ISSN 2075-1117, Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2017, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 87–100. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2017.
Original Russian Text © V.V. Pereverzeva, A.A. Primak, M.V. Pavlenko, N.E. Dokuchaev, A.A. Evdokimova, 2016, published in Rossiiskii Zhurnal Biologicheskikh Invazii, 2016,
No. 4, pp. 93–109.
Genetic Features and the Putative Sources of Formation of Isolated
Populations of the Striped Field Mouse Apodemus agrarius Pallas,
1771 in Magadan Oblast
V. V. Pereverzevaa, *, A. A. Primaka, **, M. V. Pavlenkob, ***,
N. E. Dokuchaeva, ****, and A. A. Evdokimovaa, *****
a
Institute of Biological Problems of the North, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (IBPN FEB RAS),
ul. Portovaya, 18, Magadan, 685000 Russia
b
Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (IBSS FEB RAS),
pr. 100 let Vladivostoku 159, Vladivostok, 690022 Russia
*e-mail: vvpereverzeva@mail.ru
**e-mail: primak@ibpn.ru
***e-mail: mv_pavlenko@mail.ru
****e-mail: dokuchaev@ibpn.ru
*****e-mail: annaevdokimova1994@yandex.ru
Received April 22, 2016
Abstract—The striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius is an invasive species new for Magadan oblast; however,
the adaptation of the animals to the conditions of the habitats north of the Sea of Okhotsk has been successful.
The full nucleotide sequence of the cytochrome b (cytb) gene from the mtDNA has been determined for mice
from four local populations in the region (settlements of Snezhnaya Dolina, Snezhnyi, Solnechnyi, and
Talon), and five cytb-haplotypes have been detected. Phylogenetic analysis revealed the similarity of cytb
nucleotide sequences in the mice from the habitats north of the Sea of Okhotsk and the conspecifics from the
Far East-Chinese part of the range. The invasion of A. agrarius into Talon is likely to have started from Primorsky krai, whereas the animals captured in Snezhnaya Dolina had ancestors from both Primorsky krai and
from China, and the animals captured in Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi were exclusively of Chinese ancestry. The
striped field mice from Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi were of a single monophyletic origin. The origin of mice
captured in Snezhnaya Dolina was apparently polyphyletic, and the origin of the animals from Talon was
monophyletic and different from the origin of other populations of the enclave located north of the Sea of
Okhotsk. Investigation of 16 allozyme loci revealed highly significant differences between the samples of
striped field mice of Snezhnyi, Solnechnyi, and Talon. The variability parameters in the set of biochemical
gene markers used for the analysis showed a trend to a decrease in striped field mouse samples from the habitats north of the Sea of Okhotsk. Genetic analysis revealed that the local settlements of A. agrarius in
Magadan oblast are currently represented by small isolated populations.
Keywords: striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius, invasive species, cytochrome b (cytb) gene, allozyme variability, genetic diversity, phylogenetic analysis
DOI: 10.1134/S2075111717010106
INTRODUCTION
The striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius Pallas,
1771 is a agrophylic rodent that belongs to the group of
alien invasive species in certain regions of Russia
(Tupikova et al., 2000; Bobrov et al., 2008; Khlyap and
Varshavskii, 2010; Khlyap et al., 2011). This species is
an important component of the ecosystem, since it
serves as prey for some predators, participates in soil
formation, causes certain damage to crops, and represents a reservoir of various feral herd infections
(Karaseva, 1979). The transmission of hemorrhagic
fever with renal syndrome from striped field mice to
humans is common in the Far East (Lee, 2003). The
range of the striped field mouse is subdivided into two
isolated areas, the European-Siberian-Kazakhstan
area and the Far East-Chinese area. The expansion
and formation of the range is largely dependent on the
economic activity of humans (Volkov et al., 1979;
Karaseva et al., 1992; Tikhonova et al., 1992;
Kostenko, 2000; Tupikova et al., 2000; Neronov et al.,
2001; Bobrov et al., 2008; Bazhenov et al., 2015). The
species was not sighted in Magadan oblast prior to the
mid-1990s (Yudin et al., 1976; Chernyavskii, 1984; Pozvonochnye…, 1996). The first instances of capture of
87
88
PEREVERZEVA et al.
the striped field mouse in the settlements of Talon and
Snezhnaya Dolina date back to the year 1995
(Dokuchaev et al., 2001; Andreev et al., 2006). The
animals were regularly captured at certain sites in
Magadan oblast (near the town of Magadan and in
Snezhnaya Dolina and Talon) in the following years.
Striped field mouse populations became rather large
in certain areas. For instance, N.E. Dokuchaev captured 63 individuals in less than a day at the beginning
of October 2003; the capture sites were located at the
periphery of a postharvest potato plot with an area of
approximately 1600 m2 in Talon. The density of the
rodent population was thus close to 400 individuals
per 1 ha (Primak et al., 2004). The sites populated by
the striped field mouse in Magadan oblast are mostly
in agricultural use (fields, vegetable gardens, backyards, and allotment gardens). Some of these lands are
abandoned and overgrown with tall weeds, the same as
at the boundaries of the patches. Some representatives
of the species were captured in the natural biotopes as
well (larch forests with dwarf pine and birch thicket,
willow bushes, cereals, and mixed herbs in the floodplain of the Dukcha River), at a distance of hundreds
of meters from the nearest vegetable gardens. Monitoring of striped field mouse populations in Magadan
oblast for 20 years revealed successful adaptation of
the species to the habitat characterized by an
extremely short vegetation period, prolonged persistence of snow cover, and night frosts and snowfalls
observed until May (and sometimes even in June).
The females who survive the winter give birth to three
litters during the warm season, and the young females
give birth to one or two litters. The average fertility
inferred from the number of embryos and placental
spots in 23 sexually mature females was 7.1 ± 0.29 pups
per litters (N.E. Dokuchaev, personal communication). Thus, the fertility of the animals was even higher
than in the south of the Far East region of Russia,
where the average number of embryos per female was
6 (Kostenko, 2000).
The striped field mouse apparently arrived in
Magadan oblast located at a distance of more than
1300 km of the native range of the species together
with animal feed or other agricultural products transported by sea, since there is no railroad transport into
Magadan oblast and transport by sea accounts for
most of the cargo turnover in the region (Goverment ...,
2016). Regular maritime transport was established at
the beginning of the 1930s. The major direction of
cargo transportation from the commercial seaport of
Magadan oblast corresponds to the ports of the south of
the Far East region of Russia (Vladivostok, Vostochnyi
(Nakhodka), and Vanino). The cargo that arrives from
Primorsky krai, Khabarovky krai, Siberia, China,
Kazakhstan, and Korea is packed into containers in
the ports named above and then transported to
Magadan oblast. Agricultural enterprises (sovkhozes)
that were under economic and administrative control
of Magadan and provided the area with vegetables,
potatoes, and hay have existed in the south of Primorsky krai (on the Khankaiskaya Plain) for many
years (the population of the striped field mice near these
agricultural facilities was very high) (Kostenko, 2000).
Regular supply of agricultural products to Magadan
oblast continued until the 1990s (Priozernoe ..., 2007; Priozernoe (Primorsky krai)…, 2016). The transport of these
rodents to Magadan oblast by cars or airplanes can be
decisively ruled out. The R504 Kolyma federal highway that connects Magadan and Yakutsk does not
enter the territory inhabited by the striped field
mouse, and the cargo transported by airplanes is limited to small quantities of vegetables and fruit.
The present-day populations of the striped field
mouse in Magadan oblast are isolated and associated
with inhabited localities or the environs thereof; the
distances between the ranges of the populations range
from 5 to 130 km (Fig. 1). The species behaves as an
herbivorous rodent species with a clear preference for
synanthropy; similar behavior was observed in other
regions of Russia (Kucheruk and Karaseva, 1992;
Khlyap and Varshavskii, 2010; Tikhonova et al., 2012).
The population of Talon is the most isolated, whereas
the local character of the three populations that
inhabit the environs of Magadan is somewhat arbitrary. All these populations are located in river floodplains, and roads flanked by kitchen gardens run
through all three sites. Thus, the expansion of the
striped field mouse population is not hindered; however, the populations are separate and all animals captured in the area were from the above-named settlements, rather than from the areas between the settlements.
The Tauiskii sovkhoz (agricultural enterprise),
which specialized in cattle breeding and potato cultivation, existed in Talon until the mid-1990s. Cows and
pigs were reared in Snezhnyi (where the Snezhnyi
sovkhoz existed between 1968 and 1997). The Severnaya poultry farm functioned in Solnechnyi between
the early 1980s and the mid-1990s. Recreation facilities are located in Snezhnaya Dolina. Private farms
and subsidiary farms, allotment gardens, and kitchen
gardens are currently found in the area. Agricultural
products and animal feed (including grains and compacted hay) were transported into all the above-named
areas through the Magadan commercial seaport.
Several attempts at elucidating the area of origin of
the rodents were undertaken. The comparison of
striped field mouse samples from Magadan oblast,
Primorsky krai, and the south of Khabarovsky krai
involved several genetic experiments, such as the
investigation of allozyme variability (Primak et al.,
2004, 2005; Zasypkin et al., 2007) and RAPD-PCR
analysis (Dokuchaev et al., 2008). The results of the
above-mentioned studies allowed for the assumption
of multiple instances of introduction of the striped
filed mouse to the territory of Magadan oblast. Molecular genetic methods were recently validated for the
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
GENETIC FEATURES AND THE PUTATIVE SOURCES OF FORMATION
N
89
Snezhnaya Dolina
Snezhnyi
Dukcha R.
S
Solnechnyi
Magadan
Staritskogo
Peninsula
Taui R.
50°
Arman’ R.
Yana R.
Talon
Ol
aR
.
60°
Amakhtonskii Bay
Koni Peninsula
50 km
SEA OF OKHOTSK
148°
149°
150°
151°
Fig. 1. The area of striped field mouse invasion north of the Sea of Okhotsk. Striped field mouse sighting points and capture sites
are shown by dots.
precise elucidation of the phylogenetic relationships
within this invasive species (Primak, 2013; Primak and
Pereverzeva, 2015). The considerable polymorphism
of the nucleotide sequence of the cytochrome b (cytb)
mtDNA gene selected for the analysis is worth mentioning, since it allows for the successful use of molecular genetic analysis of the cytb haplotypes in phylogenetic research on А. agrarius (Serizawa et al., 2000;
Reutter et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2004; Suzuki et al.,
2008; Dubey et al., 2009; Sakka et al., 2010; Оh et al.,
2013; Pereverzeva and Pavlenko, 2014; Koh et al.,
2014; Kim and Park, 2015).
The genetic structure of the striped field mouse
populations in the areas north of the Sea of Okhotsk is
presumably in the formative stage, since the habitat is
still new for the species. The gene pool of А. agrarius
individuals found in Magadan oblast is apparently
shaped by founder effects and gene drift to the greatest
extent. A small-scale but regular supply of new genes
with the striped field mouse individuals transported
together with animal feed and agricultural produce
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
from the southern part of the Far East of Russia cannot be ruled out.
The aim of the present work consisted in the identification of donor populations of the striped field
mouse of Magadan oblast and assessment of the
genetic variability level of this species in the populations located to the north of the Sea of Okhotsk.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Striped field mice used in the study were captured
during the years 1997–2015 by N.E. Dokuchaev,
E.A. Dubinin, and А.А. Primak (IBPN FEB RAS) in
the settlements listed above. The samples for molecular genetic investigation (skeletal muscle) were fixed in
96% ethanol, and those used for the allozyme analysis
were frozen and stored at –20°С. The isolation of total
DNA from ethanol-fixed muscle tissue, as well as
DNA purification, followed the procedure described
by Fleming and Cook (2002) with some modifications. The full nucleotide sequence of the cytb gene
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
90
PEREVERZEVA et al.
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
KR338983
KR338982
KR338984
KR338985
KR338986
111223344
3346378928
9275434660
CGACTTCGGG
.A........
.A.T.C.C..
T.........
TAG.A.T.AA
4566677789
8428846847
9346718002
ACATTGCCCC
...C.A....
..G...T...
G.....T...
.T..C..TTT
11
00
36
55
CA
.C
.C
..
TC
Fig. 2. Haplotypes of the cytochrome b gene in striped
field mice from Magadan oblast. Nucleotide substitutions
relative to the sequence variant М1 are shown. The numbering of the substitution sites starts from the beginning of
the cytochrome b gene of the mitochondrial genome of
A. agrarius, GenBank no. HM034866 (Oh et al., 2011).
from the mitochondrial genome was determined using
the primers ApoL14061 (cta cac agc att caa ctg tga cta
atg aca tg) and ApoR15351 (cct tct tct tga tgc cct gag
aag aga agt tct tcg) designed at the laboratory of population genetics (IBPN FEB RAS). The conditions of
the amplification of the nucleotide sequence of the
cytb gene were as described by Balakirev et al. (2007).
The amplified mtDNA fragment was purified and prepared for sequencing according to the conventional
procedure that employed the DiatomTM DNA CleanUp kit (Laboratoriya Izogen, Russia). The nucleotide
sequences of the cytb mtDNA gene were obtained
according to the standard procedure that employed
the DNA Big Dye Terminator reagent kit (Applied
Biosystems, v. 3.1) and the gene analyzer ABI Prism
3130 (Applied Biosystems, United States). The cytb
gene was mapped to the full nucleotide sequence of
A. agrarius mtDNA (GenBank no. HM034866 (Oh
et al., 2011)).
Phylogenetic analysis was performed with the data
obtained in the present study and the sequences
retrieved from GenBank; the latter were represented
by full or partial (880 bp) nucleotide sequences of the
cytb gene in 191 individuals of the striped field mouse
from different localities (Serizawa et al., 2000; Liu
et al., 2004; Sakka et al., 2010; Оh et al., 2013; Pereverzeva and Pavlenko, 2014; Koh et al., 2014; Kim
and Park, 2015). All animals selected for the genetic
analysis originated from Primorsky krai, Khabarovsk
krai, Siberia, China, Kazakhstan, and Korea, since
the probability of introduction of the striped field
mouse into Magadan oblast was the highest for these
areas. The nucleotide sequence of the cytb gene of
Apodemus chevrieri (Milne-Edwards, 1868), GenBank
no. AB096818, was used as the outgroup. The MEGA
6.0.2.74 (Tamura et al., 2013), ARLEQUIN ver. 3.5
(Excoffier et al., 2005), and Network 4.5.1.0 (Bandelt
et al., 1999) software packages were used for statistical
processing and analysis of the genetic data.
The allozymes were separated by vertical electrophoresis in 6.5–7.5% polyacrylamide gel in a modified
electrophoretic cell (Zasypkin, 1983, 1986); the buffer
systems used were Tris-borate-EDTA (Peacock et al.,
1965) or Tris-glycine (Davis and Ornstein, 1959). The
enzyme activity assays were carried out according to
standard procedures (Manchenko, 2003). Fifteen
enzyme systems presumably encoded by 16 interpretational loci were analyzed. The symbols of the loci correspond to the abbreviated names of enzymes suggested by Manchenko (2003). CHIHW and CHIRXC
software (Zaykin and Pudovkin, 1993) was used to test
the correspondence of the relative abundances of the
genotypes to the Hardy–Weinberg distribution for the
allele frequencies identified and to assess the genetic heterogeneity of the samples. The total value of the ∑χ2
parameter based on the additivity of the χ2 distribution
was calculated as described in (Zhivotovskii, 1991).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The full nucleotide sequence of the cytb mtDNA
gene was determined in striped field mice captured in
four local communities in Magadan oblast (Fig. 1).
The cytb gene of this species consists of 1143 base pairs
(bp) and is located between the bases 14127 and 15270
of the mitochondrial genome. The total number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the cytb sequence of
the animals analyzed was 22, and combinations of
these polymorphisms corresponded to five different
haplotypes of the cytb gene (Fig. 2). The М1–М5
nucleotide sequences obtained were submitted to
GenBank (nos. KR338982–KR338986).
The single-nucleotide polymorphisms detected in
the cytb gene sequence of the striped field mouse were
mostly synonymous, with 18 transitions and three
transversions observed in position 3 of the codon. The
results obtained are in agreement with the reports on
the highest variability of the third nucleotide in most
codons of the translated fragments of genes; this feature is due to the degenerate character of the genetic
code (Zardoya and Meyer, 1996). The replacement of
thymine by cytosine in the М2 haplotypes affected the
second nucleotide of a triplet (at 686 bp from the gene
start site) and led to the replacement of isoleucine by
threonine in position 229 of the polypeptide chain of
cytochrome b. This amino acid residue is located in
the VI transmembrane domain of the enzyme and is
characterized by an intermediate degree of conservation (Howell, 1989). The modified physicochemical
Grantham distance for this substitution is 59, this
being higher than the threshold value of 57.9 for single
substitutions and thus being indicative of the conservative character of the substitution (Butvilovskii et al.,
2009). The amino acid substitution observed is apparently neutral from the evolutionary point of view.
The distribution of the frequencies of the cytb gene
haplotypes in the striped field mouse samples investigated is shown in Table 1.
Striped field mice captured near Snezhnaya Dolina
constituted the only group characterized by a poly-
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
GENETIC FEATURES AND THE PUTATIVE SOURCES OF FORMATION
91
Table 1. Haplotype frequencies of the cytochrome b gene in striped field mice captured at different sites in Magadan oblast
Haplotypes of the cytochrome b gene
Sampling site
Sample size
М1
М2
М3
М4
М5
haplotype abundance in the sample
Snezhnaya Dolina
Snezhnyi
Solnechnyi
Talon
6
17
34
23
0.1667
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1667
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
morphic structure of the cytb gene. Since the number
of animals investigated was relatively small (n = 6), the
presence of other cytb haplotypes in the striped field
mice from this area cannot be ruled out. The population of this species in Snezhnaya Dolina was presumably formed as a result of several “waves” of invasion
by small numbers of animals from different donor
populations or the same donor population that gave
rise to several instances of invasion. The invader animals apparently had different mtDNA haplotypes in
the case of invasion that corresponded to the latter
model. A single instance of introduction of a large
group of unrelated animals appears less probable.
The monomorphic structure of the cytb nucleotide
sequence in the striped field mice from all other samples is apparently due to synergy of the founder effect
and the gene drift effect. All individuals from Snezhnyi
had the М5 haplotype, which was common for the
animals from Snezhnaya Dolina as well. These settlements are located on different banks of the Dukcha
River, and the distance between them is less than
2 km. The striped field mice of Magadan oblast
inhabit areas populated by humans and vegetable gardens adjacent to these areas, and therefore the existence of limitations on the flow of genes between the
local communities of this species in Snezhnyi and
Snezhnaya Dolina can be expected. The individuals
with the М5 haplotype were apparently transported
into both neighboring settlements with the same shipment of agricultural produce (or hay), whereas the
invasion of individuals with other cytb haplotypes
might not have occurred in Snezhnyi. Another putative scenario implies the introduction of striped field
0.1667
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1.0000
0.5000
1.0000
1.0000
0.0000
mice carrying other variants of the cytb gene into Snezhnyi followed by stochastic elimination of haplotypes
other than М5 from the gene pool of mice in this population.
All striped field mice from Solnechnyi were carriers
of the М5 variant. This settlement is connected to
Snezhnyi by an 18-km road flanked by isolated vegetable gardens, but no striped field mice were captured
in the area between the populated territories. This may
be due to the small size of striped field mouse populations in these settlements and the related low migratory activity of the animals. All striped field mice of
these populations carried the М5 haplotype, this
apparently being due to the invasion of rodents from
the same area.
All mice that inhabited the environs of Talon were
carriers of the М4 haplotype, and this may be due to
the combined action of the founder effect and gene
drift as well. The neighbor-joining (NJ) method
implemented in the MEGA6 software package was
used to construct a tree that reflected the phylogenetic
relationships between striped field mouse populations
of Magadan oblast (Fig. 3).
The NJ dendrogram included two clusters. The
groups of M5 haplotype carriers from Snezhnyi and
Solnechnyi constituted the first clade. The mouse
population from Snezhnaya Dolina characterized by
polymorphism of the cytb nucleotide sequence of the
gene and the M4 haplotype carriers from Talon constituted the second clade. These populations could be
combined owing to the structural similarity of the
М1–М3 variants (Snezhnaya Dolina), on one hand,
and the М4 variant (Talon) of the cytb haplotype of the
Snezhnyi
Solnechnyi
Snezhnaya Dolina
Talon
A. chevrieri AB096818
0.01
Fig. 3. NJ phylogenetic tree that shows relationships between the striped field mouse colonies in Magadan oblast. The tree is
based on the data on the variability of the cytochrome b gene of mtDNA. The scale bar shows the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
92
PEREVERZEVA et al.
striped field mouse, on the other hand. The branch
that corresponded to the animals captured in Talon
was longer, since the М4 haplotype carriers occurred
only at this site. Striped field mice were apparently
introduced into this settlement with a single lot of agricultural produce that was transported exclusively to
Talon. Carriers of other cytb haplotypes either did not
arrive in Talon or were eliminated from the population
owing to stochastic processes.
Farm animal feed and agricultural produce that
could be the source of striped field mice introduced to
Magadan oblast were mostly brought from Primorsky
krai and Khabarovsk krai, and some lots of these goods
were from Siberia, Kazakhstan, China, and Korea.
Therefore, sequences of the cytb gene (or its fragments
of not less than 880 bp in length) of striped field mice
from this region were retrieved from GenBank.
Initial analysis revealed the similarity of the haplotypes М1–М4 and the nucleotide sequences (742 bp)
of cytb gene variants B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, and B8 (GenBank nos. FJ906759, FJ906756, FJ906761, FJ906760,
FJ906762, and FJ906764, respectively) detected in
striped field mice captured in the south of Primorsky
krai (Pereverzeva and Pavlenko, 2014). More detailed
analysis involved the registration of full nucleotide
sequences of the cytb gene corresponding to every single haplotype of the individuals captured in Primorsky
krai. The sequences obtained were deposited in GenBank. The GenBank sequence KU859999 corresponds
to the В1 haplotype; KU860001, to B2; KU860002, to
В3; KU860000, to В5; KU860003, to В7; and
KU860006, to В8. Importantly, exactly these haplotypes were detected in striped field mice captured near
the village of Priluki in Khorol’skii raion (Pereverzeva
and Pavlenko, 2014), the area adjacent to the farmlands of the village of Priozernoe that were the source
of agricultural produce supplies to Magadan oblast
until the late 1990s. The neighbor-joining (NJ)
method implemented in the MEGA6 software package was used to construct a tree that illustrated the
phylogenetic relationships between the nucleotide
sequences characteristic of the haplotypes М1–М5
and the variants of the cytb gene of striped field mouse
individuals captured at the above-mentioned sites
(Fig. 4). The results obtained point to the high degree
of polymorphism of the nucleotide sequence of the
cytb gene in A. agrarius, as evident from the existence
of subclusters with high bootstrap index values. The
M5 variant is located on a branch close to the root of
the tree with a 70% bootstrap support. The M5 haplotype apparently belongs to a more ancient and isolated
genetic subline.
The nucleotide sequences selected for further phylogenetic analysis were located in the same subclusters
as М1–М5 on the NJ tree; the median network that
obeyed the principle of minimal number of nucleotide
substitutions was constructed for these sequences (Fig. 5).
The median network (Fig. 5) was used for a more
detailed elucidation of the phylogenetic relationships
between the M1–M5 haplotypes. The M1 variant
(within the 880-bp fragment) was identical to the
nucleotide sequences of the АМ495857 sample (animal captured in the zone of range disjunction, in the
Onon River valley, near the village of Karaksar in
Zabaykalsky krai close to the border of the Far East
okrug) (Pavlenko et al., 2007; Sakka et al., 2010) and
the KU860002 sample (animal captured in Primorsky
krai). It is reasonable to assume that the carriers of the
М1 haplotype of this species were transported into
Magadan oblast from Primorsky krai, since the economic ties between Primorsky krai and the Magadan
area are better developed than those between the latter
and Zabaykalsky krai. The nucleotide sequence of the
cytb gene of the KJ082007 and KJ082011 individuals
(Kim and Park, 2015) captured in China was almost
identical to М1, with only one nucleotide substitution
(Fig. 5). China borders on Primorsky krai, and therefore the flow of genes between A. agrarius populations
of these areas is entirely possible.
The nucleotide sequence of this gene fragment was
identical in mice from Khabarovsk krai (АМ495865)
and Primorsky krai (KU860000) (Fig. 5). This cytb
haplotype was almost identical to М1, except for a single nucleotide substitution. It is the ancestor haplotype for a small subcluster that includes the cytb gene
variants detected in the individuals captured in Primorsky krai (KU859999, KU860001, and KU860003)
and for the M2 haplotype (Fig. 5). This may be indicative
of the single origin of these haplotypes. One may assume
that the carriers of the M2 haplotype originate from Primorsky krai as well (or from Khabarovsk krai).
The gene variants M3 and M4 have similar nucleotide sequences and form a small subcluster that originates from M1 (Fig. 5). Very extensive polymorphism
of the nucleotide sequence of the cytb gene is characteristic of A. agrarius. For instance, the number of
variants of the 742-bp fragment of the cytb gene in a
striped field mouse sample from the south of Primorsky krai was 36 (Pereverzeva and Pavlenko, 2014).
One may assume that the number of variants of the
cytb gene will increase as the full nucleotide sequence
(1143 bp) is analyzed in the representatives of the population of this species in Primorsky krai. The presence
of cytb haplotypes identical to the hypothetical mv1 or
more closely related to М3 and М4 in the gene pool of
the striped field mouse is highly probable. However,
mice that carry these genotypes have not been captured yet, and the respective nucleotide sequences of
the cytb gene have not been registered in GenBank.
The genetic relatedness of the М1 nucleotide sequence
and the sequences М3 and М4 is apparent, and this
points to the putative invasion of striped field mice
with М3 and М4 haplotypes from Primorsky krai into
Magadan oblast.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
GENETIC FEATURES AND THE PUTATIVE SOURCES OF FORMATION
92
98
63
AM945753
AM945752
AM945850
AM945751
AM945746
AM945743
68
68
66 KJ082033
KJ082031
KJ082032
KJ082030
KJ082034
KJ082035
KJ082037
KJ082036
AB096816
AB096809
AM945749
AM945748
AM945747
AM945750
AM945754
AM945740
59
58
65
51
60
52
89
KJ082008
KJ082022
KJ082018
KJ082014
KJ082021
KJ082006
90
AM945744
AM945741
91
AM945745
AM945742
AM945755
KJ082023
KJ082016
HQ343406
FJ906765
AM945766
AM945757
AM945756
AM945772
AM945778
AM945771
AM945770
AM945762
64
AM945776
FJ906766
AM945777
AM945763
FJ906767
AM945765
KJ082013
HM034884
AM945767
KJ082027
HM034878
KJ081997
KJ082009
FJ906762
HM034868
KF294389
KJ082017
KF294396
KF294395
KF294392
KF294387
KF294394
61
KF294388
KF294390
KF294393
KF294391
61HM034885
AM945769
HM034886
HM034887
67
AM945768
KJ082020
KJ082003
67
KJ082002
AM945855
68
AM945764
HQ343403
AF427334
HQ343397
KJ082004
51
HQ343398
68
91
AY389012
AM945775
HQ343395
AM945849
AM945759
FJ906768
66
HQ343396
M3
M3
HQ343402
KJ082012
63
KJ082007
HQ343391
FJ906757
AM945857
M1
M1
HQ343394
AM945854
KJ082011
KJ082025
AM945853
KJ082026
HQ343401
KJ082029
FJ906763
AM945852
KJ082010
KJ082028
M4
83 M4
HQ343404
HQ343405
FJ906764
HQ343399
HQ343400
HQ343384
HQ343392
52
69
74
52
76
KJ081988
KJ081984
KJ081983
77
HQ343393
AM945847
AM945839
AM945848
AM945846
FJ906759
FJ906761
60
AM945774
HQ343390
HQ343389
AF427333
AM945773
KJ082015
FJ906756
HQ343385
FJ906758
61
HQ343387
HQ343388
AF427332
FJ906760
HQ343386
KJ081987
KJ081989
KJ081985
63
KJ081982
KJ081986
KJ081981
57
53
M2
0.01
70
M5
96
AM945845
AM945856
AB032851
AM945851
AB096815
KJ082005
AB303225
KJ081990
52
HM034888
HM034877
50
HM034874
HM034871
63
HM034869
HM034872
HM034876
HM034891
63
HM034889
HM034870
HM034879
AM945761
KJ081995
KJ081996
AM945760
HM034882
HM034881
KJ081999
KJ081994
KJ082000
KJ082001
KJ081991
65
HM034875
HM034873
HM034890
KJ081992
HM034880
66
AB303224
KJ081998
KJ081993
HM034883
81
AM945758
KJ082024
AY389011
M2
M5
A. chevrieri AB096818
Fig. 4. NJ phylogenetic tree based on the data on the variability of a 880-bp fragment of the cytochrome b gene of mtDNA of
striped field mouse from Magadan oblast and from the putative donor populations. The bootstrap indices >50% are shown on the
branches of the tree. The scale bar corresponds to the genetic distance between the haplotypes.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
93
94
PEREVERZEVA et al.
НМ034891
Korea
987
АМ945759
Primorsky
krai
AМ945758
Primorsky
krai
Primorsky
krai
804
KU 859999
KU 860001
489
KU 860003
912
KJ 082007
704
369
916
654
China
660
975
303 KU 860006 KJ 082011
642
China
Primorsky
901
480
686
713
krai
mv6
1041
798
741
426 mv3
АМ495856 Khabarovsky krai
816
396
KU 860000 Primorsky krai
498
780
mv7
768
234
428
mv1
831
1035 228
АМ495857
Zabaikalsky krai
mv11
mv9
KU860002 Primorsky krai mv2
279
273
228 1035
306
465
489
396
mv10
417
mv8
624
AM945854
407
Novosibirsk
189
243
mv4
204
255 972
228
342
303
255
294
687
592
312
AМ945839
672
318
600
Kazakhstan
543
717
654
444
480
837
741
717
687
М2
М1
М3
М4
726
АМ945743
China,
Ningxia Hui
Autonomous Region
1020
396
AМ945845
Kazakhstan
735
384
900
mv12
909
243
AВ096816
Taiwan
552
858
426 mv5
840
~
~
79 substitutions
AY389011
China
Xi’an
Shaanxi province
М5
А. chevrieri
AB096818
Fig. 5. The median network of A. agrarius mtDNA haplotypes registered in Magadan oblast and the putative donor populations.
The size of the circles is proportional to the frequency of occurrence of the mtDNA variant in striped field mouse samples from
the colonies of Magadan oblast. The numbers correspond to the location of the mutation sites relative to the start of the cytochrome b gene of the mitochondrial genome of A. agrarius, GenBank no. HM034866 (Oh et al., 2011). The hypothetical haplotypes mv 1–12 are marked by black squares.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
GENETIC FEATURES AND THE PUTATIVE SOURCES OF FORMATION
Thus, Primorsky krai is the most likely source of
invasion of striped field mice with the haplotypes
М1–М4 into Magadan oblast. This assumption is
supported by the highest similarity of the nucleotide
sequences of mtDNA variants of striped field mice
captured near the village of Priluki in Primorsky krai
(near the farm that regularly supplied agricultural produce to Magadan oblast) to the М1–М4 haplotypes. It
is also important to note that the haplotypes of striped
field mice from Primorsky krai most similar to the cytb
variants of the animals from Magadan oblast included
the variants В2 (KU860001), В3 (KU860002), and В7
(KU860003), which we previously assumed to be of
adaptive value (Pereverzeva and Pavlenko, 2014).
The M1 variant is ancestral both for M2–M4
detected in the animals from Magadan oblast and for
other haplotypes from the eastern part of Asia, including those from Primorsky krai, Khabarovsk krai,
China (the Far East-Chinese part of the range), and
Eastern Siberia and Kazakhstan (the European-Siberian-Kazakhstan block) (Fig. 5). Therefore one may
assume that the M1 variant is relatively common for
striped field mouse populations of the eastern part of
Asia. This variant is apparently characteristic of
A. agrarius individuals of the Far East-Chinese block.
However, M1 may also be the ancestor variant of the
nucleotide sequences from certain individuals captured
in the European-Siberian-Kazakhstan part of the range
(АМ945839, АМ945845, and АМ945854). Notwithstanding the isolation of the two parts of A. agrarius
range, accidental transport of striped field mice from
one area to the other cannot be ruled out. Such transport would most likely be related to economic activity
of people, namely, to the railroad transportation of
agricultural produce or farm animal feed. Therefore,
isolation of the mice of the European-SiberianKazakhstan and Far East-Chinese parts of the range
might not be complete (Sakka et al., 2010; Frisman
et al., 2015; Kim and Park, 2015), but the gene flow
between the A. agrarius populations in these two
blocks is apparently rather limited.
The M5 haplotype occupies an isolated position in
the median network (Fig. 5). M5 is closer to the cytb
gene from A. chevrieri than any other variant of this
part of the mitochondrial genome of A. agrarius. This
is evident of the archaic character of this nucleotide
sequence. The M5 variant belongs to a genetically isolated (bootstrap index of 70%) subcluster that also
includes the AY389011 sample from an animal captured in China (Central China, Shaanxi province,
Xi’an (Liu et al., 2004)) (Fig. 4). The similarity of the
nucleotide sequences of М5 and AY389011 points to the
possible origin of these haplotypes from a single genetic
subline of A. agrarius. The nucleotide sequences of these
samples contain 16 (M5) and 17 (AY389011) singlenucleotide substitutions relative to the sample
АМ945743 (closest to these sequences with regard to
structure and retrieved from an animal captured in the
neighboring area of China, the Ningxia-Hui autonoRUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
95
mous region (Sakka et al., 2010)). The number of substitutions observed upon the comparison with M1 is 11
and 12, respectively (Fig. 5). However, if one takes the
topology of the NJ tree (Fig. 4) into account, the invasion of carriers of the M5 haplotype from the central
provinces of China appears highly probable. The trade
ties between Magadan oblast and China are currently
very well developed. Goods are transported through
the ports of the Far East of Russia, and therefore direct
transportation of striped field mouse individuals from
China into Magadan oblast is possible.
In general, the striped field mice of Magadan
oblast are likely to have originated from the inhabitants
of the Far East-Chinese part of the range of this species, that is, from striped field mice of Primorsky krai
and China.
The М5 haplotype was detected in mice from the
colonies of Snezhnyi, Snezhnaya Dolina, and Solnechnyi (Table 1). This may be indicative of the introduction of the representatives of this species into
Magadan oblast from a single donor population.
The similarity of the gene pools of A. agrarius from
Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi was characterized in more
detail using genetic analysis of the biochemical markers of nuclear genes. Sixteen allozyme loci were
detected and interpreted in the samples of striped field
mice from Magadan oblast. The loci LDH-1, LDH-2,
IDH-2, PGD, GR, SOD, HK, AK, and EST-D were
monomorphic in all groups investigated. Seven polymorphic enzyme systems were detected in the mouse
colonies investigated. Characteristics of the polymorphic loci, parameters of allozyme variability of the
samples, and estimates of intersample heterogeneity
for these gene markers are listed in Table 2.
The frequency of the major allele in the polymorphic systems ranged from 0.556 to 0.98. Most loci
included two alleles, with the exception of the EST-M
locus, which included three and four alleles, respectively, in the animals from Talon and Solnechnyi. A
heterozygous individual from the latter area carried
two rare alleles.
The study revealed polymorphic gene markers that
were restricted to a single group of mice, identified
allozyme loci polymorphic between two samples of
individuals, and pointed to markers polymorphic in all
groups investigated.
Significant deviation of the genotype abundances
observed from those expected for a Hardy–Weinberg
distribution was observed in three cases. Firstly, one of
the individuals captured near Solnechnyi had the
0.90/1.30 genotype in the EST-M locus and was the
only carrier of two rare alleles, this being the reason for
the genetic disequilibrium observed. Secondly, a significant excess of individuals heterozygous in the ACP
locus was observed in the same sample. Several putative reasons for this deviation from the equilibrium
state can be stated. The animals were captured at the
end of August on a relatively small part of a large field;
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
96
PEREVERZEVA et al.
Table 2. Allele frequencies for the polymorphic loci, assessment of the genetic heterogeneity level, and allozyme variability
parameters for the striped field mouse samples from Magadan oblast
Capture sites
Locus
F
Talon
N = 62
Solnechnyi
N = 42
Snezhnyi
N = 18
χ2 value
Allele frequencies
G-3-PD
1.00
1.10
Hobs
1.00
1.00
0.972
0.028
0.056
χ2 = 5.83
d.f. = 2
ME
1.00
1.10
Hobs
0.911
0.089
0.177
1.00
1.00
χ2 = 11.70**
P < 0.01
d.f. = 2
GOT
1.00
1.10
Hobs
1.00
0.369
0.631
0.500
0.861
0.139
0.278
χ2 = 88.69***
P < 0.001
d.f. = 4
EST-M
0.90
1.00
1.20
1.30
Hobs
0.113
0.556
0.331
0.000
0.548
0.012
0.750
0.226
0.012
0.381
84.03*** P < 0.001
6
1.00
χ2 = 37.42***
P < 0.001
d.f. = 12
0.847
0.153
0.274
0.702
0.298
0.548
4.03* P < 0.05
1
0.806
0.194
0.167
3.94* P < 0.05
1
χ2 = 14.99**
P < 0.01
d.f. = 4
L(χ2)
d.f.
ACP
1.00
1.10
Hobs
L(χ2)
d.f.
GLO
1.00
1.10
Hobs
1.00
1.00
0.833
0.167
0.222
χ2 = 30.12***
P < 0.001
d.f. = 4
PGM
1.00
1.10
Hobs
0.984
0.016
0.032
1.00
1.00
χ2 = 1.97
d.f. = 2
Allozyme variability parameters in the samples
Hobs
0.064
0.089
0.045
∑ χ2 = 190.72***
P < 0.001
NA/L
1.3
1.3
1.1
d.f. = 30
number of individuals investigated, L(χ2)—value of the χ2 parameter for the Hardy–Weinberg
F—relative mobility of the allele, N—the
estimate in the locus, d.f.—number of degrees of freedom, Р—confidence level, Hobs—average heterozygosity observed, NA/L —average
number of alleles per locus, ∑χ2—integrated value of the χ2 parameter.
therefore, the predomination of related animals of less
than one year of age and the same heterozygous genotype was possible. Thirdly, a significant deviation from
the genotype distribution was observed in case of the
ACP locus in striped field mice of Snezhnyi. The disequilibrium observed for this sample was related to the
presence of two rare homozygote individuals. The
number of animals captured at the same site was relatively small (Table 2), and therefore the carriers of
these genotypes may belong to the same litter. The fre-
quencies of the genotypes for the rest of polymorphic
allozyme loci in the striped field mouse samples
obeyed the Hardy–Weinberg law.
The level of heterogeneity was assessed in order to
reveal the putative isolation of specific groups of
striped field mice in Magadan oblast (Table 3).
The distribution of the alleles of biochemical gene
markers in every sample of mice was significantly different from that in the other samples. This is indicative
of complete isolation of the Magadan oblast colonies
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
GENETIC FEATURES AND THE PUTATIVE SOURCES OF FORMATION
97
Table 3. Total genetic heterogeneity of striped field mouse samples from Magadan oblast as inferred from the analysis
of polymorphic allozyme loci
Capture site
Talon
Talon
Solnechnyi
Snezhnyi
∑χ2 = 117.90***
d.f. = 12
∑χ2 = 75.52***
d.f. = 13
P < 0.001
Snezhnyi
2
Solnechnyi
∑χ2 = 53.68***
d.f. = 10
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
2
∑χ —the total value of the χ parameter for all loci, P—confidence level, d.f.—number of degrees of freedom.
of A. agrarius analyzed in the present study, and therefore the colonies can be regarded as isolated populations. The gene pool of isolated colonies of the striped
field mouse is shaped by the synergy of the founder
effect, gene drift, and selection. The number of striped
field mouse individuals transported into different settlements of Magadan oblast could have been small,
and thus the original gene pool could have contained
a limited number of alleles. Importantly, animals that
ended up in different settlements carried different
allele combinations. These relatively small sets of
alleles unique for each colony of striped field mice laid
the foundations for the formation of the unique gene
pools of these populations. Smaller sizes of the local
colonies and more pronounced size fluctuations are
predisposed to higher intensity of stochastic changes
in the allele frequency of various genes that are not
directly related to selection (gene drift). The striped
field mouse is a species characterized by rapid reproduction and strong fluctuations of the population size.
This is confirmed by the results of annual test captures
of animals in the farmlands near Solnechnyi during the
years 2005–2013. Striped field mice were numerous in
this area in the years 2005 and 2008, whereas the number of animals captured in the other years was either
very low or zero (no animals captured) (А.А. Primak,
personal communication). A dramatic decrease in population size results in the survival of a small number of
individuals with a very restricted allele pool. The gene
pool of the colony undergoes a “bottleneck” stage that
leads to the decrease in polymorphism.
Comparison of the levels of protein polymorphism
in striped field mice from different populations of
Magadan oblast and the Far East-Chinese part of the
range was based on data on allozyme variability of
A. agrarius samples from Primorsky krai and Khabarovsk
krai. The integrated variability parameters of the set of
allozyme loci analyzed showed a trend to a decrease in
the groups of striped field mice that inhabited the territories north of the Sea of Okhotsk. The number of
polymorphic loci among the 16 loci investigated
ranged from three to four for all populations of
A. agrarius investigated, whereas the number of polymorphic loci in the above-mentioned set of allozyme
markers ranged from four to six in the native populaRUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
tions of this species in Primorsky krai and Khabarovsk
krai. The EST-M locus was the only one with four
alleles in the animals from the colonies of Magadan
oblast, whereas the presence of 3–4 alleles was registered for several loci (G-3-PD, ME, EST-M, and
GLO) in striped field mice from the south of the Far
East of Russia (Zasypkin et al., 2007).
CONCLUSIONS
Comparative analysis of the data of molecular
genetic and allozyme studies can be used to reconstruct the history of formation of the gene pool of new
A. agrarius populations that emerged in Magadan
oblast owing to multiple invasions. The monomorphic
structure of the nucleotide sequence of the cytb gene in
the individuals from three colonies of the four investigated is worth mentioning. Considerable polymorphism of this mtDNA region is characteristic of the
native populations of this species. This is evident of
intense microevolutionary processes in the isolated
A. agrarius colonies investigated. The information on
the phylogenetic relationships of the haplotypes of the
cytb mtDNA gene in striped field mouse captured
north of the Sea of Okhotsk pointed to Primorsky krai
as the putative source of invasion of this species into
Snezhnaya Dolina and Talon, whereas the ancestors
of certain animals captured in Snezhnaya Dolina,
Snezhnyi, and Solnechnyi were apparently imported
from China. These territories belong to the Far EastChinese part of the range of A. agrarius. The detection
of М5 cytb haplotypes in the samples from Snezhnyi
and Solnechnyi is evident of the single monophyletic
origin of these colonies. Transportation of a single lot
of agricultural produce into these settlements apparently resulted in the invasion of matrilineally related
striped field mice with the same mitotype. The invasion of individuals with different cytb haplotypes into
Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi cannot be ruled out, but in
this case, the invasion was apparently followed by the
elimination of the carriers of these haplotypes from
the colonies in question owing to stochastic processes.
Several instances of invasion by this species due to
repeated transportation of agricultural produce into
the settlements investigated cannot be ruled out. The
frequency of cytb haplotypes introduced during the
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
98
PEREVERZEVA et al.
repeated invasions was apparently low, and gene drift
led to the elimination of these mitotypes from the gene
pool of striped field mice of Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi.
Highly significant differences between the sets of biochemical genetic markers of these samples are apparently due to the synergy of the founder effect and gene
drift. The level of allozyme polymorphism in the
donor population of A. agrarius was apparently higher,
but only part of the gene pool of this population was
transported to the colonies of this species formed in
Magadan oblast, since the number of invading individuals was low. The polymorphism in the EST-M
locus was conserved only in the striped field mouse
colony of Solnechnyi, whereas the polymorphism in
the loci G-3-PD and GLO was conserved in Snezhnyi. Stochastic processes could have contributed to
the loss of certain alternative alleles of these loci as
well, since the striped field mouse groups investigated
were small and isolated.
ferent from that of all other colonies of this species in
the area north of the Sea of Okhotsk. Importantly, the
degree of geographical isolation was the highest for
this population. Highly significant genetic differences
between the striped field mouse samples collected in
Magadan oblast point to the isolated character of the
colonies identified and show that these colonies can be
regarded as independent populations. These A. agrarius
colonies were probably formed at different times, and
several instances of invasion by the striped field mouse
contributed to their formation. The density of these
populations was generally low, with local peaks of
population size observed during certain years (the year
2003 in the case of Talon and the years 2005 and 2008
in the case of Solnechnyi). The small population size
apparently is the reason for low migration activity of
the rodents and the existence of isolated local colonies
of the striped field mouse in Magadan oblast.
The only A. agrarius colony of Magadan oblast that
showed polymorphism in the structure of the nucleotide sequence of the cytb gene inhabited Snezhnaya
Dolina. The formation of this population was apparently due to repeated invasion of small groups of animals from the same donor population in China (carriers of the M5 mitotype) and from several donor population of Primorsky krai (carriers of the haplotypes
М1–М3). An alternative scenario of the formation of
the gene pool of the striped field mouse in Snezhnaya
Dolina is possible as well. This scenario involves a single instance of invasion by striped field mice with the
M5 haplotype (from a single Chinese population) and
several instances of invasion by the carriers of the М1–
М3 cytb gene variants from the same population of
Primorsky krai.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to E.A. Dubinin (Laboratory of
Ecology of Mammals, Institute of Biological Problems of the North, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences), for the contribution to the collection
of material for the molecular genetic and allozyme
analysis. We are also grateful to the esteemed reviewers
for the suggestions that resulted in considerable
improvement of the material published. This study was
supported by the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian
Academy of Sciences, project Foundation for Basic
Research, project no. 15-04-02668 (N.E. Dokuchaev
as supervisor); and the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, project no. 15-I-6-015o
(V.P. Nikishin as supervisor).
Talon is situated at a distance of 130 km from
Magadan. The М4 haplotype was detected only in the
rodents from this settlement, and this may be indicative of a unique monophyletic origin of the rodent
community from Talon. The range of polymorphic
allozyme markers of this sample had certain distinctive
features as well. The МЕ and PGM loci were polymorphic in the mice captured in Talon, whereas these loci
were monomorphic in the mouse samples from Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi. Polymorphism in the GOT locus
was detected in the DNA of mice from Snezhnyi and
Solnechnyi; however, this marker was monomorphic in
the mice from Talon (Table 2). Striped field mice were
presumably transported to Talon with a single lot of agricultural produce supplied from Primorsky krai.
The results of molecular genetic and allozyme
analysis are evident of the existence of small isolated
A. agrarius colonies in Magadan oblast. The single
monophyletic origin of striped field mice from Snezhnyi and Solnechnyi was revealed. The origin of the
colony of this species in Snezhnaya Dolina was apparently polyphyletic. The origin of the striped field
mouse population of Talon was monophyletic and dif-
REFERENCES
Andreev, A.V., Dokuchaev, N.E., Krechmar, A.V., and
Chernyavskii, F.B., Nazemnye pozvonochnye SeveroVostoka Rossii (Terrestrial Vertebrates of the North-East
Russia), Magadan: Sev.-Vost. Nauch. Tsentr, Dal’nevostochn. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2006.
Balakirev, A.E., Baskevich, M.I., Gmyl’, A.P., Okulova, N.M.,
Andreeva, T.A., Sokolenko, O.V., Malygin, V.M.,
Khlyap, L.A., Oparin, M.L., and Orlov, V.N., On the
taxonomic rank of ciscaucasicus and its relationships with
the pygmy wood mouse Sylvaemus uralensis inferred from
the mtDNA cytochrome b gene sequence, Russ. J. Genet.,
2007, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1386–1399.
Bandelt, H.J., Forster, P., and Röhl, A., Median-joining
networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies, Mol.
Biol. Evol., 1999, vol. 16, pp. 37–48.
Bazhenov, Yu.A., Pavlenko, M.V., Korablev, V.P., and Kardash, A.I., Current distribution of the striped field
mouse (Apodemus agrarius Pallas, 1771) in Eastern
Transbaikalia: new findings in the disjunction area,
Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2015, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5.
Bobrov, V.V., Warshavsky, A.A., and Khlyap, L.A., Chuzherodnye vidy mlekopitayushchikh v ekosistemakh Rossii
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
GENETIC FEATURES AND THE PUTATIVE SOURCES OF FORMATION
(Alien Species of Mammals in the Ecosystems of Russia), Moscow: KMK, 2008.
Butvilovskii, A.V., Barkovskii, E.V., Butvilovskii, V.E.,
Davidov, V.V., Chernous, E.A., and Khrustalev, V.V.,
Osnovnye metody molekulyarnoi evolyutsii (The Basic
Methods for Molecular Evolution), Minsk: Beloruss.
Gos. Med. Univ., 2009.
Chernyavskii, F.B., Mlekopitayushchie krainego severovostoka Sibiri (Mammals in the Extreme North-East
Siberia), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.
Davis, B.J. and Ornstein, L., A New High Resolution Electrophoresis Method, New York: Soc. Study N.Y. Acad.
Med., 1959, pp. 112–118.
Dokuchaev, N.E., Lapinskii, A.G., and Solovenchuk, L.L.,
Genetic diversity of the striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius Pallas, 1771) in the Russian Far East as
assessed by RAPD-PCR, Biol. Bull., 2008, vol. 35,
no. 4, pp. 368–373.
Dokuchaev, N.E., Pospekhov, V.V., and Lazutkin, A.N.,
Undesirable introduction of field mice in the Magadan
Region, Kolymskie Vesti, 2001, no. 14, pp. 19–20.
Dubey, S., Michaux, J., Brünner, H., Hutterer, R., and
Vogel, P., False phylogenies on wood mice due to cryptic cytochrome-b pseudogene, Mol. Phylogen. Evol.,
2009, vol. 50, pp. 633–641.
Excoffier, L., Laval, G., and Schneider, S., Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population
genetics data analysis, Evol. Bioinform. Online, 2005,
vol. 1, pp. 47–50.
Fleming, M.A. and Cook, J.A., Phylogeography of endemic
ermine (Mustela erminea) in Southeast Alaska, Mol.
Ecol., 2002, vol. 11, pp. 795–807.
Frisman, L.V., Bogdanov, A.S., Sheremet’eva, I.N., Kartavtseva, I.V., and Pavlenko, M.V., Isolates of western
and eastern field mice: comparative analysis of the five
microsatellite loci, in Mater. konf. “Struktura vida u
mlekopitayushchikh,” Tezisy dokladov (Proc. Sci. Conf.
“The Structure of Mammalian Species,” Moscow,
October 21–23, 2015, Abstracts of Papers), Moscow:
KMK, 2015, p. 82.
Howell, N., Evolutionary conservation of protein regions in
the proton motive cytochrome b and their possible roles
in redox catalysis, J. Mol. Evol., 1989, vol. 29, pp. 157–
169.
Government of the Magadan Region. http://www.49gov.ru/
our_region/overview/.
Karaseva, E.V., The field mouse (Apodemus agrarius Pallas,
1771), in Meditsinskaya teriologiya (Medical Theriology),
Moscow: Nauka, 1979, pp. 194–203.
Karaseva, E.V., Tikhonova, G.N., and Bogomolov, P.L.,
The range of field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) in the
SSSR and the patterns of its distribution in different
parts of the SSSR, Zool. Zh., 1992, vol. 71, no. 6,
pp. 106–115.
Khlyap, L.A. and Warshavsky, A.A., Synanthropic and
agrophilic rodents as invasive alien mammals, Russ. J.
Biol. Invasions, 2010, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 301–312.
Khlyap, L.A., Warshavsky, A.A., and Bobrov, V.V., Diversity of alien mammal species in different regions of Russia,
Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2011, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 293–299.
Kim, H.R. and Park, Y.C., Genetic diversity and genetic structure of the striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius coreae
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
99
(Muridae, Rodentia) in Korea, Gene, 2015, vol. 572, no. 2,
pp. 292–297. doi 10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.014
Koh, H.S., Shaner, P.J., Csorba, G., Wang, Y., Jang, K.H.,
and Lee, J.H., Comparative genetics of Apodemus
agrarius (Rodentia: Mammalia) from insular and continental Eurasian populations: cytochrome b sequence
analyses, Acta Zool. Acad. Sci. Hung., 2014, vol. 60,
no. 1, pp. 73–84.
Kostenko, V.A., Gryzuny (Rodentia) Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii
(Rodents (Rodentia) of the Far East of Russian), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2000.
Kucheruk, V.V. and Karaseva, E.V., Synanthropic rodents,
in Sinantropiya gryzunov i ogranichenie ikh chislennosti
(Synanthropic Rodents and Limitation of Their Population), Sokolov, V.E. and Karasev, E.V., Eds., Moscow: Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1992, pp. 4–36.
Lee, H.W., Emergence and control of hantavirus disease, in
Khantavirusy i khantavirusnye infektsii (k 70-letiyu
izucheniya GLPS na Dal’nem Vostoke Rossii) (Hantaviruses and Hantavirus Infections: The 70th Anniversary
of the Study of Hemorrhagic Fever with Nephritic Syndrome in the Far East Russia), Vladivostok: Primpoligrafkombinat, 2003, pp. 20–42.
Liu, X., Wei, F., Li, M., Jiang, X., Feng, Z., and Hu, J.,
Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of wood mice
(genus Apodemus Kaup, 1829) based on complete
mtDNA cytochrome b sequences, with emphasis on
Chinese species, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2004, vol. 33,
no. 1, pp. 1–15.
Manchenko, G.P., Handbook of Detection of Enzymes on
Electrophoretic Gels, Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2003.
Neronov, V.M., Khlyap, L.A., Tupikova, N.V., and Warshavsky, A.A., Formation of rodent communities in
arable lands of the Northern Eurasia, Russ. J. Ecol.,
2001, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 326–333.
Oh, D.J., Kim, T.W., Chang, M.H., Han, S.H., Oh, H.S.,
and Kim, S.J., Mitochondrial genome sequences of the
striped field mice Apodemus agrarius coreae and Apodemus agrarius chejuensis, Mitochondr. DNA, 2011, vol. 22,
nos. 5–6, pp. 165–167.
Oh, D.J., Kim, T.W., Chang, M.H., Han, S.H., Oh, H.S.,
and Kim, S.J., Migration route estimation of the Jeju
striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius chejuensis
(Rodentia, Muridae), Mitochondr. DNA, 2013, vol. 24,
no. 2, pp. 137–144.
Pavlenko, M.V., Korablev, V.P., Kartavtseva, I.V., and Kardash, A.I., Changing of the range of field mouse Apodemus agrarius Pallas, 1771 (Rodentia, Muridae) in
Transbaikalia: new artifacts from the disjunction zones
and their genetic characteristics, in Mater. mezhd. konf.
“Prirodookhrannoe sotrudnichestvo Chitinskoi oblasti
(Rossiiskaya Federatsiya) i avtonomnogo raiona Vnutrennyaya Mongoliya (KNR) v transgranichnykh ekologicheskikh regionakh” (Proc. Int. Conf. “Environmental
Cooperation of the Chita Region (Russian Federation)
and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China
(PRC) in the Cross-Border Ecological Regions”), Chita:
Transbaikal. Gos. Pedagog. Univ., 2007, pp. 260–265.
Peacock, A.C., Bunting, S.L., and Queen, K.G., Serum
protein electrophoresis in acrylamide gel: patterns and
theory, Science, 1965, vol. 147, no. 3664, pp. 1451–1453.
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017
100
PEREVERZEVA et al.
Pereverzeva, V.V. and Pavlenko, M.V., Diversity of the
mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b gene of the field
mouse Apodemus agrarius Pallas, 1771 in the south of
the Russian Far East, Biol. Bull., 2014, vol. 41, no. 1,
pp. 1–11.
Pozvonochnye zhivotnye Severo-Vostoka Rossii (Vertebrates
of the North-East of Russia), Chereshnev, I.A., Ed.,
Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 1996.
Primak, A.A., New data on the origin of enclave of field
mouse in the village Talon, Magadan region, in Vseros.
nauch. konf. “Chteniya pamyati akad. K.V. Simakova”
(Magadan, 26–28 noyabrya 2013), Tezisy dokladov
(All-Russia Sci. Conf. “Readings in the Memory of
Acad. K.A. Simakov,” Magadan, November 26–28,
2013, Abstracts of Papers), Magadan, 2013, p. 162.
Primak, A.A., Dokuchaev, N.E., and Zasypkin, M.Yu.,
The first data on allozyme variability of field mice—a
recent invader in the Magadan Region, in Vseross. Sib.
zool. konf., posvyashchennaya 60-letiyu ISiEZh SO RAN,
15–22 sentyabrya 2004, Tezisy dokladov (All-Russia
Sib. Zool. Conf. to the 60th Anniversary of the Inst.
Syst. Ecol. Animal, Sib. Branch, Russ. Acad. Sci.,
Novosibirsk, September 15–22, 2004, Abstracts of
Papers), Novosibirsk, 2004, pp. 171–172.
Primak, A.A., Dokuchaev, N.E., and Zasypkin, M.Yu.,
Allozyme variability of field mouse (Apodemus agrarius
Pallas, 1771)—a recent invader in the Magadan region,
in Vseros. nauch. konf. “Nauka Severo-Vostoka Rossii –
nachalo veka,” posvyashchennoi pamyati akad. V.V. Simakova i v chest’ ego 70-letiya (Magadan, 26–28 aprelya 2005),
Tezisy dokladov (All-Russia Sci. Conf. “Science in the
North-East Russia – The Beginning of the Century” to
the 70th Anniversary of Acad. K.A. Simakov,
Magadan, April 26–28, 2005, Abstracts of Papers),
Magadan, 2005, pp. 339–340.
Primak, A.A. and Pereverzeva, V.V., Polymorphism of cytochrome b gene structure of a field mouse, Apodemus
agrarius Pallas, 1771, in the North Priokhot’e, in Vseros.
nauch. konf. “Chteniya pamyati akad. K.V. Simakova”
(Magadan, 24–25 noyabrya 2015) (All-Russia Sci. Conf.
“Readings in the Memory of Acad. K.A. Simakov,”
Magadan, November 24–25, 2015, Abstracts of Papers),
Magadan, 2015, pp. 160–161.
Priozernoe (Primorsky Krai). https://ru.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Priozernoe_(Primorskii_krai).
Reutter, B.A., Petit, E., Bruenner, H., and Voge, P., Cytochrome b haplotype divergences in West European Apodemus, Z. Saugetierkd., 2003, vol. 68, pp. 153–164.
Sakka, H., Quéré, J.P., Kartavtseva, I., Pavlenko, M., Chelomina, G., Atopkin, D., Bogdanov, A., and Michaux, J.,
Comparative phylogeography of four Apodemus species
(Mammalia: Rodentia) in the Asian Far East: evidence
of quaternary climatic changes in their genetic structure, Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 2010, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 797–
821.
Serizawa, K., Suzuki, H., and Tsuchiya, K., A phylogenetic
view on species radiation in Apodemus inferred from
variation of nuclear and mitochondrial genes, Biochem.
Genet., 2000, vol. 38, pp. 27–40.
Suzuki, H., Filippucci, M.G., Chelomina, G.N., Sato, J.J.,
Serizawa, K., and Nevo, E., A biogeographic view of
Apodemus in Asia and Europe inferred from nuclear and
mitochondrial gene sequences, Biochem. Genet., 2008,
vol. 46, pp. 329–346.
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A., and
Kumar, S., MEGA-6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2013, vol. 30,
no. 12, pp. 2725–2729.
The history and the current status of Khorolsk region, in
Territory of Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok: Primorye
State Public Library, 2007. http://old.pgpb.ru/cd/
terra/horol/horol_01.htm.
Tikhonova, G.N., Karaseva, E.V., and Bogomolov, P.L.,
The main changes of the range of field mouse in the
Soviet Union over the last 30–40 years, in Sinantropiya
gryzunov i ogranichenie ikh chislennosti (Synanthropic
Rodents and Limitation of Their Population), Moscow: Nauka, 1992, pp. 301–322.
Tikhonova, G.N., Tikhonov, I.A., Surov, A.V., Bogomolov, P.L., and Kotenkova, E.V., Ekologicheskie
aspekty formirovaniya fauny melkikh mlekopitayushchikh
urbanisticheskikh territorii srednei polosy Rossii (Environmental Aspects of the Formation of Small Mammals Fauna in Urban Territories of the Central Russia),
Moscow: KMK, 2012.
Tupikova, N.V., Khlyap, L.A., and Warshavsky, A.A., The
rodents of fields in the Northeastern Palearctic, Zool.
Zh., 2000, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 480–494.
Volkov, V.I., Chernykh, P.A., Dolgikh, A.M., and Yakovleva, T.V., Distribution and ecology of the main features of field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) in the Amur
region, Zool. Zh., 1979, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1202–1212.
Yudin, B.S., Krivosheev, V.G., and Belyaev, V.G., Melkie
mlekopitayushchie Severa Dal’nego Vostoka (Small
Mammals of the Northern Far East), Novosibirsk:
Nauka, 1976.
Zardoya, R. and Meyer, A., Phylogenetic performance of
mitochondrial protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1996,
vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 933–942.
Zasypkin, M.Yu., The camera for electrophoresis of proteins in polyacrylamide gel plates, Lab. Delo, 1983,
no. 3, pp. 58–59.
Zasypkin, M.Yu., Semi-automatic system for the transfer of
protein samples from centrifuge into electrophoretic
chamber, Lab. Delo, 1986, no. 2, pp. 117–118.
Zasypkin, M.Yu., Primak, A.A., Pavlenko, M.V., and
Dokuchaev, N.E., Genetic heterogeneity of the field
mouse (Apodemus agrarius Pallas, 1771) in the
Magadan region and the Southern Far East of Russia
according to study of allozyme variability, Vestn. Sev.Vost. Nauch. Tsentra, Dal’nevostochn. Otd., Ross. Akad.
Nauk, 2007, no. 2, pp. 49–55.
Zaykin, D.V. and Pudovkin, A.I., Two programs to estimate
significance of Chi-square values using pseudo-probability test, J. Heredity, 1993, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 152–155.
Zhivotovskii, L.A., Populyatsionnaya biometriya (Population Biometrics), Moscow: Nauka, 1991.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Translated by S. Semenova
Vol. 8
No. 1
2017