Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
University of Warsaw The Faculty of History The Institute of Archaeology Spyridon Bakas Index no: The Mycenaean Dendra Panoply. Experimental reconstruction & Interpretations. Master Thesis in Archaeology Thesis supervised by Prof Kazimierz Lewartowski Department of Aegean Archaeology Warszawa 1 Oświadczenie kierującego pracą Oświadczam, że niniejsza praca została przygotowana pod moim kierunkiem i stwierdzam, że spełnia ona warunki do przedstawienia jej w postępowaniu o nadanie tytułu zawodowego. Data Podpis kierującego pracą Oświadczenie autora (autorów) pracy Świadom odpowiedzialności prawnej oświadczam, że niniejsza praca dyplomowa została napisana przeze mnie samodzielnie i nie zawiera treści uzyskanych w sposób niezgodny z obowiązującymi przepisami. Oświadczam również, że przedstawiona praca nie była wcześniej przedmiotem procedur związanych z uzyskaniem tytułu zawodowego w wyższej uczelni. Oświadczam ponadto, że niniejsza wersja pracy jest identyczna z załączoną wersją elektroniczną. Data Podpis autora (autorów) pracy 2 Abstract The Dendra panoply was originally discovered by Professor Paul Åström and Dr Nicolaos Verdelis, in tomb 12 in Argolis/Greece, near Midea citadel and is dated on LHIIB period. Since it is considered the first complete set of body armor that has ever been found in the archaeological records, it emerges a series of questions of how a warrior could perform under this panoply. The remit of this thesis is to investigate possible answers on the function and the nature of the Dendra panoply in terms of experimentation. The author uses the work of Åström and Verdelis as his primary source, but supplements it with other significant academic works on this subject. The research expands on the relevant archaeological findings and the Linear B ideograms concerning this type of armor. To better understand the function and effectiveness of the armour a series of experiments were conducted in which a replica of this armor was reconstructed and tested in the context of mobility, stability and in conjuction with the use of several weapons. This thesis mainly argues that this was intended for use by infantry who would use a spear as his main weapon, while his operational task could not have been conducted without the cooperation of light troops. It is highlighted that the Dendra panoply warrior needs a lot of open space and cannot operate efficiently in close-combat conditions. The ability of a Dendra panoply warrior to stand on a chariot, while on charge, remains doubtful. Keywords Mycenaean, Mycenaean Warfare, Bronze Age, Body armor, Experimental Archaeology Field 08400 Archaeology Thematic classification Bronze Age period in Greece 3 Table of Contents: Index.............................................................................................................................4 Chapter 1: Introduction..............................................................................................5 Chapter 2: Previous works and references on the Dendra Cuirass by other Schollars.......................................................................................................................8 Chapter 3: The cuirass as an archaeological finding..............................................17 3.1 The torso plates......................................................................................17 3.2 The shoulder pieces...............................................................................18 3.3 The arm guards.....................................................................................19 3.4 The breast shield....................................................................................20 3.5 The throat guard...................................................................................20 3.6 The belts.................................................................................................20 Chapter 4: Relevant Archaeological findings of body armor in Bronze Age Aegean basin...............................................................................................................23 Chapter 5: The cuirass in Mycenaean art and literature.......................................26 Chapter 6: The Experimental Reconstruction of the Dendra Cuirass.................29 6.1 Reconstruction........................................................................................29 6.2 Interpretation and experimental applications.....................................30 Chapter 7: Testing of the Dendra Cuirass...............................................................35 7.1 Experiential testing................................................................................35 7.2 Evaluation of the experiment................................................................39 Chapter 8: Results – Conclusions.............................................................................41 Bibliography:..........,...................................................................................................47 Illustrations:................................................................................................................51 4