Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Arshia Gerami
  • +60123106345
Placing horizontal wells in the correct zones of the producing reservoir in static/dynamic models is important for robust model quality and essential for production history matching. A laborious technique of manually generating correction... more
Placing horizontal wells in the correct zones of the producing reservoir in static/dynamic models is important for robust model quality and essential for production history matching. A laborious technique of manually generating correction points around each un-calibrated well is often used by geomodelers. This technique is not systematic and is highly interpretive. We present an automated global solution that leverages not only the well tops, but also the well trajectory information to calibrate the horizontal wells. The solution comprises a series of processes that can all be run through a custom built graphical user interface (GUI). The processes are designed to a) detect the calibration problems with the ability to visualize them, b) correct each surface separately for zone mismatch and c) retrieve original zone thickness whenever possible. Treating each surface separately simplifies the problem and causes great reduction in run time compared to simultaneous correction of all sur...
Abstract There are different approaches to solve the three-dimensional (3D) resistivity model. In this research, a new modeling technique has been developed to solve 3D potential distribution in a resistor network. This method uses the... more
Abstract There are different approaches to solve the three-dimensional (3D) resistivity model. In this research, a new modeling technique has been developed to solve 3D potential distribution in a resistor network. This method uses the Kirchhoff's law for discretizing a resistor network. This different approach for the 3D resistivity modeling helps to describe an arbitrary 3D model using a resistor network. This method has no singularity constraint, although there is no need to apply any singularity removal techniques. The resistor network can be used for any electrode configuration. The potential distributions at all nodes are simultaneously solved for each injection source. Sensitivity matrix and potential distribution in both models are compared. Experiments with various physical models and numerical models show the similarity of the method with traditional resistivity modeling. Comparing the result of this approach with other methods shows better sensitivity away from edges. Furthermore, a parallel programming technique is used to improve the processing time. Flexibility and extensibility to build any resistivity model make this approach a powerful modeling tool in 2D and 3D electrical resistivity forward modeling.
Various seismic imaging methods are introduced to resolve some of the possible ambiguities of seismic interpretation in complex structures. Reducing dependency of imaging techniques on velocity or using diffraction energy for imaging more... more
Various seismic imaging methods are introduced to resolve some of the possible ambiguities of seismic interpretation in complex structures. Reducing dependency of imaging techniques on velocity or using diffraction energy for imaging more structural details are the main topics of the imaging research. In this study, we try to improve the seismic image quality in semi-complex structures by combining the common reflection surface (CRS) method with a diffraction based scheme in the common-offset domain. Previously introduced partial CRS and common offset CRS methods exhibited reliable performance in imaging complex media. Here, we were looking for stable and efficient solutions, preserving advantages of the previous methods. Herewith, the proposed operator fits better to diffractions than to reflections. Therefore, we call it the common-offset common diffraction surface stack (CO CDS). In a previous study, improvement of the quality of seismic image by the CRS method was achieved by combination of the CDS method with the partial CRS. This resulted in the introduction of the partial CDS. Initially, in this study, the common-offset CRS traveltime equation was modified to the common-offset CDS. The hypothetical shot reflector experiment in the CRS method was changed to shot diffraction point experiment. In the introduced operator, two wavefront curvatures, observed at receivers positions, are set equal in order to satisfy the diffraction condition. In the proposed method, we search for accurate attribute sets for each considered offset individually, and then form a new operator by four coherent attributes. Application of the common-offset CDS method on synthetic and field data shows more details of the geological structures with higher quality, while preserving continuity of reflection events. The proposed method is, however, more expensive than the partial and common offset CRS for large dataset. K e y w o r d s : CRS, CDS, seismic imaging, complex structures
Various seismic imaging methods are introduced to resolve some of the possible ambiguities of seismic interpretation in complex structures. Reducing dependency of imaging techniques on velocity or using diffraction energy for imaging more... more
Various seismic imaging methods are introduced to resolve some of the possible ambiguities of seismic interpretation in complex structures. Reducing dependency of imaging techniques on velocity or using diffraction energy for imaging more structural details are the main topics of the imaging research. In this study, we try to improve the seismic image quality in semi-complex structures by combining the common reflection surface (CRS) method with a diffraction based scheme in the common-offset domain. Previously introduced partial CRS and common offset CRS methods exhibited reliable performance in imaging complex media. Here, we were looking for stable and efficient solutions, preserving advantages of the previous methods. Herewith, the proposed operator fits better to diffractions than to reflections. Therefore, we call it the common-offset common diffraction surface stack (CO CDS). In a previous study, improvement of the quality of seismic image by the CRS method was achieved by combination of the CDS method with the partial CRS. This resulted in the introduction of the partial CDS. Initially, in this study, the common-offset CRS traveltime equation was modified to the common-offset CDS. The hypothetical shot reflector experiment in the CRS method was changed to shot diffraction point experiment. In the introduced operator, two wavefront curvatures, observed at receivers positions, are set equal in order to satisfy the diffraction condition. In the proposed method, we search for accurate attribute sets for each considered offset individually, and then form a new operator by four coherent attributes. Application of the common-offset CDS method on synthetic and field data shows more details of the geological structures with higher quality, while preserving continuity of reflection events. The proposed method is, however, more expensive than the partial and common offset CRS for large dataset. K e y w o r d s : CRS, CDS, seismic imaging, complex structures
Research Interests:
There are different approaches to solve the three-dimensional (3D) resistivity model. In this research, a new modeling technique has been developed to solve 3D potential distribution in a resistor network. This method uses the Kirchhoff's... more
There are different approaches to solve the three-dimensional (3D) resistivity model. In this research, a new modeling technique has been developed to solve 3D potential distribution in a resistor network. This method uses the Kirchhoff's law for discretizing a resistor network. This different approach for the 3D resistivity modeling helps to describe an arbitrary 3D model using a resistor network. This method has no singularity constraint, although there is no need to apply any singularity removal techniques. The resistor network can be used for any electrode configuration. The potential distributions at all nodes are simultaneously solved for each injection source. Sensitivity matrix and potential distribution in both models are compared. Experiments with various physical models and numerical models show the similarity of the method with traditional resistivity modeling. Comparing the result of this approach with other methods shows better sensitivity away from edges. Furthermore, a parallel programming technique is used to improve the processing time. Flexibility and extensibility to build any resistivity model make this approach a powerful modeling tool in 2D and 3D electrical resistivity forward modeling.
Research Interests: