Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Examining Preschool Children’s Perceptions
of School
Oğuz Serdar Kesicioğlu
To cite this article:
Kesicioğlu, O. S. (2024). Examining Preschool Children’s Perceptions of School. Journal of Qualitative
Research in Education, 38, 24-58. DOI: 10.14689/enad.38.1844
Abstract
About the Article
The aim of this research is to examine the school perceptions of preschool
children. The study employed a qualitative case study design to explore
preschool children’s perceptions of school. The research involved 100
children aged 60-72 months from five different preschools during the fall
semester of the 2022–2023 academic year. Data was collected through
the ‘School Perception Interview Form’ and ‘School Picture Drawings’ to
explore the children’s perceptions. To analyze the collected data, the study
employed content analysis, a common method used in qualitative data
analysis. The content analysis process involved four stages: coding the
data, identifying themes, organizing codes and themes, and describing
and interpreting the findings. The study findings revealed that the children
perceived school as a place for learning new things and experiencing
happiness. Their favorite activity was art, and they enjoyed the school’s
garden area. They preferred Lego/blocks and puzzles the most. Overall,
they exhibited a positive attitude toward attending school, and their
drawings depicted school buildings. In light of all these findings, it is
recommended that the physical environments of preschool education
institutions be organised, and they should be better equipped by increasing
the variety of toys and materials.
Received: Aug. 01, 2024
Revised: Mar. 31, 2024
Accepted: Apr. 18, 2024
Article Type:
Research
Keywords: Preschool, school, perception, children
© 2024 ANI Publishing. All rights reserved.
Prof. Dr., Giresun University, Education Faculty, Turkiye
24
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Introduction
During the preschool period, children undergo rapid development in cognitive,
language, motor, social, and emotional domains, encompassing all areas of growth.
This stage holds great significance as it plays a critical role in acquiring values and
behaviors that form the basis of life (Köksal & Tükel, 2017; Selçuk & Yavuz, 2018;
Tunçeli & Zembat, 2017). The experiences children have during the preschool period
greatly contribute to shaping the individuals they become in the future. Children begin
to develop their perceptions of themselves and their surroundings, and these
experiences play a significant role in determining their future characteristics and
qualities. The preschool period is a time when children are particularly receptive to
external influences from their environment (Akyol, 2016; Aral & Kadan, 2018). Given
that children spend most of their time in school, it is important to focus on educational
environments.
The environment is one of the most important factors in ensuring the effectiveness of
the early childhood process, which supports the development of all areas of
individuals. When designing educational environments, it is necessary to create spaces
that allow children to move independently and interact with their peers, fostering their
problem-solving skills and desire for learning (Pedok, 2017; as cited in the study by
Gül, 2019). Educational environments also considerably influence children’s life
experiences (Nicholson, 2005). Therefore, when planning educational spaces,
considerations such as materials, flooring, lighting, ceiling height, shape, texture,
color, and size should be made to create a harmonious environment for children
(Maxwell, 2007; Sakarya, 2019). Research has revealed that the quality of the
educational environment affects children’s cognitive and social-emotional
development. It has a significant and long-lasting effect on children’s development and
impacts their behavior (Fontaine et al., 2006; Mashburn et al., 2008; Peisner-Feinberg
et al., 2001; Sakarya, 2019). Accordingly, all arrangements to be made in the
educational environment should be planned after considering the child’s psychology,
age group, health, safety, and comfort (Göregenli, 2013; Sakarya, 2019). However,
Güven’s (2006) research in Türkiye demonstrated that play and movement activities in
preschool education institutions were not effectively implemented owing to inadequate
implementation, materials, and the physical environment.
In this context, considering the role of schools in shaping children's behavioral and
developmental changes, it is unclear how these interactions shape individuals' school
perceptions. Schools, as educational institutions, play a vital role in educating today’s
society for the society of tomorrow (Heppell et al., 2004). Schools, serving as
educational and training environments, are expected to impact children’s behavior and
developmental changes. The physical environment of schools should contribute to the
development and learning of children (Baştepe, 2009; Güleş, 2013). Arnon et al.
(2018) emphasized that children learn in indoor and outdoor learning environments in
preschool education institutions. Studies comparing preschools across different
countries demonstrate that the utilization of spaces and materials is closely linked to
25
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
the pedagogical approach of educators and the relationship between children and
teachers (Cleghorn et al., 2008). In other words, how the child perceives the
educational environment, materials and communication with the teacher is very
important.
When considering the effects of educational environments on children, it is important
to develop an understanding of how these effects shape individuals' perceptions of
school. Perception is defined as a meaning-making process in which the stimuli
received from the external world through the sense organs are interpreted through
mental processes. Perception is a complex process that includes the current mental
state, past experiences, and expectations about the future (Bakan & Kefe, 2014).
School perception refers to individuals’ overall views, observations, feelings, and
thoughts about school. It is believed that attitudes toward school and the perception of
school serve as predictors for various behaviors exhibited toward school (Gülcemal,
2019; Özdemir & Kalaycı, 2013). Several factors can influence school perception, such
as the physical condition of the school, students’ feelings at school, rules applied at
school, socioeconomic status of children, and developmental level of the region where
the school is located (Toprakçı & Gülmez, 2018; Voight et al., 2015; Yüner &
Özdemir, 2017). Piaget stated that children cannot view the world as adults do (Wood,
2003). As different from adults, children’s perception of their environment is shaped by
their experiences, and their mental images of the environment develop as their
interactions with the space evolve. The environment provides sensory stimuli that
enable perception through the senses (Roth, 2002; Sakarya, 2019). Civek (2018)
documented that preschool children perceive school as a place of learning and hold
positive perceptions. They often envision their ideal school as being beautiful and
large. In children’s drawings, the school is depicted as a social environment where
social relations are established and developed. Some children perceive school as a
place that fulfils their needs for play and movement. Accordingly, the quality and
quantity of preschool education institutions impact children’s perceptions of school,
emphasizing the importance of a comprehensive organization both indoors and
outdoors. Children with positive school perception exhibit behaviors such as enjoying
school, actively participating in activities, having positive relationships with peers and
teachers, and indicating overall happiness. Children with negative school perceptions
tend to be unhappy, reluctant to attend school, and disinterested in activities (Özdemir
& Kalaycı, 2013). Andersson and Strander (2004) determined that a positive
perception of school is associated with a more optimistic outlook on the future, better
problem-solving skills, and the belief that conditions can be positively changed.
Aksoy and Baran (2010) concluded that the quality and quantity of preschool
environments, including the content and various dimensions, significantly influence
children’s perceptions. Consequently, it is crucial to equip preschool education
institutions with appropriate resources and environments. Studies have revealed that
preschool children’s perceptions of school can affect their academic achievement in
the following years (Katz & McClelland, 2016; Pekrun et al., 2009). Developing a
positive perception of school during the preschool years can contribute to increased
26
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
academic achievement and positively impact children’s lives (Denham et al., 2015;
Kostelnik et al., 2015). When the literature is examined, it is seen that there is no
research examining the school perceptions of preschool children in Turkey, except for
the thesis study conducted by Civek (2018). This situation shows that we do not have
enough data about the factors affecting children's perceptions of school and the
schools where they spend most of their time. This situation prevents the creation of
educational environments and the development of educational programmes by taking
into account children's perspectives on educational environments. In addition,
revealing children's school perceptions is important in terms of accelerating children's
school adaptation processes and their future academic lives. It is thought that the
research will make significant contributions to national and international literature.
Given these findings, it becomes imperative to examine the factors associated with
preschool children’s perceptions of school and provide recommendations to enhance
their perceptions. In light of this information, this study aims to examine preschool
children's perceptions of school. In order to achieve this aim, answers to the following
questions were sought.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
How do preschool children define the concept of school?
What are preschool children's reasons for attending school?
How do preschool children feel at school?
What are preschool children's favourite activities at school?
What school activities do preschool children dislike?
What are preschool children's favourite areas at school?
Which toys/materials do preschool children like the most at school?
What else would preschool children like to see in order to make the school a better
place?
9. Do preschool children prefer to attend school or stay at home?
10. How do preschool children portray the concept of school in their drawings?
Method
Research Model
The study employed a qualitative research method to explore preschool children’s
perceptions of school. Qualitative research aims to understand and interpret events
and phenomena in their natural environment, taking into account the holistic and
realistic aspects. Qualitative research is defined as ‘research in which qualitative data
collection methods such as observation, interview, and document analysis are used and
a qualitative process is followed to reveal perceptions and events in a realistic and
holistic manner in a natural environment’. The research process follows a qualitative
approach, which involves formulating a research question and seeking answers
through the collection and analysis of data (Creswell, 2007; Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2016).
In this research, the basic qualitative research design, one of the qualitative research
27
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
approaches, was used. The aim of basic qualitative research, which strives to reveal
the undiscovered "meanings" created by individuals, is to understand how people
understand their lives and experiences. In basic qualitative research, researchers focus
on the process and try to understand it (Merriam, 2013). In this study, the researcher
tried to understand children's school perceptions by focusing on their perceptions.
Study Group
In the study, conducted during the fall semester of the 2022–2023 academic year, 100
children aged 60-72 months, who were enrolled in five different preschools,
participated. The study group comprised 41 girls and 59 boys. Twelve children
participating in the study have been attending preschool education institutions for three
years, 82 children for two years and 6 children for the first time. All of the children
participating in the study attend public schools. All the children in the study group
exhibited normal development and did not have any special needs. The researchers
employed purposive sampling to form the study group (Patton, 2014), a method
commonly used in qualitative research. Purposive sampling allows for the selection of
participants based on specific criteria, aiming to include individuals who can provide
rich and informative insights on the research topic (Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2016). In this
sampling approach, the researchers identify important criteria for participant selection,
ensuring that the sample represents the target population with its diverse characteristics
(Tavşancıl & Aslan, 2001).
Data Collection Tools
To examine preschool children’s perceptions of school, the study utilized two different
data collection tools: the ‘School Perception Interview Form’ and the ‘School Picture
Drawings’.
School Perception Interview Form
A semi-structured interview form comprising nine questions developed by the
researcher was used as a data collection tool to reveal preschool children’s perceptions
of school. The researcher developed the form by creating a pool of questions and
selecting those that were relevant to the research objectives. The questions were
formulated based on existing literature on ranking principles and data sources (Patton,
2014; Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2016). The researcher ensured that the questions were openended, single-dimensional, non-directive, and easy for the participants to understand.
The interview form was reviewed for content and face validity by three faculty members
(one professor and two associate professors) with expertise and experience in early
childhood education. The pre-application of the questionnaire was conducted with ten
preschool children, and corrections were made to two questions that were unclear or
poorly worded.
28
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
School Picture Drawings
As part of the data collection process, children’s drawings were utilized as a tool to
capture preschool children’s perceptions of school. The children were provided with
crayons and white A4 paper, allowing them the freedom to express their perceptions
through drawings. They were given as much time as they needed to complete their
drawings without any time constraints.
Data Collection from Children’s Drawings
One of the major challenges in conducting studies with preschool children is their
potential reluctance to provide information to unfamiliar researchers and participate
actively in the research process. The study recognized the importance of engaging
preschool children in a fun and interesting manner to facilitate data collection and
establish trust between the children and the researcher. To achieve this, various
methods were employed, including having children draw pictures, take photographs,
and play games (Fargas-Malet et al., 2010; Punch, 2002). The study employed the
draw-and-tell technique to collect data on children’s perceptions of school. The drawand-tell technique involves children creating drawings and subsequently providing
explanations of their drawings. This technique serves as a diagnostic method that helps
researchers understand how children construct thoughts and concepts (McWhirter et al.,
2000; Shepardson, 2005). Prior to the implementation of the draw-and-tell technique,
the children in the sample were interviewed and engaged in a conversation about
school. Then, they were instructed to draw a picture by giving the instruction "Everyone
draw a school picture". They were provided with crayons and white A4 paper, allowing
them the freedom to draw their perception of a school. They were given ample time to
complete their drawings without any interference or guidance. After the drawings were
completed, each child was asked to describe their picture, and the researcher took
notes during these descriptions.
Collection of Interview Data
The data collection process in the study involved conducting individual interviews with
the children. These interviews were conducted in a designated area between the two
classrooms to ensure that the children’s responses were not influenced by each other.
Prior to the interviews, introductory questions such as What is your name? and Do you
have siblings? were asked to establish rapport and gather demographic information
(Creswell, 2007). During the interviews, the researcher used a voice recorder to record
the conversations. The interviews lasted between 30 and 40 minutes. Following the
interviews, the researcher transcribed the recorded audio into a Word document on the
computer.
Data Analysis
In the study, content analysis was employed as the method for analyzing the interview
records and children’s drawings, which is a commonly used approach in qualitative
29
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
data analysis. The content analysis was conducted in four stages: coding the data,
finding themes, organizing codes and themes, and defining and interpreting the
findings in the processing of qualitative research data obtained from documents
(Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2016). During the coding process, the researchers created codes
based on the purpose of the research. The open coding method was used to generate
the codes, and they were then tabulated and interpreted. Themes were developed by
categorizing the codes, either by utilizing pre-existing themes developed by others or
by creating a new theme system (Bilgin, 2006).
In the study, researchers analyzed the interviewees’ discourses separately in terms of
the determined themes and conducted an inter-coder reliability analysis. Aside from
the researcher, one associate professor, one assistant professor, and one associate
professor specializing in educational sciences participated as independent coders in
the analysis of interview data. The content of the children's drawings was listed in
detail. Themes related to similar qualities were created from the list. Afterwards, the
themes were coded. After this first analysis, a break was given for 15 days. At the end
of 15 days, the pictures were analysed again for the second time, lists were created
and coding was done. The results of the first and second analyses were compared and
the themes and codes were finalised. The inter-coder reliability percentage was
calculated at 95% using the inter-coder reliability formula (Miles & Huberman, 1994).
According to Kabapınar (2003), a consistency level of 80% or above is considered
reliable in research analyses. In research using descriptive analysis, including direct
quotations from the interviewees and drawing conclusions based on them are crucial
(Yıldırım & Şimşek, 2016). To ensure the transferability of the results obtained, the
researchers described the data in detail and supported their findings with direct
quotations from time to time. In the direct quotations, the real names of the
participants were kept confidential and the direct quotations were expressed as C1, C2,
etc. In the study, the researchers cited the sections they deemed important as
quotations.
The Researcher's Role
At the beginning of qualitative research studies, the position of the researcher and
possible biases that are thought to affect the study should be explained. In this context,
if the researchers have any tendency, assumption, past experience or prejudice about
the study, it is explained in this section (Creswell, 2016). The researcher has previously
conducted many studies in the field of preschool education, directed theses and
conducted many qualitative studies. In this study, all interviews with children were
conducted by the researcher. The researcher was involved in the reporting process of
the study by undertaking tasks such as content analysis, methodological structure,
transcription and literature review as well as interviews.
The task of the researchers in this qualitative study is to reveal the participants'
perceptions of the school and shed light on the problems and needs they experience.
The researchers' other task is to protect the participants' information and data
30
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
confidentiality. The protection of data confidentiality is one of the first priorities of this
study.
Findings
The study aimed to examine preschool children’s perceptions of school. The findings
obtained were categorized and presented in line with this purpose. In the analysis of
the data collected from the demographic information form, semi-structured interview
form, and children’s drawings, the researchers identified ten themes related to
preschool children’s views on the concept of school. One of the themes focuses on
preschool children’s views on defining the concept of school. Figure 1 presents
preschool children’s views on defining the concept of school.
Findings Related to Preschool Children’s Definitions of the Concept of School: Figure 1
presents the views of preschool children on the concept of school.
Figure 1. Preschool Children's Views on the Concept of Schoo
According to Figure 1, preschool children mostly defined school as A Place Where They
Go To Learn New Things (n:30), A Place Where They Go For Fun/Play (n:28), and A
Place Where They Do Activities (n:23). Figures 2 and 3 depict the pictures reflecting the
views of the children.
31
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 2. An example of a Picture Related to the Theme of a Place Where You Go to
Learn New Things (Age5) (C23)
Figure 2 presents a visual representation of the picture drawn by a child who defined
school as ‘a place to go to learn new things’ at the highest rate. The child’s drawing in
this figure may include a teacher figure and letter symbols.
Figure 3. An Example of a Picture from the Category of a Place to Go for Fun/Play (Age
5) (C35)
Figure 3 represents the picture drawn by a child who defined school as ‘a place where
children go for fun/play’ at the highest rate. In this picture, the child is depicted as
playing games with her friends.
Findings on Preschool Children’s Reasons for Attending School: Figure 4 presents the
views of preschool children on the reasons for attending school.
32
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 4. Preschool Children's Views on the Reasons for Coming to School
Figure 4 represents the reasons stated by preschool children for coming to school. The
highest rate of responses included To Learn New Things (n: 40), Because They Love It
(n: 13), and To Do Activities (n: 12). Figures 5 and 6 depict pictures reflecting the views
of the children.
Figure 5. An Example of a Picture in the Category ‘To Learn New Things’ (Age 6) (C38
In Figure 5, the child who defined the reason for coming to school as ‘to learn new
things’ drew letter symbols on and around the school building.
33
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 6. An Example of a Picture in the Category ‘Because I Have Friends’ (Age 5)
(C93)
In Figure 6, the child who defined the reason for coming to school as ‘Because I have
friends’ drew himself and his friends in front of the school building.
Findings on How Preschool Children Feel at School: Figure 7 presents the views of
preschool children on how they felt at school.
Figure 7. Preschool Children's Views on How They Feel at School
According to Figure 7, preschool children reported feeling happy at school at a very
high rate (n: 97), two children reported feeling unhappy, and one child reported
feeling angry. Figures 8 and 9 depict pictures reflecting the views of the children.
34
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 8. An Example of a Picture from the Happy Category (Age 6) (C10)
In Figure 8, the child who stated that he felt ‘happy’ at school drew himself inside the
school building and indicated that he was happy by drawing a heart symbol.
Figure 9 An Example Picture for the Unhappy Category (Age 6) (C36)
In Figure 9, the child who stated that he/she felt ‘unhappy’ at school drew
himself/herself inside the school building with a lonely and emotionless expression.
Findings on Preschool Children’s Favorite Activities at School: Figure 10 presents the
preschool children's views on their favorite activities at school.
35
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 10. Preschool Children's Opinions on Their Favorite Activities at School
In Figure 10, preschool children’s favorite activities at school included art activities (n:
55), play activities (n: 9), Turkish activities, and literacy preparation activities (n: 7).
Figure 11 depicts the picture reflecting the views of the children.
Figure 11. An Example of a Picture from the Art Activity Category (Age 5) (C42)
In Figure 11, the child who defined his/her favorite activity at school as ‘Art’ drew
herself with paints in her hands.
36
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Findings Related to the Activities that Preschool Children Dislike at School: Figure 12
presents the views of preschool children on the activities they disliked at school.
Figure 12. Preschool Children's Opinions on Activities They Dislike at School
In Figure 12, the activities that preschool children disliked at school were Art Activities
(n: 20) and Literacy Preparation Activities (n: 10) at the highest rate.
Findings on Preschool Children’s Favorite Areas at School: Figure 13 presents the
preschool children's views on their favorite areas at school.
37
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 13. Preschool Children's Opinions on the Areas They Like at School
According to Figure 13, preschool children’s favorite places at school were the Garden
(n: 30), the Dramatic Play Center (n: 23), and the Playground (n: 14). Figures 14 and
15 present pictures reflecting the views of the children.
38
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 14. An Example of a Picture from the Garden Category (Age 6) (C55)
In Figure 14, the child who expressed the area he liked most as the ‘Garden’ drew a
park area next to the school building in the picture.
Figure 15. An Example of a Picture from the Dramatic Play Center Category (Age 6)
(C14)
In Figure 15, the child who defined her favorite place at school as the ‘Dramatic Play
Center’ drew herself in the dramatic play center with her friends and a doll in her
hand.
39
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Findings on Preschool Children’s Favorite Toys/Materials at School: Figure 16 presents
preschool children's views on the toys/materials they liked the most at school.
Figure 16. Preschool Children's Opinions on the Toys/Materials They Most Enjoy at
School
In Figure 16, the toys/materials that preschool children most enjoyed playing with at
school were Lego/Blocks/Puzzles (n: 47), Play House Toys (n: 22), and Tools (n: 12).
Figures 17 and 18 demonstrate pictures reflecting the views of the children.
40
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 17. An Example of a Picture from the Lego/Blocks Category (Age 6) (C57)
According to Figure 17, the child who defined the toys/materials she liked to play with
the most at school as ‘Lego/Blocks/Puzzles’ made towers with blocks in the picture she
drew.
Figure 18. An Example of an Image from the Vehicles Category (Age 5) (C64)
In Figure 18, the child who defined the toys/materials he liked to play with at school
the most as ‘Vehicles’ drew cars in his drawing.
41
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Findings Regarding What Other Things Preschool Children Want to Make School A
Better Place: Figure 19 presents the opinions of preschool children on what else they
would like to see at school to make it more beautiful.
Figure 19. Preschool Children's Views on What Else They Would Like to See At School
In Figure 19, preschool children stated that the school would be more beautiful if there
were new toys (n: 32), fun areas (n: 20), and decorations (n: 15) the most. Figures 20
and 21 show pictures reflecting the views of the children.
42
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 20. An Example of a Picture from the Decorations Category (Age 5) (C71)
In Figure 20, the child who stated that the school would be more beautiful if there were
‘Decorations’ in the school decorated the roof of the school in the form of a rainbow.
Figure 21. An Example of a Picture from the Decorations Category (Age 5) (C44)
In Figure 21, the child who stated that the school would be more beautiful if there were
‘decorations’ in the school decorated the school with balloons.
Findings on Preschool Children’s Preferences for Attending School and Staying at
Home: Figure 22 presents the views of preschool children on their preferences for
coming to school and staying at home.
43
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 22. Preschool Children's Opinions on Their Preferences for Coming to School
and Staying at Home
Figure 22 shows that the number of preschool children who wanted to come to school
(n: 75) was higher than the number of children who wanted to stay at home (n: 25).
Figures 23 and 24 show pictures reflecting the views of the children.
44
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 23. An Example of a Picture from the Category ‘I Want to Come to School’ (Age
5) (C60)
In Figure 23, the child who said ‘I want to come to school’ drew a picture of a school
and decorated the surroundings of the school with pictures.
Figure 24. An Example of a Picture from the Category ‘I Want to Stay at Home’ (Age 5)
(C98)
In Figure 24, the child who said ‘I want to stay at home’ drew his teacher and himself
next to the school and his mother and brother next to the house.
Findings Related to Preschool Children’s Reflection of the Concept of School in Their
Drawings: Figure 25 presents an analysis of preschool children’s drawings of the
concept of school.
45
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Figure 25. The Distribution of the Objects Used in the Drawings of Preschool Children
Figure 25 shows that children mostly drew school buildings (n: 70), emotion symbols
(n: 41), humans (n: 27) and nature (n: 27). The category of School Buildings was the
most commonly observed (n: 70) in children's drawings. This suggests that children
spend most of their time at school, and this environment leaves a dominant impression
on them. Representations related to the category of School Park Area, Slide (n: 2),
reflect children’s interest in the outdoor spaces on school premises and show children’s
interest in playgrounds and elements such as slides in the school park area and the
significance of the time they spend in these areas.
In the Emotion Symbols category, Smiley Face (n: 30) was the most frequently drawn
emotion expression, suggesting that children prefer to express their positive emotions.
Further, the Heart (n: 10) symbol represented emotions such as love or contentment,
and the scarcity of the Unhappy Face (n: 1) in drawings indicated that children express
their negative emotions less.
Under the category of Human drawings, children drew Themselves (n: 15), Friends (n:
10) who are important in their social environment, Teachers (n: 2) and family
members (Mother/Father, n: 2). In the Nature category, the use of natural elements
such as the Sun (n: 10), Trees and Flowers (n: 8) and Clouds (n: 6) showed that
children are interested in nature and see these elements as a part of their daily lives.
Stars (n: 2) and Rainbows (n: 1) were drawn less frequently.
In the category of Inanimate Objects, Toys (n: 6) and less frequently Flags (n: 1) and
Balloons (n: 1) were drawn, showing children’s preferences during playtime. In the
Academic Symbols category, Numbers/Letters (n: 10) were represented, indicating the
importance of learning processes and school in children’s lives. Regarding the Use of
Colour in Drawings, the predominance of Coloured (n: 88) drawings and the scarcity
of Colourless (n: 2) drawings were noteworthy.
46
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Results and Discussion
Based on the results of the study, preschool children defined school as The Place
Where You Go to Learn New Things at the highest rate. Children exhibited this in their
drawings with the number/letter symbols they drew. The results suggested that children
perceived school as a place where new acquisitions are made and academic skills are
acquired. Civek (2018) observed that preschool children defined school as a Learning
Place at the highest rate. When the literature is examined, this result is in line with the
traditional perception in societies. According to the traditional view, school is
considered as a place of learning, not play (Samuelsson & Carlsson, 2008). Wildinger
& McIntrye (2011) stated that children think that preparation for primary school should
be done in the preschool period. It can be said that parents' wishes are also effective
on children's perceptions of school. Further, children perceived school as a Place to Go
for Fun/Play. In response to the question What else would you like to see that would
make the school beautiful?, the children stated that the school would be more beautiful
if there were more New Toys and Fun Areas. Yazıcı et al. (2018) stated that preschool
children believed that school was an ‘entertaining’ element and that children produced
metaphors such as ‘Playground’, ‘Park’, and ‘Fun’ under the category of ‘Fun’ related
to the concept of ‘school’. The reason for this can be that children learn by having fun
because the activities offered to children in the preschool period are play-based;
therefore, they view school as an entertaining element (MoNE, 2013; Yazıcı et al.,
2018).
According to the research findings, most preschool children felt happy at school and
preferred to go to school rather than stay at home.In the school drawings of the
children, the children expressed their positive perceptions of the school by using
positive emotion expressions such as Smiley Faces and Hearts. In the analysis of the
opinions of the children, they used expressions such as Happy, playing with my friends
entertains me, and Happy because I have fun. Therefore, it is important for children to
spend time and play games with their friends at school. Uusitalo-Malmivaara (2012)
stated that relationships with peers are an effective variable related to school
happiness (Uusitalo-Malmivaara, 2012). According to Koçyiit (2014), almost all
children stated that teachers should play games and/or that they would be happier if
they did. At the same time, the fact that preschool education environments are rich in
materials and that children can play with toys can also be considered as a reason why
children feel happy. Civek (2018) stated that in an environment with rich, pleasant,
and interesting play materials, children were extremely happy and developed positive
perceptions of the school environment. Aksoy and Baran (2010) examined children’s
perceptions of school through pictures and concluded that the content of the
environment and the quantity and quality of its different dimensions effectively
determined the child’s perception and that it was important to equip preschool
education institutions. The results of the research show that one child felt angry and two
children felt frustrated at school. When the opinions of the children are analysed, it is
seen that they used expressions such as "unhappy because they hit me all the time", "my
47
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
friends do not play with me". When these views of the children are analysed, it can be
said that negative relationships with their friends affect their perception of school.
Similarly, Uusitalo-Malmivaara (2012) and Nairn et al. (2011) stated that relationships
with peers affect school perception.
The research results further suggested that while most of the children preferred to come
to school instead of staying at home, some preferred to stay at home. Children who
wanted to stay at home stated that this was because they did not want to be separated
from their family members, such as I want to stay at home because I miss my mother, I
want to stay at home because I miss my sibling and because they wanted to play with
technological devices, such as I like home more because I watch TV, I can play on my
phone at home. When a child's enrolment in preschool coincides with the birth of a
sibling, if the birth of a sibling coincides with the start of preschool education, the child
may worry that their family no longer values or loves them as much as before. These
concerns can manifest as resistance or reluctance towards attending school (Özkaya,
2020; Solter, 2020; Yavuz, 2016). One can assume that these children have negative
perceptions toward school due to the reasons mentioned above. Özdemir and Kalaycı
(2013) stated that children with a negative school perception were unhappy, did not
want to come to school, and exhibited disinterested behaviors in activities.
The results of the research indicated that preschool children’s favorite activities at
school were Art Activities and Play Activities. Their least favorite activities were Art
Activities and Literacy Preparation Activities. The examination of the opinions of the
children revealed that their opinions regarding the reasons for not liking art activities
were as follows: I have difficulty in cutting, tearing, rolling because it is very difficult, I
do not like cutting with scissors, it is hard for me. Their opinions regarding the reasons
for not liking the Literacy Preparation Activities were as follows: I get bored making
magazines, line work takes too long, and my hands get tired. Based on these results,
one can understand that the fine motor development of the children was not at the
desired level and the activities being carried out were not suitable for their
developmental characteristics. Accordingly, children developed a negative attitude
toward the work done in these activities. An analysis of the literature revealed studies
showing that teachers lacked sufficient knowledge to support preschool children's
writing preparation skills (Fogo, 2008; Güleç, 2008). Children with inadequate
readiness in skills such as holding a pencil and cutting with scissors may experience
frustration and develop negative emotions, which may also affect their academic
success. For this reason, researchers have stated that practices that will improve
children’s attention and fine motor skills should be included more (Ericsson, 2008;
Grissmer et al., 2010; Vander Fels et al., 2015).
When the results are examined, it is noteworthy that Art Activity was among the
activities that children both liked and disliked. Teachers may have incorporated art
activities more frequently than other activities, which is why this condition exists.
According to Kesiciolu (2018), art activities were the activity that preschool teachers
included the most. Civek (2018) stated that the activities that children did at school
48
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
were mostly limited to activities such as games, art, and literacy preparation activities
and that other activities were not included much.
Another finding of the study indicated that preschool children's highest-rated favorite
places at school were the Garden and the Dramatic Play Center. Aksoy and Baran
(2010) concluded that the place where children felt the happiest in the school
environment was the section for playing at home. They stated that this situation was
caused by the fact that this section was mostly accessible and usable by children. In the
literature, similar studies have shown that the area that the children preferred the most
was the dramatic play center (Çandır, 2020; Özyürek & Kılınç, 2015; Yılmaz, 2019).
Çandır (2020) stated that the reason for this situation was that the dramatic play center
was rich in terms of materials and that the variety of activities was high. İsmailoğlu and
Yılmaz (2019) stated that all children enjoyed spending time in the garden. Çandır
(2020) observed that children preferred a structured playground consisting of
playground equipment such as slides, climbing areas, and large towers. However, an
analysis of the results of this study revealed that only two children drew pictures of the
school garden area. The reason for this situation can be the lack of space in the
garden area, the insufficiency, or the underutilization of school garden areas. Hinkley
et al. (2016) stated that children enjoyed spending time in the garden, but there were
not enough activities organized in these areas. Similarly, Çelik (2012) stated that the
open spaces in preschool education institutions were not used effectively and that the
gardens were not suitable for children to move freely. Karaküçük (2008) stated that the
gardens in preschool education institutions did not have sufficient features. Kuo and
Faber Taylor (2004) stated that children who spend time in nature are less stressed
and happier than those who do not spend time in nature. Similarly, Wells and Evans
(2003) and Lundy and Trawick Smith (2021) found that children who spend time in
nature have longer attention spans, higher creativity, and increased levels of the
happiness hormone. In a study conducted by Bjørgen and Svendsen (2015), it was
determined that as teachers included outdoor activities, teachers enjoyed garden
activities more and became better role models for children.
Recommendations
In light of all these findings, preschool education institutions should be better equipped
by increasing the variety of toys and materials. Researchers should investigate the
reasons why children do not want to go to school. In preschool education institutions,
teachers should include all activities based on children's developmental levels. They
should conduct appropriate activities for fine motor skills development. Promoting
children's perceptions of school can be achieved through various strategies, including
organizing school areas to meet children's mobility needs and maximizing the
utilization of school gardens. For preschools without a dedicated garden, it is
important to create alternative spaces that cater to children's needs. Additionally,
49
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
establishing social areas that encourage peer interaction can contribute to positive
perceptions of school among children.
This study's limitations include the fact that there were only 100 children in the study
group, and that the data collected only included the participants' drawings and
responses to the semi-structured interview questions. Although it is acknowledged that
the effects of uncontrollable variables on participant answers may be minimal, they
might nonetheless originate from the researcher, participants, and application
contexts.
References
Aksoy, P., & Baran, G. (2010, 11-13 November). 60-72-month-old children's perceptions of school
through drawing incelenmesi [Analysis of perceptions of 60-72 months children regarding school]
[Conference presentation]. The International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their
Implication, Antalya, Turkey.
Akyol, A. K. (2016). Aims and principles of pre-school education. In A. K. Akyol (Ed.), Preschool in
education programs (pp. 10–16). Target Publishing.
Andersson, B. E., & Strander, K. (2004). Perceptions of school and future adjustment to life: a
longitudinal study between the ages of 18 and 25. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,
48(5), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/003138042000272122
Aral, N., & Kadan, G. (2018). 2013 Values education in preschool education program in the context of
the
context.
Journal
of
Early
Childhood
Studies,
2(1),
113–131.
https://doi.org/10.24130/eccd-jecs.196720182159
Arnon, M., Sharir, T., Shoval, E., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). The effect of integrating movement into the
learning environment of kindergarten children on their academic achievements. Early Childhood
Education Journal, 46(3), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0870-x
Arslan K. S. (2008). Physical/spatial conditions in preschool education institutions review: Sivas Province
example. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Social Sciences, 32(2), 307–320.
Bakan, I., & Kefe, I. (2014). Perception and perception management from a corporate perspective.
Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Journal of Imam University Faculty of Economics and Administrative
Sciences, 2(1), 19–34.
Baştepe, I. (2009). Qualities of the educational process and environment dimensions of an effective
school. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(29), 76–83.
Bilgin, N. (2006). Content analysis in social sciences. Siyasal Publications.
Bjørgen, K., & Svendsen, B. (2015). Kindergarten practitioners’experience of promoting children’s
involvement in and enjoyment of physically active play: Does the contagion of physical energy
affect physically active play? Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(3), 257-271.
50
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Civek, I. (2018). School performance of 48–71-month-old children attending preschool education
institutions perceptions [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Abant Izzet Baysal University.
Cleghorn, A., Green, N., & Prochner, L., (2008). Space considerations: Materials in the learning
environment in three majority world preschool settings. International Journal of Early Years
Education, 16(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760802343857
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni.
Mesut Bütün & Selçuk Beşir Demir (Çev.). Siyasal Yayınevi.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Çandır, T. (2020). The educational environments of 48-66 month-old children attending pre-school
education spatial characteristics [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ege University.
Çelik, A. (2012). The use of open space in pre-school education institutions: Kocaeli example. Atatürk
University Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, 43(1), 79–88.
Denham, S. A., Bassett, H. H., Brown, C., Way, E., & Steed, J. (2015). “I know how you feel”:
Preschoolers’ emotion knowledge contributes to early school success. Journal of Early Childhood
Research, 13(3), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X1349
Ericsson, I. (2008). Motor skills, attention and academic achievements. An intervention study in school
years 1-3. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 301–313.
Fogo, L. J. (2008). Writing in preschool [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Purdue University.
Fontaine, N. S., Torre, L. D., Grafwallner, R., & Underhill, B. (2006). Increasing quality in early care and
learning environments. Early Child Development and Care, 176(2), 157–169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000302690
Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C. (2010). Research with children:
Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–
192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X09345412
Göregenli, M. (2013). Environmental psychology: Human-space relations. Istanbul Bilgi University
Publications.
Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., & Steel, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early
comprehension of the world: Two new school readiness indicators. Developmental
Psychology,46(5),1008–1017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020104
Gül, Ş. (2019). The role of teachers during interaction among children in early childhood [Unpublished
master’s thesis]. Başkent University.
Gülcemal, E. (2019). Attitudes towards school and perception of school on students' truancy behavior
[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University.
Güleç, G. (2008). Pre-school teachers' comments on literacy preparation activities views and practices
[Unpublished master's thesis]. Pamukkale University.
51
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Güleş, F. (2013). Determination of quality standards for physical environment in preschool education
[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Selcuk University.
Güven, G. (2006). Play and sports activities implemented in preschool education institutions in Kütahya
programs [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Dumlupinar University.
Heppell, S., Chapman, C., Millwood, R., Constable, M., & Furness, J. (2004). Building learning futures.
A research project at ultralab within the CABE/RIBA “Building Futures” programme. Accessed on
07.05.2023 from http://rubble.heppell.net/cabe/final_report.pdf
Hinkley, T., Salmon, J., Crawford, D., Okely, A. D., & Hesketh, K. D. (2016). Preschool and childcare
center characteristics associated with children’s physical activity during care hours: An
observational study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13(1), 117–
126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0444-0
İsmailoğlu, S., & Yılmaz, H., (2019). Classroom in pre-school education institutions: Children evaluation
through
your
eyes.
International
Journal
of
Social
Science,
74,
387–400,
http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7871
Kabapınar, F. (2003). A scale that can be used to measure misconceptions can be used to measure
knowledge- differences from the scale aiming to measure the level of comprehension. In Theory
and Practice Educational Administration, 35(35) 398–417.
Katz, L. G., & McClelland, M. M. (2016). Young children's schooling and child development. In R. M.
Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 4, pp. 187-243).
John Wiley & Sons.
Kesicioğlu, O.S. (2018, September 6-8). Analysis of educational activities of preschool teachers
[Conference presentation]. International Learning Teaching and Educational Research Congress
(ILTER 2018), Amasya, Turkey .
Koçyiğit, S. (2014). Preschool education from children's perspective. Pamukkale University Journal of the
Faculty of Education, 36(36), 203–2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.9779/PUJE707
Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., Whiren, A. P., & Rupiper, M. L. (2015). Developmentally appropriate
curriculum: Best practices in early childhood education (6th ed.). Pearson.
Köksal, O., & Tükel, A. (2017). Teachers' views on preschool values education evaluation.Ö. Demirel
and S. Dinçer (Eds.), Innovation in educational sciences and in search of quality (547–558).
Pegem Academy.
Kuo, F. E., & Faber Taylor, A. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attentiondeficit/hyperactivity
disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580-1586.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1580
Lundy, A. & Trawick-Smith, J. (2021). Effects of active outdoor play on preschool children’sontask
classroom
behavior.
Early
Childhood
Education
Journal,
49,
463–471.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01086-w
52
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Maxwell, L. E. (2007). Competency in child care settings. Environment and behavior, 39(2), 229–245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916506289976
Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., ... & Howes, C.
(2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of
academic,
language,
and
social
skills. Child
development, 79(3),
732–749.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2008.01154.x
Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber. Nobel Yayınları.
McWhirter, J. M., Collins, M., Bryant, I., Wetton, N. M., & Bishop, J. N. (2000). Evaluating ‘safe in the
sun’, a curriculum programme for primary schools. Health Education Research,15(2), 203–217.
https://doi.org/10.1093/her/15.2.203
MoNE (2013). Preschool education program. Ankara.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2th.ed.).
Sage.
Nairn, A., Duffy, B., Sweet, O., Swiecicka, J., & Pope, S. (2011). Children’s well-being in UK, Sweden
and Spain: The role of inequality and materialism. Ipsos MORI Social research insitute. UNICEF
UK.
Nicholson, E. (2005). The school building as the third teacher, children’s spaces. Elsevier Architectural
Press.
Özdemir, M., & Kalaycı, H. (2013). A study on school engagement and metaphorical school perception
review: The example of Çankırı Province. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(4),
2125–2137.
Özyürek, A., & Kılınç, N. (2015). Learning centers in preschool education institutions effect on children's
free play behaviors. Karabuk University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 5(5–2), 125–125.
https://doi.org/10,14230/joiss124
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a
model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 101(1), 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013383
Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., &
Yazejian, N. (2001). The relation of preschool child‐care quality to children's cognitive and social
developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72(5), 1534–1553.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00364
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. In M. Bütün and S. B. Demir
(Translation. Ed.). Pegem Academy.
Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood,
9(3),321–341. https://doi.org/10- .1177/0907568202009003005
Roth, L. M. (2002). The story of architecture. Kabalcı Publishing House.
53
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Sakarya, Ş. (2019). Spatial evaluation of preschool Montessori educational environments Bursa örneği
[Unpublished master’s thesis]. Uludag University.
Samuelsson, I.P. & Carlsson, M.A. (2008). The playing learning child: Towards a pedagogy of early
childhood.
Scandinavian
Journal
of
Educational
Research,
52(6),
623–641.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830802497265
Selçuk, A., & Yavuz, H. M. (2018). Overview of findings on early childhood development in Turkey.
Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 2(2), 334–363. https://doi.org/10.24130/eccdjecs.196720182271
Shepardson, D. P. (2005). Student’s ideas: What is an environment? Journal of Environmental Education,
36(4), 49–58.
Solter, A. J. (2020). Listen to your child (A. Cebeneyon Translation). Doğan Publishing.
Tavşancıl, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). Content analysis and application examples. Epsilon Publishing.
Toprakçı, E., & Gülmez, D. (2018). Students’ educational life from the parents' perspective (Memories a
qualitative analysis in context). Journal of Qualitative Research in Education Qualitative Research
in Education, 6(1), 253–275. https://doi.10.14689/issn.21482624.1.6c1s11m
Tortamis- Ozkaya, B. (2020). Child mental health. Nobel Publishing.
Tunçeli, H. İ., & Zembat, R. (2017). Evaluation of development in early childhood and its importance.
Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, 3, 1–12.
Uusitalo-Malmivaara, L. (2012). Global and school-related happiness in Finnish school children. Journal
of Happiness Studies, 13, 601-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9282-6
Vander Fels, I. M. J., Te Wierike, S. C. M., Hartman, E., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Smith, J., & Visscher, C.
(2015). The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4–16 year old typically
developing children: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18, 697–703.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.007
Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children.
Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311-330.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503035003001
Wildenger, L. K., & McIntyre, L. L. (2011). Family concerns and involvement during kindergarten
transition, Journal of Child & Family Studies, 20, 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-0109403-6
Voight, A., Hanson, T., O’Malley, M. & Adekanye, L. (2015). The racial school climate gap: Within‐
school disparities in students’ experiences of safety, support, and connectedness. American Journal
of Community Psychology, 56(3-4), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9751-x
Wood, D. (2003). Thinking and learning in children. Özünlü, M. (Translation Ed.). Doruk Publishing.
54
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Yazıcı, E., Çelik, M., Yıldırım, F. N., Altıntaş, E., & Günes, A. (2018). In the preschool period
children's metaphorical perceptions of the concept of school. Sakarya University Education
Faculty Journal, 35, 64–86.
Yavuz, S. (2016). Magic suggestions. Pedagogy Publications.
Yıldırım A., & Şimşek H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Exclusive Publishing.
Yüner, B., & Özdemir, M. (2017). The relationship between metaphorical school perception and dropout
tendency examining the relationship according to student views. Gazi University Faculty of
Education Journal, 37(3), 1041–1060.
55
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Genişletilmiş Türkçe Özet
Okul algısını okulun fiziki durumu, çocukların okulda kendilerini nasıl hissettiği, okulda
uygulanan kurallar, çocukların sosyoekonomik durumu, okulun bulunduğu bölgenin
gelişmişlik düzeyi gibi faktörler etkileyebilmektedir (Toprakçı & Gülmez, 2018; Voight,
Hanson, O’Malley & Adekanye, 2015; Yüner & Özdemir, 2017). Piaget, çocukların
dünyayı yetişkinlerin gördüğü gibi göremeyeceklerini belirtmiştir (Wood, 2003). Bu
nedenle çocukların okula ilişkin algıları da yetişkinlerden farklı olacaktır. Çocuk için
mekân doğrudan anlaşılmaz. Fakat yaşadıkları deneyimler aracılığıyla şekillenir.
Mekân ile etkileşim geliştikçe; mekânın zihinsel çerçevede oluşan görüntüleri de
gelişmektedir. Mekân sahip olduğu pek çok uyarıcı ile duyu organlarına bilgi aktarımı
sağlamaktadır. Olumlu okul algısı olan çocuklar okul öncesi dönemden itibaren okulu
sevme, etkinliklere katılma, arkadaşları ve öğretmeniyle iyi geçinme, mutlu birer birey
olma gibi davranışlar sergilerken, okul algısı olumsuz olan çocukların bu durumun tam
tersi olarak mutsuz oldukları, okula gelmek istemedikleri ve etkinliklere ilgisiz
davranışlar sergiledikleri gözlemlenmektedir (Özdemir & Kalaycı, 2013).
Okul öncesi dönem çocukların okul algılarının ortaya çıkarılması amacının
gerçekleştirilmesi için araştırmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır Nitel araştırma
"gözlem, görüşme ve doküman analizi gibi nitel veri toplama yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı,
algıların ve olayların doğal ortamda gerçekçi ve bütüncül bir biçimde ortaya
konmasına yönelik nitel bir sürecin izlendiği araştırma" türü olarak tanımlanmaktadır.
Bu araştırmada temel nitel araştırma modeli kullanılmıştır (Creswell, 2007; Yıldırım &
Şimşek, 2016). Araştırmaya 2022-2023 eğitim-öğretim yılı güz döneminde beş farklı
anaokulunda eğitim gören 60-72 ay olmak üzere toplamda 100 çocuk katılmıştır.
Çalışma grubundaki çocukların 41’i kız, 59’u erkek çocuktan oluşmaktadır. Çalışma
grubunda yer alan çocukların tamamı normal gelişim gösteren ve özel bir gereksinimi
bulunmayan çocuklardır. Çalışma grubunun oluşturulmasında amaçlı örnekleme
kullanılmıştır (Patton, 2014). Okul öncesi dönem çocukların okul algılarının incelenmesi
amacıyla “Okul Algısı Görüşme Formu” ve “Okul Resimlerinin Çizimi” olmak üzere iki
farklı veri toplama aracı kullanılmıştır. Okul öncesi dönemde çocuklarla yapılan
çalışmaların en büyük zorluklarından biri çocukların tanımadıkları bir araştırmacıya
bilgi vermek istememesi ve araştırmaya katılmak istememesi olabilmektedir. Çocuklara
resim çizdirme, fotoğraf çekme ve oyun oynama vb. yöntemler; yapılandırılmamış
süreçlerle çocukların daha eğlenceli ve ilginç zaman geçirmesini sağlayacak ve
çocukların araştırmacıya olan güvenini artırarak veri toplamasını kolaylaştıracaktır
(Punch, 2002; Fargas-Malet, McSherry, Larkin & Robinson, 2010). Bu nedenle
araştırmada çocukların okul algılarına ilişkin verileri toplamak için çiz ve anlat tekniği
kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada ikinci olarak veriler görüşme tekniği kullanılarak elde
edilmiştir. Çocuklarla yapılan görüşmeler iki sınıf arasında bulunan alanda çocuklarla
tek tek yapılmıştır. Bu sayede çocukların birbirinin cevaplarından etkilenmeleri
engellenmiştir. Her bir görüşme öncesi öncelikle, çocuklara daha rahat iletişim
kurabilmeleri için ve demografik bilgilerini de ortaya çıkaran “Adın nedir?, Kardeşin
var mı?” gibi ısındırma soruları sorulmuştur (Creswell, 2007). Görüşmeler ses kayıt
56
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
cihazı ile kayıt altına alınmıştır. Her bir görüşme 30-40 dakika arası sürmüştür. Daha
sonra alınan ses kayıtları araştırmacı tarafından bilgisayar ortamında word belgesi
olarak hazırlanmıştır. Görüşme kayıtlarının ve çocukların resimlerinin değerlendirilmesi
sürecinde, elde edilen verilerin daha ayrıntılı bir şekilde irdelenmesi amacıyla, nitel veri
analizinde kullanılan yöntemlerden biri olan “içerik analizi” kullanılmıştır.
Araştırma sonucunda çocukların okulu yeni şeyler öğrenilen yer olarak tanımladıkları,
okulda kendilerini mutlu hissettikleri, en sevdikleri etkinliğin sanat etkinliği olduğu,
okulda en sevdikleri alanın bahçe alanı olduğu, en çok lego/blok ve yapbozları tercih
ettikleri, okula gelmeyi tercih ettikleri ve resimlerinde en çok okul binası çizdikleri
görülmektedir. Tüm bu bulgular ışığında okulöncesi eğitim kurumlarında oyuncak ve
materyal çeşitliliğinin artırılarak daha donanımlı hale getirilmesi, okula gelmek
istemeyen çocukların okula gelmeme nedenlerinin araştırılarak özellikle ebeveynlere
kardeş kıskançlığı üzerine eğitimler verilmesi, okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında
öğretmenlerin etkinlikler arasında denge sağlayarak bütün etkinliklere dengeli bir
şekilde yer verilmesi, öğretmenlerin çocukların gelişim düzeylerini çok iyi saptaması ve
yapılan etkinliklerde çocukların gelişim düzeylerine, özellikle küçük kas gelişimlerine,
uygun etkinlikler yapılması, okullarda çocukların hareket ihtiyaçlarını sağlayacak
alanlar düzenlenmesi ve özellikle okul bahçelerinin etkili olarak kullanılması, okul
bahçesi bulunmayan anaokullarında çocuklara uygun alanlar ve çocukların
akranlarıyla zaman geçirebilecekleri sosyal alanlar oluşturulmasının çocukların okula
ilişkin algılarını olumlu yönde artırabileceği düşünülmektedir.
57
Journal of Qualitative Research in Education
Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi
Ethics Committee Approval: The ethics committee approval for this study/reserach was
obtained from Giresun University (Number: E-50288587-050.01.04-159906).
Informed Consent: Informed consent was obtained from the 100 of participants.
Peer Review: This study was peer-reviewed
Authors' Contribution: 1st author: %100
Conflict of Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Financial Disclosure: No Funding
Author
Contact
Oğuz Serdar KESİCİOĞLU
Giresun University, Education Faculty, Türkiye
58