Vol. 7(2) February (2014)
Advances In Management
Review Paper:
Leadership styles
Nanjundeswaras wamy T. S. * and Swamy D. R.
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, JSS Academy of T echnical Education, Bangalore, INDIA
*
nswamy.ts@gmail.com
Abstract
team innovation with the mediating effects of knowledge
sharing and team communication14 .
In this global competitive environment, effective
leadership style is necessary to reduce the attrition
rate. From the effective leadership styles only it is
possible to achieve organizational goal productively.
Leadership styles affect on the employee performance
and productivity. This paper summarizes and analyzes
the available literature of leadership styles and effect
on different components of Quality of work life.
Exploring the Relationship between Organizational Culture
and Style of Leadership we used the factors like
Organizational
Culture,
Charismatic
Leadership,
Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership.
Voon et al37 found out the influence of leadership styles on
employees‟ job satisfaction in public sector organizations
in Malays ia. They used the factors like salaries, job
autonomy, job security, workplace flexibility. Out of these
factors, they found that transformational leadership style
has a stronger relationship with job satisfaction.
Keywords: Leadership styles, productivity, performance,
work life.
Chung – Hs iung Fang et al13 identified that leadership style
can affect organizational commitment and work satisfaction
positively and work satisfaction intern can affect
organizational commitment and work performance
positively. Leadership is largely culturally orientated,
embracing traditional beliefs, norms and values and a
preoccupation29 . According to Goh Yuan et al17 study,
leadership style is significantly influenced by the leader‟s
immediate and extended family, clan and tribe. This study
finds the linkages between organizational leadership and
business ethics, thereby making a contribution toward
increasing the quality of organizational life which may
have a positive influence on both members of the
organization and the wider community. Lu Ye et al27 study
explained employees‟ perceptions about transactional or
transformational leadership style of executive, both have
highly positive correlation with perceptions about
executive‟s encouragement factors of its innovation
climate.
Introduction
An effective leader influences followers in a desired
manner to achieve desired goals. Different leadership styles
may affect organizational effectiveness or performance30.
Transformational leadership is a stronger predictor of both
job satisfaction and overall satisfaction7 . In the study it was
concluded that organizational performance is influenced by
a competitive and innovative culture. Organizational
Culture is influenced by leadership style and consequently,
leadership style affects organizational performance.
Review of Literature
Leadership Styles: Leadership is a social influence
process in which the leader seeks the voluntary
participation of subordinates in an effort to reach
organization goals 10 . A leader can be defined as a person
who delegates or influencing others to act so as to carry out
specified objectives 28 . Today‟s organizations need effective
leaders who understand the complexities of the rapidly
changing global environment. If the task is highly
structured and the leader has good relationship with the
employees, effectiveness will be high on the part of the
employees. The study further revealed that democratic
leaders take great care to involve all members of the team
in discussion and can work with a small but highly
motivated team.
Podsakoff et al32 said that leadership behavior can affect
trust and satisfaction of employees to organization and
organizational citizenship behavior further enhances the
relationship between leadership style and organizational
commitment directly. Transactional leadership is
considered as the subordinates‟ rewards through their
efforts and performance. Guang-yi et al18 compared the
Transactional leadership. Transformational leadership
theory is deemed to improve the subordinates‟ performance
by changing the motives and values of employees.
Barchiesi et al1 measured the leadership effectiveness and
leadership role and its influence on performance, leadership
behaviors, attitudes. They found that high leadership
indexes are not related to past performance records but
associated both to higher potentiality of enhanced
performance and to higher reputation of organizations,
pointing in the direction of a meaningful influence of
behavioral complexity and dynamics on the leadership
perceived level. A mechanism of leadership styles affecting
team innovation in the private research centers investigated
the relationship between different leadership styles and
Bass 5 divided leadership style into transformational
leadership and transactional leadership. Transformational
leadership has the characteristics of individual influence,
spiritual encouragement and intellectual stimulation. They
often take individual into consideration, establish vision
and aim ins ide, create open culture, trust the staff to reach
their goals and give full play for staff's potential.
57
Vol. 7(1) January (2014)
Advances In Management
Transactional leadership is focused on staff‟s basic and
external demand, the relationship between leaders and
subordinates is based on the contract. They tend to attain
organizational goal by pacific job roles and mission des ign,
their basic purpose is to maintain a stable organization.
According to Bass and Avolio2 , transformational leaders
encourage followers to view problems from new
perspectives, provide support and encouragement
communicates a vision, stimulates emotion and
identification. Bruce et al9 said that transformational
leaders are able to define and articulate a vision for their
organizations and their leadership style can influence or
“transform” individual-level variables such as increasing
motivation and organization-level variables, such as
mediating conflict among groups or teams. Podsakoff et
32
al
disclosed transformational leadership had active
influence on individual and organizational outcomes such
as employee satisfaction and performance. Higher levels of
transformational leadership were associated with higher
levels of group potency.
32
Podsakoff et al said that leadership behavior can affect
trust and satisfaction of employees to organization and
organizational citizenship behavior further enhances the
relationship between leadership style and organizational
commitment directly.
Leadership style is the „relatively consistent pattern of
15
behavior that characterizes a leader‟ . Today‟s
organizations need effective leaders who understand the
complexities of the rapidly changing global environment.
Different leadership styles may affect organizational
electiveness or performance30 . According to the Oladipo et
al31 , the success or failure of proper organizations, nations
and other social units has been largely credited to the nature
of their leadership style,
Transactional Leadership styles: Transactional leadership
relies more about "trades" between the leader and follower
by which followers are compensated for meeting specific
36
goals or performance criteria . The transactional leader
will first validate the relationship between performance and
reward and then exchange it for an appropriate response
that encourages subordinates to improve performance34.
Jeremy et al22 explained in manufacturing company,
leadership is really a process for impacting on others
commitment towards recognizing their full potential in
achieving goals, vision with passion and integrity. The
study also revealed that the associations between leader and
worker give additional factor employees‟ satisfaction which
are considerably affected through the leadership style
adopted by the leader. However from the available
literature we can summarize the different dimensions of
leadership styles and their effect on employee satisfaction,
team work, organizational change and employee
performance. Table 1 lists some of the dimens ions of
leadership styles and components as viewed by the scholars
along with the type of the sectors and outcomes.
Transactional leadership in organizations plays an
exchange role between managers and subordinates 24 .
Transactional leadership style is understood to be the
exchange of rewards and targets between employees and
management20 . Bass and Avolio2 explained Transactional
leaders motivate subordinates through the use of contingent
rewards, corrective actions and rule enforcement.
Bass Bernard et al6 explained that transactional leadership
depends on contingent reinforcement, either positive
contingent reward or the more negative active or passive
forms of management-by-exception. Transactional leaders
motivate followers through exchange; for example,
accomplishing work in exchange for rewards or
preferences38. Kahai et al33 found group efficacy was higher
under the transactional leadership condition. According to
Burns 11 , transactional leader tends to focus on task
completion and employee compliance and these leaders
rely quite heavily on organizational rewards and
punishments to influence employee performance.
Transformational Leadership styles: Transformational
leadership style concentrates on the development of
followers as well as their needs. Managers with
transformational leadership style concentrate on the growth
and development of value system of employees, their
inspirational level and moralities with the preamble of their
21
5
abilities . According to Bass , the aim of transformational
leadership would be to „transform‟ people and
organizations inside a literal sense - to alter them in the
mind and heart enlarge vis ion, ins ight and understanding
clarify reasons make behavior congruent with values,
concepts and brings about changes which are permanent,
self-perpetuating and momentum building.
Conclusion
It is observed that from the available literature, all the
studies conducted are related to the large sector which
interns reveal that leadership style, organizational
commitment and work satisfaction are interrelated. Thus,
leadership styles can affect the quality of work life. Since
much work has not been carried out with respect to SMEs,
there is a need for the study of the effect of
Transformational and Transactional leadership styles on the
Quality of work life of employees working in the SMEs.
According to Bass and Avolio4 , transformational leadership
happens when leader become wider and uphold the
interests of the employees, once they generate awareness
and acceptance for the purpose and assignment of the
group, so when they blend employees to appear beyond
their own self-interest for the good of the group.
58
Vol. 7(2) February (2014)
Advances In Management
Author
Berson
Jonathan
7
Linton
Goh Yuan
Sheng et al17
Liliana
pedrajarejas,Emilion
RodriguezPonce,Y Juan
Rodriguez39
Ponce
Bunmi
Omolayo10
Jui-Kuei Chen
and I-Shuo
Chen23
Lirong Long
and
Minxin Mao26
Hsien-Che Lee
Yi-Wen Liu 40
Chung-Hsiung
13
Fang et al
Table 1
Leadership styles and components on which leadership styles effect
Dimensions of
Components
Type of the
Outcomes
leadership styles
Industries
1 Transformational
Employee
Telecommunication
Impact
of
transformational
Leadership,
Satisfaction
firms
leadership
styles
is
more
2 Transactional And
significant to establish quality
Non- Transactional,
environment in the R and D part
3 Laissez-Faire
of Telecommunication firms
Leadership
1 Transformational
1 Job Performance,
All types of SMEs
The result indicates that the
Leadership,
2 Deontology
in Singapore
ethical behavior of leader have an
2 Transactional
Ethical Approach,,
important
mediating
effect
leadership,
3 Teleology Ethical
between their leadership styles
Approach.
and
job
performance
of
employees
1 Participative style
Effectiveness
SMEs In Chile
Supportive and participative
2 Supportive style
leadership styles have a pos itive
3 Instrumental style
influence on effectiveness in
SMEs. Instrumental leadership
has a negative influence on
effectiveness
in
small
organizations.
1 Autocratic
1 Job-Related
Manufacturing
Results shows that workers
Leadership Style
Tension And
organizations Lagos under democratic leadership style
2 Democratic
2 Psychological
State, Nigeria
do not experience higher jobLeadership Style
Sense Of
related tension than workers
Community In Work
under autocratic leadership style.
Organizations
Also, workers under autocratic
style of leadership do not
experience higher sense of
community than workers under
democratic style of leadership
1 Active Participant
Big- Five Personal Professors and
The results of the study show that
Style
Traits
lecturers from
leadership style has a significant
universities in
relationship
to
innovative
Taiwan
operation.
1 Transformational
Organizational
Employees from
The findings indicate that both
Leadership
change
different types of
transformational leadership and
2 Transactional
private and public
transactional leadership have
Leadership
organizations in
positive impact on organizational
China
change.
1 Transactional
1 Organizational
Electronics
The leadership style has a
Leadership
Innovation
Information Industry positive
relationship
on
2 Transformation
Performance,
in Taiwan
organizational
innovation
Leadership
2 Organizational
performance, and the leadership
Innovation
style moderates the relationship
Capability
between
organizational
innovation
capability
and
organizational
innovation
performance.
1 Staff Work
Hospital Employees Leadership has a significant,
1 Leadership Style
Satisfaction,
positive and direct effect on work
2 Organizational
satisfaction and can affect
Commitment 3
organizational commitment and
Work Performance
work performance indirectly
through work satisfaction.
59
Vol. 7(1) January (2014)
Advances In Management
Yafang Tsai,
Shih-Wang
Wu, and HsienJui Chung 41
1 Charismatic
leadership
2 Transformational
leadership
3 Transactional
leadership
4 Team leadership
1 Organizational
Culture
2 Ideological
Culture
3 Hierarchical
Culture
4 Coordinate
Culture
Hospitals employees
in Taiwan
Cong Yang
Yu Wei 42
1 Leader‟s Charm,
tourist hotels
employees China
Duanxu Wang
14
et al
1 Authoritarian
Leadership
2 Transformational
Leadership
3 Transactional
Leadership
4 Benevolent
Leadership
1 Staffs
Psychological
Empowerment.
2 Staffs Satisfaction.
1 Team Innovations
2 Team
Communications.
3 Knowledge
Sharing
Li-Ren Yang
and Yen-Ting
Chen 43
1 Transactional
Leadership
2 Transformation
Leadership
1 Teamwork
a.
Communication,
b. Collaboration
c. Cohesiveness
2 Performance
Employees of
Taiwanese industry,
Taipei, Taiwan
Voon et al37
1 Transactional
Leadership
2 Transformation
Leadership
Job Satisfaction.
Malaysian
executives working
in public sectors,
Malaysia
Lu Ye et al27
1 Transactional
Leadership
2 Transformation
Leadership
1 Innovation
Climate,
2 Job Independency,
3 Job Challenging
Employees of hightech corporations in
Hebei
60
Employees and
supervisors in the
PRC , China
The results show us that
organizational cultures influence
the style of leadership. There is
positive correlation between
ideological
culture
and
transformational leadership.
There is positive correlation
between hierarchical culture and
charismatic leadership. There is
positive correlation between
coordinate culture and team
leadership. There is positive
correlation
between
rational
culture
and
transactional
leadership.
Leader‟s charm has positive
effects
on
employees‟
Satisfaction
and
service
innovation.
Study suggested that knowledge
sharing & team communication
completely mediated the
negative relationship between
authoritarian leadership and team
innovation, and partially
mediated the contributions of
transformational leadership and
benevolent leadership to team
innovation.
The analyses suggest that project
manager‟s
leadership
style,
teamwork,
and
project
performance
are
highly
correlated. The findings also
indicate
that
teamwork
dimensions may partially or fully
mediate the relationships between
leadership style and project
performance.
The
results
showed
that
transformational leadership style
has a stronger relationship with
job satisfaction. This implies that
transformational leadership is
deemed suitable for managing
government organizations
The empirical study show that
employees‟ perceptions about
transactional or transformational
leadership style of executive both
have highly pos itive correlation
with
perceptions
about
executive‟s
encouragement
factors of its innovation climate.
Between them, transformational
leadership style has had a higher
influence on cognition of leader‟s
motivation,
Vol. 7(2) February (2014)
Advances In Management
17. Goh Yuan, Sheng Victor and Geoffrey N. Soutar, University
of Western Australia, The Role Of Ethical Behaviours In The
Relations Between Leadership Styles And Job Performance,
ANZMAC Conference: Corporate Responsibility (2005)
References
1. Barchiesi Maria Assunta, LA BELLA Agostino, Leadership
Styles of World's most Admired Companies A Holistic Approach
to Measuring Leadership Effectiveness, International Conference
on Management Science & Engineering, 14th August, 20-22
(2007)
18. Guang-yi Wang Zhi-sheng, The Impact of Transformational
Leadership Style on Organizational Performance: The
Intermediary Effects of Leader-Member Exchange, International
Conference on Management Science & Engineering, 15th
September (2008)
2. Bass B. M. and Avolio B. J., Developing transformational
leadership: 1992 and beyond, Journal of European Industrial
Training, 14, 21–27 (1990)
19. Heller H. W., The relationship between teacher job
satisfaction and principal leadership style, Journal of School
Leadership, 3(1), 74–86 (1993)
3. Bass B. M., Leadership and performance beyond expectations ,
New York, Free Press, 3-242 (1985)
4. Bass B. M. and Avolio B. J., Transformational Leadership and
Organizational Culture, Public Administration Quarterly, 12,
113-121 (1993)
20. Howell J. M. and Avolio B. J., Transformational leadership,
transactional leadership, locus of control and support for
innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business unit
performance, J. Serv. Mark., 16, 487-502 (1993)
5. Bass B. M., The ethics of transformational leadership, KLSP:
Transformational Leadership, Working Papers (1997)
21. Ismail A., Halim F. A., Munna D. N., Abdullah A., Shminan
A. S. and Muda A. L., The mediating effect of empowerment in
the relationship between transformational leadership and service
quality, J. Bus. Manage., 4(4), 3-12 (2009)
6. Bass Bernard M. and Avolio Bruce J., Improving
organizational effectiveness-Through transformational leadership,
Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California (1994)
22. Jeremy M., Melinde C. and Ciller V., Perceived leadership
style and employee participation in a manufacturing company in
the democratic republic of Congo, African journal of business
management, 6(15),5389-5398 (2012)
7. Berson Jonathan Linton, An Examination Of The Relationships
Between Leadership Style, Quality and Employee Satisfaction In
R&D Environments, 0-803-8150-5/03/$17.00 02003 IEEE (2003)
8. Bogler R., The influence of leadership style on teacher job
satisfaction, Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 662–
683 (2001)
23. Jui-Kuei Chen and I-Shuo Chen, The Relationships between
Personal Traits, Leadership Styles and Innovative Operation,
Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference,
Melbourne, Australia, 420-425 (2007)
9. Bruce Tracey J. and Timonthy R. Hinkin, How
transformational leaders lead in the hospitality industry, Internal
Journal of Hospitality Management, 15(2), 165-176 (1995)
24. Jung D. I., Transformational and transactional leadership and
their effects on creativity in groups , Creativity Research Journal,
13, 185-195 (2001)
10. Bunmi Omolayo, Effect of Leadership Style on Job-Related
Tension and Psychological Sense of Community in Work
Organizations: A Case Study of Four Organizations in Lagos
State, Nigeria, Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 4(2), July
(2007)
25. Lashbrook W., Business performance, employee satisfaction
and leadership practices, Performance Improvement, 36(5), 29-33
(1997)
26. Lirong Long and Minxin Mao, Impact of leadership style on
organizational change, IEEE (2008)
11. Burns J. M., Leadership, Harper & Row, New York (1978)
12. Chung, The Exploration of Relationship between
Organizational Culture and Style of Leadership, IEEE (2009)
27. Lu Ye, Deng Junye and Ma Yan, The Relationships between
Leadership Styles and Organizational Innovation Climate, IEEE
(2011)
13. Chung-Hsiung Fang, Sue-Ting Chang and Guan-Li Chen,
Applying Structural Equation Model to Study of the Relationship
Model among leadership style, satisfaction, Organization
commit ment and Performance in hospital industry, IEEE (2009)
28. Mullins L., Management and Organisational Behaviour,
Pearson Higher Education FT Prentice Hall (2004)
14. Duanxu Wang, Huijuan Xue and Jie Xu, The Mechanism of
Leadership Styles Affecting Team Innovation in the PRC, IEEE
(2009)
29. Murray Prideaux et al, Uncovering Leadership Issues in
Papua New Guinea, The 4th SMEs in a global economy
conference, 9th – 10th July (2007)
15. DuBrin A. J., Leadership: Research findings, practice, skills ,
3rd ed., Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin (2001)
30. Nahavandi A., The art and science of leadership, 3rd ed.,
Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall (2002)
16. Gee-Woo Bock, Wei-Liang Ng and Yuhyung Shin, The
Effect of a Perceived Leader‟s Influence on the Motivation of the
Members of Nonwork-Related Virtual Communities, IEEE
Transactions On Engineering Management, 55(2), May (2008)
31. Oladipo K. S., Jamilah O., Abdul daud S., Jeffery L. D. and
Salami D. K., Review of leadership theories and Organizational
performances, International Business Management Journal, 7(1),
50-54 (2013)
61
Vol. 7(1) January (2014)
Advances In Management
39. Liliana Pedraja-Rejas, Emilio Rodríguez-Ponce and Juan
Rodríguez-Ponce, Leadership styles and effectiveness: a study of
small firms in Chile, Interciencia, 31(7), 500-504 (2006)
32. Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Moorman R. H. and Fetter
R., Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on
followers‟ trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational
citizenship behaviors, Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142 (1990)
40. Hsien-Che Lee and Yi-Wen Liu, Impacts of organizational
innovation capability and leadership styles on innovation
performance for electronics information industry in
Taiwan, Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics,
IEEE/SOLI 2008, IEEE International Conference, 1903-1907
(2008)
33. Kahai S. S., Sosik J. J. and Avolio B. J., Effects of Leadership
Style and Problem Structure on Work Group Process and
Outcomes in an Electronic Meeting System Environment,
Personnel Psychology, 50, 1-146 (1997)
34. Scott E. B., The role of transformational and transactional
leadership in creating, sharing and exploiting organizational
knowledge, Journal of Leadership & Organization Studies, 9(4),
32-44 (2003)
41. Yafang Tsai, Shih-Wang Wu and Hsien-Jui Chung, The
exploration of relationship between organizational culture and
style of leadership, Service Systems and Service Management,
ICSSSM 2009 6th International Conference, 585-590 (2009)
35. Sharma B. R., Not by bread alone - A study of employer employee relations in India, New Delhi, Shri Ram Centre for
Industrial Relations and Human Resources (1987)
42. Cong Yang and Yu Wei, An Empirical Study of the
Relationship
among
Leadership
Style,
Psychological
Empowerment and Service Innovation, Information Management,
Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, International
Conference, 386-390 (2009)
36. Trottier T., Van Wart M. and Wang X., Examining the Nature
and Significance of Leadership in Government Organizations ,
Public Administration Review, 319-333 (2008)
43. Li-Ren Yang and Yen-Ting Chen, Project Manager's
Leadership Style Linked with Schedule and Cost
Performance, Management and Service Science (MASS), 2010
International Conference, 1-4 (2010).
37. Voon M. C. et al, The influence of leadership styles on
employees‟ job satisfaction in public sector organizations in
Malaysia, International Journal of Business, Management and
Social Sciences, 2(1), 24-32 (2011)
(Received 30
2014)
38. Yang Jen-Te, Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate
leadership roles and collaborative culture, Tourism Management,
28, 530-543 (2007)
th
November 2013, accepted 05
th
January
*****
62
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.