Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
The paper deals with the copying of morphemes and patterns from Turkic into the morphology of Kryz, an East Caucasian language of northern Azerbaijan. The copied morphemes in question are clitics found in the periphery of the verb system (expressing evidentiality, indefiniteness) and valency–changing morphology imported globally together with Azeri forms, as well as adjective-forming derivational suffixes. The copied structures are more diverse, and have left a mark on many areas of the morphology, in both verb and noun phrases.
(An unpublished paper from 2013 containing some opinions on the historical phonology of Turkic which I no longer entertain) The ambiguous verbal suffix -zU occurs only twice in the whole Old Turkic corpus. In the introduction, it is concluded that it is a virtually obsolete causal converb. Having analysed the sound change *ǰ > z in Turkic by means of various cases, *-r2U and *-ǰU are presented as two equally possible Proto-Turkic reconstructions of the converbial suffix -zU. Since internal evidence is indecisive in reconstructing -zU as *-r2U or *-ǰU, external evidence is taken into account. The Mongolic converbs in -ǰi ~ -ǰU and -rUn are suggested as two possible cognates of -zU. Both are discussed in detail, and the Mongolic converb in -ǰi ~ -ǰU is ruled out due to its semantic discrepancy. It is concluded that Mongolic -rUn might be the cognate of Turkic -zU whereas Mongolic -ǰi ~ -ǰU is a borrowing of the Turkic converb in *-dI.
2015 •
This paper is devoted to a comparative-historical analysis of the structural-semantic and functional peculiarities of some specific participial, adverbial participial and infinitive forms in the Turkic languages and their dialects and patois. Currently a number of issues regarding the structural-semantic and functional features of specific participial, adverbial participial and infinitive forms in the Turkic languages have not received exhaustive coverage in Turkology. In this research similar and distinguishing features of these forms in the Turkic languages are identified, as well as their etymology is discussed. It should be noted that a systematic comparativehistorical study of the grammatical elements of the Turkic languages takes on special significance in Turkology. The relevance of the chosen topic is determined by these factors.
Studia Orientalia, Helsinki
A Turkic loan-word in modern Russian political publicism and Turkic and Mongolic preverbs1999 •
2015 •
Article history: Received 12 December 2014 Received in revised form 26 January 2015 Accepted 3 February 2015 Available online 25 February 2015
2020 •
SOL, O Templário, The Portugal News + Resident
Sephardic Identity - The Portuguese Aspect2023 •
2002 •
Literature at Portsmouth
Marmaduke Pickthall: A Forgotten English Novelist2020 •
Exploring the green economy: İssues, challanges and benefits
The Importance of a Green Economy and Green Accounting: Analysis of the Knowledge on Green Accounting and Economy in Azerbaijan2023 •
Beyond the Office Shaping the Future with Hybrid and Remote Work
Beyond the Office Shaping the Future with Hybrid and Remote Work2024 •
O corpo na Análise do Discurso: conceito em movimento
O corpo na Análise do Discurso: entrevista com Eni Orlandi2023 •
2024 •
2018 •
2013 •
2024 •
JCOM, journal of science communication
Using science communication research to practice iterative engagement in collaborative nutrient management2024 •
East African journal of business and economics
Loan Repayment Performance on Smallholder Tobacco Contract Farmers. A Case of Ward 21 Marondera District, Mashonaland East Province2024 •
GPF India
Hindi - अखंड समाज की रचना और सामंजस्यपूर्ण जीवन में मध्यस्थ दर्शन और वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम की भूमिका2024 •
El Hinojal. Revista de Estudios del MUVI
La guerra del rif, la guerra olvidada