Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
The Role of Body Moves in Dialogue
The Role of Body Moves in Dialogue
Satinder Gill2000, The Role of Body Moves in Dialogue
The importance of non verbal communication within the human interface, the point at which interaction occurs, is becoming of increasing significance for natural language pragmatics and the design of interactive systems based upon it. This dimension of communication is essential for an understanding of 'co-presence' (Good 1996), which is an essential component of human understanding. Co-presence denotes simply how we are present to each other, be this in the same physical space or in differing physical spaces. Being present may be described as a precondition for communication, and the nature of this precondition has a bearing on how we coordinate with each other.
Related Papers
Int. J. Qualitative Research in Services, Vol. X, No. Y, xxxx
REVIEW Interaction and Mobility, Language and the Body in MotionThe present book would be impossible a couple of decades back because sociology and philosophy paid less attention to the effects of visual technology in daily life. Today, emotions and experiences may be captivated from home without moving. To date, the existent specialised literature in mobility and ethno-methodology has agreed that space and sign are determined by the process of social interaction. Linguistics revealed how the body itself seems to be embedded in the roots of language. At time of speaking the other is represented on me and viceversa (being in this world with). Equally important, interaction and mobility are concepts very well enrooted in the expression of body and language. The evolution of talk not only produces the content of communication, but evidences the details of how talk is formed.
Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on …
Grammar, meaning and movement-based interaction2006 •
Human movement is rightly seen as a rich and under-explored resource for the design of novel interaction modalities. In this paper, I briefly explore some of the difficulties inherent to harnessing what seems to be the limitless potential of human movements as a means of interacting with systems. In particular, I treat these difficulties as a symptom of the fact that movement (generally conceived), unlike language, does not have a grammar. Some implications of this for the promise of human movement as interaction design material are then discussed.
2008 •
In this paper we discuss the function and use of non-verbal signals in regulating and coordinating communication. The focus is especially on gestures but facial expressions and body posture are also in-cluded as non-verbal means that convey communicative information and assist the interlocutors to construct mutual knowl-edge. Non-verbal activity manifests itself in the synchrony and alignment between the interlocutors when they monitor their own communication and manage the in-teraction with the others. It is studied both from the pragmatic-linguistic and the automatic signal-processing view-points, and correlation is found between speech and gesturing activity. It is ex-pected that the modelling of these signals contributes to our understanding of hu-man communication but also to the de-velopment of natural, efficient, and sym-pathetic interactions between humans and computers.
Journal of Sociolinguistics
Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction2016 •
Proceedings of Japanese/Korean Linguistics
Cooperation of Body and Language: Object-Transfer Requests in Japanese Interactions2021 •
Semiotica. Vol. 166. Pp. 463-476.
Gesture and Language2007 •
This essay addresses the complex issues related to kinesics as presented by David McNeill in Gesture and Thought. Gestures combine imagery and content. Crucial to the understanding of the meaning(s) of gesture is the context in which they are employed. This article considers a definition of gesture, the so-called Kendon-continuum (speech-linked gestures, emblems, pantomime, a brief history of gesture research, andgesture classification.
2012 •
International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences
Analysis of Verbal Language from the Theory of Human Movement as a Complex SystemThe objective of this manuscript is to carry out a conceptual analytical review of verbal language from the theory of Human Body Movement as a Complex System (HMCS). This theory is proposed by the Body-Movement Research Group from the Autonomous University of Manizales, Colombia. This model assumes that language production is essentially an embodied motor function. The analysis here presented involves postulates of both structural and functional theories of language, as well as cognitive linguistics, since the HMCS theory encompasses these multiple possibilities of approach. It is this conjecture of a holistic vision of language from its different approaches that leads to the proposition that, in effect, the different levels of linguistic analysis find several analogous components in the HMCS model. A conceptual analytical review is carried out, and structured in two main components. In the first part, the HMCS theory is exposed with its three levels of interaction: the objectified aspects of movement, the potentiality of movement and the external context of human movement. In the second part, an analysis of verbal language is carried out from this conceptual framework, also analyzed from the three levels of interaction: the objectified aspects of verbal language as a motor expression, the potentiality of verbal language and the context in the production of verbal language. Definitions, concepts, interactions and analogies are presented during the development of the article. In conclusion, body movement is language and language is, in essence, human movement. Both are intricate, integrated, indivisible, and inherently constitutive aspects of the same cognitive processes. The analogy achieved highlights the theory of the shared resource between motor control and cognitive control. In the same way that verbal language allows communication based on communicative intentions, body movement allows the exchange of information, constituting a bridge between cognition and the world.
Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes
Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction1998 •
RELATED PAPERS
Paleo-Hebrew Translation Lessons
Paleo-Hebrew Translation Lesson #1 Genesis 1:12024 •
Študijné zvesti
Včasnostredoveké opaskové kovania typu Bojná. Nové nálezy2023 •
Kyiv-Mohyla Humanities Journal
1984 After February 24th: A Philosophical Rereading of Orwell's Novel2023 •
Open Life Sciences
In-silico analysis of non-synonymous-SNPs of STEAP2: To provoke the progression of prostate cancer2016 •
Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales
Caracterización de la comunidad experta en el proceso constituyente Chileno2024 •
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Differential Regulation of the Glucagon and Insulin I Gene Promoters by the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors E47 and BETA21998 •
Journal of advances in biology & biotechnology
Fungal Diversity Associated with the Hive Stored Pollen of Stingless Bees Tetragonula travancorica Shanas and Faseeh2024 •
Journal of Chemical Ecology
Attraction of the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle, Xyleborus glabratus, to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures2011 •
2011 •
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Taskonomy: Disentangling Task Transfer Learning2018 •
- Find new research papers in:
- Physics
- Chemistry
- Biology
- Health Sciences
- Ecology
- Earth Sciences
- Cognitive Science
- Mathematics
- Computer Science