Setting the scene
As a guest to a hotel you would have
seen this notice –“save our planet”and sometimes might have not taken it seriously. However, it is a sign
that a hotel requires your (guest’s)
support in preserving water, energy
and environment. Unlike any industry the support of a guest is indispensable in a hotel to successfully
implement any initiative aimed at
preserving environment. Preserving
environment in tourism industry is
getting increasingly import due to
various reasons including, but not
limited to, growing green consciousness of tourists, mounting media
coverage of environmental impacts
created by tourism industry and development of new concepts such as
eco tourism and responsible travel.
This is further compounded when
the tourism industry is planned to
attract 2.5 million tourists annually
and USD 3 billion as foreign direct
investment to the country, by the
year 2016 while providing 500,000
employment opportunities. With
this impressive growth prediction
of tourism, the environmental management is getting popular and
important in hotels not only in Sri
Lanka but around the globe. However, the objective of this article is
not to look at various environmental
management strategies in the hotel
sector but to identify the accounting
that supports those strategies. In order to support various environmen-
49
tal management strategies a body of
accounting practices has emerged/
developed as Environmental Management Accounting (EMA). The
primary objective of EMA is to act as
an interface between internal reporting oriented management accounting and environmental management
strategies. Thus, it is a supporting
tool that facilitates environmental
strategies of an organization.
Demystifying Environmental
Management Accounting
According to United Nations division of Sustainable Development
(UNDSD) (2001) EMA is broadly defined to be the identification,
collection, analysis and use of two
types of information for internal
decision making, physical information, on the use, flows and destinies of energy, water and materials
(including wastes) and monetary
information on environment-related costs, earnings and savings. It
is obvious that EMA can take place
in physical measures and monetary
values. The physical side of EMA
can take place in kilograms, litres,
50
When a hotel purchases
a solar panel system
the financial viability
is usually assessed.
It is a good example
of how EMA takes
place.
Usually
a
hotel calculates the
electricity cost saved
due to the installation
of these solar panels.
These electricity cost
savings in units is the
PEMA. When these
units are valued at
the existing electricity
tariff the total cost
savings
can
be
identified and it is the
MEMA.
cubic metres, joules, etc and it is
called as physical environmental
management accounting (PEMA).
Impacts of corporate activities on
environmental systems are reflected
in PEMA. These impacts are created through the use of water, energy,
materials and generation of waste
and emissions. The physical information mentioned herein is, therefore, the key to the development of
many environment-related costs.
The monetary aspect of EMA, mostly, takes place when a financial value
is assigned for the PEMA. It is then
called as monetary environmental
management accounting (MEMA).
MEMA can also be created without
any relation to physical information
and license fee, environmental fines
In the previous
solar panel system
installation situation,
when the payback
period for the system
is calculated it is ad
hoc future oriented
long term MEMA
information. On
a daily basis the
kilowatts of electricity
saved is calculated
to include into the
green book for
internal management
reporting, it is routine,
present/past oriented
physical information.
are some examples. Thus, it is clear
that impacts of corporate activities
on economic systems are reflected
through MEMA. MEMA and PEMA
information can be further emphasized in three dimensions:
anced scorecard, environmental impact assessment, capital budgeting,
etc. Due to the innovative nature of
EMA, many practices are developed
or existing practices are adopted
day-by-day.
¾ Time frame - the period being addressed by different tools (past,
current or future);
Benefits of Environmental
Management Accounting
¾ Length of time frame - the duration of the period being addressed
by the tool (tools addressing the
short term vs long term); and
¾ Routineness of information - ad
hoc vs routine gathering of information.
EMA has been suggested as an innovative managerial technology.
However, it is not merely an environmental management tool among
many but is a broad set of principles
and approaches that provides the
information for the successful implementation of many other environmental strategies. EMA includes
a wide array of accounting practices
such as accounting for material, energy and water, material flow cost
accounting, life cycle analysis, activity based costing, sustainability bal-
The adoption of EMA practices and
tools offers numerous benefits. They
can be categorized under three broad
headings. It should also be noted
that these benefits are overlapping
as it is difficult to clearly demarcate
the boundaries of the benefits of
EMA.
Ensuring compliance
EMA will ensure that an organization complies with environmental
regulations and self imposed environmental policies.
Supporting eco-efficiency
EMA supports the efficient use of
water, material, energy while reducing the environmentally harmful
impacts such as waste, emissions,
pollutants, etc. This improves the
A hotel may install a
waste water treatment
plant mainly to comply
with the environmental
law.
However,
the
treated
water
is
used for gardening
purposes which derives
economic
benefits.
Further, the hotel can
use this as a marketing
tool to generate a
favorable public image
as a green hotel mainly
in the eyes of guests.
efficiency at which the resources are
used resulting in cost savings. This
advantage has been further highlighted as the business case of EMA.
Gaining competitive position
EMA will enable an organization to
establish and strengthen its position
as a green organization through cost
effective and environmentally sensitive programmes.
Challenges to Environmental
Management Accounting
There are many challenges that will
deter the aforementioned benefits of
EMA. Among them the main challenge comes from the conventional
management accounting practices.
Non-collection of environmentally
related costs, treatment of environmental costs as general overheads,
and ignorance of environmental
costs in accounting are some of the
issues inherent in conventional
management accounting. Further,
underdeveloped
communications
links between the accounting and
other functions can act as a barrier
for better adoption of EMA. This is
51
mainly due to the fact that many of
the environmental related information is usually collected outside the
accounting department. For example, the use of gas is collected by the
kitchen staff and the use of water is
collected by the engineer in a typical
Sri Lankan hotel. But the insufficient
or lack of communication between
the accounting and the departments
that collect the information can hinder the application of EMA. Furthermore, in the Sri Lankan context the
lack of knowledge on the subject, i.e.
EMA, can be regarded as another
barrier.
The way forward
In order to derive the benefits of
EMA while overcoming the challenges, a carefully designed programme
for EMA is needed. The programme
will be dependant/contingent on
many external and internal factors
such as the market of the product/
service, intensity of regulations, nature of the operations, organizational structure, history and ownership,
nature of the environmental challenges faced, availability of resources, etc. A common broad framework
for the successful adoption of EMA
can be presented as follows (refer
Figure 1).
52
As mentioned previously, the environmental management strategies
pursued by an organization should
be well supported through EMA
practices. In essence, EMA and environmental management strategies
should be well interwoven. The integration of EMA with environmental management strategies should
take place on a daily basis. In other
words, it has to be a part of day-today decision making process of an
organisation. As given in Figure 2,
these EMA and environmental management practices should be well
supported by the various stakeholders of the organization such as management, employees, customers,
suppliers, regulators and even public/community. Without the support
of the stakeholders on a continuous
basis, the sustenance of these practices can’t be guaranteed. When
EMA and environmental management practices are well integrated
with the support of various stakeholders the benefit can be derived in
terms of compliance, eco-efficiency
and strategic position as mentioned
previously. Thus, an organization
should devise its own clear strategy
based on its contextual factors for
the successful adoption of EMA.
References
Burritt, R., Hahn, T. & Schaltegger,
S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive
framework for environmental management accounting: links between business
actors and environmental management
accounting tools. Australian Accounting
Review, 12, 2, 39–50.
Ministry of Economic Development
(MEDSL). (2011). Tourism Development
Strategy 2011 – 2016, MEDSL, Sri Lanka.
United Nations Division for Sustainable
Development (UNDSD). (2001). Environmental Management Accounting,
Procedures and Principles, New York
and Geneva: United Nations Publications.