Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

First checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of French Guiana

Zootaxa, 2019
We provide here a checklist of the ants of French Guiana, an overseas department of France situated in northern South America, with a very low human population density and predominantly covered by old-growth tropical rainforests. Based on 165 scientific papers, specimens deposited in collections, and unpublished surveys, a total of 659 valid species and subspecies from 84 genera and 12 subfamilies is presented. Although far from complete, these numbers represent approximately 10% of the ant diversity known to occur in the Neotropical realm. Additionally, three ant genera and 119 species are reported for the first time for French Guiana. Finally, five species are recognized as erroneous records for the department in the literature. This checklist significantly expands the basic knowledge of the ants in the Guiana Shield, one of the world’s most important biodiversity hotspots....Read more
ZOOTAXA ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Accepted by J. Longino: 21 Aug. 2019; published: 27 Sept. 2019 509 Zootaxa 4674 (5): 509–543 https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Article https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4674.5.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5ADC3159-606A-4EB1-B243-FE20D88F5E60 First checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of French Guiana WESLLY FRANCO 1 , NATALIA LADINO 1 , JACQUES H. C. DELABIE 2,3 , ALAIN DEJEAN 4,5 , JERÔME ORIVEL 5 ; MÉLANIE FICHAUX 5 , SARAH GROC 5 , MAURICE LEPONCE 6,7 & RODRIGO M. FEITOSA 1,8 1 Laboratório de Sistemática e Biologia de Formigas, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Avenida Coronel Francisco Heráclito dos Santos, s/n, Caixa Postal 19020, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil E-mail: weslly.franco@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0003-2670-4527; nmladino@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0001-8230-9439; rsmfeito- sa@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0001-8230-9439; 0000-0001-9042-0129 2 Laboratório de Mirmecologia, Convênio UESC-CEPEC, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, Caixa Postal 7, CEP 45600-000, Itabuna, BA, Brazil. E-mail: jacques.delabie@gmail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-2695-1061 3 Departamento de Ciencias Agrárias e Ambientais, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, 45662-000, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil 4 Ecolab, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, UPS, Toulouse, France E-mail: alain.dejean@wanadoo.fr, ORCID: 0000-0002-3561-2248 5 CNRS, UMR EcoFog, AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRA, Université des Antilles, Université de Guyane, Campus agronomique, BP316, 97310 Kourou, France E-mail: jerome.orivel@ecofog.gf; melanie.fichaux@ecofog.gf; groc.sarah@gmail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-5636-3228; 0000-0001- 7904-3529 6 Biodiversity Monitoring & Assessment, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Bel- gium. E-mail: mleponce@naturalsciences.be, ORCID: 0000-0003-2474-5915 7 Behavioural & Evolutionary Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Av. F.D. Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium 8 Corresponding author. E-mail: rsmfeitosa@gmail.com Abstract We provide here a checklist of the ants of French Guiana, an overseas department of France situated in northern South America, with a very low human population density and predominantly covered by old-growth tropical rainforests. Based on 165 scientific papers, specimens deposited in collections, and unpublished surveys, a total of 659 valid species and subspecies from 84 genera and 12 subfamilies is presented. Although far from complete, these numbers represent approximately 10% of the ant diversity known to occur in the Neotropical realm. Additionally, three ant genera and 119 species are reported for the first time for French Guiana. Finally, five species are recognized as erroneous records for the the department in the literature. This checklist significantly expands the basic knowledge of the ants in the Guiana Shield, one of the world’s most important biodiversity hotspots. Key words: Formicidae, rainforest, Guiana Shield, distribution, Amazon Introduction French Guiana is located in the oldest and most homogeneous part of the Guiana Shield in South America (Guitet et al. 2015). Extending over approximately 85,000 km 2 , the predominantly flat relief of French Guiana is dissected by rivers and comprises two main geographical regions: a coastal strip with savannas and mangroves, and a dense tropical forest that covers almost 95% of the territory (Thiollay 1989; Guitet et al. 2013, 2015). The Guiana Shield is one of the most important biodiversity hotspots in the world, and the well-preserved natural environments of French Guiana have been the focus of a number of biodiversity inventories (e.g. Ter Steege et al. 2000; Thiollay 2002; Brosset & Charles-Dominique 2009; Le Bail et al. 2012; Brûlé & Touroult 2014; Lamarre et al. 2016; Roy et al. 2016; Privet et al. 2018; Pollet et al. 2018). Among the initiatives to generate a better understanding of that biodiversity, an emphasis has been placed on the importance of compiling species checklists as baseline studies. These lists reflect our taxonomic knowledge of the organisms in a particular place and time (Brandão 1991; Boggan et al. 1997; Alonso & Agosti 2000; Fernández
FRANCO ET AL. 510 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press & Sendoya 2004). Checklists complement species distribution databases and can be useful in the identification of sampling gaps and range extensions, and can also be used in macroecological studies, species distribution modeling and conservation strategies (Gasper et al., 2016). Brûlé & Touroult (2014) highlighted the insect fauna of French Guiana and discussed the significance of species lists and databases. They addressed the role of both amateur and professional entomologists in gathering taxonomic knowledge. French Guiana has checklists for well-studied insect groups such as butterflies, bees and beetles (Heiss & Moragues 2009; Faynel 2010; Brûlé 2011; Pauly et al. 2013; Sambhu & Nankishore 2018), but no comprehensive checklists of ant species for the region have been produced thus far (MNHN 2018). Ants comprise a diverse and ubiquitous insect family, with a relatively straightforward taxonomy and promi- nent ecological roles (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990, 2009; Folgarait 1998; Alonso & Agosti 2000; Brühl et al. 2003; Kaspari 2003; Crist 2009; Lach et al. 2010). The Guianese district of Cayenne is the type locality of at least 21 of the oldest names of Neotropical ants, with a remarkable influence on the ant taxonomy of the New World (Bolton, 2019). Numerous ecological surveys and taxonomic studies of Formicidae in French Guiana have been published (e.g. Radoszkowsky 1884; Kempf 1972; Perrault 1988; Perrault 1999; Fernández & Sendoya 2004; Groc et al. 2009, 2013; Delabie et al. 2009, 2010, 2011; Dejean et al. 2000, 2004, 2012, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019; Mariano et al. 2011; Lacau et al. 2012; Fichaux et al. 2019). Such studies generated a large number of species records both in the litera- ture and in ant collections. Here we compile the basic data on the ant fauna of French Guiana, using 165 scientific papers, four online repositories, three myrmecological collections, field endeavors, and unpublished surveys. This first checklist will be an important tool for myrmecological studies in the Neotropical region. Methods The species/subspecies list was compiled by reviewing taxonomic and ecological literature, including collection events focused on partial surveys of the French Guianese ant fauna, and the following online repositories of speci- men records: AntWeb Specimen-level data and the images linked to them. Available at https://www.antweb.org. Antmaps.org A comprehensive global database of ant species distributional records, including written records, mu- seum databases, and online specimen databases. Available at http://antmaps.org. The Antmaps.org database was primarily consulted to confirm written species records and to double-check the French Guianese occurrences. GBIF Global Biodiversity Information Facility. An international network and research infrastructure pro- viding free access to species occurrence records. Available at https://www.gbif.org. IDigBio Integrated Digitized Biocollections. A biological species data and images collection curated, con- nected and available in electronic format. Available at https://idigbio.org. Since not all of the identifications could be verified, the occurrences were used only when deemed credible (i.e., taxa that were already known in the Amazon region or when the author specialist confirmed that the record would be improbable). Each entry in the list is backed by at least one published reference or data source. The validity and authority of species names follow Bolton (2019), as implemented on AntCat (www.antcat.org). Species described as morphospecies and specimens identified only to a level higher than species were not in- cluded in the checklist. We also incorporated the species records from French Guiana based on the material deposited in the myrmeco- logical collection of the Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau at the Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira (CEPLAC), in Bahia, Brazil. This is one of the most comprehensive ant collections from French Guiana known to exist in the world, since it holds specimens collected during different diversity programs and surveys conducted since the beginning of the 21 st century, mainly by Alain Dejean and colleagues who intensively studied the biology and diversity of ants in French Guiana for at least two decades (e.g. Dejean et al. 2000, 2004, 2012; Delabie et al. 2009; Groc et al. 2009, 2013, 2017). Despite the extensive species lists published in recent papers, many samples deposited in CEPLAC are newly
Zootaxa 4674 (5): 509–543 https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) Article ZOOTAXA ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4674.5.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5ADC3159-606A-4EB1-B243-FE20D88F5E60 First checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of French Guiana WESLLY FRANCO1, NATALIA LADINO1, JACQUES H. C. DELABIE2,3, ALAIN DEJEAN4,5, JERÔME ORIVEL5; MÉLANIE FICHAUX5, SARAH GROC5, MAURICE LEPONCE6,7 & RODRIGO M. FEITOSA1,8 1 Laboratório de Sistemática e Biologia de Formigas, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Avenida Coronel Francisco Heráclito dos Santos, s/n, Caixa Postal 19020, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil E-mail: weslly.franco@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0003-2670-4527; nmladino@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0001-8230-9439; rsmfeitosa@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0001-8230-9439; 0000-0001-9042-0129 2 Laboratório de Mirmecologia, Convênio UESC-CEPEC, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, Caixa Postal 7, CEP 45600-000, Itabuna, BA, Brazil. E-mail: jacques.delabie@gmail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-2695-1061 3 Departamento de Ciencias Agrárias e Ambientais, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, 45662-000, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil 4 Ecolab, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INPT, UPS, Toulouse, France E-mail: alain.dejean@wanadoo.fr, ORCID: 0000-0002-3561-2248 5 CNRS, UMR EcoFog, AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRA, Université des Antilles, Université de Guyane, Campus agronomique, BP316, 97310 Kourou, France E-mail: jerome.orivel@ecofog.gf; melanie.fichaux@ecofog.gf; groc.sarah@gmail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-5636-3228; 0000-00017904-3529 6 Biodiversity Monitoring & Assessment, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: mleponce@naturalsciences.be, ORCID: 0000-0003-2474-5915 7 Behavioural & Evolutionary Ecology, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Av. F.D. Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium 8 Corresponding author. E-mail: rsmfeitosa@gmail.com Abstract We provide here a checklist of the ants of French Guiana, an overseas department of France situated in northern South America, with a very low human population density and predominantly covered by old-growth tropical rainforests. Based on 165 scientific papers, specimens deposited in collections, and unpublished surveys, a total of 659 valid species and subspecies from 84 genera and 12 subfamilies is presented. Although far from complete, these numbers represent approximately 10% of the ant diversity known to occur in the Neotropical realm. Additionally, three ant genera and 119 species are reported for the first time for French Guiana. Finally, five species are recognized as erroneous records for the the department in the literature. This checklist significantly expands the basic knowledge of the ants in the Guiana Shield, one of the world’s most important biodiversity hotspots. Key words: Formicidae, rainforest, Guiana Shield, distribution, Amazon Introduction French Guiana is located in the oldest and most homogeneous part of the Guiana Shield in South America (Guitet et al. 2015). Extending over approximately 85,000 km2, the predominantly flat relief of French Guiana is dissected by rivers and comprises two main geographical regions: a coastal strip with savannas and mangroves, and a dense tropical forest that covers almost 95% of the territory (Thiollay 1989; Guitet et al. 2013, 2015). The Guiana Shield is one of the most important biodiversity hotspots in the world, and the well-preserved natural environments of French Guiana have been the focus of a number of biodiversity inventories (e.g. Ter Steege et al. 2000; Thiollay 2002; Brosset & Charles-Dominique 2009; Le Bail et al. 2012; Brûlé & Touroult 2014; Lamarre et al. 2016; Roy et al. 2016; Privet et al. 2018; Pollet et al. 2018). Among the initiatives to generate a better understanding of that biodiversity, an emphasis has been placed on the importance of compiling species checklists as baseline studies. These lists reflect our taxonomic knowledge of the organisms in a particular place and time (Brandão 1991; Boggan et al. 1997; Alonso & Agosti 2000; Fernández Accepted by J. Longino: 21 Aug. 2019; published: 27 Sept. 2019 509 & Sendoya 2004). Checklists complement species distribution databases and can be useful in the identification of sampling gaps and range extensions, and can also be used in macroecological studies, species distribution modeling and conservation strategies (Gasper et al., 2016). Brûlé & Touroult (2014) highlighted the insect fauna of French Guiana and discussed the significance of species lists and databases. They addressed the role of both amateur and professional entomologists in gathering taxonomic knowledge. French Guiana has checklists for well-studied insect groups such as butterflies, bees and beetles (Heiss & Moragues 2009; Faynel 2010; Brûlé 2011; Pauly et al. 2013; Sambhu & Nankishore 2018), but no comprehensive checklists of ant species for the region have been produced thus far (MNHN 2018). Ants comprise a diverse and ubiquitous insect family, with a relatively straightforward taxonomy and prominent ecological roles (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990, 2009; Folgarait 1998; Alonso & Agosti 2000; Brühl et al. 2003; Kaspari 2003; Crist 2009; Lach et al. 2010). The Guianese district of Cayenne is the type locality of at least 21 of the oldest names of Neotropical ants, with a remarkable influence on the ant taxonomy of the New World (Bolton, 2019). Numerous ecological surveys and taxonomic studies of Formicidae in French Guiana have been published (e.g. Radoszkowsky 1884; Kempf 1972; Perrault 1988; Perrault 1999; Fernández & Sendoya 2004; Groc et al. 2009, 2013; Delabie et al. 2009, 2010, 2011; Dejean et al. 2000, 2004, 2012, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019; Mariano et al. 2011; Lacau et al. 2012; Fichaux et al. 2019). Such studies generated a large number of species records both in the literature and in ant collections. Here we compile the basic data on the ant fauna of French Guiana, using 165 scientific papers, four online repositories, three myrmecological collections, field endeavors, and unpublished surveys. This first checklist will be an important tool for myrmecological studies in the Neotropical region. Methods The species/subspecies list was compiled by reviewing taxonomic and ecological literature, including collection events focused on partial surveys of the French Guianese ant fauna, and the following online repositories of specimen records: AntWeb Specimen-level data and the images linked to them. Available at https://www.antweb.org. Antmaps.org A comprehensive global database of ant species distributional records, including written records, museum databases, and online specimen databases. Available at http://antmaps.org. The Antmaps.org database was primarily consulted to confirm written species records and to double-check the French Guianese occurrences. GBIF Global Biodiversity Information Facility. An international network and research infrastructure providing free access to species occurrence records. Available at https://www.gbif.org. IDigBio Integrated Digitized Biocollections. A biological species data and images collection curated, connected and available in electronic format. Available at https://idigbio.org. Since not all of the identifications could be verified, the occurrences were used only when deemed credible (i.e., taxa that were already known in the Amazon region or when the author specialist confirmed that the record would be improbable). Each entry in the list is backed by at least one published reference or data source. The validity and authority of species names follow Bolton (2019), as implemented on AntCat (www.antcat.org). Species described as morphospecies and specimens identified only to a level higher than species were not included in the checklist. We also incorporated the species records from French Guiana based on the material deposited in the myrmecological collection of the Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau at the Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira (CEPLAC), in Bahia, Brazil. This is one of the most comprehensive ant collections from French Guiana known to exist in the world, since it holds specimens collected during different diversity programs and surveys conducted since the beginning of the 21st century, mainly by Alain Dejean and colleagues who intensively studied the biology and diversity of ants in French Guiana for at least two decades (e.g. Dejean et al. 2000, 2004, 2012; Delabie et al. 2009; Groc et al. 2009, 2013, 2017). Despite the extensive species lists published in recent papers, many samples deposited in CEPLAC are newly 510 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. identified to species level and their records are presented here for the first time. Specifically, the specimens deposited in the CEPLAC ant collection are samples obtained from several locations in French Guiana (i.e Awala-Yalimapo, Kaw Mountain Kourou, Maripasoula, The Nouragues National Natural Reserve, Paracou Research Station, Petit Saut, Pointe Combi and Saint-Élie). All the species listed from the CEPLAC collection were identified by JHCD. The recent biodiversity inventories of leaf litter ants conducted by the Joint Research Unit EcoFoG (Ecologie des Forêts de Guyane), Kourou, were also included. A part of the specimens was deposited at CEPLAC, but a reference collection is also housed locally, in Kourou. This collection comprises specimens collected from five different sites: three in the area of the Parc amazonien de Guyane, the national park covering about one third of the southern area of French Guiana (Saül; Itoupé Mountain, and the Mitaraka Mountains), the National Natural Reserve of La Trinité and Kaw Mountain. Ants from these inventories were collected using pitfall traps and the Winkler Extractor method. High-resolution images of EcoFoG specimens are available at the Antweb.org webpage under the Group (Specimen Contributors) “ECOFOG”. Additionally, we included the records of species from the sampling effort conducted by the SEAG team (Société Entomologique Antilles-Guyane) in 2011 in the areas of Saül and Roura. For Roura, samples were collected in the Montagnes des Chevaux, one of the few near-shore reliefs that mark the transition between the coastal savanna and the dense tropical forests of French Guiana. Ant specimens were collected with Sand, Land and Air Malaises (SLAM) traps (MegaView Science, Taichung City, Taiwan), a variant of the classical Malaise trap. We also included records from the species collected at the 17th Ant Course, conducted in August 2018 at the Nouragues Ecological Research Station. The Nouragues Ecological Research Station is a scientific field station of the CNRS (French National Center for Scientific Research) in the Nouragues National Natural Reserve. The course sampling points were established in the inselberg camp and ants were collected manually and through Winkler sampling. Finally, our list includes the records provided by Dr. Phil S. Ward (University of California at Davis) from his personal database of the Pseudomyrmex species known to occur in French Guiana. These records refer to specimens deposited in different ant collections and also to the sampling effort by Dr. Ward during the Ant Course 2018. All the ants collected by the SEAG team and part of the material from the Ant Course 2018 were sent to the Laboratório de Sistemática e Biologia de Formigas at the Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, where the samples were processed and identified. Vouchers were deposited in the Padre Jesus Santiago Moure Entomological Collection at the Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP). Results and discussion We have gathered information on 646 species and 13 subspecies from 84 genera and 12 subfamilies of ants recorded for French Guiana (Table 1). The most diverse subfamilies are the Myrmicinae and Ponerinae, with 314 (38 genera) and 81 (14 genera) species/subspecies, respectively. Among all genera, Pheidole (Myrmicinae) and Camponotus (Formicinae) had the highest richness, with 70 and 55 species, respectively (Table 1). The most frequent species in the database is Wasmannia auropunctata (Myrmicinae) with 18 records, followed by Cephalotes atratus (Myrmicinae) and Camponotus femoratus (Formicinae) with 17 records each. These diversity values are not surprising since the taxa mentioned include hyperdiverse and ubiquitous groups from large subfamilies of the Formicidae (Wilson 2003; Ward 2009, 2014). In contrast, subfamilies such as the Agroecomyrmecinae, Amblyoponinae, and Proceratiinae were less diverse, with no more than three species each (Table 1). More than 65% of the ant species known for French Guiana are from the 16 most diverse genera, with ten or more species each. Nineteen genera are represented by a single species. In contrast, almost two-thirds of the genera have between two and nine species each. A total of 119 species are reported here for French Guiana for the first time. Exhaustive inventories and species lists of ants in tropical ecosystems are virtually impossible, given the high diversity of species distributed in the different strata of the environment (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990; Folgarait 1998). Therefore, the number of species records increases with the increasing number of surveys in a given area and the exploration of different strata with different sampling methods. In the 112 species records derived from the SEAG material, 22 species represent new occurrences for the country. The specimens recorded from the SEAG material mainly consist of sexual (alate) forms captured by flight FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 511 interception traps. This fact is in line with the observation that applying different sampling methods in a given location improves our knowledge of ant biology and distribution (Bestelmeyer et al. 2000). In total, 125 species were identified from the Ant Course’s material, 29 of which constitute new records for the country. Also, the myrmicine genus Talaridris Weber, 1941 was recorded for French Guiana for the first time (i.e., Ant Course and EcoFoG samplings). This record extended the distribution of the genus by more than 500 km to the east from the previously easternmost record in Guyana. A total of 25 new occurrences for French Guiana was obtained from the 177 species records derived from the CEPLAC material. 36 new occurrences were from the material deposited in the EcoFoG collection, including the first records for the genera Mycetarotes and Oxyepoecus (Myrmicinae). The distribution of Mycetarotes now extends more than 400 km to the east from the nearest previous record, from Venezuela. For the genus Oxyepoecus, the distribution now extends more than 1,000 km to the north from the previous records in the states of Amazonas and Pará, Brazil. In total, 60 new records of species for French Guiana were derived from the material deposited in the CEPLAC and EcoFoG collections. This confirms the importance of these collections as depositories of voucher specimens from studies on ant diversity historically carried out in French Guiana. This also highlights the importance of biological collections in the compilation of records for studies in any field of knowledge involving the distribution of organisms, since a significant number of species in these collections is not listed nor mentioned in published papers (Turney et al. 2015; Santos & Hoppe 2018). For the 659 species/subspecies of ants reported here for French Guiana, just 13 species from eight genera and three subfamilies are clearly identified as exotic, representing 2% of the local ant fauna. Among them, we listed the following introduced species: Cardiocondyla emeryi, Cardiocondyla minutior, Cardiocondyla obscurior, Cardiocondyla wroughtonii, Monomorium floricola, Monomorium pharaonis, Pheidole megacephala, Tetramorium bicarinatum, Tetramorium lanuginosum, Tetramorium simillimum (Myrmicinae); Linepithema humile, Tapinoma melanocephalum, Technomyrmex vitiensis (Dolichoderinae); and Paratrechina longicornis (Formicinae). The presence of these species in French Guiana was expected since they can be found in all neighboring countries (Antmaps 2019). However, the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Holway et al. 2002), is reported for the first time in French Guiana based on the CEPLAC material. Records of exotic species are most common from sites near the coastline, where most of the Guianese population is concentrated, in the communes of Cayenne, Roura and Sinnamary. Consequently, a correlation between those records and human activities can be assumed. Still, exotic species have been found in the Nouragues National Natural Reserve, a relatively remote region in the heart of FG, and also in Maripasoula, located along the Maroni River, about 200 km south from the coast. The presence of exotic species in these remote areas is not surprising, since there are human settlements in Maripasoula and a constant incoming of food and supplies in the Nouragues Reserve camp. The list of ant taxa presented here considerably surpasses the 522 species currently reported on Antmaps (Antmaps 2019), as well as those recorded from neighboring countries in the Guiana Shield (Table 2). In addition, the 659 ant species/subspecies reported here represent approximately 10% of the total diversity currently known for the Neotropical realm (6,356 spp.) (AntWeb 2019). However, these numbers are in constant flux as new species are recorded or changes are made to their definitions as part of the taxonomical process inherent to species identification (Ward 2007). In comparison to the surrounding territories, the ant fauna of French Guiana appears quite species rich. This is in spite of the fact that French Guiana has no high mountain ranges (the highest elevation is 851 m), and so it lacks species specialized for higher montane habitats. This high diversity can be attributed, at least partly, to the large sampling effort made during recent decades in French Guiana compared to adjacent areas (e.g., Guyana, Suriname, Amapá-Brazil). Most of the records are from the coastal area (Fig. 1), which is easily accessible compared to the inland. Moreover, a large part of the specimens comes from leaf litter sampling and the diversity of arboreal and subterranean species remains largely underexplored. Considering the undersampling of extensive areas and strata and the large number of specimens not identified to species level reported in the literature and museum collections, the number of ant species recorded for French Guiana may increase considerably, making the region one of the most locally diverse in the world for ant species. 512 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. TAble 1. Number of named taxa per genus for French Guiana, based on compiled records. Subfamily/ Genus Number of species/subspecies SEAG Literature Source Online repositories ANT COURSE CEPLAC EcoFoG AGROeCOMYRMeCINAe Tatuidris AMblYOPONINAe 1 1 Fulakora Prionopelta DOlICHODeRINAe 3 3 1 1 Azteca Dolichoderus Dorymyrmex Linepithema Tapinoma Technomyrmex DORYlINAe 25 24 3 3 1 1 Acanthostichus Cheliomyrmex Cylindromyrmex Eciton Labidus Neivamyrmex Neocerapachys Nomamyrmex eCTATOMMINAe 2 2 2 9 4 20 2 2 Ectatomma Gnamptogenys Typhlomyrmex FORMICINAe 5 27 3 Acropyga Brachymyrmex Camponotus Gigantiops Myrmelachista Nylanderia Paratrechina HeTeROPONeRINAe 5 7 55 1 1 5 1 Acanthoponera Heteroponera MYRMICINAe 1 3 Acanthognathus Acromyrmex Allomerus Apterostigma Atta Basiceros Cardiocondyla Carebara 2 6 2 12 3 4 4 6 10* 2* 2* 1 1* 2 3 19* 1 1 20 17 3 2 1 1 2 2 1 8 4 17 1 2 5 22 3 5 5 38 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 6* 1 1* 1 1 4* 10* 2 1* 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 6* 4 13* 1* 4* 1 1 17* 1 1 1 2 6 2 6 3 2 4 4 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1* 2 2 1 2* 1 2* 4 2 2 1 ......continued on the next page FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 513 TAble 1. (Continued) Subfamily/ Genus Number of species/subspecies Cephalotes Crematogaster Cryptomyrmex Cyphomyrmex Daceton 22 23 1 9 1 Eurhopalothrix Hylomyrma Lachnomyrmex Megalomyrmex Monomorium Mycetarotes Mycetophylax Mycocepurus Myrmicocrypta Nesomyrmex Ochetomyrmex Octostruma Oxyepoecus Pheidole Procryptocerus Rogeria Sericomyrmex Solenopsis Stegomyrmex Strumigenys Talaridris Tetramorium Trachymyrmex Tranopelta Wasmannia PARAPONeRINAe 1 7 3 11 2 1 5 2 2 7 2 5 1 70 7 12 5 12 2 40 1 3 12 1 5 Paraponera PONeRINAe Anochetus Centromyrmex Cryptopone Hypoponera Leptogenys Mayaponera Neoponera Odontomachus Pachycondyla Platythyrea Pseudoponera Rasopone SEAG Literature 7* 4* 1 1 20 21 1 9 1 1* 1 2 1 7 1 8 3 1 1 1 1 Source Online repositories ANT COURSE 2 9 CEPLAC 2 1 5 1 1 3 1* 1 1 3 2 2 7 2 4 EcoFoG 11* 10* 1 1 1 1 1 2 3* 1 2 3 2 1* 2 1* 6* 3* 1 1 5* 41 2 10 5 11 2 27 2 3 11 1 5 1 1 1 9 3 2 3 10 1 22 13 4 4 3 4 1 3* 8 3 2 3 9 1 18 11 4 3 3 4 10* 5* 1 2 1 1 10 26* 5* 2 3* 4 9* 1* 7* 2 1 5 1* 2 3 1 1 1 1 7* 5 1 1 1* 1 4 4* 2 1 3 5* 1 2 1 10* 5 1 2 2 2 1 1 ......continued on the next page 514 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. TAble 1. (Continued) Subfamily/ Genus Number of species/subspecies SEAG Simopelta Thaumatomyrmex PROCeRATIINAe 2 1 1 1 Discothyrea PSeUDOMYRMeCINAe 2 2 Pseudomyrmex Total exclusive records 40 659 7 112 23 Source Online repositories Literature ANT COURSE CEPLAC EcoFoG 1 1 23 510 289 6 31 19 1* 125 29 9* 177 24 1 36 35 * Includes species that are new records for French Guiana. TAble 2. Number of ant taxa reported from French Guiana (this paper) and neighboring countries (Antmaps 2019). Country French Guiana Pará (Brazil) Amapá (Brazil) Venezuela Guyana Suriname Subfamilies Genera Species/subspecies 12 12 9 10 10 10 82 80 46 78 73 66 659 599 146 442 394 294 FIGURe 1. Locations in French Guiana with available geographic coordinates for ant records, discriminated by source. Overlapping records (white crosses) are accompanied by the letters of each source, as follows: collections (C), literature (L), online databases (O), and sampling effort (S). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 515 Acknowledgments We would like to thank the Brazilian Council of Research and Scientific Development (CNPq) for the financial support provided to WF (grant 141234/2018-0), NL (grant 131363/2017-4), JHCD (grant 307128/2014-8) and RMF (grant 302462/2016-3). This paper was partially funded by the Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) Science Program (NAS/USAID – award number AID-OAA-A-11-00012 - project 3-188). Financial support was also provided by an Investissement d’Avenir grant from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (CEBA, ANR10-LABX-25-01) for the organization of the Ant Course and the funding of the DIADEMA (DIssecting Amazonian Diversity by Enhancing a Multiple taxonomic-groups Approach) and DIAMOND (DIssecting And MONitoring amazonian Diversity) projects, and by the PO-FEDER 2014-2020, Région Guyane (BiNG, GY0007194). We would also like to thank the national park and natural reserve managers for allowing access to protected areas. Specimens from Itoupé and Mitaraka were collected in the core area of the Parc Amazonien de Guyane. The Itoupé expedition was organized and conducted in collaboration with the Parc Amazonien de Guyane. The Mitaraka expedition was part of the “Our Planet Reviewed” French Guiana-2015 initiative organized by the Museìum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris) and the NGO Pro-Natura International, and funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Conseil Reìgional de Guyane, the Conseil Geìneìral de Guyane, the Direction de l’Environnement, de l’Ameìnagement et du Logement and by the MinisteÌre de l’Eìducation nationale, de l’Enseignement Supeìrieur et de la Recherche. Specimens from the Trinité area were collected in the Réserve Naturelle Nationale de La Trinité managed by the Office National des Forêts. The expedition was funded by the Réserve Naturelle Nationale de La Trinité and the DEAL Guyane. We would like to thank the Nouragues Natural Reserve for allowing sampling in the protected area and to the Nouragues Research Station and the CNRS Guyane for logistical support to the Ant Course. Thanks also to Alexandre Casadei Ferreira and Thiago Sanches R. da Silva for the identification of Pheidole and Strumigenys species, respectively. We are deeply indebted to Alexandre C. Ferreira, Phil Ward and Jack Longino for providing us with samples and a list of species from the Ant Course 2018. Finally, thanks to Jack Longino, Benoit Guénard, and an anonymous reviewer for critically reading a previous version of this work. literature cited Alonso, L. & Agosti, D. (2000) Biodiversity studies, monitoring, and ants: an overview. In: Agosti, D., Majer, J., Alonso, L. & Schultz, T. (Eds.), Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press., Washington, D.C., pp. 1–8. Antmaps (2019) Available from: http://www.antmaps.org. (accessed 5 July 2019) Bestelmeyer, B.T., Agosti, D., Alonso, L.E., Brandão, C.R.F, Brown, Jr. W.L., Delabie, J.H.C. & Silvestre, R. (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground-dwelling ants: an overview, description, and evaluation. In: Agosti, D.D., Majer, J.D., Alonso, L.E., Schultz, T.R. (Eds.), Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 222–144. Boggan, J., Funk, V., Kelloff, C., Hoff, M., Cremers, G. & Feuillet, C. (1997) Checklist of the plants of the Guianas (Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). Smithsonian’s Biological Diversity of the Guianas Program. Washington, 238 pp. Bolton, B. (2019) An online catalog of the ants of the world. Available from: http://antcat.org (accessed 26 March 2019) Brandão, C. (1991) Adendos ao catálogo abreviado das formigas da região Neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 35 (2), 319–412. Broseet, A. & Charles-Dominique, P. (2009) The bats from French Guiana: a taxonomic, faunistic and ecological approach. Mammalia, 54 (4), 509–560. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1990.54.4.509 Brühl, C., Eltz, T. & Linsenmair, K. (2003) Size does matter-effects of tropical rainforest fragmentation on the leaf litter ant community in Sabah, Malaysia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12 (7), 1371–1389. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023621609102 Brûlé, S. (2011) Etat des connaissances sur les Buprestes de Guyane (Coleoptera, Buprestoidea). In: Touroult, J. (Ed.), Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de Guyane, tome III. ACOREP-France, Paris, pp. 46–70. [http://www.acorep.fr/documentation.html] Brûlé, S. & Touroult, J. (2014) Insects of French Guiana: a baseline for diversity and taxonomic effort. ZooKeys, 434, 111– 130. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.434.7582 Crist, T. (2009) Biodiversity, species interactions and functional roles of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in fragmented landscapes: a review. Myrmecological News, 12, 3–13. 516 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Dejean, A., Corbara, B., Orivel, J., Snelling, R.R., Delabie, J.H.C & Belin-Depoux, M. (2000) The importance of ant gardens in the pioneer vegetal formations of French Guiana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 35 (3), 425–439 Dejean, A., Quilichini, A., Delabie, J.H.C, Orivel, J., Corbara, B. & Gibernau, M. (2004) Influence of its associated ant species on the life history of the myrmecophyte Cordia nodosa in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20 (6), 701–704. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740400183X Dejean, A., Delabie, J.H.C., Corbara, B., Azémar, F., Groc, S., Orivel, J. & Leponce, M. (2012) The ecology and feeding habits of the arboreal trap-jawed ant Daceton armigerum. PLoS ONE, 7 (6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037683 Dejean, A., Céréghino, R., Leponce, M., Rossi, V., Roux, O., Compin, A., Delabie, J.H.C. & Corbara, B. (2015) The fire ant Solenopsis saevissima and habitat disturbance alter ant communities. Biological Conservation, 187, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.012. Dejean, A., Petitclerc, F., Compin, A., Azémar, F., Corbara, B., Delabie, J.H.C. & Leroy, C. (2017) Hollow internodes permit a Neotropical understory plant to shelter multiple mutualistic ant species, obtaining protection and nutrient provisioning (myrmecotrophy). American Naturalist, 190 (5), E124–E131. https://doi.org/10.1086/693782 Dejean, A., Azémar, F., Peticlerc, F., Delabie, J.H.C., Corbara, B., Leroy, C., Céréghino, R. & Compin, A. (2018) Highly modular pattern in ant-plant interactions involving specialized and non-specialized myrmecophytes. The Science of Nature (Naturwissenschaften), 105, 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-018-1570-0 Dejean A., Compin, A., Delabie, J.H C., Azémar, F., Corbara, B. & Leponce, M. (2019) Biotic and abiotic determinants of the formation of ant mosaics in primary Neotropical rainforests. Ecological Entomology, 44 (4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12735 Delabie, J., Céréghino, R., Groc, S., Dejean, A., Gibernau, M., Corbara, B. & Dejean, A. (2009) Ants as biological indicators of Wayana Amerindian land use in French Guiana. Comptes rendus biologies, 332 (7), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.01.006 Delabie, J.H.C., da Rocha, W.D., Feitosa, R.M., Devienne, P. & Fresneau, D. (2010) Gnamptogenys concinna (F. Smith, 1858): nouvelles données sur sa distribution et commentaires sur ce cas de gigantisme dans le genre Gnamptogenys (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ectatomminae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 115 (3), 269–277. Delabie, J.H.C., Groc, S. & Dejean, A. (2011) The tramp ant Technomyrmex vitiensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) on South America. Florida Entomologist, 94 (3), 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0335 Faynel, C. (2010) 3ème note sur les Theclinae de Guyane (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Lambillionea, 110 (1), 9–16. Fernández, F. & Sendoya, S. (2004) Lista de las hormigas neotropicales. Biota Colombiana, 5 (1), 3–93. Fichaux, M., Béchade, B., Donald, J., Weyna, A., Delabie, J.H.C., Murienne, J., Baraloto, C. & Orivel, J. (2019) Habitats shape taxonomic and functional composition of Neotropical ant assemblages. Oecologia, 189 (2), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04341-z Folgarait, P. (1998) Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7 (9), 1221–1244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008891901953 Gasper, A.L., Eisenlohr, P.V. & Salino, A. (2016) Improving collection efforts to avoid loss of biodiversity: lessons from comprehensive sampling of lycophytes and ferns in the subtropical Atlantic Forest. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 30 (2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062015abb0292 Groc S., Orivel, J., Dejean, A., Martin, J., Etienne, M., Corbara, B. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2009) Baseline study of the leaf-litter ant fauna in a French Guianese forest. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2 (3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00060.x Groc, S., Delabie, J., Fernández, F., Leponce, M., Orivel, J., Silvestre, R., Vasconcelos, H. & Dejean, A. (2013) Leaf-litter ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a pristine Guianese rainforest: stable functional structure versus high species turnover. Myrmecological News, 19, 43–51. Groc, S., Delabie, J.H.C., Fernandez, F., Petitclerc, F. Corbara, B., Leponce, M., Cereghino, R. & Dejean, A. (2017) Litterdwelling ants as bioindicators to gauge the sustainability of small arboreal monocultures embedded in the Amazonian rainforest. Ecological Indicators, 82, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.026 Guénard, B., Weiser, M., Gomez, K., Narula, N. & Economo, E. (2017) The Global Ant Biodiversity Informatics (GABI) database: a synthesis of ant species geographic distributions. Myrmecological News, 24, 83–89. Guitet, S., Cornu J., Brunaux O., Betbeder J., Carozza, J. & Richard-Hensen, C. (2013) Landform and landscape mapping, French Guiana (South America). Journal of Maps, 9 (3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2013.785371 Guitet, S., Pélissier, R., Brunaux, O., Jaouen, G. & Sabatier, D. (2015) Geomorphological landscape features explain floristic patterns in French Guiana rainforest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24 (5), 1215–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0854-8 Heiss, E. & Moragues, G. (2009) Flat Bugs of French Guyana – a preliminary faunal list (Heteroptera, Aradidae). Linzer Biolo- FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 517 gische Beitraege, 41 (2), 1659–1675. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (1990) The Ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 732 pp. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E.O. (2009) The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, 576 pp. Holway, D.A., Lach, L., Suarez, A.V., Tsutsui, N.D. & Case, T.J. (2002) The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics, 33, 181–233 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444 Janicki, J., Narula, N., Ziegler, M., Guénard, B. & Economo, E. (2016) Visualizing and interacting with large-volume biodiversity data using client-server web-mapping applications: The design and implementation of Antmaps.org. Ecological Informatics, 32, 185–193. Kaspari, M. (2003) Introducción a la ecología de las hormigas. In: Fernández, F. (Ed.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp. 97–112. Kempf, W. (1972) Catálogo abreviado das formigas da região Neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 15 (1–4), 1–344. Lacau, S., Groc, S., Dejean, A., de Oliviera, M. & Delabie, J. (2012) Tatuidris kapasi sp. nov.: a new armadillo ant from French Guiana. Psyche, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/926089 Lach, L., Parr, C.L. & Abbott, K.L. (2010) Ant Ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, 410 pp. Lamarre, G.P.A., Hérault, B., Fine, P.V., Vedel, V., Lupoli, R., Mesones, I. & Baraloto, C. Taxonomic and functional composition of arthropod assemblages across contrasting Amazonian forests. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85 (1), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12445 LaPolla, J., Suman, T., Sosa-Calvo, J. & Schultz, T. (2007) Leaf litter ant diversity in Guyana. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16 (2), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-6229-4 Le Bail, P.Y., Covain, R., Jégu, M., Fisch-Muller, S., Vigouroux, R. & Keith, P. (2012) Updated checklist of the freshwater and estuarine fishes of French Guiana. Cybium, 36 (1), 293–319. Mariano, C.S.F., Santos, I.S., Groc, S., Leroy, C., Malé, P.-J., Ruiz-Gonzales, M. X., Cerdan, P., Dejean, A. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2011) The karyotypes of Gigantiops destructor (Fabricius) and other ants from French Guiana (Formicidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France, 47 (1–2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2011.10697705 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (2003-2018) Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel. Available from: https://inpn. mnhn.fr. (accessed 16 April 2019). Pauly, A., Pedro, S., Rasmussen, C. & Roubik, D. (2013) Stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Meliponini) of French Guiana. In: Vit, P., Pedro, S. & Roubik, D. (Eds.), Pot-Honey, A legacy of stingless bees. Springer, New York, pp. 87–97. Perrault, G. (1988) Octostruma betschi, n. sp. de Guyane Française (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revue Française d’Entomologie, 10 (4), 303–307. Perrault, G. (1999) Heteroponera georgesi n. sp. de Guyane Française (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 103 (5), 475–477. Pollet, M., Leponce, M., Pascal, O., Touroult, J. & Van Calster, H. (2018) Dipterological survey in Mitaraka Massif (French Guiana) reveals megadiverse dolichopodid fauna with an unprecedented species richness in Paraclius Loew, 1864 (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Zoosystema, 40 (21), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a21 Privet, K., Courtial, C., Decaens, T., Djoudi, E.A., Vedel, V., Ysnel, F. & Pétilion, J. (2018) Spider assemblage structure in a neotropical rainforest-inselberg complex: ecological and methodological insights from a small-scale intensive survey. Tropical Ecology, 59 (1), 21–34. Radoszkowsky, O. (1884) Fourmis de Cayenne Française. Trudy Russkago Entomologicheskago Obshchestva, 18, 30–39. Roy, M., Schimann, H., Braga-Neto, R., Da Silva, R. A., Duque, J., Frame, D., Wartchow, F. & Neves, M.A. (2016) Diversity and distribution of ectomycorrhizal fungi from Amazonian lowland white-sand forests in Brazil and French Guiana. Biotropica, 48, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12297 Sambhu, H. & Nankishore, A. (2018) Butterflies (Lepidoptera) of Guyana: A compilation of records. Zootaxa, 4371 (1), 1– 187. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4371.1.1 Santos, B.F. & Hoppe, J.P.M. (2018) Filling gaps in species distributions through the study of biological collections: 415 new distribution records for Neotropical Cryptinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 62 (4), 288–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2018.09.001 Schmidt, M., Dejean, A. (2018) A dolichoderine ant that constructs traps to collectively ambush prey: convergent evolution with a myrmicine genus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 124 (1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly028 Ter Steege, H., Sabatier, D., Castellanos, H., Van Andel, T., Duivenvoorden, J., Adalardo de Oliveira, A., EK, R., Lilwah, R., 518 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Maas, P. & Mori, S. (2000) An analysis of the floristic composition and diversity of Amazonian forests including those of the Guiana Shield. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 16 (6), 801–828. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400001735 Thiollay, J. (1989) Area requirements for the conservation of rain forest raptors and game birds in French Guiana. Conservation Biology, 3 (2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00065.x Thiollay, J. (2002) Avian diversity and distribution in French Guiana: Patterns across a large forest landscape. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 18 (4), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740200233X Turney, S. Cameron, E.R., Cloutier, C.A. & Buddle, C.M. (2015) Non-repeatable science: assessing the frequency of voucher specimen deposition reveals that most arthropod research cannot be verified. PeerJ, e1168. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1168 Ward, P.S. (2007) Phylogeny, classification, and species-level taxonomy of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 1668, 549–563. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1668.1.26 Ward, P.S. (2009) Taxonomy, phylogenetics, and evolution. In: Lach, L., Parr, C. & Abbott, K. (Eds.), Ant Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3–17. Ward, P.S. (2014) The phylogeny and evolution of ants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 45, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091824 Wilson, E. (2003) Pheidole in the New World: A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 794 pp. Species list The numbers in parentheses correspond to those listed in the References section. The numbered references for a species do not always represent an exhaustive list of the published reports, and they are not ordered chronologically. Genera and species/subspecies indicated with an asterisk (*) refer to new records for French Guiana. The introduced species are indicated with a cross (+). AGROeCOMYRMeCINAe: 1 species Tatuidris: 1 species Tatuidris tatusia Brown & Kempf, 1968 (39, 96). AMblYOPONINAe: 6 species Fulakora: 3 species Fulakora lurilabes (Lattke, 1991) (1, 71, 72). Fulakora mystriops* (Brown, 1960) (21). Fulakora orizabana* (Brown, 1960) (40). Prionopelta: 3 species Prionopelta amabilis* Borgmeier, 1949 (1). Prionopelta antillana Forel, 1909 (57, 58). Prionopelta marthae Forel, 1909 (21). DOlICHODeRINAe: 53 species/4 subspecies Azteca: 22 species/3 subspecies Azteca alfari Emery, 1893 (24, 58). Azteca andreae Guerrero, Delabie & Dejean, 2010 (74, 149). Azteca bequaerti Wheeler & Bequaert, 1929 (32). Azteca brevis Forel, 1899 (34, 142). Azteca chartifex Forel, 1896 (21, 24, 58, 68). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 519 Azteca constructor Emery, 1896 (58). Azteca delpini Emery, 1893 (58). Azteca depilis Emery, 1893 (2, 32). Azteca fasciata* Emery, 1893 (21). Azteca forelii* Emery, 1893 (21). Azteca gnava Forel, 1906 (2). Azteca gnava cayennensis Forel, 1912 (87). Azteca instabilis (Smith, 1862) (21, 33, 58, 71, 72, 141, 147, 170). Azteca jelskii Emery, 1893 (32, 42, 47, 58, 87, 104, 141). Azteca ovaticeps Forel, 1904 (2). Azteca paraensis Forel, 1904 (32). Azteca schimperi Emery, 1893 (58, 147). Azteca sericea (Mayr, 1866) (42, 58, 170). Azteca tonduzi* Forel, 1899 (40). Azteca trailii Emery, 1893 (24, 58). Azteca trigona Emery, 1893 (58). Azteca trigona mediops Forel, 1904 (58). Azteca trigona subdentata Forel, 1904 (58). Azteca ulei cordiae Forel, 1904 (58). Azteca velox Forel, 1899 (58). Dolichoderus: 24 species Dolichoderus abruptus* (Smith, 1858) (1). Dolichoderus attelaboides (Fabricius, 1775) (1, 21, 24, 58, 68, 71, 72, 124, 140). Dolichoderus bidens (Linnaeus, 1758) (4, 21, 24, 33, 35, 43, 58, 72, 73, 124, 140, 141). Dolichoderus bispinosus (Olivier, 1792) (17, 21, 24, 35, 58, 82, 87, 68, 72, 73, 108, 124, 125, 140, 141). Dolichoderus debilis Emery, 1890 (58, 73). Dolichoderus decollatus Smith, 1858 (1, 35, 58, 73, 87, 108, 131, 141). Dolichoderus diversus* Emery, 1894 (1, 21). Dolichoderus ferrugineus* Forel, 1903 (21). Dolichoderus gagates Emery, 1890 (58). Dolichoderus imitator Emery, 1894 (1, 21, 68, 71, 72, 73, 140). Dolichoderus inermis* MacKay, 1993 (40). Dolichoderus lamellosus (Mayr, 1870) (58, 140). Dolichoderus laminatus (Mayr, 1870) (21, 58, 140, 147). Dolichoderus lugens Emery, 1894 (58). Dolichoderus lutosus (Smith, 1858) (1, 21, 58, 72, 73, 124, 140). Dolichoderus mucronifer (Roger, 1862) (47, 58, 62, 63, 82, 87, 108, 131, 141). Dolichoderus quadridenticulatus (Roger, 1862) (31, 124, 140). Dolichoderus rugosus (Smith, 1858) (58). Dolichoderus schulzi* Emery, 1894 (140). Dolichoderus septemspinosus Emery, 1894 (2, 58, 140). Dolichoderus smithi* MacKay, 1993 (40). Dolichoderus spurius Forel, 1903 (21, 58). Dolichoderus varians* Mann, 1916 (21). Dolichoderus voraginosus Mackay, 1993 (147). Dorymyrmex: 2 species/1 subspecies Dorymyrmex brunneus Forel, 1908 (22, 58, 147). Dorymyrmex pyramicus (Roger, 1863) (21, 29, 58, 124, 147). Dorymyrmex pyramicus guyanensis Santschi, 1922 (6, 21, 58, 87, 132, 141). 520 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Linepithema: 3 species Linepithema humile* + (Mayr, 1868) (21). Linepithema iniquum (Mayr, 1870) (58). Linepithema neotropicum Wild, 2007 (1, 35, 73). Tapinoma: 1 species Tapinoma melanocephalum+ (Fabricius, 1793) (2, 4, 17, 58, 72, 73, 87, 124, 141, 147). Technomyrmex: 1 species Technomyrmex vitiensis+ Mann, 1921 (37, 147). DORYlINAe: 40 species/3 subspecies Acanthostichus: 2 species Acanthostichus brevicornis Emery, 1894 (21, 87). Acanthostichus serratulus (Smith, 1858) (94). Cheliomyrmex: 2 species Cheliomyrmex megalonyx Wheeler, 1921 (58). Cheliomyrmex morosus (Smith, 1859) (58). Cylindromyrmex: 2 species Cylindromyrmex brasiliensis* Emery, 1901 (140). Cylindromyrmex striatus Mayr, 1870 (58, 140). Eciton: 6 species/3 subspecies Eciton burchellii (Westwood, 1842) (1, 4, 35). Eciton burchellii cupiens Santschi, 1923 (6, 12, 13, 14, 58, 87, 89, 133). Eciton drepanophorum Smith, 1858 (6, 12, 13, 48, 58, 72, 131). Eciton hamatum (Fabricius, 1782) (13, 17, 21, 58, 87, 140). Eciton mexicanum Roger, 1863 (13). Eciton mexicanum latidens Santschi, 1911 (6, 12, 13, 87, 126). Eciton mexicanum moralum Santschi, 1923 (12, 13, 14, 87, 133). Eciton rapax* Smith, 1855 (140). Eciton vagans (Olivier, 1792) (1, 6, 12, 13, 14, 17, 58, 87, 131). Labidus: 4 species Labidus auropubens (Santschi, 1920) (6, 12, 13, 14, 58, 87). Labidus coecus (Latreille, 1802) (1, 11, 13, 21, 35, 48, 58, 72, 73, 110, 164). Labidus praedator (Smith, 1858) (1, 21,110, 140). Labidus truncatidens (Santschi, 1920) (6, 12, 13, 14, 58, 83, 87). Neivamyrmex: 20 species Neivamyrmex angustinodis (Emery, 1888) (58). Neivamyrmex bohlsi (Emery, 1896) (58). Neivamyrmex carettei* (Forel, 1913) (40). Neivamyrmex compressinodis Borgmeier, 1953 (100). Neivamyrmex diana (Forel, 1912) (73). Neivamyrmex emersoni (Wheeler, 1921) (58). Neivamyrmex falciferus (Emery, 1900) (12, 13, 58). Neivamyrmex gibbatus Borgmeier, 1953 (58). Neivamyrmex guerinii (Shuckard, 1840) (58). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 521 Neivamyrmex guyanensis (Santschi, 1916) (6, 12, 13, 14, 58, 87, 128). Neivamyrmex halidaii (Shuckard, 1840) (6, 11, 12, 13, 48, 58, 127, 143). Neivamyrmex iridescens Borgmeier, 1950 (58, 72, 73). Neivamyrmex legionis (Smith, 1855) (2). Neivamyrmex leptognathus (Emery, 1900) (2). Neivamyrmex maxillosus (Emery, 1900) (13, 58, 126). Neivamyrmex megathrix Kempf, 1961 (58). Neivamyrmex pilosus (Smith, 1858) (4, 58). Neivamyrmex postangustatus (Borgmeier, 1934) (58). Neivamyrmex punctaticeps (Emery, 1894) (58). Neivamyrmex walkerii (Westwood, 1842) (13, 58). Neocerapachys: 2 species Neocerapachys neotropicus Weber, 1939 (73). Neocerapachys splendens* Borgmeier, 1957 (1, 140). Nomamyrmex: 2 species Nomamyrmex esenbeckii (Westwood, 1842) (6, 12, 13, 58). Nomamyrmex hartigii (Westwood, 1842) (58). eCTATOMMINAe: 35 species Ectatomma: 5 species Ectatomma brunneum Smith, 1858 (3, 4, 21, 53, 57, 58, 65, 73, 87, 97, 117, 124, 131, 147). Ectatomma edentatum Roger, 1863 (1, 21, 35 58, 57, 71, 72, 73, 101, 117, 140). Ectatomma lugens Emery, 1894 (1, 21, 35, 57, 58, 71, 72, 73, 117). Ectatomma ruidum (Roger, 1860) (57, 58, 92, 110, 125). Ectatomma tuberculatum (Olivier, 1792) (21, 24, 33, 57, 58, 68, 73, 101, 117, 124, 125, 140). Gnamptogenys: 27 species Gnamptogenys acuminata (Emery, 1896) (21, 57, 58, 71, 72, 73). Gnamptogenys ammophila* Lattke, 1990 (21). Gnamptogenys annulata (Mayr, 1887) (55, 56, 72, 131). Gnamptogenys concinna (Smith, F., 1858) (36). Gnamptogenys continua (Mayr, 1887) (72, 73). Gnamptogenys enodis Lattke, Fernández & Palacio, 2004 (71, 72). Gnamptogenys ericae (Forel, 1912) (2). Gnamptogenys gracilis (Santschi, 1929) (57, 58). Gnamptogenys haenschi (Emery, 1902) (21, 71, 72, 73). Gnamptogenys horni (Santschi, 1929) (1, 21, 35, 57, 58, 71, 72, 73). Gnamptogenys interrupta* (Mayr, 1887) (1). Gnamptogenys mecotyle Brown, 1958 (72, 73). Gnamptogenys menozzii* (Borgmeier, 1928) (21). Gnamptogenys mina (Brown, 1956) (21, 71, 72). Gnamptogenys minuta (Emery, 1896) (21, 57, 58, 71, 72, 73). Gnamptogenys moelleri (Forel, 1912) (1, 21, 35, 137). Gnamptogenys mordax (Smith, 1858) (46, 57, 58, 71, 72). Gnamptogenys pleurodon (Emery, 1896) (1, 21, 72, 73, 97, 101). Gnamptogenys porcata (Emery, 1896) (72, 73, 101). Gnamptogenys regularis Mayr, 1870 (21, 57, 58). Gnamptogenys relicta (Mann, 1916) (1, 21, 71, 72, 73, 101, 140). Gnamptogenys striatula Mayr, 1884 (17, 18, 21, 35, 57, 58, 65, 71, 72, 87, 124, 125, 137, 140, 173). 522 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Gnamptogenys strigata (Norton, 1868) (17, 18, 35, 57, 58, 65, 71, 72, 87, 124, 125, 137, 173). Gnamptogenys striolata* (Borgmeier, 1957) (40). Gnamptogenys sulcata (Smith, 1858) (57, 58, 71, 72, 140). Gnamptogenys tortuolosa (Smith, 1858) (1, 21, 35, 57, 58, 72, 73, 97). Gnamptogenys triangularis (Mayr, 1887) (1, 87, 131, 137). Typhlomyrmex: 3 species Typhlomyrmex clavicornis Emery, 1906 (57, 58). Typhlomyrmex pusillus Emery, 1894 (73, 77, 95). Typhlomyrmex rogenhoferi Mayr, 1862 (57, 58, 77, 95 112). FORMICINAe: 72 species/3 subspecies Acropyga: 5 species Acropyga decedens (Mayr, 1887) (72, 73). Acropyga fuhrmanni (Forel, 1914) (71, 72, 73). Acropyga guianensis Weber, 1944 (8). Acropyga romeo LaPolla, 2004 (21, 72). Acropyga smithii Forel, 1893 (71, 72). Brachymyrmex: 7 species Brachymyrmex admotus Mayr, 1887 (73). Brachymyrmex brevicornis Emery, 1906 (58). Brachymyrmex cavernicola* Wheeler, 1938 (1). Brachymyrmex cordemoyi Forel, 1895 (58). Brachymyrmex heeri Forel, 1874 (21, 58, 59, 72, 73). Brachymyrmex patagonicus Mayr, 1868 (29, 35, 50, 58, 124, 147). Brachymyrmex pictus* Mayr, 1887 (40). Camponotus: 52 species/3 subspecies Camponotus ager (Smith,1858) (1, 58, 140). Camponotus apicalis (Mann, 1916) (87, 131). Camponotus atriceps (Smith, 1858) (21, 24, 31, 32, 35, 58, 68, 72, 73, 75, 87, 124, 132, 140, 147). Camponotus auricomus Roger, 1862 (58). Camponotus balzani Emery, 1894 (21, 76). Camponotus beebei Wheeler, 1918 (58). Camponotus bidens Mayr, 1870 (31, 32, 58, 140). Camponotus blandus (Smith, 1858) (21, 29, 58, 140). Camponotus brasiliensis Mayr, 1862 (124). Camponotus cacicus Emery, 1903 (124). Camponotus chartifex (Smith, 1860) (24, 54, 58). Camponotus cingulatus* Mayr, 1862 (140). Camponotus crassus Mayr, 1862 (21, 31, 32, 68, 73, 140, 147). Camponotus curviscapus* Emery, 1896 (140). Camponotus divergens* Mayr, 1887 (140). Camponotus excisus* Mayr, 1870 (40). Camponotus fasciatellus Dalla Torre, 1892 (58, 124). Camponotus fastigatus Roger, 1863 (21, 35, 58, 71, 72, 73,147). Camponotus femoratus (Fabricius, 1804) (1, 4, 21, 24, 33, 35, 58, 68, 71, 72, 73, 101, 102, 113, 140, 147, 150). Camponotus flavescens (Fabricius, 1793) (58, 87). Camponotus geayi Santschi, 1922 (87, 132). Camponotus heathi Mann, 1916 (59). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 523 Camponotus hippocrepis* Emery, 1920 (140). Camponotus indicatus Santschi, 1922 (58, 87, 132). Camponotus latangulus Roger, 1863 (58, 73, 124, 168). Camponotus lespesii Forel, 1886 (72, 73). Camponotus leydigi Forel, 1886 (21, 58, 61, 73). Camponotus linnaei* Forel, 1886 (40). Camponotus melanoticus Emery, 1894 (21, 29, 72, 73, 147). Camponotus mocsaryi Forel, 1902 (58, 68, 140). Camponotus nidulans (Smith, 1860) (21, 54, 73, 87, 124, 131, 140). Camponotus novogranadensis Mayr, 1870 (21, 31, 32, 38, 58, 72, 101, 124, 140). Camponotus orthocephalus* Emery, 1894 (1). Camponotus picipes (Olivier, 1792) (17, 58, 87). Camponotus pittieri* Forel, 1899 (140). Camponotus platytarsus Roger, 1863 (58, 61). Camponotus plutus Santschi, 1922 (87, 132). Camponotus punctulatus andigenus Emery, 1903 (2, 101). Camponotus rapax (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 35, 58, 68, 71, 72, 73, 140). Camponotus rectangularis Emery, 1890 (58, 73, 140). Camponotus rectangularis setipes* Forel, 1904 (21). Camponotus renggeri Emery, 1894 (21, 58, 68, 72, 73, 147). Camponotus rufipes (Fabricius, 1775) (58, 140, 147). Camponotus salvini* Forel, 1899 (40). Camponotus sanctaefidei* Dalla Torre, 1892 (21, 140). Camponotus senex (Smith, 1858) (24, 140, 147). Camponotus sericeiventris (Guérin-Méneville, 1838) (58). Camponotus sexguttatus (Fabricius, 1793) (1, 21, 43, 58, 124, 140, 147). Camponotus simillimus (Smith, 1862) (58, 140). Camponotus simillimus indianus Forel, 1879 (61). Camponotus substitutus Emery, 1894 (58). Camponotus trapezoideus Mayr, 1870 (21, 101). Camponotus urichi Forel, 1899 (2). Camponotus vittatus* Forel, 1904 (21). Camponotus zoc Forel, 1879 (61). Gigantiops: 1 species Gigantiops destructor (Fabricius, 1804) (2, 4, 7, 21, 29, 30, 58, 72, 73, 101, 113, 124, 140, 167). Myrmelachista: 1 species Myrmelachista guyanensis Wheeler, 1934 (58). Nylanderia: 5 species Nylanderia caeciliae (Forel, 1899) (58, 140). Nylanderia fulva (Mayr, 1862) (21, 58, 71, 72, 124, 147) Nylanderia guatemalensis (Forel, 1885) (72, 73). Nylanderia lietzi (Forel, 1908) (58). Nylanderia steinheili (Forel, 1893) (2). Paratrechina: 1 species Paratrechina longicornis+ (Latreille, 1802) (21, 35, 58, 71, 72, 124, 147). 524 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. HeTeROPONeRINAe: 4 species Acanthoponera: 1 species Acanthoponera peruviana Brown, 1958 (51). Heteroponera: 3 species Heteroponera georgesi Perrault, 1999 (57, 58, 120). Heteroponera microps Borgmeier, 1957 (51). Heteroponera panamensis* (Forel, 1899) (40). MYRMICINAe: 313 species/1 subspecies Acanthognathus: 2 species Acanthognathus brevicornis Smith, 1944 (73). Acanthognathus ocellatus Mayr, 1887 (72, 140). Acromyrmex: 5 species / 1 subspecies Acromyrmex biscutatus (Fabricius, 1775) (87). Acromyrmex coronatus globoculis Kempf, 1972 (58). Acromyrmex hystrix (Latreille, 1802) (68, 87, 147, 173). Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich, 1793) (17, 21, 35, 58, 69, 71, 72, 87, 110, 156, 169). Acromyrmex rugosus (Smith, 1858) (21, 73). Acromyrmex subterraneus (Forel, 1893) (72). Allomerus: 2 species Allomerus decemarticulatus Mayr, 1878 (1, 21, 32, 55, 70, 71, 72, 144). Allomerus octoarticulatus Mayr, 1878 (1, 25, 31, 32,55, 70, 144). Apterostigma: 12 species Apterostigma acre Lattke, 1997 (59). Apterostigma angustum* Lattke, 1997 (21). Apterostigma auriculatum Wheeler, 1925 (30, 58). Apterostigma avium* Lattke, 1997 (40). Apterostigma chocoense* Lattke, 1997 (40). Apterostigma ierense* Weber, 1937 (40). Apterostigma pariense Lattke, 1997 (73). Apterostigma pilosum* Mayr, 1865 (21). Apterostigma robustum Emery, 1896 (58). Apterostigma tachirense* Lattke, 1997 (40). Apterostigma urichii Forel, 1893 (58, 72, 73, 98). Apterostigma wasmannii Forel, 1892 (58). Atta: 3 species Atta cephalotes (Linnaeus, 1758) (35, 58, 68, 72, 73, 110, 124). Atta laevigata (Smith, 1858) (58). Atta sexdens (Linnaeus, 1758) (4, 29, 35, 58, 91, 124, 132). Basiceros: 4 species Basiceros manni* Brown & Kempf, 1960 (40). Basiceros militaris* (Weber, 1950) (40). Basiceros scambognathus (Brown, 1949) (1, 123, 140). Basiceros singularis (Smith, 1858) (58, 68, 123). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 525 Cardiocondyla: 4 species Cardiocondyla emeryi+ Forel, 1881 (159). Cardiocondyla minutior+ Forel, 1899 (35, 147) Cardiocondyla obscurior+ Wheeler, 1929 (21, 73, 147). Cardiocondyla wroughtonii+ (Forel, 1890) (21, 67). Carebara: 6 species Carebara bicarinata Santschi, 1912 (49, 58, 87, 127, 166). Carebara brevipilosa* Fernández, 2004 (1). Carebara elongata Fernández, 2004 (71, 72). Carebara mayri (Forel, 1901) (58, 133). Carebara reina* Fernández, 2004 (1). Carebara urichi (Wheeler, 1922) (21, 58, 71, 72, 73). Cephalotes: 22 species Cephalotes angustus* (Mayr, 1862) (21). Cephalotes atratus (Linnaeus, 1758) (1, 21, 23, 24, 30, 33, 35, 58, 68, 72, 73, 80, 101, 124, 129, 130, 140). Cephalotes clypeatus (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 58). Cephalotes complanatus (Guérin-Méneville, 1844) (16, 17, 23, 58, 80, 82, 87, 111, 124, 140). Cephalotes cordatus (Smith, 1853) (21, 43, 58). Cephalotes grandinosus (Smith, 1860) (124) Cephalotes laminatus* (Smith, 1860) (140). Cephalotes maculatus (Smith, 1876) (21, 23, 72, 73). Cephalotes marginatus (Fabricius, 1804) (23, 58, 80, 87, 101, 122, 130). Cephalotes minutus (Fabricius, 1804) (1, 21, 73, 80, 101, 124, 138, 140). Cephalotes oculatus (Spinola, 1851) (124). Cephalotes opacus Santschi, 1920 (21, 23, 31, 32, 58, 80, 83, 87, 88, 130, 136). Cephalotes pallens (Klug, 1824) (21, 23, 58, 140). Cephalotes pallidoides De Andrade, 1999 (6, 73,147). Cephalotes pallidus De Andrade, 1999 (73). Cephalotes pavonii (Latreille, 1809) (58, 140). Cephalotes placidus (Smith, 1860) (31, 32, 82, 83). Cephalotes pusillus (Klug, 1824) (21, 58). Cephalotes simillimus (Kempf, 1951) (58). Cephalotes spinosus (Mayr, 1862) (21, 58, 73). Cephalotes targionii (Emery, 1894) (61). Cephalotes umbraculatus (Fabricius, 1804) (58, 124, 140). Crematogaster: 23 species Crematogaster abstinens Forel, 1899 (1, 21, 58, 61, 73, 103, 147). Crematogaster brasiliensis Mayr, 1878 (21, 31, 32, 72, 73, 101, 140, 147). Crematogaster carinata Mayr, 1862 (1, 4, 21, 24, 30, 35, 68, 72, 73,147). Crematogaster crinosa Mayr, 1862 (21, 33, 58, 66, 110, 124, 134). Crematogaster curvispinosa Mayr, 1862 (21, 58, 101, 147). Crematogaster delitescens Wheeler, 1921 (58). Crematogaster distans Mayr, 1870 (61, 72, 86). Crematogaster egregior Forel, 1912 (1, 135). Crematogaster erecta Mayr, 1866 (55, 101, 140, 147). Crematogaster flavosensitiva Longino, 2003 (1, 35, 59, 71, 72, 73). Crematogaster laevis Mayr, 1878 (1, 25, 32). Crematogaster levior Longino, 2003 (1, 33, 58, 68, 101, 102,103, 147). Crematogaster limata Smith, 1858 (1, 21, 25, 31, 32, 35, 70, 71, 72, 100, 101). 526 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Crematogaster longispina Emery, 1890 (31, 32, 58, 68, 71, 72, 101, 135). Crematogaster nigropilosa Mayr, 1870 (1, 21, 71, 72). Crematogaster obscurata* Emery, 1895 (21). Crematogaster quadriformis Roger, 1863 (58). Crematogaster rochai* Forel, 1903 (140). Crematogaster sotobosque Longino, 2003 (1, 71, 72, 73). Crematogaster stollii Forel, 1885 (33, 73, 86). Crematogaster sumichrasti Mayr, 1870 (68, 116). Crematogaster tenuicula Forel, 1904 (21, 29, 31, 32, 35, 71, 72, 73, 101, 103, 140, 147). Crematogaster wardi Longino, 2003 (21, 71, 72). Cryptomyrmex: 1 species Cryptomyrmex longinodus (Fernández & Brandão, 2003) (71, 72). Cyphomyrmex: 9 species Cyphomyrmex cornutus Kempf, 1968 (21, 113). Cyphomyrmex costatus Mann, 1922 (73). Cyphomyrmex flavidus Pergande, 1896 (72, 73). Cyphomyrmex laevigatus Weber, 1938 (1, 58, 71, 72). Cyphomyrmex minutus Mayr, 1862 (21, 48, 58). Cyphomyrmex peltatus Kempf, 1966 (21, 59, 71, 72, 73). Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola, 1851) (1, 58, 100, 124, 140). Cyphomyrmex salvini Forel, 1899 (4, 21, 71, 72). Cyphomyrmex transversus Emery, 1894 (21, 35, 68, 72, 73, 147). Daceton: 1 species Daceton armigerum (Latreille, 1802) (1, 5, 21, 28, 33, 58, 124, 140, 147). Eurhopalothrix: 1 species Eurhopalothrix bolaui (Mayr, 1870) (1, 58, 73). Hylomyrma: 7 species Hylomyrma balzani (Emery, 1894) (71, 72, 73, 121). Hylomyrma blandiens Kempf, 1961 (1, 58). Hylomyrma immanis Kempf, 1973 (1, 21,71, 72, 73, 121). Hylomyrma longiscapa Kempf, 1961 (1, 58, 121). Hylomyrma praepotens Kempf, 1973 (72, 121). Hylomyrma reginae Kutter, 1977 (71, 72, 73, 121). Hylomyrma sagax Kempf, 1973 (71, 72, 121). Lachnomyrmex: 3 species Lachnomyrmex amazonicus* Feitosa & Brandão, 2008 (1). Lachnomyrmex pilosus Weber, 1950 (59, 71, 72). Lachnomyrmex scrobiculatus* Wheeler, 1910 (140). Megalomyrmex: 11 species Megalomyrmex balzani* Emery, 1894. (40). Megalomyrmex bituberculatus (Fabricius, 1798) (58, 87). Megalomyrmex cuatiara Brandão, 1990 (73). Megalomyrmex drifti Kempf, 1961 (21, 58, 73). Megalomyrmex emeryi Forel, 1904 (15, 58). Megalomyrmex gnomus Kempf, 1970 (73). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 527 Megalomyrmex incisus Smith, 1947 (72). Megalomyrmex leoninus Forel, 1885 (58, 101). Megalomyrmex modestus Emery, 1896 (2). Megalomyrmex pusillus* Forel, 1912. (40). Megalomyrmex silvestrii Wheeler, 1909 (58, 71, 72, 73, 140). Monomorium: 2 species Monomorium floricola+ (Jerdon, 1851) (21, 58, 101, 124, 147). Monomorium pharaonis+ (Linnaeus, 1758) (55, 124). Mycetarotes*: 1 species Mycetarotes acutus* Mayhé-Nunes, 1995 (40). Mycetophylax: 5 species Mycetophylax bigibbosus (Emery, 1894) (55, 71, 72). Mycetophylax conformis (Mayr, 1884) (58, 84, 87, 90, 124). Mycetophylax faunulus (Wheeler, 1925) (1, 21, 58, 72). Mycetophylax morschi* (Emery, 1888) (40). Mycetophylax strigatus* (Mayr, 1887) (40). Mycocepurus: 2 species Mycocepurus smithii (Forel, 1893) (58, 71, 72, 73, 140). Mycocepurus tardus Weber, 1940 (71, 72). Myrmicocrypta: 2 species/subspecies Myrmicocrypta buenzlii Borgmeier, 1934 (58). Myrmicocrypta squamosa uncinata (Mayr, 1887) (58). Nesomyrmex: 7 species Nesomyrmex anduzei (Weber, 1943) (58). Nesomyrmex asper (Mayr, 1887) (21, 31, 32, 71, 72). Nesomyrmex echinatinodis (Forel, 1886) (58). Nesomyrmex pleuriticus (Kempf, 1959) (58, 140). Nesomyrmex rutilans (Kempf, 1958) (58). Nesomyrmex spininodis (Mayr, 1887) (1, 58). Nesomyrmex wilda (Smith, 1943) (73). Ochetomyrmex: 2 species Ochetomyrmex neopolitus Fernández, 2003 (1, 21, 58, 71, 72, 73, 101, 115). Ochetomyrmex semipolitus Mayr, 1878 (1, 21, 35, 58, 71, 72, 73, 115, 140). Octostruma: 5 species Octostruma amrishi* (Makhan, 2007) (1). Octostruma balzani (Emery, 1894) (21, 58, 71, 72, 73, 119, 140). Octostruma batesi (Emery, 1894) (58). Octostruma betschi Perrault, 1988 (1, 16, 21, 58, 71, 73, 106, 148). Octostruma iheringi (Emery, 1888) (1, 21, 71, 72). Oxyepoecus*: 1 species Oxyepoecus ephippiatus* Albuquerque & Brandão, 2004 (40). 528 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Pheidole: 70 species Pheidole aberrans* Mayr, 1868 (1). Pheidole alexeter Wilson, 2003 (59) Pheidole alienata Borgmeier, 1929 (71, 72). Pheidole allarmata Wilson, 2003 (1, 72, 73). Pheidole araneoides Wilson, 2003 (1, 2). Pheidole aripoensis Wilson, 2003 (2). Pheidole astur Wilson, 2003 (1, 58, 72). Pheidole biconstricta Mayr, 1870 (1, 35, 124). Pheidole bruesi Wheeler, 1911 (72, 73, 140). Pheidole bufo* Wilson, 2003 (1). Pheidole carinata Wilson, 2003 (71, 72). Pheidole cataractae Wheeler, 1916 (1, 2, 140). Pheidole cramptoni Wheeler, 1916 (73). Pheidole cuprina* Wilson, 2003 (1). Pheidole cursor Wilson, 2003 (35). Pheidole deima Wilson, 2003 (72). Pheidole diligens* (Smith, 1858) (21). Pheidole dolon Wilson, 2003 (35, 41, 71, 72). Pheidole embolopyx* Brown, 1968 (21). Pheidole exigua Mayr, 1884 (58, 87, 124, 165, 172). Pheidole fallax Mayr, 1870 (1, 21, 35, 100, 101, 147). Pheidole fimbriata Roger, 1863 (21, 58). Pheidole fissiceps Wilson, 2003 (67). Pheidole flavens Roger, 1863 (1, 101). Pheidole funki* LaPolla, 2005 (1). Pheidole gauthieri Forel, 1901 (1, 2, 140). Pheidole gigas Wilson, 2003 (72, 73). Pheidole grandinodus* Wilson, 2003 (1). Pheidole impressa Mayr, 1870 (73). Pheidole jeannei* Wilson, 2003 (21). Pheidole jelskii Mayr, 1884 (60, 87, 124, 147). Pheidole kukrana Wilson, 2003 (101). Pheidole longipes (Latreille, 1802) (84, 140). Pheidole longiscapa* Forel, 1901 (1). Pheidole mamore Mann, 1916 (58). Pheidole megacephala+ (Fabricius, 1793) (55, 143). Pheidole mendicula Wheeler, 1925 (1, 2). Pheidole micon* Wilson, 2003 (1). Pheidole midas Wilson, 2003 (35, 71, 72, 73). Pheidole minutula Mayr, 1878 (1, 21, 25, 20, 58, 144). Pheidole moffetti Wilson, 2003 (2, 67, 76). Pheidole neoschultzi* LaPolla, 2006 (1). Pheidole obscurithorax* Naves, 1985 (140). Pheidole pedana Wilson, 2003 (71, 72). Pheidole pepo Wilson, 2003 (101). Pheidole perpusilla* Emery, 1894 (1). Pheidole plebecula Forel, 1899 (1, 2). Pheidole pugnax Dalla Torre, 1892 (2). Pheidole puttemansi* Forel, 1911 (21). Pheidole radoszkowskii Mayr, 1884 (17, 21, 58, 72, 83, 87, 100, 105, 124, 147, 172). Pheidole rochai* Forel, 1912 (1). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 529 Pheidole rubiceps Wilson, 2003 (72, 73). Pheidole scolioceps Wilson, 2003 (1, 71, 72, 73). Pheidole sculptior Forel, 1893 (35). Pheidole sensitiva* Borgmeier, 1959 (1). Pheidole severini Forel, 1904 (61, 87). Pheidole socrates Forel, 1912 (58). Pheidole subarmata Mayr, 1884 (1, 17, 20, 68, 87, 124). Pheidole susannae Forel, 1886 (30). Pheidole synarmata Wilson, 2003 (35, 72, 73). Pheidole tachigaliae Wheeler, 1921 (58). Pheidole terribilis Wilson, 2003 (35, 72, 73). Pheidole transversostriata Mayr, 1887 (58, 72, 73, 101). Pheidole tristicula Wilson, 2003 (58). Pheidole tristops Wilson, 2003 (101). Pheidole vafra Santschi, 1923 (172). Pheidole vorax (Fabricius, 1804) (124). Pheidole wallacei Mann, 1916 (71, 72). Pheidole zelata* Wilson, 2003 (1). Pheidole zeteki Smith, 1947 (2). Procryptocerus: 7 species Procryptocerus attenuatus (Smith, 1876) (58). Procryptocerus goeldii* Forel, 1899 (140). Procryptocerus hirsutus* Emery, 1896 (140). Procryptocerus hylaeus Kempf, 1951 (71, 72). Procryptocerus scabriusculus* Forel, 1899 (40). Procryptocerus schmitti* Forel, 1901 (40). Procryptocerus spiniperdus* Forel, 1899 (140). Rogeria: 12 species Rogeria alzatei Kugler, 1994 (71, 72). Rogeria besucheti Kugler, 1994 (73). Rogeria blanda (Smith, 1858) (1, 21, 58, 73, 140). Rogeria ciliosa* Kugler, 1994 (1). Rogeria foreli Emery, 1894 (1, 29, 73). Rogeria germaini Emery, 1894 (72). Rogeria innotabilis* Kugler, 1994 (40). Rogeria lirata Kugler, 1994 (71, 72, 73). Rogeria micromma Kempf, 1961 (1, 58, 71, 72). Rogeria scobinata Kugler, 1994 (1, 71, 72). Rogeria subarmata (Kempf, 1961) (21, 68, 71, 72, 101). Rogeria tonduzi Forel, 1899 (72, 73). Sericomyrmex: 5 species Sericomyrmex bondari Borgmeier, 1937 (78). Sericomyrmex lutzi Wheeler, 1916 (58, 140). Sericomyrmex mayri Forel, 1912 (73, 78). Sericomyrmex parvulus Forel, 1912 (78). Sericomyrmex saussurei Emery, 1894 (79). Solenopsis: 12 species Solenopsis altinodis Forel, 1912 (58). 530 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Solenopsis bicolor (Emery, 1906) (58). Solenopsis brevicornis Emery, 1888 (58). Solenopsis corticalis Forel, 1881 (58). Solenopsis geminata (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 58, 73, 124, 147, 158). Solenopsis globularia (Smith, 1858) (21, 73, 124, 147). Solenopsis minutissima Emery, 1906 (58). Solenopsis pollux Forel, 1893 (71, 72). Solenopsis pygmaea* Forel, 1901 (1). Solenopsis saevissima (Smith, 1855) (1, 21, 29, 32, 35, 58, 68, 73, 147). Solenopsis sulfurea (Roger, 1862) (58). Solenopsis virulens (Smith, 1858) (1, 21, 71, 72, 73). Stegomyrmex: 2 species Stegomyrmex manni Smith, 1946 (71, 72). Stegomyrmex olindae Feitosa, Brandão & Diniz, 2008 (72). Strumigenys: 40 species Strumigenys alberti Forel, 1893 (58, 72, 140). Strumigenys appretiata (Borgmeier, 1954) (71, 72). Strumigenys auctidens (Bolton, 2000) (9, 71, 72, 73). Strumigenys beebei (Wheeler, 1915) (1, 21, 71, 72, 73). Strumigenys borgmeieri Brown, 1954 (147). Strumigenys cincinnata* (Kempf, 1975) (40). Strumigenys cordovensis Mayr, 1887 (73). Strumigenys cosmostela Kempf, 1975 (71, 72). Strumigenys crassicornis Mayr, 1887 (62, 73). Strumigenys deinomastax (Bolton, 2000) (71, 73). Strumigenys denticulata Mayr, 1887 (1, 9, 21, 58, 59, 71, 72, 73, 146). Strumigenys depressiceps* Weber, 1934 (21, 140). Strumigenys diabola Bolton, 2000 (71, 72). Strumigenys dyseides Bolton, 2000 (71, 72). Strumigenys eggersi* Emery, 1890 (21). Strumigenys elongata Roger, 1863 (1, 71, 72, 73). Strumigenys epinotalis* Weber, 1934 (21). Strumigenys fairchildi* Brown, 1961 (1). Strumigenys glenognatha (Bolton, 2000) (9, 58). Strumigenys godmani* Forel, 1899 (140). Strumigenys hadrodens (Bolton, 2000) (71, 72, 73). Strumigenys hyphata (Brown, 1953) (1, 71, 72). Strumigenys inusitata (Lattke, 1992) (59). Strumigenys lanuginosa Wheeler, 1905 (71, 72, 163). Strumigenys louisianae Roger, 1863 (161). Strumigenys metopia (Brown, 1959) (71, 72). Strumigenys mirabilis* Mann, 1926 (40). Strumigenys perparva Brown, 1958 (1, 72, 73). Strumigenys prospiciens* Emery, 1906 (140). Strumigenys saliens Mayr, 1887 (72, 73). Strumigenys schulzi* Emery, 1894 (40). Strumigenys smithii* Forel, 1886 (140). Strumigenys spathula* Lattke & Goitía, 1997 (40). Strumigenys subedentata Mayr, 1887 (1, 9, 10, 21, 58, 70, 71, 72). Strumigenys tococae Wheeler & Bequaert, 1929 (9, 58). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 531 Strumigenys trinidadensis Wheeler, 1922 (73). Strumigenys trudifera Kempf & Brown, 1969 (1, 21, 71, 72). Strumigenys villiersi (Perrault, 1986) (9, 16, 58, 73). Strumigenys waiwai* (Sosa-Calvo, Schultz & LaPolla, 2010) (40). Strumigenys zeteki* (Brown, 1959) (1). Talaridris*: 1 species Talaridris mandibularis* Weber, 1941 (1, 2, 40). Tetramorium: 3 species Tetramorium bicarinatum+ (Nylander, 1846) (72). Tetramorium lanuginosum+ Mayr, 1870 (147). Tetramorium simillimum+ (Smith, 1851) (147). Trachymyrmex: 12 species Trachymyrmex bugnioni (Forel, 1912) (58). Trachymyrmex compactus Mayhé-Nunes & Brandão, 2002 (72, 73). Trachymyrmex cornetzi (Forel, 1912) (58, 72, 73). Trachymyrmex diversus Mann, 1916 (58). Trachymyrmex farinosus (Emery, 1894) (21, 72, 73). Trachymyrmex intermedius (Forel, 1909) (2). Trachymyrmex ixyodus Mayhé-Nunes & Brandão, 2007 (71, 72). Trachymyrmex mandibularis Weber, 1938 (70, 71, 73). Trachymyrmex opulentus (Mann, 1922) (21, 72). Trachymyrmex relictus Borgmeier, 1934 (21, 35, 58, 73, 114). Trachymyrmex urichii (Forel, 1893) (58). Trachymyrmex verrucosus Borgmeier, 1948 (58). Tranopelta: 1 species Tranopelta gilva Mayr, 1866 (1, 58). Wasmannia: 5 species Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger, 1863) (1, 21, 29, 31, 32, 35, 68, 71, 72, 73, 85, 93, 100, 101, 107, 138, 140, 147). Wasmannia iheringi Forel, 1908. (59). Wasmannia rochai Forel, 1912 (21, 58, 101, 140, 147). Wasmannia scrobifera Kempf, 1961 (21, 71, 72, 73). Wasmannia sigmoidea (Mayr, 1884) (58, 87, 107, 124). PARAPONeRINAe: 1 species Paraponera: 1 species Paraponera clavata (Fabricius, 1775) (4, 24, 30, 33, 57, 58, 87, 95, 97, 110, 124, 140). PONeRINAe: 81 species Anochetus: 9 species Anochetus bispinosus (Smith, 1858) (1, 21, 58, 59, 72, 73, 140). Anochetus diegensis Forel, 1912 (1, 21, 71, 72). Anochetus emarginatus (Fabricius, 1804) (1, 57, 58). Anochetus horridus Kempf, 1964 (1, 21, 30, 71, 72, 73, 100, 113). Anochetus inermis André, 1889 (71, 72, 73). 532 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Anochetus mayri Emery, 1884 (1, 21, 57, 58, 71, 72, 73). Anochetus neglectus Emery, 1894 (72, 73). Anochetus simoni Emery, 1890 (57, 58, 71, 72). Anochetus targionii* Emery, 1894 (21). Centromyrmex: 3 species Centromyrmex alfaroi Emery, 1890 (64, 140). Centromyrmex brachycola (Roger, 1861) (1, 2). Centromyrmex gigas Forel, 1911 (64, 140). Cryptopone: 2 species Cryptopone guianensis (Weber, 1939) (1, 73). Cryptopone holmgreni (Wheeler, 1925) (57, 58, 72). Hypoponera: 3 species Hypoponera foreli (Mayr, 1887) (21, 71, 72). Hypoponera opaciceps (Mayr, 1887) (29, 110). Hypoponera opacior (Forel, 1893) (72, 73). Leptogenys: 10 species Leptogenys amu* Lattke, 2011 (1). Leptogenys arcuata Roger, 1861 (57, 58, 99, 124). Leptogenys famelica Emery, 1896 (99). Leptogenys gaigei Wheeler, 1923 (57, 58). Leptogenys langi Wheeler, 1923 (58, 72, 73). Leptogenys linearis (Smith, 1858) (57, 58, 71). Leptogenys panops Lattke, 2011 (99). Leptogenys pusilla (Emery, 1890) (21, 73). Leptogenys unistimulosa Roger, 1863 (21, 57, 58, 99). Leptogenys vogeli Borgmeier, 1933 (72). Mayaponera: 1 species Mayaponera constricta (Mayr, 1884) (1, 17, 21, 30, 35, 57, 58, 68, 71, 72, 73, 87, 97, 109, 124, 131). Neoponera: 22 species Neoponera apicalis (Latreille, 1802) (1, 21, 57, 58, 97, 101, 109, 140, 145, 171). Neoponera bactronica (Fernandes, De Oliveira & Delabie, 2014) (52). Neoponera carinulata (Roger, 1861) (21, 57, 58, 109). Neoponera cavinodis Mann, 1916 (31, 32). Neoponera commutata (Roger, 1860) (57, 58, 97, 101, 109, 140). Neoponera cooki (Mackay & Mackay, 2010) (1, 72). Neoponera crenata (Roger, 1861) (21, 31, 32, 57, 58, 72, 97, 109, 140). Neoponera foetida (Linnaeus, 1758) (52, 57, 58, 109, 124). Neoponera globularia (Mackay & Mackay, 2010) (109, 140). Neoponera goeldii Forel, 1912 (4, 24, 56, 87, 97, 102, 109, 118). Neoponera inversa (Smith, 1858) (21, 52, 68, 109, 140). Neoponera laevigata (Smith, 1858) (57, 58, 72). Neoponera marginata* (Roger, 1861) (21). Neoponera moesta Mayr, 1870 (21, 27, 140). Neoponera oberthueri* Emery, 1890 (40). Neoponera obscuricornis (Emery, 1890) (21, 57, 58, 97). Neoponera procidua (Emery, 1890) (1, 21, 41, 57, 58, 72, 85, 87, 109, 140). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 533 Neoponera rostrata (Emery, 1890) (26) Neoponera striatinodis Emery, 1890 (1, 31, 32, 140). Neoponera unidentata Mayr, 1862 (21, 31, 32, 57, 58, 72, 109, 124). Neoponera verenae (Forel, 1922) (35, 72, 73, 97, 109, 140, 171). Neoponera villosa (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 24, 52, 57, 58, 73, 101, 109, 110, 140, 147). Odontomachus: 13 species Odontomachus bauri* Emery, 1892 (140). Odontomachus biumbonatus Brown, 1976 (57, 58, 71, 72). Odontomachus brunneus (Patton, 1894) (73). Odontomachus caelatus Brown, 1976 (21, 35, 57, 58, 71, 72). Odontomachus chelifer (Latreille, 1802) (57, 58, 72, 110). Odontomachus haematodus (Linnaeus, 1758) (1, 21, 29, 30, 35, 44, 58, 68, 71, 72, 73, 97, 101, 124, 140, 147). Odontomachus hastatus (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 24, 33, 35, 57, 58, 68, 71, 72, 97, 113, 140). Odontomachus insularis Guérin-Méneville, 1844 (57). Odontomachus laticeps Roger, 1861 (57, 58). Odontomachus mayi Mann, 1912 (4, 19, 24, 57, 58, 68, 97, 118, 140). Odontomachus meinerti Forel, 1905 (1, 21, 35, 72, 73, 140). Odontomachus scalptus Brown, 1978 (1, 21, 57, 58, 59, 71, 72, 113). Odontomachus spissus* Kempf, 1962 (1). Pachycondyla: 4 species Pachycondyla crassinoda (Latreille, 1802) (1, 35, 57, 58, 72, 73, 87, 109, 124, 125). Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius, 1804) (1, 21, 35, 57, 58, 68, 71, 72, 73, 97, 109, 110, 140, 162). Pachycondyla impressa (Roger, 1861) (57, 58, 109). Pachycondyla striata Smith, 1858 (71, 72, 73). Platythyrea: 4 species Platythyrea angusta Forel, 1901 (21, 57, 58, 140). Platythyrea pilosula* (Smith, 1858) (40). Platythyrea punctata (Smith, 1858) (57, 58, 124). Platythyrea sinuata (Roger, 1860) (4, 21, 57, 58, 97, 140, 147). Pseudoponera: 3 species Pseudoponera gilberti (Kempf, 1960) (21, 30, 109). Pseudoponera stigma (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 29, 57, 58, 68, 71, 72, 73, 97, 109, 110, 140, 160). Pseudoponera succedanea (Roger, 1863) (109). Rasopone: 4 species Rasopone arhuaca (Forel, 1901) (1, 21, 35, 57, 58, 71, 72, 109). Rasopone ferruginea (Smith, 1858) (21, 73). Rasopone lunaris (Emery, 1896) (73, 109, 140). Rasopone pergandei (Forel, 1909) (73). Simopelta: 2 species Simopelta laticeps* Gotwald & Brown, 1967 (40). Simopelta pergandei (Forel, 1909) (72). Thaumatomyrmex: 1 species Thaumatomyrmex soesilae Makhan, 2007 (72). 534 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. PROCeRATIINAe: 2 species Discothyrea: 2 species Discothyrea denticulata Weber, 1939 (21, 57, 58, 71, 72, 73). Discothyrea sexarticulata Borgmeier, 1954 (71, 72). PSeUDOMYRMeCINAe: 40 species Pseudomyrmex: 38 species Pseudomyrmex alternans (Santschi, 1936) (6, 58, 87, 139, 152, 155). Pseudomyrmex alvarengai Kempf, 1961 (2, 155). Pseudomyrmex atripes* (Smith, 1860) (155) Pseudomyrmex beccarii* (Menozzi, 1935) (1, 155). Pseudomyrmex concolor (Smith, 1860) (21, 58). Pseudomyrmex cubaensis (Forel, 1901) (2, 155). Pseudomyrmex curacaensis (Forel, 1912) (58, 147, 151, 155). Pseudomyrmex depressus* (Forel, 1906) (155) Pseudomyrmex duckei* (Forel, 1906) (155) Pseudomyrmex eduardi (Forel, 1912) (2, 140, 155). Pseudomyrmex elongatus (Mayr, 1870) (21, 58, 140). Pseudomyrmex ethicus (Forel, 1911) (35). Pseudomyrmex euryblemma* (Forel, 1899) (155) Pseudomyrmex faber (Smith, 1858) (58, 101). Pseudomyrmex filiformis (Fabricius, 1804) (58, 110). Pseudomyrmex flavidulus (Smith, 1858) (44). Pseudomyrmex godmani* (Forel, 1899) (155) Pseudomyrmex gracilis (Fabricius, 1804) (4, 21, 33, 58, 73, 134, 140, 147, 157, 155). Pseudomyrmex laevifrons Ward, 1989 (154, 155). Pseudomyrmex laevigatus (Smith, 1877) (58). Pseudomyrmex laevivertex* Forel, 1906 (155) Pseudomyrmex lisus* (Enzmann, 1944) (155). Pseudomyrmex maculatus (Smith, 1855) (58, 155). Pseudomyrmex malignus (Wheeler, 1921) (58, 153, 155). Pseudomyrmex obtusus* Ward, 2017 (infopw) Pseudomyrmex oculatus (Smith, 1855) (21, 58, 147, 151, 155). Pseudomyrmex penetrator (Smith, 1877) (30, 113, 155). Pseudomyrmex peruvianus* (Wheeler, W.M., 1925) (155). Pseudomyrmex pupa (Forel, 1911) (2, 21, 155). Pseudomyrmex rochai* (Forel, 1912) (21, 155). Pseudomyrmex simplex (Smith, 1877) (2, 147, 155). Pseudomyrmex spiculus Ward, 1989 (58, 155). Pseudomyrmex tenuis (Fabricius, 1804) (21, 31, 32, 58, 71, 72, 73, 100, 155). Pseudomyrmex tenuissimus (Emery, 1906) (21, 45, 58, 111, 151, 155). Pseudomyrmex termitarius (Smith, 1855) (4, 21, 29, 58, 73, 83, 147, 155). Pseudomyrmex triplaridis (Forel, 1904) (58, 155). Pseudomyrmex unicolor (Smith, 1855) (58, 81, 132, 140, 155). Pseudomyrmex urbanus (Smith, 1877) (58, 140, 151, 155). Pseudomyrmex viduus (Smith, 1858) (58, 155). Pseudomyrmex vinneni* (Forel, 1906) (40, 155). FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 535 erroneous ant records for French Guiana in the literature MYRMICINAe Pheidole tysoni Forel, 1901 (72) Tetramorium spinosum (Pergande, 1896) (58) PSeUDOMYRMeCINAe Pseudomyrmex elongatulus (Dalla Torre, 1892) (58, 110) Pseudomyrmex nigrocinctus (Emery, 1890) (58) Pseudomyrmex triplarinus (Weddell, 1850) (2) References/Sources and numbering for the species/subspecies list [1] Ant Course (2018) Vouchers partially deposited at the Padre Jesus Santiago Moure Entomological Collection, Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP), Brazil. [2] AntWeb (2019) Available from: http://www.antweb.org (accessed 5 July 2019) [3] Arias-Penna, T. (2008) Subfamilia Ectatomminae. In: Lozano-Zambrano, F., Fernández, F., Jiménez, E. & Arias, T. (Eds.), Sistemática, biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp. 53–107. [4] Astruc, C., Julien, J.F., Errard, C. & Lenoir, A. (2004) Phylogeny of ants based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31 (3), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.10.024 [5] Azorsa, F. & Sosa-Calvo, J. (2008) Description of a remarkable new species of ant in the genus Daceton Perty (Formicidae: Dacetini) from South America. Zootaxa, 1749 (1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1749.1.3 [6] Baroni Urbani, C. (1977) Katalog der Typen von Formicidae (Hymenoptera) der Sammlung des Naturhistorischen Museums Basel (2. Teil). Mitteilugen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel, 3 (27), 61–102. [7] Beugnon, G., Chagne, P. & Dejean, A. (2001) Colony structure and foraging behavior in the tropical formicine ant, Gigantiops destructor. Insectes Sociaux, 48 (4), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001788 [8] Blaimer, B.B., LaPolla, J.S., Branstetter, M.G.M., Lloyd, W. & Brady, S.G. (2016) Phylogenomics, biogeography and diversification of obligate mealybug-tending ants in the genus Acropyga. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 102, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.030 [9] Bolton, B. (2000) The Ant Tribe Dacetini. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 65, 1–1028. [10] Bolton, B., Sosa-Calvo, J., Fernández, F. & Lattke., J.E. (2008) New synonyms in Neotropical myrmicine ants. Zootaxa, 1732 (1), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1732.1.5 [11] Borgmeier, T. (1936) Sobre algumas formigas dos gêneros Eciton e Cheliomyrmex (Hym. Formicidae). Archivos do Instituto de Biologia Vegetal, Rio de Janeiro, 3, 51–68. [12] Borgmeier, T. (1953) Vorarbeiten zu einer Revision der neotropischen Wanderameisen. Studia Entomologica, 2, 1–51. [13] Borgmeier, T. (1955) Die Wanderameisen der neotropischen Region. Studia Entomologica, 3, 1–720. [14] Borowiec, M.L. (2016) Generic revision of the ant subfamily Dorylinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys, 608, 1– 280. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.608.9427 [15] Brandão, C.R.F. (1990) Systematic revision of the Neotropical ant genus Megalomyrmex Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae), with the description of thirteen new species. Arquivos de Zoologia, São Paulo, 31 (5), 411–481. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v31i5p1-91 [16] Brandão, C. (1991) Adendos ao catálogo abreviado das formigas da região Neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 35 (2), 319–412. [17] Branstetter, M.G & Sáenz, L. (2012) Las hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Guatemala. In: Cano, E.B. & Schuster, J.C. (Eds.), Biodiversidad de Guatemala. Vol. 2. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala, pp. 221–268. [18] Brown, W.L. Jr. (1956) Notes on the ant genus Holcoponera Mayr, with descriptions of two new species. Insectes Sociaux, 3 (4), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02226452 [19] Brown, W.L. Jr. (1976) Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. Part VI. Ponerinae, tribe Ponerini, subtribe Odontomachiti. Section A. Introduction, subtribal characters. Genus Odontomachus. Studia Entomologica, 19 (1–4), 67–171. [20] Brown, W.L. Jr. (1981) Preliminary contributions toward a revision of the ant genus Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). 536 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Part I. Journal of Kansas Entomological Society, 54 (3), 523–530. [21] CEPLAC [Comissão Executiva do Plano da Lavoura Cacaueira] (unkown date) Vouchers deposited at the Centro de Pesquisa do Cacau Collection, Bahia (CPDC), Brazil. [22] Cuezzo, F. & Guerrero, R.J. (2011) The ant genus Dorymyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) in Colombia. Psyche, 2012, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/516058 [23] de Andrade, M.L. & Baroni Urbani, C. (1999) Diversity and adaptation in the ant genus Cephalotes, past and present. Stuttgarter Beitrage zur Naturkunde, Serie B, 271, 1–889. [24] Dejean, A., Corbara, B., Orivel, J., Snelling, R.R., Delabie, J.H.C & Belin-Depoux, M. (2000) The importance of ant gardens in the pioneer vegetal formations of French Guiana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 35 (3), 425–439. [25] Dejean, A., Quilichini, A., Delabie, J.H.C, Orivel, J., Corbara, B. & Gibernau, M. (2004) Influence of its associated ant species on the life history of the myrmecophyte Cordia nodosa in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20 (6), 701–704. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646740400183X [26] Dejean, A., Delabie, J.H.C., Cerdan, P., Gibernau, M., Corbara, B. (2006) Are myrmecophytes always better protected against herbivores than other plants? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 89 (1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00660.x [27] Dejean, A., Corbara, B., Leroy, C., Rossi, V., Delabie, J.H.C. & Céréghino, R. (2011) Inherited biotic protection in a Neotropical pioneer plant. PLoS ONE, 6 (3), e18071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018071 [28] Dejean, A., Delabie, J.H.C., Corbara, B., Azémar, F., Groc, S., Orivel, J. & Leponce, M. (2012) The ecology and feeding habits of the arboreal trap-jawed ant Daceton armigerum. PLoS ONE, 7 (6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037683 [29] Dejean, A., Céréghino, R., Leponce, M., Rossi, V., Roux, O., Compin, A., Delabie, J.H.C. & Corbara, B. (2015) The fire ant Solenopsis saevissima and habitat disturbance alter ant communities. Biological Conservation, 187, 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.012. [30] Dejean, A., Groc, S., Hérault, B., Rodríguez-Pérez, H., Touchard, A., Céréghino. R., Delabie, J.H.C. & Corbara, B. (2015) Bat aggregation mediates the functional structure of ant assemblages. Comptes Rendus—Biologie, 338 (10), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2015.06.011. [31] Dejean, A., Petitclerc, F., Compin, A., Azémar, F., Corbara, B., Delabie, J.H.C. & Leroy, C. (2017) Hollow internodes permit a Neotropical understory plant to shelter multiple mutualistic ant species, obtaining protection and nutrient provisioning (myrmecotrophy). American Naturalist, 190 (5), E124–E131. https://doi.org/10.1086/693782 [32] Dejean, A., Azémar, F., Peticlerc, F., Delabie, J.H.C., Corbara, B., Leroy, C., Céréghino, R. & Compin, A. (2018) Highly modular pattern in ant-plant interactions involving specialized and non-specialized myrmecophytes. The Science of Nature, Naturwissenschaften, 105 (7–8), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-018-1570-0 [33] Dejean, A., Orivel, J., Leponce, M., Compin, A., Delabie, J.H.C., Azémar, F. & Corbara, B. (2018) Ant-plant relationships in the canopy of an Amazonian rainforest: the presence of an ant mosaic. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 125 (2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly125. [34] Dejean A., Compin, A., Delabie, J.H C., Azémar, F., Corbara, B. & Leponce, M. (2019) Biotic and abiotic determinants of the formation of ant mosaics in primary Neotropical rainforests. Ecological Entomology, 44 (4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12735. [35] Delabie, J., Céréghino, R., Groc, S., Dejean, A., Gibernau, M., Corbara, B. & Dejean, A. (2009) Ants as biological indicators of Wayana Amerindian land use in French Guiana. Comptes rendus biologies, 332 (7), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.01.006 [36] Delabie, J.H.C., da Rocha, W.D., Feitosa, R.M., Devienne, P. & Fresneau, D. (2010) Gnamptogenys concinna (F. Smith, 1858): nouvelles données sur sa distribution et commentaires sur ce cas de gigantisme dans le genre Gnamptogenys (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ectatomminae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 115 (3), 269–277. [37] Delabie, J.H.C., Groc, S. & Dejean, A. (2011) The tramp ant Technomyrmex vitiensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dolichoderinae) on South America. Florida Entomologist, 94 (3), 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.094.0335 [38] Deyrup, M. & Belmont, R.A. (2013) First record of a Florida population of the Neotropical carpenter ant Camponotus novogranadensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist, 96 (1), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0148 [39] Donoso, D.A. (2012) Additions to the taxonomy of the armadillo ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Tatuidris). Zootaxa, 3503 (1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3503.1.5 [40] EcoFoG [Écologie des Forêts de Guyane] (unkown date) Vouchers deposited at the UMR Ecofog Collection, Campus Agronomique, Kourou. FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 537 [41] Emery, C. (1890) Voyage de M. E. Simon au Venezuela (Décembre 1887–Avril 1888). Formicides. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 6 (10), 55–76. [42] Emery, C. (1893) Studio monografico sul genere Azteca Forel. Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze dell’Istituto di Bologna, 5 (3), 119–152. [43] Emery, C. (1894) Camponotus sexguttatus Fab. e C. sexguttatus Sm. et auct. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia Comparata della Reale Università di Torino, 9 (187), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.8049 [44] Emery, C. (1899) Intorno alle larve di alcune formiche. Memoria Real Accademia delle Scienze dell Istituto di Bologna, 5 (8), 3–10. [45] Emery, C. (1906) Studi sulle formiche della fauna neotropica. XXVI. Bullettino della Società Entomologica Italiana, 37, 107–194. [46] Emery, C. (1911) Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Ponerinae. Genera Insectorum, 118, 1–125. [47] Emery, C. (1913) Hymenoptera. Fam. Formicidae. Subfam. Dolichoderinae. Genera Insectorum, 137, 1–50. [48] Esteves, F.A., Brandão, C.R.F. & Prado, L.P. (2011) The type specimens of Dorylomorph ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae: Aenictinae, Ecitoninae, Cerapachyinae, Leptanilloidinae) deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 51 (22), 341–397. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492011002200001 [49] Ettershank, G. (1966) A generic revision of the world Myrmicinae related to Solenopsis and Pheidologeton (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Australian Journal of Zoology, 14 (1), 73–17. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9660073 [50] Faynel, C. & Bénéluz, F. (2013) Notes d’élevage sur deux lycènes em Guyane, Reboa stagira (Hewitson, 1867) et Celmia celmus (Cramer, 1775) (Lepidoprtera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae). Lambillionea, 113 (2), 141–144. [51] Feitosa R.M. (2011) Revisão taxonômica e análise filogenética de Heteroponerinae (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). PhD thesis Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 311 pp. [52] Fernandes, I.O., de Oliveira, M.L. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2014) Description of two new species in the Neotropical Pachycondyla foetida complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) and taxonomic notes on the genus. Myrmecological News, 19, 133–163. [53] Fernández, F. (1992) Las hormigas cazadoras del género Ectatomma (Formicidae: Ponerinae) en Colombia. Caldasia, 16 (79), 551–564. [54] Fernández, F. (2002) Revisión de las hormigas Camponotus subgénero Dendromyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia, 42 (4), 47–101. [55] Fernández, F. (2007) The myrmicine ant genus Allomerus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Caldasia, 29 (1), 159–175. [56] Fernández, F. (2008) Subfamilia Ponerinae s.str. In: Jiménez, E., Fernández, F., Arias-Penna, T.M. & Lozano-Zambrano, F.H. (Eds.), Sistemática, biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp. 123–218. [57] Fernández, F. & Arias-Penna, T.M. (2008) Las hormigas cazadoras en la región Neotropical. In: Jiménez, E., Fernández, F., Arias-Penna, T.M. & Lozano-Zambrano, F.H. (Eds.), Sistemática, biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp. 3–39. [58] Fernández, F. & Sendoya, S. (2004) Lista de las hormigas neotropicales. Biota Colombiana, 5 (1), 3–93. [59] Fichaux, M., Béchade, B., Donald, J., Weyna, A., Delabie, J.H.C., Murienne, J., Baraloto, C. & Orivel, J. (2019) Habitats shape taxonomic and functional composition of Neotropical ant assemblages. Oecologia, 189 (2), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04341-z [60] Forel, A. (1901) Variétés myrmécologiques. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 45, 334–382. [61] Forel, A. (1904) Fourmis du Musée de Bruxelles. Annales de la Sociéte Entomologique de Belgique, 48, 168–177. [62] Forel, A. (1910) Glanures myrmécologiques. Annales de la Sociéte Entomologique de Belgique, 54, 6–32. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.21462 [63] Forel, A. (1911) Ameisen des Herrn Prof. v. Ihering aus Brasilien (Sao Paulo usw.) nebst einigen anderen aus Südamerika und Afrika (Hym.). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1911, 285–312. [64] Franco, W. & Feitosa, R.M. (2018) Discovery of the termite specialist ant genus Centromyrmex, Mayr 1866 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for the Guiana Shield. Sociobiology, 65 (2), 345–347. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i2.2069 [65] Gallardo, A. (1918) Las hormigas de la República Argentina. Subfamilia Ponerinas. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 30, 1–112. [66] Gallardo, A. (1934) Las hormigas de la República Argentina. Subfamilia Mirmicinas, segunda sección Eumyrmicinae, tribu Crematogastrini (Forel), género Crematogaster Lund. Anales del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Buenos Aires, 38, 1–84. [67] GBIF (2018) The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available from: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 16 April 2019) [68] Gibernau, M., Orivel, J., Delabie, J.H.C., Barabe, D. & Dejean, A. (2007) An asymmetrical relationship between an arboreal ponerine ant and a trash-basket epiphyte (Araceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 91 (3), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00799.x 538 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. [69] Gonçalves, C.R. (1961) O gênero Acromyrmex no Brasil (Hym. Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 4 (1–4), 113–180. [70] Grangier, J., Orivel, J., Negrini, M. & Dejean, A. (2008) Low intraspecific aggressiveness in two obligate plant-ant species. Insectes Sociaux, 55 (3), 238–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-008-0993-6 [71] Groc S., J. Orivel, A. Dejean, J. Martin, M. Etienne, B. Corbara, & Delabie, J.H.C. (2009) Baseline study of the leaf-litter ant fauna in a French Guianese forest. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2 (3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00060.x [72] Groc, S., Delabie, J., Fernández, F., Leponce, M., Orivel, J., Silvestre, R., Vasconcelos, H. & Dejean, A. (2013) Leaf-litter ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a pristine Guianese rainforest: stable functional structure versus high species turnover. Myrmecological News, 19, 43–51. [73] Groc, S., Delabie, J.H.C., Fernandez, F., Petitclerc, F. Corbara, B., Leponce, M., Cereghino, R. & Dejean, A. (2017) Litter-dwelling ants as bioindicators to gauge the sustainability of small arboreal monocultures embedded in the Amazonian rainforest. Ecological Indicators, 82, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.026 [74] Guerrero, R.J., Delabie, J.H.C. & Dejean, A. (2010) Taxonomic contribution to the aurita group of the ant genus Azteca (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 19 (1), 51–65. [75] Hashmi, A.A. (1973) A revision of the Neotropical ant subgenus Myrmothrix of genus Camponotus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 16 (1–4), 1–140. [76] IdgBio (2018) Integrated Digitized Biocollections. Available from: https://idigbio.org/ (acessed 13 April 2019) [77] Jahyny, B., Lacau, S., Delabie, J.H.C. & Fresnau, D. (2008) Le genre Thaumatomyrmex Mayr, 1887, cryptique et prédateur spécialiste de Diplopoda Peniccilata. In: Jiménez, E., Fernández, F., Arias-Penna, T.M. & Lozano-Zambrano, F.H. (Eds.), Sistematica, biogeografia y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Instituto Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp. 329–346. [78] Ješovnik, A. & Schultz, T.R. (2017) Revision of the fungus-farming ant genus Sericomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae). ZooKeys, 670, 1–109. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.670.11839 [79] Ješovnik, A., Chaul, J. & Schultz, T. (2018) Natural history and nest architecture of the fungus-farming ant genus Sericomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 26, 65–80. [80] Kempf, W. (1951) A taxonomic study on the ant tribe Cephalotini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista de Entomologia, 22 (1–3), 1–244. [81] Kempf, W. (1958) New studies of the ant tribe Cephalotini (Hym. Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 1 (1–2), 1–168. [82] Kempf, W. (1959) A revision of the Neotropical ant genus Monacis Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 2 (1–4), 225–270. [83] Kempf, W. (1960) Insecta Amapaensia.—Hymenoptera: Formicidae (segunda contribuição). Studia Entomologica, 3 (1–4), 385–400. [84] Kempf, W. (1962) Miscellaneous studies on neotropical ants. II. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 5 (1–4), 1–38. [85] Kempf, W. (1964) Miscellaneous studies on Neotropical ants. III. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 7 (1–4), 45–71. [86] Kempf, W. (1968) Miscellaneous studies on Neotropical ants. IV. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 11 (1–4), 369–415. [87] Kempf, W. (1972) Catálogo abreviado das formigas da região Neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 15 (1–4), 1–344. [88] Kempf, W. (1974) Taxonomic and faunistic notes on some Neotropical Cephalotini ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 18 (2), 67–76. [89] Kempf, W.W. (1975) Miscellaneous studies on neotropical ants. VI. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Studia Entomologica, 18 (1–4), 341–380. [90] Klingenberg, C. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2009) Revision of the fungus-growing ant genera Mycetophylax Emery and Paramycetophylax Kusnezov rev. stat., and description of Kalathomyrmex n. gen. (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini). Zootaxa, 2052 (1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2052.1.1 [91] Kost, C., de Oliveira, E.G., Knoch, T.A. & Wirth, R. (2005) Spatio-Temporal Permanence and Plasticity of Foraging Trails in Young and Mature Leaf Cutting Ant Colonies (Atta spp.). Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21 (6), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467405002592 [92] Kugler, C. & Brown, W.L. Jr. (1982) Revisionary and other studies on the ant genus Ectatomma, including the description of two new species. Search Agriculture, Ithaca, New York, 24, 1–8. [93] Kusnezov, N. (1952) El género Wasmannia en la Argentina (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 10, 173–182. [94] Kusnezov, N. (1962) El género Acanthostichus Mayr (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Acta Zoologica Lilloana, 18, 121–138. [95] Lacau, S., Villemant, C. & Jahyny, B. (2008) Typhlomyrmex Mayr, 1862: un genre meconnu de petites fourmis cryptiques et predatrices (Ectatomminae: Typhlomyrmecini). In: Jiménez, E., Fernández, F., Arias-Penna, T.M. & Lozano-Zambrano, FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 539 F.H. (Eds.), Sistemática, biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander Von Humboldt, Bogotá, pp. 241–283. [96] Lacau, S., Groc, S., Dejean, A., de Oliviera, M. & Delabie, J. (2012) Tatuidris kapasi sp. nov.: a new armadillo ant from French Guiana. Psyche, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/926089 [97] Lachaud, J-P., Cerdan, P. & Pérez-Lachaud, G. (2012) Poneromorph ant associated with parasitoid wasps of the genus Kapala Cameron (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae) in French Guiana. Psyche, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/393486 [98] Lattke, J.E. (1997) Revisión del género Apterostigma Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, São Paulo, 34 (5), 121–221. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v34i5p121-221 [99] Lattke J.E. (2011) Revision of the New World species of the genus Leptogenys Roger (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny, 69 (3), 127–264. [100] Le Breton, J., Dejean, A., Snelling, G. & Orivel, J. (2007) Specialized predation on Wasmannia auropunctata by the army ant species Neivamyrmex compressinodis. Journal of Applied Entomology, 131 (9–10), 740–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01221.x [101] Leponce, M., Delabie, J.H.C., Orivel, J., Jacquemin, J., Martin, M.C. & Dejean, A. (2019) Tree-dwelling ant survey (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Mitaraka, French Guiana. Zoosystema, 41, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a25 [102] Leroy, C., Corbara, B., Dejean, A. & Céréghino, R. (2009) Ants mediate foliar structure and nitrogen acquisition in a tankbromeliad. New Phytologist, 183 (4), 1124–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02891.x [103] Longino, J.T. (2003) The Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae) of Costa Rica. Zootaxa, 151 (1), 1– 150. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.151.1.1 [104] Longino, J.T. (2007) A taxonomic review of the genus Azteca (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Costa Rica and a global revision of the aurita group. Zootaxa, 1491 (1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1491.1.1 [105] Longino, J.T. (2009) Additions to the taxonomy of New World Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 2181 (1), 1–90. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2181.1.1 [106] Longino, J.T. (2013) A revision of the ant genus Octostruma Forel 1912 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Zootaxa, 3699 (1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3699.1.1 [107] Longino, J.T & Fernández, F. (2007) Taxonomic review of the genus Wasmannia. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 80, 271–289. [108] Mackay, W.P. (1993) A review of the New World ants of the genus Dolichoderus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 22 (1), 1–148. [109] MacKay, W.P. & MacKay, E.E. (2010) The systematics and biology of the New World ants of the genus Pachycondyla (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York, 642 pp. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4271.8726 [110] Maes, J.M. & MacKay, W.P. (1993) Catalogo de las hormigas (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) de Nicaragua. Revista Nicaraguense de Entomologia, 23, 1–46. [111] Mann, W.M. (1916) The Stanford Expedition to Brazil, 1911, John C. Branner, Director. The ants of Brazil. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 60, 399–490. [112] Mariano, C.S.F., Lacau. S., Pompolo, S.G., Sposito, E.C., Borges, D.S., Dergam, J.A., Villemant, C. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2006) Cytogenetic studies in the rare Neotropical ant genus Typhlomyrmex Mayr (Ectatomminae: Typhlomyrmecini). Sociobiology, 47 (1), 225–234. [113] Mariano, C.S.F., Santos, I.S., Groc, S., Leroy, C., Malé, P.-J., Ruiz-Gonzales, M.X., Cerdan, P., Dejean, A. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2011) The karyotypes of Gigantiops destructor (Fabricius) and other ants from French Guiana (Formicidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France, 47 (1–2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2011.10697705 [114] Mayhé-Nunes, A.J & Brandão, C.R.F. (2002) Revisionary studies on the Attine ant genus Trachmyrmex Forel. Part 1: Definition of the Genus and the Opulentus Group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 40 (3), 667–698. [115] Meurer, E., Battirola, L.D., Marques, M. I. & Delabie, J.H.C. (2015) New records and distribution for the Neotropical ant genus Ochetomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 62 (2), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v62i2.266-269 [116] Morgan, C. & Mackay, W.P. (2017) The North America acrobat ants of the hyperdiverse genus Crematogaster. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Mauritius, 540 pp. [117] Nettel-Hernanz, A., Lachaud, J.P., Fresneau, D., Lopez-Munoz, R.A. & Poteaux, C. (2015) Biogeography, cryptic diversity, and queen dimorphism evolution of the Neotropical ant genus Ectatomma Smith, 1958 (Formicidae, Ectatomminae). 540 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 15 (3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-015-0215-9 [118] Orivel, J., Dejean, A. & Errard, C. (1998) Active Role of Two Ponerine Ants in the Elaboration of Ant Gardens. Biotropica, 30 (3), 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.1998.tb00085.x [119] Perrault, G. (1988) Octostruma betschi, n. sp. de Guyane Française (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revue Française d’Entomologie, 10 (4), 303–307. [120] Perrault, G. (1999) Heteroponera georgesi n. sp. de Guyane Française (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 103 (5), 475–477. [121] Pierce, M.P., Branstetter, M.G. & Longino, J.T. (2017). Integrative taxonomy reveals multiple cryptic species within Central American Hylomyrma Forel, 1912 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 25, 131–143. [122] Prado, L.P. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2013) A Catalogue of Cephalotini ant types (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae) deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 53 (20), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0031-10492013002000001 [123] Probst da Silva, R. (2015) Revisão taxonômica e análise filogenética de Basiceros Schulz, 1906 (Formicidae, Myrmicinae, Basicerotini). Master Thesis Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 263 pp. [124] Radoszkowsky, O. (1884) Fourmis de Cayenne Française. Trudy Russkago Entomologicheskago Obshchestva, 18, 30– 39. [125] Salinas, P.J. (2010) Catalogue of the ants of the Táchira State, Venezuela, with notes on their biodiversity, biogeography and ecology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Amblyioponinae, Ponerinae, Proceratiinae, Myrmicinae, Ecitoninae, Formicinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Dolichoderinae). Boletín de la SEA, 47, 315–328. [126] Santschi, F. (1911) Une nouvelle espèce d’Eciton. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, 56, 113. [127] Santschi, F. (1912) Quelques fourmis de l’Amérique australe. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 20 (10), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.19250 [128] Santschi, F. (1916) Formicides sudaméricains nouveaux ou peu connus. Physis, Buenos Aires, 2, 365–399. [129] Santschi, F. (1919) Nouveaux formicides de la République Argentine. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina, 87, 37–57. [130] Santschi, F. (1920) Nouvelles fourmis du genre Cephalotes Latr. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 1920 (9), 147–149. [131] Santschi, F. (1921) Ponerinae, Dorylinae et quelques autres formicides néotropiques. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 54, 81–103. [132] Santschi, F. (1922) Camponotus néotropiques. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 62, 97–124. [133] Santschi, F. (1923) Pheidole et quelques autres fourmis néotropiques. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 63, 45–69. [134] Santschi, F. (1925) Nouveaux Formicides brésiliens et autres. Bulletin et Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 65, 221–247. [135] Santschi, F. (1929a) Mélange myrmécologique. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung, 46 (2), 84–93. [136] Santschi, F. (1929b) Nouvelles fourmis de la République Argentine et du Brésil. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina, 107, 273–316. [137] Santschi, F. (1929c) Révision du genre Holcoponera Mayr. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 82, 437–477. [138] Santschi, F. (1931) Fourmis de Cuba et de Panama. Revista de Entomologia, 1 (3), 265–282. [139] Santschi, F. (1936) Contribution à l’étude des fourmis de l’Amérique du Sud. Revista de Entomologia, 6 (2), 196–218. [140] SEAG [Société Entomologique Antilles-Guyane] (unkown date) Vouchers deposited at the Padre Jesus Santiago Moure Entomological Collection, Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP), Brazil. [141] Shattuck, S.O. (1994) Taxonomic catalog of the ant subfamilies Aneuretinae and Dolichoderinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). University of California Publications in Entomology, 112 (1), 1–241. [142] Schmidt, M. & Dejean, A. (2018) A dolichoderine ant that constructs traps to ambush prey collectively: convergent evolution with a myrmicine genus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 124 (1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly028 [143] Snelling, G.C. & Snelling, R. R. (2007) New synonymy, new species, new keys to Neivamyrmex army ants of the United States. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, 80, 459–550. [144] Solano, P.J., Durou, S., Corbara, B., Quilichini, A., Cerdan, P., Belin-Depoux, M., Delabie, J.H.C. & Dejean, A. (2003) Myrmecophytes of the Understory of French Guianian Rainforests: Their Distribution and Their Associated Ants. Sociobiology, 41 (2), 1–10. [145] Soroker, V., Lucas, C., Simon, T., Fresneau, D., Durand, J.L. & Hefetz, A. (2003) Hydrocarbon distribution and colony odour homogenisation in Pachycondyla apicalis. Insectes Sociaux, 50 (3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-003-0669-1 [146] Sosa-Calvo, J., Shattuck, S.O. & Schultz, T.R. (2006) Dacetine ants of Panama: new records and description of a new species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 108 (4), 814–821. [147] Talaga, S., Delabie, J.H.C., Dezerald, O., Sarda-Lopez, A., Petitclerc, F., Leroy, C., Hérault, B., Céréghino, R. & Dejean, A. (2015) A bromeliad species reveals invasive ant presence in urban areas of French Guiana. Ecological Indicators, 58, FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 541 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.027 [148] Ulysséa, M.A., Prado, L.P. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2015) Type specimens of the traditional Myrmicinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) ant tribes deposited in the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil: Adelomyrmecini, Basicerotini, Blepharidattini, Crematogastrini, Formicoxenini, Lenomyrmecini, Myrmicini, Phalacromyrmecini, Pheidolini, Stegomyrmecini, Stenammini and Tetramoriini. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 55 (12), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1590/0031-1049.2015.55.12 [149] Ulysséa, M.A., Prado, L.P. & Brandão, C.R.F. (2017) Catalogue of the Dolichoderinae, Formicinae and Martialinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) types deposited at the Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 57 (23), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.11606/0031-1049.2017.57.23 [150] Vantaux, A., Dejean, A., Dor, A. & Orivel, J. (2007) Parasitism versus mutualism in the ant-garden parabiosis between Camponotus femoratus and Crematogaster levior. Insectes Sociaux, 54 (1), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-007-0914-0 [151] Ward, P.S. (1989) Systematic Studies on Ants: Revision of the Pseudomyrmex oculatus and P. subtilissimus species groups with taxonomic comments on other species. Questiones Entomologicae, 25 (4), 393–468. [152] Ward, P.S. (1990) The ant subfamily Pseudomyrmecinae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Generic revision and relationship to other formicids. Systematic Entomology, 15 (4), 449–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1990.tb00077.x [153] Ward, P.S. (1999) Systematics, biogeography and host plant associations of the Pseudomyrmex viduus group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Triplaris- and Tachigali-inhabiting ants. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 126, 451–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1999.tb00157.x [154] Ward, P.S. (2017) A review of the Pseudomyrmex ferrugineus and Pseudomyrmex goeldii species groups: acacia-ants and relatives (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 4227 (4), 524–542. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4227.4.3 [155] Ward. P.S. (2019) Personal database. University of California, Davis, California. [database] [156] Weber, N.A. (1946) The biology of the fungus-growing ants. Part IX. The British Guiana species. Revista de Entomologia, Rio de Janeiro, 17, 114–172. [157] Wetterer, J.K. (2010) Worldwide spread of the graceful twig ant, Pseudomyrmex gracilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist, 93 (4), 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.093.0410 [158] Wetterer, J.K. (2011) Worldwide spread of the tropical fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 14, 21–35. [159] Wetterer J.K. (2012a) Worldwide spread of Emery’s sneaking ant, Cardiocondyla emeryi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 17, 13–20. [160] Wetterer, J.K. (2012b) Worldwide spread of the stigma ant, Pachycondyla stigma (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 16, 39–44. [161] Wetterer, J.K. (2014) Geographic distribution of Strumigenys louisianae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews, 7 (2–4), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1163/18749836-07021080 [162] Wetterer, J.K. (2016) Geographic range of Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology, 63 (1), 623–627. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v63i1.764 [163] Wetterer, J.K. (2017) Geographic distribution of Strumigenys lanuginosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 143 (4), 729–733. https://doi.org/10.3157/061.143.0402 [164] Wetterer, J.K. & Snelling, G.C. (2015) Geographic distribution of Labidus coecus (Latr.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), a subterranean army ant. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 44, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.3897/JHR.44.4672 [165] Wheeler, W.M. (1908) The ants of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 24, 117–158. [166] Wheeler, W.M. (1922a) Neotropical ants of the genera Carebara, Tranopelta and Tranopeltoides, new genus. American Museum Novitates, 48, 1–14 [167] Wheeler, W.M. (1922b) Observations on Gigantiops destructor Fabricius and other leaping ants. Biological Bulletin, Woods Hole, 42 (4), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1536521 [168] Wheeler, W.M. (1934) Neotropical ants collected by Dr. Elisabeth Skwarra and others. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 77 (5), 157–240. [169] Wheeler, W.M. (1937) Mosaics and other anomalies among ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 95 pp. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674437081 [170] Wheeler, W.M. (1942) Studies of Neotropical ant-plants and their ants. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 90, 1–262. 542 · Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press FRANCO ET AL. [171] Wild, A.L. (2005) Taxonomic revision of the Pachycondyla apicalis species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa, 834 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.834.1.1 [172] Wilson, E. (2003) Pheidole in the New World: A dominant, hyperdiverse ant genus. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, 794 pp. [173] Zolessi, L.C. de, de Abenante, Y.P. & Philippi, M.E. (1989) Catálogo sistemático de las especies de Formícidos del Uruguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). ORCYT Unesco, Montevideo, 40 pp. FIRST CHECKLIST OF THE ANTS OF FRENCH GUIANA Zootaxa 4674 (5) © 2019 Magnolia Press · 543
Keep reading this paper — and 50 million others — with a free Academia account
Used by leading Academics
Anna Lipphardt
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Chryssa Vergidou
University of Groningen
Patrice GEORGES-ZIMMERMANN
INRAP, Institut National de Recherches Archéologiques Préventives
Eszter Banffy
Hungarian Academy of Sciences