October 10, 2018
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT BY DESIGN
Realistic Risk Communication: The Case Against Cute
Cute Cats Make
Fluffy Failures
There is a place for humor and
comedic relief — but public
education is not always one of
them. Using cartoons or funny
illustrations to describe threats
and hazards removes negative
risks associated the impacts
and outcomes of those hazards.
For instance, an emergency
manager gives a public seminar
on hurricanes. To convey the
difference in Saffir Simpson
wind speed categories, they
use a cute cat meme. The
intention is to get people to
understand that Category 1
storms are weaker and
Category 4 storms are stronger.
Instead of conveying
seriousness of deadly storms,
emergency managers are
treating the hurricane as a joke.
The audience now follows suit.
While the audience surely
understands the scientific basis,
they do not gain understanding
of the dire nature. In real life,
there is not a flying cat in the air
of a Category 5 storm. In reality,
the cat likely died during the
cute, fluffy Category 3. Or could
have drowned during a tropical
storm. And using that for a
public seminar is, of course, not
even funny.
© 2018 by Cascia Consulting LLC
The Case Against Cute
Disasters are ugly. Living without
electricity, clean water, or food for
weeks is a dire but realistic fact in
post-impact communities.
Emergency Management has
struggled in communicating
potentially fatal realities of
hurricanes, floods, and wildfires in
lieu of safe but lacking information.
When talking to the public about
hurricanes, do not use funny or cute
clip art and memes. Sure, you might
get a laugh and people might
remember funny flying cats
supposed to convey hurricane wind
categories but you’re damning
people’s ability to understand the
seriousness of disaster preparedness.
Physicians do not use “cute” cancer
clip-art when talking to patients
about their diagnosis. Paramedics do
not finish their education by
bandaging dolls. Law enforcement
officers do not practice life-saving
skills using memes. Emergency
managers create an industry lacking
credibility and seriousness when they
use unrealistic and comedic
scenarios to describe disasters. If you
can’t explain it using factual
examples, you are telling the
audience that you do not understand
it yourself. Not only that, but these practitioners do a massive —
potentially fatal — disservice to their audience. If people believe
that hurricanes are cute and funny, they will not understand their
risk and therefore will not prepare adequately.
www.casciaconsulting.com