Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 107 (2011) 202–205
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jip
Detection of single and mixed covert baculovirus infections in eastern spruce
budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana populations
Elizabeth M. Kemp a,b, David T. Woodward a,c, Jenny S. Cory a,b,d,⇑
a
Great Lakes Forestry Centre, 1219 Queen St. E., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
Algoma University, 1520 Queen St. E., Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, Canada
c
University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
d
Department of Biological Sciences, 8888 University Drive, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 31 January 2011
Accepted 9 May 2011
Available online 15 May 2011
Keywords:
Sublethal infection
Multiplex PCR
Mixed infections
Pathogen ecology
Vertical transmission
a b s t r a c t
We surveyed for covert baculovirus infections in the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana
(Clemens) and compared the prevalence of virus detected in a laboratory and a field population. DNA was
extracted from budworm adults and then PCR with degenerate primers was used to identify individuals
carrying baculovirus DNA. Multiplex PCR was then applied to the positive samples to distinguish between
the multiple baculovirus types that could potentially be found in C. fumiferana populations. Covert infections were found in both the laboratory and the field population of C. fumiferana, although the frequency
of infection and the composition of viruses found were very different. Overall 28% of insects from the laboratory population were positive for baculovirus DNA. Individual adults supported both single and mixed
covert infections with CfMNPV plus CfDEFNPV, CfDEFNPV plus a GV and mixtures of all three viruses
together. However, the majority of insects supported single virus infections, and surprisingly this virus
was CfDEFNPV, a virus that is reported not to have per os activity in C. fumiferana larvae. Insects from field
populations showed a very different pattern; 70.5% of individuals were baculovirus positive and all of
these were positive for CfDEFNPV only.
Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Baculoviruses are important natural enemies of many lepidopteran and hymenopteran species and several have been developed
as biological control agents of a range of pests in agriculture and
forestry. They are known to be able to persist in the environment
for long periods of time as occlusion bodies (OBs), if protected from
ultra violet irradiation, allowing transmission within and between
generations (Cory and Myers, 2003). In addition to this environmental reservoir, baculoviruses have also been shown to persist
in insect populations as covert or persistent infections which can
be passed vertically from parent to offspring (Hughes et al.,
1997; Burden et al., 2002, 2003; Vilaplana et al., 2010), although
the mechanism by which the virus remains as a persistent infection and its role in virus population dynamics are unknown.
Pre-existing covert infections have the potential to greatly influence the outcome of introduced baculovirus infections; for example,
covertly infected individuals can revert to productive infections
when challenged with heterologous viruses (Hughes et al., 1993;
Cooper et al., 2003). Covert baculovirus infections also have the po⇑ Corresponding author at: Department of Biological Sciences, 8888 University
Drive, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
E-mail address: jsc21@sfu.ca (J.S. Cory).
0022-2011/$ - see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jip.2011.05.015
tential, theoretically, to alter host population dynamics (e.g. Bonsall
et al., 2005). Thus, it is possible that the background levels of covert
infection in a population could be an important factor in understanding insect–baculovirus dynamics in natural populations and
could also influence the outcome of microbial pest control programs.
Additionally, if the frequency, or type, of covert infections in laboratory stocks differ from those found in the field, laboratory-based efficacy testing may not accurately predict the outcome of planned
control strategies. To this end, we have undertaken a survey of existing covert infections of baculoviruses in both laboratory-reared and
field-collected populations of eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana, an economically important forest pest that exhibits
cyclical population dynamics, with devastating outbreaks occurring
on average every 35 years (Royama et al., 2005).
Several baculoviruses have been isolated from C. fumiferana,
including a nucleopolyhedrovirus (CfMNPV) (de Jong et al., 2005)
and a granulovirus (Bah et al., 1999; Lucarotti et al., 2004). A third
baculovirus has also been isolated from C. fumiferana and designated CfDEFNPV because it is unable to infect per os, although it
is infective by injection into the haemocoel (Lauzon et al., 2005).
CfDEFNPV appears to be a distinct species, and is more related to
other Group I baculoviruses, such as Anticarsia gemmatalis NPV,
than it is to CfMNPV (Lauzon et al., 2005). When introduced in
the presence of CfMNPV, CfDEFNPV is able to infect and replicate,
203
E.M. Kemp et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 107 (2011) 202–205
which has led to the relationship being described as ‘symbiont-like’
(Lauzon et al., 2005). Other viruses have also been identified in
C. fumiferana, including a cypovirus (Echeverry et al., 1997) and
an entomopoxvirus (Bird, 1976). None of these viruses appears to
be common as overt infections in field populations of C. fumiferana
(Lucarotti et al., 2004), although the authors used DNA dot blot
hybridization to detect CfMNPV and C. fumiferana GV and this technique is unlikely to be sensitive enough to detect sublethal infections, and it is not clear whether these probes would have
detected CfDEFNPV.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Insects
Second instar larvae were collected from laboratory stocks of
diapausing C. fumiferana reared by Insect Production Services at
the Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Larvae were reared on artificial diet at 23 °C, 60% relative humidity
and a 16 h:8 h light/dark cycle and kept until they emerged as
adults. C. fumiferana pupae, plus a few late instar larvae, were also
collected arbitrarily from white spruce (Picea glauca ((Moench)
Voss) trees in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario (N46° 330 , W84° 160 ) in late
June, and kept in the laboratory until they emerged as adults. One
hundred and five insects were examined from both laboratory and
field populations.
may amplify other GVs present, so the results for these primers are
referred to as granulovirus rather than specifically Choristoneura
spp. GV. The orfs selected for multiplex PCR were also chosen to be
located at a distance from the lef-8 orf to decrease the probability
that we were amplifying short stretches of the virus genome which
may be inserted into the host genome, or were not part of full-length
virus genomic DNA. The orfs chosen were: CfMNPV lef-8 (orf 48) and
orf 90; CfDEFNPV lef-8 (orf 47) and orf 142; and ChocGV
lef-8 (orf 107) and gran (orf 1). All templates were then amplified
with the following multiplex primer set: Mpx1-Cf90F ATGGACA
CATCATTTTGTCGCCGGAA, Mpx1-Cf90R, TACTATTCGTCGCAATA
GAAGTGGCA to amplify orf 90 from CfMNPV, Mpx1-DEF142F, CAGTCAACATGAATCAAAACGCGGTA, Mpx1-DEF142R GTACCGGAA
AACGGTCGCTCAACGAC to amplify orf 142 from CfDEFNPV and
Mpx1-granF,
CACCTAAAAGCTTAGGTTCTGTGC,
Mpx1-granR,
TCTTGGACAAGTTGATGCGTTCCA to amplify gran from GVs. PCR
conditions were as follows: 1 PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 300 lM
dNTPs, 8 mM MgCl2, 80 lM BSA, 0.2 lM each primer, 2 U Taq polymerase (Invitrogen) in a 25 ll reaction volume. The reaction was
amplified by an initial denaturation step of 95 °C for 5 min, followed
by 35 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, 2 min at 72 °C and a final
extension of 10 min at 72 °C. This multiplex primer set produced
easily distinguishable products for CfDEFNPV (239 bp), CfMNPV
(667 bp) and granulovirus (464 bp). PCR data were compared using
Pearson’s v2.
4. Results and discussion
DNA was extracted from apparently healthy C. fumiferana adults
using a Qiagen DNeasy mini kit. The samples were screened in two
stages using PCR; first, degenerate primers were used to detect
any baculovirus in the adults, and second, samples positive for the
first screen were then probed with multiplex primers that were
specific for each of the three baculoviruses that had been found
previously in C. fumiferana. As little sequence information was
available for C. fumiferana GV and no DNA was available, C. occidentalis GV (ChocGV) sequence data was used to design primers (Escasa
et al., 2006). PCR was first carried out with Invitrogen recombinant
Taq polymerase using the following degenerate primers: prL8-1
TTYTTYCAYGGNGARATGAC and prL8-2 CAYRTANGGRTCYTCNGC
that were adapted from Lange et al., (2004) to amplify a region of
the lef-8 orf which is conserved between all known baculoviruses,
that resulted in a 756 bp product for CfMNPV. The high degree of
degeneracy of the outer primer set could lead to reduced sensitivity
and specificity relative to PCR with specific primers, so a nested
degenerate primer pair was designed to overcome this problem. A
sample of the product from the first reaction (1 ll) was used as a
template for the following nested primers: lef-8intDF GCNTTYAA
NRAYMGDCCNAC and lef-8intDR ACNKCACHANHGTCCACA. The
nested primers resulted in a product of 545 bp for CfMNPV. Amplification was carried out with Invitrogen recombinant Taq polymerase
according to the manufacturer’s recommendations with cycling
conditions of an initial denaturation step of 95 °C for 5 min, followed
by 25 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, 1 min at 72 °C and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel.
Compatible multiplex primers were designed using FastPCR
Professional experimental test version 5.0.45 according the
recommendations in Heregariu et al., (1997). The open reading
frames for CfMNPV and CfDEFNPV multiplex PCR were selected
carefully to ensure selective amplification of the correct isolate in
the presence of the other viruses, based on lack of significant sequence homology in the published genome sequences. The primers
for the GV were designed not to amplify CfMNPV and CfDEFNPV but
Baculovirus DNA was detected in both the laboratory-reared
and field-collected C. fumiferana adults. In the first stage of PCR
testing, the degenerate lef-8 primers identified 29 laboratoryreared adults carrying baculoviral DNA, and 74 positive individuals
from the field-collected samples. The prevalence of covert infections in the laboratory stock (28%) was considerably lower than
that found in the wild population tested (70.5%) (Pearson’s
v2 = 38.58, df = 1, P < 0.0001). Individuals were divided by sex,
however, for a small number of field-collected samples we were
not able to visually identify the sex due to damage to the bodies
collected, these are labeled as ‘unknown’ in the figure (Fig. 1).
There was no difference between the sexes in the proportion of
individuals that were positive for baculovirus DNA (Pearson’s
v2 = 0.43, df = 1, P > 0.05).
% of individuals positive for viral DNA
3. PCR testing of adult C. fumiferana
80
n = 46
n = 46
Field collected
70
Laboratory-reared
60
50
n = 13
40
n = 59
30
n = 46
20
10
0
Male
Female
Unknown
Sex of individuals
Fig. 1. Percentage of C. fumiferana adults positive for baculovirus DNA in fieldcollected and laboratory-reared populations. PCR was carried out using degenerate
primers designed to amplify lef-8 sequences from baculoviruses. A number of the
field-collected insects were not intact and it was not possible to visually identify the
sex of these samples (listed as unknown). Numbers of individuals tested for each
population is shown above each bar.
204
E.M. Kemp et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 107 (2011) 202–205
% of individuals testing positive
for virus combination
All positive individuals were retested using the multiplex primer set to identify the viruses present and in which combinations.
Field-collected individuals were found to carry only CfDEFNPV,
whilst a small number of laboratory-reared individuals were found
with mixed virus types, although the majority of individuals also
carried CfDEFNPV alone. Of the 29 adults from the laboratory colony positive for baculovirus DNA, multiplex PCR identified that all
of these contained CfDEFNPV, and five of these individuals were
positive for multiple virus types (Fig. 2). One individual tested
positive for lef-8 DNA but no product was found with any of the
multiplex primers, introducing the possibility of an additional baculovirus isolate being present. It is possible that the first result was
a false positive, although the negative controls (water controls for
extraction and PCR) for all PCR reactions were negative and all
other samples tested resulted in amplicons of the expected sizes
with the multiplex primer set following a positive result with the
lef-8 primers. Insect-based negative controls in the assay were
not feasible as there is no way to guarantee that an insect is free
of virus, other than by using PCR, which will always be limited
by having a lower sensitivity threshold. However, the large number
of insects that were negative in the assay and predictability of the
amplicon sizes lead us to believe that false positives were not an
issue. The discovery of CfDEFNPV in apparently healthy laboratory
cultures may explain the occasional contamination of CfMNPV
occlusion bodies amplified in C. fumiferana with CfDEFNPV as observed by genomic DNA extraction and restriction profiling
(E. Kemp, unpubl. data). One potential issue with multiplex PCR
is that the smallest PCR product is likely to be amplified with the
greatest efficiency, which in this case is CfDEFNPV. This could
potentially lead to overestimation of CfDEFNPV relative to other
baculovirus types; however, CfMNPV primers were actually more
sensitive, and able to consistently detect 1 pg DNA per reaction,
whereas the CfDEFNPV primers were only able to consistently detect 10 pg per reaction (with only the expected template present)
(data not shown). Therefore we do not think that this is likely to
be a significant issue.
It is interesting that the structure of the covert virus community
found in the wild C. fumiferana population differs from that of the
laboratory-reared population. In the field-collected samples only a
single virus isolate, CfDEFNPV, was identified, whereas the laboratory-reared population contained at least three distinct viruses,
CfMNPV, CfDEFNPV and a GV. The wild populations tested were
collected from several trees in a single location, which may explain
the conservation of the CfDEFNPV infection across most of the individuals tested. More samples from a wider geographical range
CfDEFNPV+CfMNPV+GV
35
CfDEFNPV + GV
30
CfMNPV + CfDEFNPV
25
CfDEFNPV only
20
15
10
5
0
Male
Female
would need to be tested to see if this is a general feature of
C. fumiferana populations, although its presence is intriguing. The
presence of multiple virus isolates in different combinations in
the laboratory culture may suggest that these covert infections
could have been initiated on more than one occasion following
exposure to single or multiple virus isolates. The laboratory culture
is occasionally supplemented from field populations so it is possible that individuals with different covert infections could have
been introduced over time.
It has been demonstrated that individuals that have survived
challenge with a baculovirus as a larva can develop a covert infection in the next generation (Burden et al., 2002; Cabodevilla et al.,
2011). However, it is not known how long covert infections
induced in this manner can persist. CfMNPV and Choristoneura
spp. GVs are known to be infectious to C. fumiferana, whereas
CfDEFNPV alone does not result in overt infections when introduced per os (Li et al., 1999; Woodward and Cory, unpublished
data); however, unexpectedly, CfDEFNPV was identified as being
the most prevalent baculovirus in both wild and laboratory populations. We believe this is the first example of a covert baculovirus
infection caused by a virus isolate that is apparently not infectious
per os to the host in which it is found. It is predicted that pathogen
strains that are transmitted vertically are less virulent than those
that rely primarily on horizontal transmission (e.g. Lipsitch et al.,
1995), thus we might expect baculovirus variants that produce
covert infections to be adapted in some way to vertical transmission, such as by showing reduced pathogenicity. There is some
recent evidence from Spodoptera exigua NPV that supports this
supposition (Cabodevilla et al., 2011). In the case of C. fumiferana,
it is not a particular strain of CfMNPV that appears to be transmitted vertically, but a different virus species. The fact that CfDEFNPV
cannot infect C. fumiferana by ingestion means that vertical transmission might be the only route available for it to persist within
the budworm population. It also suggests the possibility that covert infections might be more common in viruses that are only
partially infective for a particular insect species, and that covert
infection could result from exposure to baculoviruses from other
species, that cannot infect on their own, but might under specific
circumstances be introduced by a fortuitous co-infection event.
There are other data that show that baculoviruses that under normal circumstances cannot infect alone, can be maintained in virus
populations by co-occlusion and where co-infection can increase
(or decrease) resulting host mortality (e.g. López-Ferber et al.,
2003). However, these interactions are usually among strains of
one species of baculovirus, some of which lack key infection genes,
rather than two different species, neither of which have been
shown to lack known virulence genes (De Jong et al., 2005; Lauzon
et al., 2005), thus the origin of the CfMNPV and CfDEFNPV interaction is harder to speculate on.
Further experiments are needed to analyze the nature and
biological consequences of covert baculovirus infections in
C. fumiferana. However, the intriguing questions are how is
CfDEFNPV retained as a covert infection in budworm populations,
and how is this related to its exposure to and interaction with
CfMNPV (and perhaps other viruses)? In addition, the presence of
CfDEFNPV at such high levels in natural populations of C. fumiferana
could influence the response of wild budworm populations to
CfMNPV artificially introduced as part of a biological control program, and it would be interesting to carry out field experiments to
study this interaction.
Total
Sex
Fig. 2. Presence of DNA from multiple baculovirus types in individual adults from
laboratory stocks of C. fumiferana. A total of 105 individuals (46 males and 59
females) isolated from laboratory stocks of C. fumiferana were tested with multiplex
PCR primers to identify the presence of CfDEFNPV, CfMNPV and GV.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Sharon Hooey for collecting the field
populations of C. fumiferana and the Insect Production Services
team at the Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
E.M. Kemp et al. / Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 107 (2011) 202–205
for providing the laboratory-reared insects. We would like to thank
Peter Krell and Basil Arif for discussion of the work. This work was
supported by a Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology
(CRSB) Grant from Natural Resources Canada and NSERC Strategic
Grant STGTP 322185-05. JSC would like to acknowledge the support of the NSERC Canada Research Chair Program.
References
Bah, A., Lucarotti, C.J., Arella, M., Guertin, C., 1999. Choristoneura fumiferana
granulovirus: sequence analysis and 50 characterization of ORF891. Arch.
Virol. 144, 737–746.
Bird, F.T., 1976. Cell-proliferation in spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) infected with entomopox virus. Can. Entomol. 108,
859–864.
Bonsall, M.B., Sait, S.M., Hails, R.S., 2005. Invasion and dynamics of covert infection
strategies in structured insect–pathogen populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 74, 464–
474.
Burden, J.P., Griffiths, C.M., Cory, J.S., Smith, P., Sait, S.M., 2002. Vertical transmission
of sublethal granulovirus infection in the Indian meal moth, Plodia
interpunctella. Mol. Ecol. 11, 547–555.
Burden, J.P., Nixon, C.P., Hodgkinson, A.E., Possee, R.D., Sait, S.M., King, L.A., Hails,
R.S., 2003. Covert infections as a mechanism for long-term persistence of
baculoviruses. Ecol. Letts. 6, 524–531.
Cabodevilla, O., Ibañez, I., Simón, O., Murillo, R., Caballero, P., Williams, T., 2011.
Occlusion body pathogenicity, virulence and productivity traits vary with
transmission strategy in a nucleopolyhedrovirus. Biol. Control 56, 184–192.
Cooper, D., Cory, J.S., Theilmann, D.A., Myers, J.H., 2003. Nucleopolyhedroviruses of
forest and western tent caterpillars: cross-infectivity and evidence for
activation of latent virus in high-density field populations. Ecol. Entomol. 28,
41–50.
Cory, J.S., Myers, J.H., 2003. The ecology and evolution of insect baculoviruses. Annu.
Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 239–272.
De Jong, J.G., Lauzon, H.A.M., Dominy, C., Poloumienko, A., Carstens, E.B., Arif, B.M.,
Krell, P.J., 2005. Analysis of the Choristoneura fumiferana nucleopolyhedrovirus
genome. J. Gen. Virol. 86, 929–943.
205
Echeverry, F., Bergeron, J., Kaupp, W., Guertin, C., Arella, M., 1997. Sequence analysis
and expression of the polyhedrin gene of Choristoneura fumiferana cytoplasmic
polyhedrosis virus (CfCPV). Gene 198, 399–406.
Escasa, S.R., Lauzon, H.A.M., Mathur, A.C., Krell, P.J., Arif, B.M., 2006. Sequence
analysis of Choristoneura occidentalis granulovirus genome. J. Gen. Virol. 87,
1917–1933.
Heregariu, O., Heerema, N.A., Dlouht, S.R., Vance, G.H., Vogt, P.H., 1997. Multiplex
PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. Biotechniques 23, 504–511.
Hughes, D.S., Possee, R.D., King, L.A., 1993. Activation and detection of a latent
baculovirus resembling Mamestra brassicae nuclear polyhedrosis virus in M.
brassicae insects. Virology 194, 608–615.
Hughes, D.S., Possee, R.D., King, L.A., 1997. Evidence for the presence of a low-level,
persistent baculovirus infection of Mamestra brassicae insects. J. Gen. Virol. 78,
1801–1805.
Lange, M., Wang, H., Zhihong, H., Jehle, J.A., 2004. Towards a molecular
identification and classification system of lepidopteran-specific baculoviruses.
Virology 325, 36–47.
Lauzon, H.A., Jamieson, P.B., Krell, P.J., Arif, B.M., 2005. Gene organization and
sequencing of the Choristoneura fumiferana defective nucleopolyhedrovirus
genome. J. Gen. Virol. 86, 945–961.
Li, X., Lauzon, H.A.M., Sohi, S.S., Palli, S.B., Retnakaran, A., Arif, B.M., 1999. Molecular
analysis of the p74 gene of Choristoneura fumiferana multicapsid
nucleopolyhedroviruses CfMNPV and CfDEFNPV. J. Gen Virol 80, 1833–1840.
Lipsitch, M., Nowak, M.A., Ebert, D., May, R.M., 1995. The population dynamics of
vertically and horizontally transmitted parasites. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B 260, 321–
327.
López-Ferber, M., Simón, O., Williams, T., Caballero, P., 2003. Defective or effective?
Mutalistic interactions between virus genotypes. Proc. R. Soc. Ser. B 270, 2249–
2255.
Lucarotti, C.J., Eveleigh, E.S., Royama, T., Morin, B., McCarthy, P., Ebling, P.M., Kaupp,
W.J., Guertin, C., Arella, M., 2004. Prevalence of viruses in spruce budworm
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in New Brunswick. Can. Entomol. 136,
255–264.
Royama, T., MacKinnon, W.E., Kettela, E.G., Carter, N.E., Hartling, L.K., 2005. Analysis
of spruce budworm outbreak cycles in New Brunswick, Canada, since 1952.
Ecology 86, 1212–1224.
Vilaplana, L., Wilson, K., Redman, E.M., Cory, J.S., 2010. Pathogen persistence in
migratory insects: high levels of vertically-transmitted virus infection in field
populations of the African armyworm. Evol. Ecol. 24, 147–160.