Service creation for end-users

2008

Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services - iiWAS '10, 2010

International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2011

16th IST Mobile and …, 2007

Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 2010

2009 Fourth International …, 2009

Recent advances in wireless networks and mobile devices have brought about new scenes for the provision of services to end-users. Besides traditional services, new ones may be provided that transparently adjust and adapt to the user context. The user would have more choice and flexibility if, besides using the services, he could also compose his own services in an ad-hoc way. This paper presents iCas, an architecture to create context-aware services on the fly and discusses its main components. Also an application ...

Brood & Rozen, 1996

Recepcja i oddziaływanie Marka Siemka w Europie, 2019

Despite such rules of evidence as were prevalent in Hindu 1 and Muslim India, 2 in the absence of any codified enactment on the subject, the courts established by royal charter in the presidency towns of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras began to follow English rules of evidence; those rules were contained in the common law and statute law as prevailed in England prior to 1726. 3 But outside the presidency there were no fixed rules of evidence; the position was really anomalous because neither the English rules nor the indigenous (Hindu or Muslim) rules applied. 4 Act X of 1835 of the Governor General in Council applied to all courts in British India 5 and dealt with evidence strictly so called. A series of Acts were passed by the Indian legislature introducing some reforms in the law of evidence. Even Act Π of 1855 was not a complete was not a complete body of rules though it had made many valuable provisions and had made those rules applicable to the entire British India. English rules of evidence were still not the law in the mofitssil; but judges and magistrates in the mofussil were not debarred from following them when they were seen to be the most equitable. There were scattered rules of evidence, however, based upon the practice of the Muslim courts which continued to govern the administration of justice even after the beginning or British Rule in India. Section 58 of Act II of 1855 expressly laid down that nothing in that Act should be so construed as to render admissible in any court any evidence which, but for the passing of that Act, would have been admissible in such courts. But in practice, judges quoted English rules of evidence. 6