- Cypriot Archaeology, Roman Cyprus, Classics, Roman Lamps, Graeco-Roman Egypt, Coastal and Island Archaeology, and 44 moreClassical Near East, Anthropology, Cypriot sculpture, Ancient History of Cyprus, Greek Archaeology, Island archaeology, Archaeology, Classical Archaeology, Cyprus Studies, Theoretical Archaeology, Near Eastern Archaeology, Archaeological Method & Theory, Heritage Management, Roman Provincial Coinage, Ptolemaic Egyptian History, Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor, Ancient Roman Numismatics, Acculturation and 'Romanisation', Roman Provincial Archaeology, Cultural Identities in the Roman World, Romanization, Roman Trade Networks, Roman Near East, Ptolemaic and Roman Egypt, Archaeology of the Hellenistic East, Roman East, Eastern Roman provinces (Archaeology), Roman Syria (Archaeology), Digital Humanities, Digital Photogrammetry applied to Archaeology, Mediterranean archaeology, Cyprus and the East Mediterranean, Mediterranean Studies, Roman engineering, Roman Archaeology Conference, Archaeology of Colonialism, Historical Archaeology, Roman Art, Roman Architecture, Insularity, Ancient Greek and Roman Art, Roman Archaeology, Roman Spain, and Archaeology of Roman Hispaniaedit
- Jody Michael Gordon is Professor of History and Archaeology in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at We... moreJody Michael Gordon is Professor of History and Archaeology in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, MA. He received his Ph.D. from the Department of Classics at the University of Cincinnati. A specialist in Roman archaeology, Jody’s Ph.D., entitled "Between Alexandria and Rome: A Postcolonial Archaeology of Cultural Identity in Hellenistic and Roman Cyprus," involved a comparative study of the effect of ancient empires on Cypriot identities. Jody is also the Assistant Director of the Athienou Archaeological Project, an excavation focused on a Cypriot religious sanctuary dating from 600 B.C.E. to Roman times. In addition to excavating, Jody has a sincere interest in applied humanities and has spearheaded the AAP’s data digitization initiative. Jody is one of the co-authors of "Mobilizing the Past: The Potential of Digital Archaeology," an open access edited volume on how mobile digital archaeological methods are transforming archaeological practice (https://thedigitalpress.org/mobilizing-the-past-for-a-digital-future/).
Jody also maintains an active research agenda that includes writing book reviews and chapters as well as presenting papers at the annual meetings of America’s premier archaeological research institutions (i.e., AIA and ASOR). Moreover, he has presented his research internationally at the Annual Meeting of the Cyprus American Archaeological Research Institute (CAARI) in Nicosia and at the Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference (TRAC) in Reading, England, and locally at Boston University and WIT’s Polytechnic Summits. Jody has held doctoral fellowships at both CAARI and Mount Allison University. Recently, he was a joint recipient of a National Endowment for the Humanities Digital Humanities Start-Up Grant for the organization of a workshop on mobile computing in archaeology that was held at WIT during the Spring of 2015. Over the last decade, Jody has taught Ancient World Civilizations, Roman Culture and Technology, Media, Culture, and Communications Studies Studio, Introduction to Archaeology, Classical World on Film, History of Technology, History of Ancient Africa, Computer Science and Society Studio, and has led a study abroad trip to Cyprus. In 2023, he received the Wentworth President's Award for Distinguished Teaching.edit
This dissertation elaborates on previous interpretations of cultural change in Ptolemaic (294-58 B.C.E.) and Roman (58 B.C.E.-293 C.E.) Cyprus by presenting a postcolonial archaeology of cultural identity that comparatively analyzes... more
This dissertation elaborates on previous interpretations of cultural change in Ptolemaic (294-58 B.C.E.) and Roman (58 B.C.E.-293 C.E.) Cyprus by presenting a postcolonial archaeology of cultural identity that comparatively analyzes coins, sculptures, and architecture. Although these artifacts all betray the cultural influence of Alexandria or Rome, this study shows that both local and imperial agents played a role in determining how material culture might express one’s socially recognized sense of belonging, i.e., their identity. Furthermore, by contextualizing such interactions in relation to each empire’s strategic agenda and Cyprus’ geographical and cultural values, this thesis illustrates how different empires can affect the same region in diverse ways and emphasizes the significance of geohistorical factors within colonial encounters.
An analysis of Ptolemaic motives and strategies indicates that the empire valued Cyprus for its strategic location and resources. Thus Cyprus was militarily occupied and Cypriots lost their political autonomy. Yet, because local and imperial agents shared cultural values, new identities could be interactively constructed. Ptolemaic officials dominated coin production, but used designs that linked imperial and local religious and linguistic affinities. The dialogue between imperial and local statues reveals how Cypriots manipulated Alexandrian styles within traditional contexts. Ptolemaic architecture expressed imperial power locally, but had little effect on Cypriot buildings. Alternatively, an examination of Rome’s attitude towards Cyprus shows that the empire viewed the island as strategically insignificant. This factor resulted in the increased participation of Cypriot elites in local affairs. Hence, Roman Cypriot coins reveal a dialogue between imperial and local symbols, whereas sculpture and architecture demonstrate that local elites emulated imperial types because they communicated a sense humanitas that reinforced one’s socio-political position.
Overall, this dissertation expands on colonialist interpretations of cultural change to reveal how imperial agendas, local geographies, social class, and cultural histories all influence the nature of imperial/local interactions. Moreover, its conclusions suggest that elite Cypriots adopted imperial fashions—especially in sculpture and architecture— primarily because they were polyvocal and appealed to both imperial and local sensibilities. These adoptions could then be actively adapted to suit local practices, and sometimes certain symbols, such as those associated with Aphrodite, could even influence the cultural identities of imperial agents. Thus, most importantly, this study proves that Cypriots were not merely “Hellenized” or “Romanized,” but rather that they often played an active role in constructing their local cultural identities within greater imperial worlds.
https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:84547
An analysis of Ptolemaic motives and strategies indicates that the empire valued Cyprus for its strategic location and resources. Thus Cyprus was militarily occupied and Cypriots lost their political autonomy. Yet, because local and imperial agents shared cultural values, new identities could be interactively constructed. Ptolemaic officials dominated coin production, but used designs that linked imperial and local religious and linguistic affinities. The dialogue between imperial and local statues reveals how Cypriots manipulated Alexandrian styles within traditional contexts. Ptolemaic architecture expressed imperial power locally, but had little effect on Cypriot buildings. Alternatively, an examination of Rome’s attitude towards Cyprus shows that the empire viewed the island as strategically insignificant. This factor resulted in the increased participation of Cypriot elites in local affairs. Hence, Roman Cypriot coins reveal a dialogue between imperial and local symbols, whereas sculpture and architecture demonstrate that local elites emulated imperial types because they communicated a sense humanitas that reinforced one’s socio-political position.
Overall, this dissertation expands on colonialist interpretations of cultural change to reveal how imperial agendas, local geographies, social class, and cultural histories all influence the nature of imperial/local interactions. Moreover, its conclusions suggest that elite Cypriots adopted imperial fashions—especially in sculpture and architecture— primarily because they were polyvocal and appealed to both imperial and local sensibilities. These adoptions could then be actively adapted to suit local practices, and sometimes certain symbols, such as those associated with Aphrodite, could even influence the cultural identities of imperial agents. Thus, most importantly, this study proves that Cypriots were not merely “Hellenized” or “Romanized,” but rather that they often played an active role in constructing their local cultural identities within greater imperial worlds.
https://etd.ohiolink.edu/ap/10?0::NO:10:P10_ETD_SUBID:84547
Research Interests: Roman History, Postcolonial Studies, Cypriot Archaeology, Coastal and Island Archaeology, Ancient Roman Numismatics, and 11 moreMediterranean archaeology, Archaeology of Identity, Annales school, Roman Provincial Archaeology, Roman Cyprus, Archaeology of the Hellenistic East, Greek and Roman Art and Architecture, Roman Architecture, Ptolemaic Empire, Archaeology of Cyprus, and Roman Archaeology
At the 2014 ASOR Annual Meeting, Jody Gordon, of Wentworth Institute of Technology, presented his paper, "Mini- Alexandrias or Local Continuity? Architectural Change, Place-Making, and Identity in Ptolemaic Cyprus," during the Continuity... more
At the 2014 ASOR Annual Meeting, Jody Gordon, of Wentworth Institute of Technology, presented his paper, "Mini- Alexandrias or Local Continuity? Architectural Change, Place-Making, and Identity in Ptolemaic Cyprus," during the Continuity or Change: The Hellenistic Near East on a Local Scale I session.
ABSTRACT: During the third century BCE, the island of Cyprus was incorporated into the Ptolemaic empire centered in Alexandria, Egypt. The Ptolemies occupied the island militarily, and this imperial intrusion had an immediate effect on Cypriot life according to the archaeological evidence. For example, an imperial coinage replaced long-standing civic ones, while the Greek alphabet superseded the traditional Cypro-Syllabic script in inscriptions. Although it also underwent profound changes, the architecture of Ptolemaic Cyprus perhaps provides a more nuanced insight into the processes by which local culture changed, especially when it is analyzed as the residue of negotiated place making. Examining architectural remains as the products of socially constructed, lived space—as dynamic places that are both the products of and frames for human practices—arguably helps to reveal the varied local and imperial interactions that shaped material culture. The goal of this paper is to explore how people’s sense of identity changed in Ptolemaic Cyprus through the study of a variety of architectural forms as socially constructed places. Through an architectural review of urban, sacred, and funerary environments, I show how an opulent architectural vocabulary characteristic of Alexandria was exported to Cyprus. However, I also illustrate how this vocabulary could be selectively utilized or even ignored depending on the actors involved in constructing social space. Overall, this regional archaeological study suggests that Hellenistic culture was contextually situated and actively constructed. Hellenistic places could be both innovative and conservative and could combine both universal as well as particular elements.
ABSTRACT: During the third century BCE, the island of Cyprus was incorporated into the Ptolemaic empire centered in Alexandria, Egypt. The Ptolemies occupied the island militarily, and this imperial intrusion had an immediate effect on Cypriot life according to the archaeological evidence. For example, an imperial coinage replaced long-standing civic ones, while the Greek alphabet superseded the traditional Cypro-Syllabic script in inscriptions. Although it also underwent profound changes, the architecture of Ptolemaic Cyprus perhaps provides a more nuanced insight into the processes by which local culture changed, especially when it is analyzed as the residue of negotiated place making. Examining architectural remains as the products of socially constructed, lived space—as dynamic places that are both the products of and frames for human practices—arguably helps to reveal the varied local and imperial interactions that shaped material culture. The goal of this paper is to explore how people’s sense of identity changed in Ptolemaic Cyprus through the study of a variety of architectural forms as socially constructed places. Through an architectural review of urban, sacred, and funerary environments, I show how an opulent architectural vocabulary characteristic of Alexandria was exported to Cyprus. However, I also illustrate how this vocabulary could be selectively utilized or even ignored depending on the actors involved in constructing social space. Overall, this regional archaeological study suggests that Hellenistic culture was contextually situated and actively constructed. Hellenistic places could be both innovative and conservative and could combine both universal as well as particular elements.
Research Interests:
Paper can be accessed at this link: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/4/155 During the Early Roman period in the Mediterranean (ca. 30 BC–330 AD), the key central places that distinguished socio-political landscapes were towns. These... more
Paper can be accessed at this link: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/7/4/155
During the Early Roman period in the Mediterranean (ca. 30 BC–330 AD), the key central places that distinguished socio-political landscapes were towns. These urban centers functioned as economic and administrative focal points that were controlled by local elites who oversaw wealth redistribution and maintained a dialectical relationship with Rome that mutually benefitted both parties. Yet, beyond providing such rudimentary observations, central place theory has recently been revised to examine how local factors, such as a place’s long-term geography and history, intersect with globalizing ones to transform settlement hierarchies as well as economic, political, and cultural landscapes. This article’s goal is to explore such intersections through a study of how port towns functioned as central places that connected globalized imperial networks to localized provincial ones within island contexts. It examines a range of material culture including, ceramics, architecture, prestige goods, and coinage from ports in Early Roman Cyprus in order to investigate how the island’s integration into Roman networks created central places that altered existing settlement types, hierarchies, and thus, local identities. Overall, this study shows how the reanalysis of central places within their unique geohistorical contexts can shed new light on both regional and state-level processes of cultural change.
During the Early Roman period in the Mediterranean (ca. 30 BC–330 AD), the key central places that distinguished socio-political landscapes were towns. These urban centers functioned as economic and administrative focal points that were controlled by local elites who oversaw wealth redistribution and maintained a dialectical relationship with Rome that mutually benefitted both parties. Yet, beyond providing such rudimentary observations, central place theory has recently been revised to examine how local factors, such as a place’s long-term geography and history, intersect with globalizing ones to transform settlement hierarchies as well as economic, political, and cultural landscapes. This article’s goal is to explore such intersections through a study of how port towns functioned as central places that connected globalized imperial networks to localized provincial ones within island contexts. It examines a range of material culture including, ceramics, architecture, prestige goods, and coinage from ports in Early Roman Cyprus in order to investigate how the island’s integration into Roman networks created central places that altered existing settlement types, hierarchies, and thus, local identities. Overall, this study shows how the reanalysis of central places within their unique geohistorical contexts can shed new light on both regional and state-level processes of cultural change.
Research Interests: Maritime Archaeology, Roman History, Globalization, Island Studies, Cypriot Archaeology, and 15 moreCyprus Studies, Coastal and Island Archaeology, History of Cyprus, Archaeology of Identity, Archaeological survey, History and Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, Roman imperialism, Roman Cyprus, Cyprus and the East Mediterranean, Roman Architecture, Roman Art, Insularity, Central Places, Archaeology of Cyprus, and Roman Archaeology
Throughout its history, the island of Cyprus, a sea-girt landmass situated close to continental shores, has often played a pivotal role in connecting the peoples of the Near East to those of the central Mediterranean. Because of its large... more
Throughout its history, the island of Cyprus, a sea-girt landmass situated close to continental shores, has often played a pivotal role in connecting the peoples of the Near East to those of the central Mediterranean. Because of its large physical size and ample natural resources, the island has also supported a significant local population of Cypriots who have had to negotiate their interactions with external groups (and with each other) from various vantage points on their island home. Thus, insularity, or an individual’s sense of belonging to a particular island population shaped by unique biogeographical properties at specific historical moments, has always been cultivated by Cypriots as a socio-cultural identity that has permitted them to adapt strategically to social change and to cultivate unique worldviews.
Yet, despite several studies of Cypriot insularity in the Bronze and Iron Ages, the question of how Cyprus’ long-term insular features intersected with the socio-political realities of the early Roman period to influence local society has rarely been considered. As a result, Roman Cyprus’ material culture has often been interpreted as merely a provincial reflection of wider cultural trends in the Roman East and has not been viewed as the unique residue of practices informed by local notions of insularity. This study offers a preliminary archaeological exploration of how a focus on Cypriot insularity can shed new light on how Cypriots engaged with Roman political power and material culture. It brings together recent research on Cyprus’ long-term history, shipwrecks, ceramic distribution patterns, as well as numismatic, sculptural, and architectural remains to establish an island archaeology for Roman Cyprus that suggests the island was not an isolated provincial backwater. Instead, this study shows that Cyprus was a highly connected maritime entrepôt whose people could experience the Roman world in different ways depending on how they constructed their identities as islanders.
Yet, despite several studies of Cypriot insularity in the Bronze and Iron Ages, the question of how Cyprus’ long-term insular features intersected with the socio-political realities of the early Roman period to influence local society has rarely been considered. As a result, Roman Cyprus’ material culture has often been interpreted as merely a provincial reflection of wider cultural trends in the Roman East and has not been viewed as the unique residue of practices informed by local notions of insularity. This study offers a preliminary archaeological exploration of how a focus on Cypriot insularity can shed new light on how Cypriots engaged with Roman political power and material culture. It brings together recent research on Cyprus’ long-term history, shipwrecks, ceramic distribution patterns, as well as numismatic, sculptural, and architectural remains to establish an island archaeology for Roman Cyprus that suggests the island was not an isolated provincial backwater. Instead, this study shows that Cyprus was a highly connected maritime entrepôt whose people could experience the Roman world in different ways depending on how they constructed their identities as islanders.
Research Interests: Roman History, Cypriot Archaeology, Identity (Culture), Coastal and Island Archaeology, History of Cyprus, and 15 moreAncient History of Cyprus, Ancient Near East, Ancient Roman Numismatics, Ancient Greek and Roman Art, Roman Provincial Archaeology, Roman Imperial Ideology, Roman imperialism, Roman Cyprus, Roman Sculpture, Greek and Roman Art and Architecture, Roman Architecture, Ancient Seafaring, Longue durée, Roman Archaeology, and Hellenistic and Roman Cyprus
This chapter presents a comparative approach to the archaeology of Hellenistic and Roman Cyprus informed by post-Braudelian discourse that sheds new light on the negotiation of identities under imperial rule and serves as a microregional... more
This chapter presents a comparative approach to the archaeology of Hellenistic and Roman Cyprus informed by post-Braudelian discourse that sheds new light on the negotiation of identities under imperial rule and serves as a microregional case study of how political/cultural connections changed in the ancient Mediterranean. It explores empires, geography, and the Mediterranean in both its actual and heuristic senses; it attempts history in the Mediterranean, but also—in some ways—of it.
The chapter proposes that imperial (dis)connectedness to a region—and so the nature of imperial influence on local culture—depends on both an empire’s historically-specific route to power and a region’s geocultural characteristics. This stance transcends traditional notions of imperial rule stressing dominance, which were often based on historical sources. It suggests that a consideration of short-term developments along with a region’s geocultural history revealed through archaeological evidence offers a more balanced perspective on cultural change. Next, Cyprus’ geocultural aspects are discerned via Braudel’s concept of the longue-durée whereby the island’s “permanent” spatial (e.g., natural resources) and temporal values (e.g., religion) are revealed.
Two archaeological case studies show how both empire-influenced conjonctures and Braudelian “permanent values” altered Cypriot culture. Ptolemaic military goals combined with Cyprus’ strategic geopolitical position to result in a strict administrative climate that marked Cypriot coinage, sculpture, and architecture. Conversely, the Roman conquest of the Eastern Mediterranean robbed Cyprus of its geopolitical importance and transformed it into a province whose location made it prosperous and whose cultural history the Romans admired. Roman Cyprus’ archaeology thus exhibits a distinct negotiation of new identities mediated by imperial and microregional factors. Overall, this chapter’s comparative archaeological overview of six centuries of imperial rule on a Mediterranean island contributes to post-Braudelian discourse by demonstrating how societies are affected via the ways that imperial peoples interact with geohistorical realities.
https://www.routledge.com/Across-the-Corrupting-Sea-Post-Braudelian-Approaches-to-the-Ancient-Eastern/Concannon-Mazurek/p/book/9781472458261
The chapter proposes that imperial (dis)connectedness to a region—and so the nature of imperial influence on local culture—depends on both an empire’s historically-specific route to power and a region’s geocultural characteristics. This stance transcends traditional notions of imperial rule stressing dominance, which were often based on historical sources. It suggests that a consideration of short-term developments along with a region’s geocultural history revealed through archaeological evidence offers a more balanced perspective on cultural change. Next, Cyprus’ geocultural aspects are discerned via Braudel’s concept of the longue-durée whereby the island’s “permanent” spatial (e.g., natural resources) and temporal values (e.g., religion) are revealed.
Two archaeological case studies show how both empire-influenced conjonctures and Braudelian “permanent values” altered Cypriot culture. Ptolemaic military goals combined with Cyprus’ strategic geopolitical position to result in a strict administrative climate that marked Cypriot coinage, sculpture, and architecture. Conversely, the Roman conquest of the Eastern Mediterranean robbed Cyprus of its geopolitical importance and transformed it into a province whose location made it prosperous and whose cultural history the Romans admired. Roman Cyprus’ archaeology thus exhibits a distinct negotiation of new identities mediated by imperial and microregional factors. Overall, this chapter’s comparative archaeological overview of six centuries of imperial rule on a Mediterranean island contributes to post-Braudelian discourse by demonstrating how societies are affected via the ways that imperial peoples interact with geohistorical realities.
https://www.routledge.com/Across-the-Corrupting-Sea-Post-Braudelian-Approaches-to-the-Ancient-Eastern/Concannon-Mazurek/p/book/9781472458261