385.3050399

Digital Library

[19]

John M. Carroll. 2000. Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions. MIT Press.

[20]

Julien Casarin, Nicolas Pacqueriaud, and Dominique Bechmann. 2018. UMI3D: A Unity3D Toolbox to Support CSCW Systems Properties in Generic 3D User Interfaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW (Nov. 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274298

Digital Library

[21]

Marco Cavallo, Mishal Dholakia, Matous Havlena, Kenneth Ocheltree, and Mark Podlaseck. 2019. Dataspace: A Reconfigurable Hybrid Reality Environment for Collaborative Information Analysis. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797733

[22]

Xavier Chalandon. 2007. Conscience de la situation : invariants internes et invariants externes. Research Report. Cnam. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00824020

[23]

Xiang “Anthony” Chen, Tovi Grossman, Daniel J. Wigdor, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Duet: Exploring Joint Interactions on a Smart Phone and a Smart Watch. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556955

Digital Library

[24]

Christopher Collins and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2007. VisLink: Revealing Relationships Amongst Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6(2007), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70521

Digital Library

[25]

Bernard Conein. 2004. Cognition distribuée, groupe social et technologie cognitive. Reseaux no 124, 2 (2004), 53–79. https://www.cairn.info/revue-reseaux1-2004-2-page-53.htm Publisher: Lavoisier.

[26]

Sharolyn Converse, JA Cannon-Bowers, and E Salas. 1993. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individual and group decision making: Current issues 221 (1993), 221–46. Publisher: Hillsdale.

[27]

Alan Cooper. 1999. The inmates are running the asylum. In Software-Ergonomie’99. Springer, 17–17.

[28]

Maxime Cordeil, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Bireswar Laha, Kim Marriott, and Bruce H. Thomas. 2017. Immersive Collaborative Analysis of Network Connectivity: CAVE-style or Head-Mounted Display?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599107 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

Digital Library

[29]

Richard L. Daft and Robert H. Lengel. 1986. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science 32, 5 (May 1986), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 Publisher: INFORMS.

Digital Library

[30]

Antonio R Damasio. 2006. L’erreur de Descartes: la raison des émotions. Odile Jacob.

[31]

Tao Dong, Elizabeth F. Churchill, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2016. Understanding the Challenges of Designing and Developing Multi-Device Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901851

Digital Library

[32]

F Thomas Eggemeier, Glenn F Wilson, Arthur F Kramer, and Diane L Damos. 1991. Workload assessment in multi-task environments. Multiple-task performance(1991), 207–216.

[33]

Niklas Elmqvist, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2008. Rolling the Dice: Multidimensional Visual Exploration using Scatterplot Matrix Navigation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 6(2008), 1539–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.153

[34]

Mica R Endsley. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors 37, 1 (1995), 32–64.

[35]

Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors 37, 1 (March 1995), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[36]

Marc Fabri, David Moore, and Dave Hobbs. 2004. Mediating the expression of emotion in educational collaborative virtual environments: an experimental study. Virtual reality 7, 2 (2004), 66–81.

[37]

Marc Fabri, David J Moore, and Dave J Hobbs. 1999. The emotional avatar: Non-verbal communication between inhabitants of collaborative virtual environments. In International gesture workshop. Springer, 269–273.

[38]

E. Fanea, S. Carpendale, and T. Isenberg. 2005. An interactive 3D integration of parallel coordinates and star glyphs. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2005. INFOVIS 2005.149–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2005.1532141

[39]

Jorge A. Wagner Filho, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Luciana Nedel. 2020. Evaluating an Immersive Space-Time Cube Geovisualization for Intuitive Trajectory Data Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1(2020), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934415

[40]

Susan R. Fussell and Leslie D. Setlock. 2014. Computer-Mediated Communication.

[41]

Dedre Gentner and Albert L Stevens. 1983. Mental models Lawrence Erlbaum associates. Hillsdale, New Jersey(1983).

[42]

Pierre Ghiglione, Agnès Landré, Pierre Molette, and Marcel Bromberg. 1998. l’analyse automatique des contenus - Rodolphe Ghiglione, Pierre... - Librairie Eyrolles. Dunod, Paris. https://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/l-analyse-automatique-des-contenus-9782100034680/

[43]

Jens Grubert, Matthias Heinisch, Aaron Quigley, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2015. MultiFi: Multi Fidelity Interaction with Displays On and Around the Body. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3933–3942. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702331

Digital Library

[44]

Jens Grubert, Matthias Kranz, and Aaron Quigley. 2016. Challenges in mobile multi-device ecosystems. mUX: The Journal of Mobile User Experience 5, 1 (2016), 1–22.

[45]

Jérôme Guegan, Julien Nelson, and Todd Lubart. 2017. The Relationship Between Contextual Cues in Virtual Environments and Creative Processes. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. 20, 3 (2017), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0503

[46]

C. Gutwin and S. Greenberg. 2000. The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces. IEEE Comput. Soc, 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2000.883711

[47]

Richard A Guzzo, Eduardo Salas, and Irwin L Goldstein. 1995. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. Vol. 22. Pfeiffer.

[48]

P. Heidicker, E. Langbehn, and F. Steinicke. 2017. Influence of avatar appearance on presence in social VR. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2017.7893357

[49]

Verlin B Hinsz, R Scott Tindale, and David A Vollrath. 1997. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.Psychological bulletin 121, 1 (1997), 43. Publisher: American Psychological Association.

[50]

Jean-Michel Hoc. 1996. Supervision et contrôle de processus: la cognition en situation dynamique. Presses universitaires de Grenoble.

[51]

Edwin Hutchins. 1987. Myth and experience in the Trobriand Islands. Cultural models in language and thought(1987), 269–289. Publisher: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, England.

[52]

Edwin Hutchins. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press. Google-Books-ID: CGIaNc3F1MgC.

[53]

ISO. 2019. 9241-210 : Ergonomie de l’interaction homme-système — Partie 210 : Conception centrée sur l’opérateur humain pour les systèmes interactifs.

[54]

Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47, 2 (March 1979), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

[55]

Adam Kendon. 1967. Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta psychologica 26(1967), 22–63.

[56]

Gary A Klein. 1993. A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. Decision making in action: Models and methods 5, 4 (1993), 138–147.

[57]

N. Kock. 2005. Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 48, 2 (June 2005), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.849649 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[58]

Robert E. Kraut, Mark D. Miller, and Jane Siegel. 1996. Collaboration in Performance of Physical Tasks: Effects on Outcomes and Communication. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (CSCW ’96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240190

Digital Library

[59]

Jean-Fabrice Lebraty and Ivan Pastorelli-Nègre. 2004. Biais cognitifs: quel statut dans la prise de décision assistée?Systèmes d’information et management 9, 3 (2004), 87–116. Publisher: Editions ESKA.

[60]

Michal Levin. 2014. Designing multi-device experiences: An ecosystem approach to user experiences across devices. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.

[61]

Thomas A Limoncelli, Christina J Hogan, and Strata R Chalup. 2016. The Practice of System and Network Administration: Volume 1: DevOps and other Best Practices for Enterprise IT. Vol. 1. Addison-Wesley Professional.

[62]

Lee Lisle, Xiaoyu Chen, J.K. Edward Gitre, Chris North, and Doug A. Bowman. 2020. Evaluating the Benefits of the Immersive Space to Think. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00073

[63]

Haik Lorenz, Matthias Trapp, Jürgen Döllner, and Markus Jobst. 2008. Interactive multi-perspective views of virtual 3D landscape and city models. In The European Information Society. Springer, 301–321.

[64]

J. Lugrin, M. Wiedemann, D. Bieberstein, and M. E. Latoschik. 2015. Influence of avatar realism on stressful situation in VR. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 227–228. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223378

[65]

Albert Mehrabian. 2008. Communication without words. Communication theory 6(2008), 193–200.

[66]

Patrick Millais, Simon L. Jones, and Ryan Kelly. 2018. Exploring Data in Virtual Reality: Comparisons with 2D Data Visualizations. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188537

Digital Library

[67]

Ewald Moser, Birgit Derntl, Simon Robinson, Bernhard Fink, Ruben C Gur, and Karl Grammer. 2007. Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions. Journal of neuroscience methods 161, 1 (2007), 126–133.

[68]

Julien Nelson. 2011. Contribution à l’analyse prospective des usages dans les projets d’innovation. phdthesis. Arts et Métiers ParisTech. https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00620406

[69]

Julien Nelson and Jérôme Guegan. 2019. ”I’d like to be under the sea”: Contextual cues in virtual environments influence the orientation of idea generation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 90(2019), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.001

[70]

Huyen Nguyen, Peter Marendy, and Ulrich Engelke. 2016. Collaborative framework design for immersive analytics. In 2016 Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA). IEEE, 1–8.

[71]

Kristine L Nowak and Frank Biocca. 2003. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 12, 5(2003), 481–494.

Digital Library

[72]

Kristine L. Nowak and Christian Rauh. 2017. The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 1 (07 2017), 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00308.x arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-pdf/11/1/153/22233912/jjcmcom0153.pdf

[73]

Celestine A. Ntuen, Eui H. Park, and Kim Gwang-Myung. 2010. Designing an Information Visualization Tool for Sensemaking. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 26, 2-3(2010), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310903498825 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310903498825

[74]

George Olsen. 2004. Persona creation and usage toolkit. Retrieved March 25(2004), 2014.

[75]

Ye Pan and Anthony Steed. 2017. The impact of self-avatars on trust and collaboration in shared virtual environments. PloS one 12, 12 (2017), e0189078.

[76]

Sebastian Pasewaldt, Matthias Trapp, and Jürgen Döllner. 2011. Multiscale visualization of 3d geovirtual environments using view-dependent multi-perspective views. (2011).

[77]

Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2016. Continuity in Multi-Device Interaction: An Online Study. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971533

Digital Library

[78]

Umar Rashid, Miguel A. Nacenta, and Aaron Quigley. 2012. Factors Influencing Visual Attention Switch in Multi-Display User Interfaces: A Survey. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Porto, Portugal) (PerDis ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307798.2307799

Digital Library

[79]

Hanaë Rateau, Alexis Clay, and Sébastien Bottecchia. 2018. Combining digital pen, tactile, and AR for technical documentation during maintenance procedures. In 30eme conférence francophone sur l’interaction homme-machine(Demos), AFIHM (Ed.). Brest, France, 2p. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01900065

[80]

Kai Richter. 2005. A Transformational Approach to Multi-Device Interfaces. In CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, USA) (CHI EA ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1126–1127. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056844

Digital Library

[81]

Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. 2002. Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann. Google-Books-ID: sRPg0IYhYFYC.

[82]

William B Rouse and Nancy M Morris. 1986. On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models.Psychological bulletin 100, 3 (1986), 349. Publisher: American Psychological Association.

[83]

Stephanie Santosa and Daniel Wigdor. 2013. A Field Study of Multi-Device Workflows in Distributed Workspaces. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing(Zurich, Switzerland) (UbiComp ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493476

Digital Library

[84]

Kadek Ananta Satriadi, Barrett Ens, Maxime Cordeil, Tobias Czauderna, and Bernhard Jenny. 2020. Maps Around Me: 3D Multiview Layouts in Immersive Spaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, ISS, Article 201 (Nov. 2020), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3427329

Digital Library

[85]

Ralph Schroeder. 2012. The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. Springer Science & Business Media.

Digital Library

[86]

Varshita Sher, Marek Hatala, and Dragan Gašević. 2019. On Multi-Device Use: Using Technological Modality Profiles to Explain Differences in Students’ Learning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (Tempe, AZ, USA) (LAK19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303790

Digital Library

[87]

Herbert A. Simon. 1957. Models of man; social and rational. Wiley, Oxford, England. Pages: xiv, 287.

[88]

Harrison Jesse Smith and Michael Neff. 2018. Communication behavior in embodied virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[89]

Henrik Sørensen, Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2014. The 4C Framework: Principles of Interaction in Digital Ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing(Seattle, Washington) (UbiComp ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2636089

Digital Library

[90]

J Spool. 2007. Three important benefits of personas. User Interface Eng (2007).

[91]

Garold Stasser and Dennis Stewart. 1992. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 3(1992), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.426 Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.

[92]

B⊘dker Susanne and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2011. The human–artifact model: An activity theoretical approach to artifact ecologies. Human–Computer Interaction 26, 4 (2011), 315–371.

[93]

Anthony M Townsend, Samuel M DeMarie, and Anthony R Hendrickson. 1998. Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Perspectives 12, 3 (1998), 17–29.

[94]

Mejdi Trimeche, Riku Suomela, Antti Aaltonen, Gaetan Lorho, Tai Dossaji, Tomi Aarnio, and Samuli Tuoriniemi. 2005. Enhancing End-User Experience in a Multi-Device Ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Christchurch, New Zealand) (MUM ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/1149488.1149492

Digital Library

[95]

Edward R Tufte. 1985. The visual display of quantitative information. The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ) 7, 3 (1985), 15.

[96]

Manas Tungare and Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones. 2009. Mental Workload in Multi-Device Personal Information Management. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI EA ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3431–3436. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520498

Digital Library

[97]

CLAUDE Valot. 1996. Gestion du temps, gestion du risque. La gestion du temps dans les environnements dynamiques (1996), 244–265.

[98]

Corrie van der Lelie. 2006. The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2 (April 2006), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0026-7

Digital Library

[99]

Willemien Visser and Marion Wolff. 2019. A cognitive approach to spatial discourse production. Combining manual and automatic analyses of route descriptions. In Proceedings of Eurocogsci 03: The European Cognitive Science Conference 2003. Routledge, 355.

[100]

Marion Wolff, Jean-Marie Burkhardt, and Concepción de la Garza. 2005. Analyse exploratoire de “points de vue”: une contribution pour outiller les processus de conception. Le travail humain 68, 3 (2005), 253–286. Publisher: Presses Universitaires de France.

[101]

Marion Wolff, Baptiste Leroy, Florence Peschaud, and Regis Mollard. 2010. Transformation du travail et accompagnement ergonomique: l’exemple de la restructuration des bureaux de poste. In Proceedings of the Ergonomie et Informatique Avancee Conference. 200–207.

Digital Library

[102]

Yalong Yang, Tim Dwyer, Bernhard Jenny, Kim Marriott, Maxime Cordeil, and Haohui Chen. 2019. Origin-Destination Flow Maps in Immersive Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1(2019), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865192

Digital Library

[103]

Yalong Yang, Tim Dwyer, Kimbal Marriott, Bernhard Jenny, and Sarah Goodwin. 2020. Tilt Map: Interactive Transitions Between Choropleth Map, Prism Map and Bar Chart in Immersive Environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2020), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3004137

Digital Library

Cited By

Santos FWinkler ISilva R(2024)Realidade virtual no teletrabalho colaborativo: aplicações, oportunidades e desafios – uma revisão da literaturaCuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo10.55905/cuadv16n13-02716:13(e6770)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv16n13-027

Index Terms

Conception centrée utilisateur d’un environnement virtuel pour la prise de décision collaborative : état de l’art pluridisciplinaire et analyse des besoins.
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Collaborative and social computing
    1. Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms
      1. Computer supported cooperative work

Recommendations

Démarche de Conception Centrée Utilisateur de Systèmes d’Aide numériques à la Mobilité pour Personnes avec Déficience Intellectuelle
IHM '23 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 34th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine

Les démarches de conception centrées sur l’utilisateur sont couramment utilisées lors du développement de systèmes interactifs. Cependant il n’est pas toujours facile d’adapter les démarches existantes quand les utilisateurs cibles ont une déficience ...
Entrepôts Autonomes à L'ère du e-Commerce : Apprentissage Automatique Pour la Prise de décision en Temps Réel
Conception collaborative au travers de versions parallèles en Réalité Augmentée
IHM '23: Proceedings of the 34th Conference on l'Interaction Humain-Machine

La Réalité Augmentée permet de faciliter la conception collaborative en superposant du contenu virtuel sur un objet physique. Cependant, des conflits peuvent survenir dans le partage de l’espace 3D lorsque plusieurs concepteurs ajoutent ou modifient du ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ErgoIA '21: Proceedings of the 17th “Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée” Conference

October 2021

74 pages

ISBN:9781450385121

DOI:10.1145/3486812

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 August 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ErgoIA'2021

ErgoIA'2021: 17ème Conférence en Ergonomie et Informatique Avancée

October 6 - 8, 2021

Bidart, France

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
45
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)9
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Santos FWinkler ISilva R(2024)Realidade virtual no teletrabalho colaborativo: aplicações, oportunidades e desafios – uma revisão da literaturaCuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo10.55905/cuadv16n13-02716:13(e6770)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv16n13-027

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents